Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction of pseudo-stress for local residual and algebraic derivation of consistent tangent in elastoplasticity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, an introduction of pseudo-stress for local residual and an algebraic derivation of consistent tangent are presented. The authors define a coupled problem of the equilibrium equation for the overall structure and the constrained equations for stress state at every material point, and the pseudo-stress and the derived consistent tangent can be implemented easily to finite element analysis. In the proposed block Newton method, the internal variables are also updated algebraically without any local iterative calculations. In addition, the authors demonstrate the performance of the proposed approach for both \(J_{2}\) plasticity and \(J_{2}\) plasticity under plane stress state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamamoto T, Yamada T, Matsui K (2021) Simultaneously iterative procedure based on block newton method for elastoplastic problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 122(9):2145–2178

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Kulkarni DV, Tortorelli DA (2005) A domain decomposition based two-level newton scheme for nonlinear problems. In: Barth TJ, Griebel M, Keyes DE et al (eds) Domain decomposition methods in science and engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 615–622

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Michaleris P, Tortorelli D, Vidal C (1994) Tangent operators and design sensitivity formulations for transient non-linear coupled problems with applications to elastoplasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 37(14):2471–2499

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Michaleris P, Tortorelli D, Vidal C (1995) Analysis and optimization of weakly coupled thermoelastoplastic systems with applications to weldment design. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38(8):1259–1285

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wisniewski K, Kowalczyk P, Turska E (2003) On the computation of design derivatives for Huber–Mises plasticity with non-linear hardening. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57(2):271–300

  6. Wallin M, Jönsson V, Wingren E (2016) Topology optimization based on finite strain plasticity. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54:783–793

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Okada J, Washio T, Hisada T (2010) Study of efficient homogenization algorithms for nonlinear problems: approximation of a homogenized tangent stiffness to reduce computational cost. Comput Mech 46(2):247–258

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lange N, Hütter G, Kiefer B (2021) An efficient monolithic solution scheme for FE2 problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 382(113):886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113886

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fritzen F, Hassani MR (2018) Space-time model order reduction for nonlinear viscoelastic systems subjected to long-term loading. Meccanica 53:1333–1355

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Matthies HG, Steindorf J (2003) Partitioned strong coupling algorithms for fluid-structure interaction. Comput Struct 81(8):805–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matthies HG, Niekamp R, Steindorf J (2006) Algorithms for strong coupling procedures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(17):2028–2049

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellsiepen P, Hartmann S (2001) Remarks on the interpretation of current non-linear finite element analyses as differential-algebraic equations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 51(6):679–707

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kulkarni DV, Tortorelli DA, Wallin M (2007) A Newton–Schur alternative to the consistent tangent approach in computational plasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(7):1169–1177

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Simo J, Taylor R (1985) Consistent tangent operators for rate-independent elastoplasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 48(1):101–118

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartmann S, Quint KJ, Arnold M (2008) On plastic incompressibility within time-adaptive finite elements combined with projection techniques. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(2):178–193

  16. Nakshatrala P, Tortorelli D (2015) Topology optimization for effective energy propagation in rate-independent elastoplastic material systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 295:305–326

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Owen D, Hinton E (1980) Finite elements in plasticity: theory and practice. Pineridge Press, Swansea

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hartmann S (2005) A remark on the application of the Newton–Raphson method in non-linear finite element analysis. Comput Mech 36(2):100–116

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rempler HU, Wieners C, Ehlers W (2011) Efficiency comparison of an augmented finite element formulation with standard return mapping algorithms for elastic-inelastic materials. Comput Mech 48(5):551–562

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Braudel H, Abouaf M, Chenot J (1986) An implicit and incremental formulation for the solution of elastoplastic problems by the finite element method. Comput Struct 22(5):801–814

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Braudel H, Abouaf M, Chenot J (1986) An implicit incrementally objective formulation for the solution of elastoplastic problems at finite strain by the F.E.M. Comput Struct 24(6):825–843

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. de Souza Neto E, Peric D, Owen D (2008) Computational methods for plasticity: theory and applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Simo J (1998) Numerical analysis and simulation of plasticity. Numerical methods for solids (part 3) numerical methods for fluids (part 1), handbook of numerical analysis, vol 6. Elsevier, B.V., pp 183–499

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Simo J, Hughes T (1998) Computational inelasticity. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Voce E (1955) A practical strain hardening function. Metallurgia 51:219–226

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME et al (2001) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

  27. Simo J (1988) A framework for finite strain elastoplasticity based on maximum plastic dissipation and the multiplicative decomposition: Part I. Continuum formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 66(2):199–219

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Simo J (1988) A framework for finite strain elastoplasticity based on maximum plastic dissipation and the multiplicative decomposition. Part II: computational aspects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 68(1):1–31

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP16H03914, JP20H04198, JP22K14147.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeki Yamamoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamamoto, T., Yamada, T. & Matsui, K. Introduction of pseudo-stress for local residual and algebraic derivation of consistent tangent in elastoplasticity. Comput Mech 71, 1081–1091 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-023-02268-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-023-02268-0

Keywords

Navigation