Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neurosurgical patients admitted via the emergency department initiating comfort care measures: a prospective cohort analysis

  • Original Article - Neurosurgery general
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Given the serious nature of many neurosurgical pathologies, it is common for hospitalized patients to elect comfort care (CC) over aggressive treatment. Few studies have evaluated the incidence and risk factors of CC trends in patients admitted for neurosurgical emergencies.

Objectives

To analyze all neurosurgical patients admitted to a tertiary care academic referral center via the emergency department (ED) to determine incidence and characteristics of those who initiated CC measures during their initial hospital admission.

Methods

We performed a prospective, cohort analysis of all consecutive adult patients admitted to the neurosurgical service via the ED between October 2018 and May 2019. The primary outcome was the initiation of CC measures during the patient’s hospital admission. CC was defined as cessation of life-sustaining measures and a shift in focus to maintaining the comfort and dignity of the patient.

Results

Of the 428 patients admitted during the 7-month period, 29 (6.8%) initiated CC measures within 4.0 ± 4.0 days of admission. Patients who entered CC were significantly more likely to have a medical history of cerebrovascular disease (58.6% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.006), dementia (17.2% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.0004), or cancer with metastatic disease (24.1% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.001). Patients with a presenting pathology associated with cerebrovascular disease were significantly more likely to initiate CC (62.1% vs. 35.3, p = 0.04). Patients who underwent emergent surgery were significantly more likely to enter CC compared with those who had elective surgery (80.0% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.02). Only 10 of the 29 (34.5%) patients who initiated CC underwent a neurosurgical operation (p = 0.002). Twenty of the 29 (69.0%) patients died within 0.8 ± 0.8 days after the initiation of CC measures.

Conclusion

CC measures were initiated in 6.8% of patients admitted to the neurosurgical service via the ED, with the majority of patients entering CC before an operation and presenting with a cerebrovascular pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CC:

Comfort care

ED:

Emergency department

References

  1. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S et al (2018) Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 378(8):708–718. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713973

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen SB, Birkelund R, Andersen MO, Carreon LY, Coulter A, Steffensen KD (2019) Factors affecting patient decision-making on surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(2):143–149. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Geurts M, de Kort FAS, de Kort PLM, van Tuijl JH, Kappelle LJ, van der Worp HB (2017) Predictive accuracy of physicians’ estimates of outcome after severe stroke. PLoS One 12(9):e0184894. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Geurts M, Macleod MR, van Thiel GJ, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ, van der Worp HB (2014) End-of-life decisions in patients with severe acute brain injury. Lancet Neurol 13(5):515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70030-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Izzy S, Compton R, Carandang R, Hall W, Muehlschlegel S (2013) Self-fulfilling prophecies through withdrawal of care: do they exist in traumatic brain injury, too? Neurocrit Care 19(3):347–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-013-9925-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, de Miquel MA, Molina CA, Rovira A et al (2015) Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372(24):2296–2306. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kannan S, Seo J, Riggs KR, Geller G, Boss EF, Berger ZD (2020) Surgeons’ views on shared decision-making. J Patient Cent Res Rev 7(1):8–18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis A, Varelas P, Greer D (2016) Prolonging support after brain death: when families ask for more. Neurocrit Care 24(3):481–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0209-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Linzey JR, Burke JF, Nadel JL, Williamson CA, Savastano LE, Wilkinson DA et al (2018) Incidence of the initiation of comfort care immediately following emergent neurosurgical and endovascular procedures. J Neurosurg 131(6):1725–1733. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.7.JNS181226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mavroudis C, Gaca J, Sade RM (2016) Can a surgeon refuse to operate when an advance directive limits postoperative care? Ann Thorac Surg 102(4):1046–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.062

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Miranda SP, Bernacki RE, Paladino JM, Norden AD, Kavanagh JE, Palmor MC et al (2018) A descriptive analysis of end-of-life conversations with long-term glioblastoma survivors. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 35(5):804–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909117738996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Noh T, Walbert T (2018) Brain metastasis: clinical manifestations, symptom management, and palliative care. Handb Clin Neurol 149:75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811161-1.00006-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pace A, Dirven L, Koekkoek JAF, Golla H, Fleming J, Ruda R et al (2017) European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for palliative care in adults with glioma. Lancet Oncol 18(6):e330–e340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30345-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paratz ED, Flynn E (2012) Rapid death after admission to palliative care. Intern Med J 42(9):984–989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02790.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Quadri SZ, Huynh T, Cappelen-Smith C, Wijesuriya N, Mamun A, Beran RG et al (2018) Reflection on stroke deaths and end-of-life stroke care. Intern Med J 48(3):330–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.13619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubin M, Bonomo J, Hemphill JC 3rd (2017) Intersection of prognosis and palliation in neurocritical care. Curr Opin Crit Care 23(2):134–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaller C, Kessler M (2006) On the difficulty of neurosurgical end of life decisions. J Med Ethics 32(2):65–69. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.011767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sison J, Tran H, Margol A, Tiwari N, Garcia KM, Cotter J et al (2017) Palliative care options for a young adult patient with a diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Cureus 9(8):e1580. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1580

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Souter M, Van Norman G (2010) Ethical controversies at end of life after traumatic brain injury: defining death and organ donation. Crit Care Med 38(9 Suppl):S502–S509. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ec5354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tawil I, Brown LH, Comfort D, Crandall CS, West SD, Rollstin AD et al (2014) Family presence during brain death evaluation: a randomized controlled trial*. Crit Care Med 42(4):934–942. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tin MK, French P, Leung KK (1999) The needs of the family of critically ill neurosurgical patients: a comparison of nurses’ and family members’ perceptions. J Neurosci Nurs 31(6):348–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Walbert T (2014) Integration of palliative care into the neuro-oncology practice: patterns in the United States. Neurooncol Pract 1(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npt004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Walbert T, Chasteen K (2015) Palliative and supportive care for glioma patients. In: Current understanding and treatment of gliomas. Cancer Treatment and Research book series, vol. 163. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12048-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Walbert T, Glantz M, Schultz L, Puduvalli VK (2016) Impact of provider level, training and gender on the utilization of palliative care and hospice in neuro-oncology: a North-American survey. J Neurooncol 126(2):337–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1973-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Walbert T, Khan M (2014) End-of-life symptoms and care in patients with primary malignant brain tumors: a systematic literature review. J Neurooncol 117(2):217–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1393-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Walbert T, Pace A (2016) End-of-life care in patients with primary malignant brain tumors: early is better. Neuro Oncol 18(1):7–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang D, Creel-Bulos C (2019) A systematic approach to comfort care transitions in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 56(3):267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.10.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zahuranec DB, Fagerlin A, Sanchez BN, Roney ME, Thompson BB, Fuhrel-Forbis A et al (2016) Variability in physician prognosis and recommendations after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 86(20):1864–1871. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002676

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditya S. Pandey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurosurgery general

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linzey, J.R., Foshee, R., Srinivasan, S. et al. Neurosurgical patients admitted via the emergency department initiating comfort care measures: a prospective cohort analysis. Acta Neurochir 163, 309–315 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04534-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04534-z

Keywords

Navigation