Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally invasive surgery techniques in pelvic exenteration: a systematic and meta-analysis review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pelvic exenteration is potentially curative for locally advanced and recurrent pelvic cancers. Evolving technology has facilitated the use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques in selected cases. We aimed to compare outcomes between open and MIS pelvic exenteration.

Methods

A review of comparative studies was performed. Firstly, we evaluated the differences in surgical techniques with respect to operative time, blood loss, and margin status. Secondly, we assessed differences in 30-day morbidity and mortality rates, and length of hospital stay.

Results

Four studies that directly compared open and MIS exenteration were included. Analysis was performed on 170 patients; 78.1% (n = 133) had open pelvic exenteration, while 21.8% (n = 37) had a MIS exenteration. The median age for open exenteration was 57.7 years versus 63 years for MIS exenteration. Even though the operative time for MIS exenteration was 83 min longer (p < 0.001), it was associated with a median of 1,750mls less blood loss. The morbidity rate for MIS exenterative group was 56.7% (n = 21/37) versus 88.5% (n = 85/96) in the open exenteration group, with pooled analysis observing a 1.17 relative risk increase in 30-day morbidity (p = 0.172) in the open exenteration group. In addition, the MIS cohort had a 6-day shorter length of hospital stay (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

MIS exenteration can be performed in highly selective cases, where there is favourable patient anatomy and tumour characteristics. When feasible, it is associated with reduced intra-operative blood loss, shorter length of hospital stay, and reduced morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zoucas E, Frederiksen S, Lydrup ML, Mansson W, Gustafson P, Alberius P (2010) Pelvic exenteration for advanced and recurrent malignancy. World J Surg 34:2177–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brunschwig A (1948) Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma; a one-stage abdominoperineal operation with end colostomy and bilateral ureteral implantation into the colon above the colostomy. Cancer 1(2):177–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Butcher HR Jr, Spjut HJ (1959) An evaluation of pelvic exenteration for advanced carcinoma of the lower colon. Cancer 12(4):681–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hockel M, Dornhofer N (2006) Pelvic exenteration for gynaecological tumours: achievements and unanswered questions. Lancet Oncol 7:837–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pawlik TM, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA (2005) Pelvic exenteration for advanced pelvic malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 13(5):612–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown KGM, Koh CE, Solomon MJ, Qasabian R, Robinson D, Dubenec S (2015) Outcomes after en bloc iliac vessel excision and reconstruction during pelvic exenteration. Dis Colon Rectum 58:850–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown KGM, Solomon MJ, Koh CE (2017) Pelvic exenteration surgery: the evolution of radical surgical techniques for advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancy. Dis Colon Rectum 60:745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodriguwz-Bigas MA, Petrelli NJ (1996) Pelvic exenteration and its modifications. Am J Surg 171(2):293–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez MJ, Standiford SB, Skibba JL (1994) Total pelvic exenteration. A 50-year experience at the Ellis Fischel Cancer Center. Arch Surg 129(4):390–395 (discussion 5–6).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu HH, Leong CH, Ong GB (1976) Pelvic exenteration for advanced pelvic malignancies. Aust N Z J Surg 46(3):197–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobrowsky W, Schmid AP (1985) Radiotherapy of presacral recurrence following radical surgery for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 28(12):917–919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferenschild FTJ, Vermaas M, Verhoef C, Ansink AC, Kirkels WJ, Eggermont AMM, deWilt JHW (2009) Total pelvic exenteration for primary and recurrent malignancies. World J Surg 33:1502–1508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Feigel A, Sylla P (2016) Role of minimally invasive surgery in the reoperative abdomen or pelvis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 29(2):168–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keller DS, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Ibarra S, Haas EM (2016) Review of 500 single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases—lessons learned. World J Gastroenterol 22(2):659–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Medlin EE, Kushner DM, Barroilhet L (2015) Robotic surgery for early stage cervical cancer: evolution and current trends. J Surg Oncol 112(7):772–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open medicine: a peer-reviewed, independent. Open-Access J 3(3):e123–e130

    Google Scholar 

  17. Srinivasaiah N, Malietzis G, Jenkins I (2015) Use of laparoscopy in pelvic exenteration surgery. PROSPERO 2015 CRD42015023284. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42015023284

  18. Faraone SV (2008) Interpreting estimates of treatment effects: implications for managed care. P&T 33(12):700–711

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic G, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Winters BR, Mann GN, Louie O, Wright JL (2015) Robotic total pelvic exenteration with laparoscopic rectus flap: Initial experience. Case Rep Surg 2015:835425

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang K, Cai L, Yao L, Zhang Z, Zhang C, Wang X, Tang J, Li X, He Z, Zhou L (2015) Laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration for pelvic malignancies: the technique and short-time outcome of 11 cases. World J Surg Oncol 15:13:301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Uehara K, Nakamura H, Yoshino Y, Arimoto A, Kato T, Yokoyama Y, Ebata T, Nagino M (2016) Initial experience of laparoscopic pelvic exenteration and comparison with conventional open surgery. Surg Endosc 30(1):132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Martinez A, Filleron T, Vitse L et al (2011) Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy: is there any advantage? Gynecol Oncol 120(3):374–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Austin KK, Solomon MJ (2009) Pelvic exenteration with en bloc iliac vessel resection for lateral pelvic wall involvement. Dis Colon Rectum 52(7):1223–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heriot AG, Byrne CM, Lee P, Dobbs B, Tilney H, Solomon MJ et al (2008) Extended radical resection: the choice for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 51(3):284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nielsen M, Rasmussen P, Lindegaard J et al (2012) A 10-year experience of total pelvic exenteration for primary advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer based on prospective database. Colrectal Dis 14(9):1076–1083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ike H, Shimada H, Yamaguchi S et al (2003) Outcomes of total pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bretagnol F, Dedieu A, Zappa M, Guedj N, Ferron M, Panis Y (2011) T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated? Colorectal Dis 13(2):138–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Healy KA, Gomella LG (2013) Retropubic, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy: is there any real difference? Semin Oncol 40(3):286–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bogani G, Cromi A, Serati M, Di Naro E, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F (2014) Laparoscopic and open abdominal staging for early-stage ovarian cancer: our experience, systematic review, and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(7):1241–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferron G, Pomel C, Martinez A et al (2012) Pelvic exenteration: current state and perspectives. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 40:43–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pomel C, Rouzier R, Pocard M, Thoury A et al (2003) Laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration for cervical cancer relapse. Gynecol Oncol 91:616–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Puntambekar S, Kudchadar RJ, Gurjar AM, Sathe RM et al (2006) Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for advanced pelvic cancers: a review of 16 cases. Gynecol Oncol 102:513–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mukai T, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Ikeda A et al (2013) Laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration with en bloc lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for advanced primary rectal cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg 6(4):314–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vasilescu C, Tudor S, Popa M, Aldea B, Gluck G (2011) Entirely robotic total pelvic exenteration. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 21(4):e200–e202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gadkari Y, Puntambekar SP et al (2015) Our experience of laparoscopic anterior exenteration in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. J Min Invasive Gynecol 22:S1–S253

    Google Scholar 

  37. Puntambekar S, Lawande A, Desai R, Puntambekar S, Joshi GA, Joshi SN (2014) Initial experience of robotic anterior pelvic exenteration at a single institute. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 126(1):41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

PelvEx Collaborative authors

Srinivasaiah N, Shekleton F, Kelly ME, Harji D, Malietzis G, Askari A, Aalbers AGJ, Alberda W, Antoniou A, Austin KK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Beynon J, Bosman SJ, Brunner M, Burger JWA, Campain N, Christensen HK, Coscia M, Colquhoun AJ, Coyne P, Daniels IR, Davies RJ, de Wilt JHW, Denost Q, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Duff M, Eglinton T, Fearnhead N, Frizelle FA, Garcia-Sabrido JL, George ML, Gentilini L, Griffiths B, Harris DA, Evans M, Heriot AG, Hohenberger W, Hoe CM, Holm T, Kanemitsu Y, Chan KKL, Kim H, Koh CE, Kok NF, Kontovounisios C, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee P, Lydrup ML, Lynch AC, Martling A, Meijerink J, Mentha A, Merkel S, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Abraham-Nordling M, O’Connell PR, Patsouras D, Poggioli G, Radwan RW, Rasheed S, Rasmussen PC, Rothbarth J, Rutten HJT, Sagar PM, Schizas AMP, Shida D, Smart NJ, Solomon MJ, Sorensen MM, Stocchi L, Tekkis PP, Tsukamoto S, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, van Ramshorst GH, van Zoggel D, Vasquez-Jimenez W, Verhoef C, Verstegen M, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Yip J, Winter DC, Jenkins JT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All PelvEx Collaborative authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

PelvEx Collaborative—JT Jenkins, St Mark’s Hospital, London, email: mrianjenkins@icloud.com.

All PelvEx Collaborative members are co-authors and approved this submission. The list of authors is provided at the end of the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

The PelvEx Collaborative. Minimally invasive surgery techniques in pelvic exenteration: a systematic and meta-analysis review. Surg Endosc 32, 4707–4715 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6299-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6299-5

Keywords

Navigation