Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extended trochanteric osteotomy: current concepts review

  • General Review • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Revision total hip arthroplasty is a technically demanding procedure which has gained importance for more than two decades. It was a nightmare for revision surgeons during its initial years of inception before the advent of extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO). This technique gains access to the femoral medullary canal without compromising the bone stock and aids removal of primary implant and cement mantle without further damaging the parent bone. Like any other surgery, ETO does have certain limitations and complications as reported by various authors. Though it has been routinely used by revision surgeons, thorough knowledge of technical details of ETO is still lacking. So this review article is aimed at addressing the indications, surgical procedure, fixation technique, implant selection and complication of ETO which has been presented over a period of years by various authors.

Methods

We searched in the most commonly used portals like MEDLINE (PubMed) and Google scholar using appropriate terminologies for the literature regarding the various preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical scenarios in which revision surgeons utilized ETO.

Results and conclusion

ETO is an important tool in the revision surgeon’s armamentarium and can be used in variety of clinical scenarios and for various intraoperative needs and goals. Awareness about biomechanics of ETO, indications, implants selection, fixation techniques and complications is paramount for good intraoperative and postoperative outcome. ETO by posterior approach continues to be a work horse approach for most revision surgeons all over the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Younger TI, Bradford MS, Magnus RE, Paprosky WG (1995) Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. A new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(3):329–338. doi:10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80182-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen WM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA (2000) Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82(9):1215–1219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miner TMMN, Chong D, Paprosky WL (2001) The extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a critical review of 166 cases at mean 3-year, 9-month follow-up. J Arthroplasty Dec:188–194. doi:10.1054/arth.2001.29385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mardones R, Gonzalez C, Cabanela ME, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2005) Extended femoral osteotomy for revision of hip arthroplasty: results and complications. J Arthroplasty 20(1):79–83. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lakstein D, Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lee P, Gross AE (2011) The long modified extended sliding trochanteric osteotomy. Int Orthop 35(1):13–17. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0890-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuruvalli RR, Landsmeer R, Debnath UK, Suresh SP, Thomas TL (2008) A new technique to reattach an extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA using suture cord. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(6):1444–1448. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0233-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ting NT, Wera GD, Levine BR, Della Valle CJ (2010) Early experience with a novel nonmetallic cable in reconstructive hip surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(9):2382–2386. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1284-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Huffman GR, Ries MD (2003) Combined vertical and horizontal cable fixation of an extended trochanteric osteotomy site. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(2):273–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Amstutz HC, Maki S (1978) Complications of trochanteric osteotomy in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(2):214–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritter MA, Gioe TJ, and Stringer EA (1981) Functional significance of nonunion of the greater trochanter. Clin Orthop 177–182. PMID:641087

  11. Thompson RC Jr, Culver JE (1975) The role of trochanteric osteotomy in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 106:102–106. doi:10.1097/00003086-197501000-00014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paprosky WG, Sporer SM (2003) Controlled femoral fracture: easy in. J Arthroplasty 18(3 Suppl 1):91–93. doi:10.1054/arth.2003.50074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Drexler M, Dwyer T, Chakravertty R, Backstein D, Gross AE, Safir O (2014) The outcome of modified extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA for Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty 29(8):1598–1604. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Paprosky WG (2003) Extended trochanteric osteotomy in complex primary total hip arthroplasty A brief note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(12):2385–2390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsukayama DT, Estrada R, Gustilo RB (1996) Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the treatment of one hundred and six infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(4):512–523

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuckler JM, Star AM, Alavi A, Noto RB (1991) Diagnosis and management of the infected total joint arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 22(3):523–530

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McDonald DJ, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Ilstrup DM (1989) Two-stage reconstruction of a total hip arthroplasty because of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(6):828–834

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lieberman JR, Callaway GH, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Brause BD (1994) Treatment of the infected total hip arthroplasty with a two-stage reimplantation protocol. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:205–212. doi:10.1097/00003086-199404000-00032

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garvin KL, Evans BG, Salvati EA, Brause BD (1994) Palacos gentamicin for the treatment of deep periprosthetic hip infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 298:97–105. doi:10.1097/00003086-199401000-00015

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Garvin KL, Hanssen AD (1995) Infection after total hip arthroplasty. Past, present, and future. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(10):1576–1588

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanssen AD, Rand JA (1999) Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 111. PMID:10098033

  22. Levine BR, Della Valle CJ, Hamming M, Sporer SM, Berger RA, Paprosky WG (2009) Use of the extended trochanteric osteotomy in treating prosthetic hip infection. J Arthroplasty 24(1):49–55. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morshed S, Huffman GR, Ries MD (2005) Extended trochanteric osteotomy for 2-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20(3):294–301. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim SJ, Moon YW, Park YS (2011) Is extended trochanteric osteotomy safe for use in 2-stage revision of periprosthetic hip infection? J Arthroplasty 26(7):1067–1071. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P (2002) The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(Suppl 2):2–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20(7):857–865. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Springer BD, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG (2003) Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(11):2156–2162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kavanagh BF (1992) Femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 23(2):249–257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Masri BA, Meek RM, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:80–95. doi:10.1097/00003086-200403000-00012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Naqvi GA, Baig SA, Awan N (2012) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(6):1047–1050. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fink B, Fuerst M, Singer J (2005) Periprosthetic fractures of the femur associated with hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125(7):433–442. doi:10.1007/s00402-005-0828-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Haidukewych GJ, Langford J, Liporace FA (2013) Revision for periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(4):368–376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Levine BR, Della Valle CJ, Lewis P, Berger RA, Sporer SM, Paprosky W (2008) Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty 23(4):527–533. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stevens SS, Irish AJ, Vachtsevanos JG, Csongradi J, Beaupre GS (1995) A biomechanical study of three wiring techniques for cerclage-plating. J Orthop Trauma 9(5):381–387. doi:10.1097/00005131-199505000-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zuurmond RG, van Wijhe W, van Raay JJ, Bulstra SK (2010) High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: an analysis of 71 cases. Injury. 41(6):629–633. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.01.102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ (2004) Treatment protocol for proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):8–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lerch M, von Lewinski G, Windhagen H, Thorey F (2008) Revision of total hip arthroplasty: clinical outcome of extended trochanteric osteotomy and intraoperative femoral fracture. Technol Health Care 16(4):293–300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ (2007) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy. J Arthroplasty 22(7):993–999. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Masri BA, Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP (1998) Seven specialized exposures for revision hip and knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 29(2):229–240. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70321-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McGrory BJ, Bal BS, Harris WH (1996) Trochanteric osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty: six variations and indications for their use. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 4(5):258–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Charity J, Tsiridis E, Gusmao D, Bauze A, Timperley J, Gie G (2013) Extended trochanteric osteotomy followed by cemented impaction allografting in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28(1):154–160. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Masri BA, Mitchell PA, Duncan CP (2005) Removal of solidly fixed implants during revision hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(1):18–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bhamra MS, Rao GS, Robson MJ (1996) Hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses: difficulties with revision in 4 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 67(1):49–52. doi:10.3109/17453679608995608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Harris WH, White RE, Jr., Mitchell S, Barber F (1981) Removal of broken stems of total joint components by a new method: drilling, undercutting, and extracting without damage to bone. Hip 37–45. PMID:7333893

  45. King S, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB (2008) Extended femoral osteotomy and proximally coated prosthesis for hip revision. Orthopedics 31(1):67. doi:10.3928/01477447-20080101-21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu Z, Ding H, Shao H, Zhou Y, Wang G (2013) An in vitro biomechanical study of different fixation techniques for the extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA. J Orthop Surg Res. 8:7. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-8-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Barrack RL, Butler RA (2005) Current status of trochanteric reattachment in complex total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:237–242. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000191274.42410.40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schwab JH, Camacho J, Kaufman K, Chen Q, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT (2008) Optimal fixation for the extended trochanteric osteotomy: a pilot study comparing 3 cables vs 2 cables. J Arthroplasty 23(4):534–538. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Archibeck MJ, Rosenberg AG, Berger RA, Silverton CD (2003) Trochanteric osteotomy and fixation during total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11(3):163–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jarit GJ, Sathappan SS, Panchal A, Strauss E, Di Cesare PE (2007) Fixation systems of greater trochanteric osteotomies: biomechanical and clinical outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(10):614–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Altenburg AJ, Callaghan JJ, Yehyawi TM, Pedersen DR, Liu SS, Leinen JA, Dahl KA, Goetz DD, Brown TD, Johnston RC (2009) Cemented total hip replacement cable debris and acetabular construct durability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(7):1664–1670. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00428

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Bauer TW, Ming J, D’Antonio JA, Morawa LG (1996) Abrasive three-body wear of polyethylene caused by broken multifilament cables of a total hip prosthesis. A report of these cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(8):1244–1247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Silverton CD, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Kull L, Conley A, Galante JO (1996) Complications of a cable grip system. J Arthroplasty.;11(4):400-404. PMID: 8792246 Doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80029-5

  54. Ritter MA, Eizember LE, Keating EM, Faris PM (1991) Trochanteric fixation by cable grip in hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(4):580–581

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Paprosky WG, Martin EL (2002) Removal of well-fixed femoral and acetabular components. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 31(8):476–478

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Firestone TP, Hedley AK (1997) Extended proximal femoral osteotomy for severe acetabular protrusion following total hip arthroplasty. A technical note. J Arthroplasty. 12(3):344–345. doi:10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90034-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Aribindi R, Paprosky W, Nourbash P, Kronick J, Barba M (1999) Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. Instr Course Lect 48:19–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Paprosky WG, Weeden SH, Bowling JW Jr (2001) Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:181–193. doi:10.1097/00003086-200112000-00021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Meek RM, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Greidanus NV, Duncan CP (2004) Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(3):480–485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Adachi JD, Loannidis G, Berger C, Joseph L, Papaioannou A, Pickard L, Papadimitropoulos EA, Hopman W, Poliquin S, Prior JC, Hanley DA, Olszynski WP, Anastassiades T, Brown JP, Murray T, Jackson SA, Tenenhouse A (2001) Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research G. The influence of osteoporotic fractures on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling men and women across Canada. Osteoporos Int 12(11):903–908. doi:10.1007/s001980170017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Masterson EL, Masri BA, Duncan CP (1998) Surgical approaches in revision hip replacement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 6(2):84–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Morrey BF, Kavanagh BF (1992) Complications with revision of the femoral component of total hip arthroplasty. Comparison between cemented and uncemented techniques. J Arthroplasty 7(1):71–79. doi:10.1016/0883-5403(92)90035-O

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wu CC, Au MK, Wu SS, Lin LC (1999) Risk factors for postoperative femoral fracture in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Formos Med Assoc 98(3):190–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Busch CA, Charles MN, Haydon CM, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Macdonald SJ, McCalden RW (2005) Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(10):1333–1336. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B10.16528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Murphy SB, Rodriguez J (2004) Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplasty 19(4 Suppl 1):115–119. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lakstein D, Eliaz N, Levi O, Backstein D, Kosashvili Y, Safir O, Gross AE (2011) Fracture of cementless femoral stems at the mid-stem junction in modular revision hip arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(1):57–65. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.01589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Aleto T, Ritter MA, Berend M (2008) Case report: superficial femoral artery injury resulting from cerclage wiring during revision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(3):749–753. doi:10.1007/s11999-007-0109-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Feugier P, Fessy MH, Carret JP, Fischer LP, Bejui J, Chevalier JM (1999) Total hip arthroplasty. Risk factors and prevention of iatrogenic vascular complications. Ann Chir 53(2):127–135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Nachbur B, Meyer RP, Verkkala K, Zurcher R (1979) The mechanisms of severe arterial injury in surgery of the hip joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:122–133. doi:10.1097/00003086-197906000-00014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Mehta V, Finn HA (2005) Femoral artery and vein injury after cerclage wiring of the femur: a case report. J Arthroplasty 20(6):811–814. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.12.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ritter MA, Lutgring JD, Davis KE, Berend ME, Meding JB (2006) A clinical, radiographic, and cost comparison of cerclage techniques: wires vs cables. J Arthroplasty 21(7):1064–1067. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Schutzer SF, Harris WH (1988) Trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. 97% union rate using a comprehensive approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:172–183. doi:10.1097/00003086-198802000-00021

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Sambandam S.N., Gopinath Duraisamy, Chandrasekharan J. and Mounasamy V. contributed equally to this work. Sambandam S.N. and Gopinath Duraisamy designed the research; Sambandam S.N. and Gopinath Duraisamy performed the research; Sambandam S.N., Gopinath Duraisamy, Chandrasekharan J. and Mounasamy V. analyzed the data; and Sambandam S.N. and Gopinath Duraisamy Chandrasekharan J. wrote the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varatharaj Mounasamy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Each author certifies that no benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sambandam, S.N., Duraisamy, G., Chandrasekharan, J. et al. Extended trochanteric osteotomy: current concepts review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 231–245 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1749-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1749-z

keywords

Navigation