Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic determinants of oil yield in Eucalyptus polybractea R.T. Baker

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eucalyptus polybractea R.T. Baker is the key species used in Australia to produce commercial quantities of pharmaceutical-grade eucalyptus oil. Much of the variability in oil yield observed in coppiced stands of the species is considered genetically determined. Nonetheless it is not known how genetics acts on leaf and secretory cavity morphology to influence oil yield. To examine this, we first chose similar-sized mature leaves of different genotypes and determined that secretory cavity size accounted for 84 % of the variation in oil yield between genotypes. We then examined natural variation in mature leaf size found along branches and observed oil yield to increase in a linear, but non-proportional fashion with increasing leaf size, suggesting leaves of different final sizes on a given tree can have different volumetric oil proportions. From these analyses, we calculated that a minimum of 2.2 μl of photosynthetic tissue is required to service each additional μl of secretory cavities as leaves expand. This suggests there is likely to be a maximum oil concentration obtainable in E. polybractea leaves for a given leaf size increase. Such information helps to understand the factors that underlie oil yields and provides a potential framework for selection strategies aimed at maximising harvestable oil yields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Barton AFM, Cotterill PP, Brooker MIH (1991) Heritability of cineole yield in Eucalyptus kochii. Silvae Genet 40:37–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H, Henze J (1983) Intercellular space volume of fruit. Acta Hort 138:107–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Calbo AG, Nery AA (1995) Methods for measurement of gas volume of fruits and vegetables. J Am Soc Hort Sci 120:217–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppen JW (2002) Production, trade and markets for eucalyptus oils. In: Coppen JW (ed) Eucalyptus: the genus Eucalyptus, vol 22. Taylor & Francis, London

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis GR (2002) Cultivation and production of eucalypts in Australia: with special reference to the leaf oils. In: Coppen JW (ed) Eucalyptus: the genus Eucalyptus, vol 22. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 183–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran JC (1991) Commercial sources, uses, formation, and biology. In: Boland DJ, Brophy JJ, House APN (eds) Eucalyptus leaf oils, use, chemistry, distillation and marketing. Inkarta Press, Melbourne, pp 11–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran JC, Matheson AC (1994) Genetic parameters and expected gains from selection for monoterpene yields in Petford Eucalyptus camaldulensis. New Forest 8:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs CH (1963) Fuchsin staining with NaOH clearing for lignified elements of whole plants or plants organs. Biotech Histochem 38:141–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodger JQD, Woodrow IE (2008) Selection gains for essential oil traits using micropropagation of Eucalyptus polybractea. For Ecol Manag 255:3652–3658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodger JQD, Woodrow IE (2009) The influence of ontogeny on essential oil traits when micropropagating Eucalyptus polybractea. For Ecol Manag 258:650–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodger JQD, Connolly CA, Woodrow IE (2007) Examination of the consistency of plant traits driving oil yield and quality in short-rotation coppice cultivation of Eucalyptus polybractea. For Ecol Manag 250:196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodger JQD, Heskes AM, King DJ, Gleadow RM, Woodrow IE (2008) Micropropagation of Eucalyptus polybractea selected for key essential oil traits. Funct Plant Biol 35:247–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King DJ, Gleadow RM, Woodrow IE (2004) Terpene deployment in Eucalyptus polybractea; relationships with leaf structure, environmental stresses, and growth. Funct Plant Biol 31:451–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King DJ, Gleadow RM, Woodrow IE (2006) The accumulation of terpenoid oils does not incur a growth cost in Eucalyptus polybractea seedlings. Funct Plant Biol 33:497–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leach GJ, Whiffin T (1989) Ontogenetic, seasonal and diurnal variation in leaf volatile oils and phenolics of Angophora costata. Aust Syst Bot 2:99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List S, Brown PH, Walsh KB (1995) Functional anatomy of the oil glands of Melaleuca alternifolia (Myrtaceae). Aust J Bot 43:629–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren RG (1991) Practical aspects of marketing essential oils. In: Boland DJ, Brophy JJ, House APN (eds) Eucalyptus leaf oils. Inkata Press, Melbourne, pp 195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildy DT, Pate JS (2002) Quantifying above- and below-ground growth responses of the Western Australian oil mallee, Eucalyptus kochii subsp. plenissima, to contrasting decapitation regimes. Ann Bot 90:185–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Peter Abbott of FGB Natural Products for use of the plantation. We also thank Ms. Allison Heskes for optimising the leaf clearing protocol for E. polybractea leaves. JQDG and IEW were supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council (Project DP1094530). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Q. D. Goodger.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Carlson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodger, J.Q.D., Woodrow, I.E. Genetic determinants of oil yield in Eucalyptus polybractea R.T. Baker. Trees 26, 1951–1956 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0744-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0744-1

Keywords

Navigation