Skip to main content
Log in

Heavy domestic, but not recreational, physical activity is associated with low back pain: Australian Twin low BACK pain (AUTBACK) study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the association between domestic and recreational physical activity (PA) and low back pain (LBP) after adjusting for genetic and environmental influences.

Methods

Twins were recruited through the Australian twin registry. LBP prevalence and domestic (vigorous gardening/heavy yard work) and recreational (light walking, moderate/vigorous) PA were assessed by a validated questionnaire. Associations were analysed using a cross-sectional analysis of the complete sample of 486 twins, including a matched case–control analysis of 69 twin pairs discordant for LBP. Logistic regression and the lincom post-estimation method were used for the analysis. Odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results

The case–control analysis showed that LBP was significantly associated with heavy domestic PA (OR 2.88, 95 % CI 1.29–6.43), whereas no significant association was found with any form of recreational PA. The results of the lincom command indicated that being engaged in both heavy domestic and recreational PA (light walking or moderate/vigorous) was associated with a significantly increased probability of LBP compared with being engaged only in recreational PA (light walking or moderate/vigorous, ORs 3.48–4.22). Using the whole sample, we found weaker associations but in the same direction.

Conclusions

We found evidence that heavy domestic PA is associated with an increased probability of LBP, and the combination of heavy domestic and recreational PA might increase the probability of LBP more so than heavy domestic or recreational PA alone. Associations being greater when using the co-twin case–control analysis indicate that genetic and environmental factors influence the relationship between PA and LBP, and demonstrate the value of a twin design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burton AK, Balague F, Cardon G, Eriksen HR, Henrotin Y, Lahad A, Leclerc A, Muller G, van der Beek AJ (2005) How to prevent low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 19:541–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, Owens DK (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 147(7):478–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heneweer H, Vanhees L, Picavet HS (2009) Physical activity and low back pain: a U-shaped relation? Pain 143(1–2):21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hildebrandt VH, Bongers PM, Dul J, van Dijk FJ, Kemper HC (2000) The relationship between leisure time, physical activities and musculoskeletal symptoms and disability in worker populations. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 73(8):507–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heneweer H, Staes F, Aufdemkampe G, van Rijn M, Vanhees L (2011) Physical activity and low back pain: a systematic review of recent literature. Eur Spine J 20(6):826–845

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sitthipornvorakul E, Janwantanakul P, Purepong N, Pensri P, van der Beek AJ (2011) The association between physical activity and neck and low back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 20(5):677–689

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartvigsen J, Christensen K (2007) Active lifestyle protects against incident low back pain in seniors: a population-based 2-year prospective study of 1387 danish twins aged 70-100 years. Spine 32(1):76–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schiltenwolf M, Schneider S (2009) Activity and low back pain: a dubious correlation. Pain 143(1–2):1–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Livshits G, Popham M, Malkin I, Sambrook PN, Macgregor AJ, Spector T, Williams FM (2011) Lumbar disc degeneration and genetic factors are the main risk factors for low back pain in women: the UK twin spine study. Ann Rheum Dis 70(10):1740–1745

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferreira PH, Beckenkamp P, Maher CG, Hopper JL, Ferreira ML (2013) Nature or nurture in low back pain? Results of a systematic review of studies based on twin samples. Eur J Pain 20(10):1532–2149

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hopper JL, Treloar SA, de Klerk NH, Morley R (2006) Australian twin registry: a nationally funded resource for medical and scientific research, incorporating match and watch. Twin Res Hum Genet 9(6):707–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR, Nachemson AL, Buchbinder R, Walker BF, Wyatt M, Cassidy JD, Rossignol M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Hartvigsen J, Leino-Arjas P, Latza U, Reis S, Gil Del Real MT, Kovacs FM, Oberg B, Cedraschi C, Bouter LM, Koes BW, Picavet HS, van Tulder MW, Burton K, Foster NE, Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Underwood M, Waddell G, Shekelle P, Volinn E, Von Korff M (1976) A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine 33(1):95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown WJ, Trost SG, Bauman A, Mummery K, Owen N (2004) Test-retest reliability of four physical activity measures used in population surveys. J Sci Med Sport 7(2):205–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Timperio A, Salmon JO, Rosenberg M, Bull FC (2004) Do logbooks influence recall of physical activity in validation studies? Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1181–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kopec JA, Sayre EC, Esdaile JM (2004) Predictors of back pain in a general population cohort. Spine 29(1):70–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee IM, Paffenbarger RS Jr (2000) Associations of light, moderate, and vigorous intensity physical activity with longevity. The Harvard alumni health study. Am J Epidemiol 151:293–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kraigher-Krainer E, Lyass A, Massaro JM, Lee DS, Ho JE, Levy D, Kannel WB, Vasan RS (2013) Association of physical activity and heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in the elderly: the Framingham heart study. Eur J Heart Fail 15:742–746

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD (2004) Low back pain in Australian adults: prevalence and associated disability. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 27(4):238–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Vos T, Buchbinder R (2012) A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 64(6):2028–2037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu FB, Goldberg J, Hedeker D, Henderson WG (1998) Modelling ordinal responses from co-twin control studies. Stat Med 17(9):957–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boomsma D, Busjahn A, Peltonen L (2002) Classical twin studies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 3(11):872–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

MH is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). CM is supported by a research fellowship from the Australian Research Council. JLH is a Senior Principal Research Fellow of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Hübscher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hübscher, M., Ferreira, M.L., Junqueira, D.R.G. et al. Heavy domestic, but not recreational, physical activity is associated with low back pain: Australian Twin low BACK pain (AUTBACK) study. Eur Spine J 23, 2083–2089 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3258-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3258-2

Keywords

Navigation