Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical high risk for psychosis paradigm for CAP: do not throw the baby out with the bathwater

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rimvall MK, van Os J, Jeppesen P (2020) Promoting a patient-centered, transdiagnostic approach to prevention of severe mental illness. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-020-01563-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oliver D, Radua J, Reichenberg A et al (2019) Psychosis polyrisk score (PPS) for the detection of individuals at-risk and the prediction of their outcomes. Front Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00174

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J, Gaebel W et al (2018) Psychosis-risk criteria in the general population: frequent misinterpretations and current evidence. World Psychiatry 17:107–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20498

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. van Os J, Guloksuz S (2017) A critique of the “ultra-high risk” and “transition” paradigm. World Psychiatry 16:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fusar-Poli P, Salazar de Pablo G, Correll CU et al (2020) Prevention of psychosis: advances in detection, prognosis, and intervention. JAMA Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Addington J, Addington D, Abidi S et al (2017) Canadian treatment guidelines for individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis. Can J Psychiatry 62:656–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743717719895

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Schultze-Lutter F, Michel C, Schmidt SJ et al (2015) EPA guidance on the early detection of clinical high risk states of psychoses. Eur Psychiatry 30:405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.01.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tor J, Dolz M, Sintes A et al (2018) Clinical high risk for psychosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27:683–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-1046-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raballo A, Poletti M, Preti A et al (2020) Clinical high risk for psychosis in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of transition prevalences. Schizophr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2020.03.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marshall M, Lewis S, Lockwood A et al (2005) Association between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in cohorts of first-episode patients: a systematic review. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:975–983. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fraguas D, del Rey-Mejías Á, Moreno C et al (2014) Duration of untreated psychosis predicts functional and clinical outcome in children and adolescents with first-episode psychosis: a 2-year longitudinal study. Schizophr Res 152:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McGorry PD, Hartmann JA, Spooner R et al (2018) Beyond the “at risk mental state” concept: transitioning to transdiagnostic psychiatry. World Psychiatry 17:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20514

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Seiler N, Maguire J, Nguyen T et al (2020) Prevalence of subthreshold positive symptoms in young people without psychotic disorders presenting to a youth mental health service. Schizophr Res 215:446–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nieman DH, McGorry PD (2015) Detection and treatment of at-risk mental state for developing a first psychosis: making up the balance. Lancet Psychiatry 2:825–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00221-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reavley NJ, Jorm AF (2011) Young people’s stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: findings from an Australian national survey. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 45:1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048674.2011.614216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshioka K, Reavley NJ, MacKinnon AJ et al (2014) Stigmatising attitudes towards people with mental disorders: results from a survey of Japanese high school students. Psychiatry Res 215:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Colizzi M, Ruggeri M, Lasalvia A (2020) Should we be concerned about stigma and discrimination in people at risk for psychosis? A systematic review. Psychol Med 50:705–726. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291720000148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parrish EM, Kim NS, Woodberry KA et al (2019) Clinical high risk for psychosis: the effects of labelling on public stigma in a undergraduate population. Early Interv Psychiatry 13:874–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trask CL, Kameoka VA, Schiffman J et al (2019) Perceptions of attenuated psychosis in a diverse sample of undergraduates. Early Interv Psychiatry 13:922–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Corcoran CM (2016) Ethical and epidemiological dimensions of labeling psychosis risk. AMA J Ethics 18:633–642. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.6.msoc2-1606

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Deschamps P, Hebebrand J, Jacobs B et al (2020) Training for child and adolescent psychiatry in the twenty-first century. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 29:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01467-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh SP, Paul M, Ford T et al (2010) Process, outcome and experience of transition from child to adult mental healthcare: multiperspective study. Br J Psychiatry 197:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.075135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shah JL, Scott J, McGorry PD et al (2020) Transdiagnostic clinical staging in youth mental health: a first international consensus statement. World Psychiatry 19:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20745

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Paul Klauser

  2. Department of Psychiatry, Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Paul Klauser

  3. Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie de L’Enfant Et de L’Adolescent, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France

    Alexis Revet & Jean-Philippe Raynaud

  4. UMR 1027, Inserm, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France

    Alexis Revet & Jean-Philippe Raynaud

  5. Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Dimitri Anagnostopoulos

  6. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, LVR Klinikum Essen, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

    Johannes Hebebrand

  7. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, IiSGM, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain

    Carmen Moreno

  8. Department of Psychiatry, Developmental Imaging and Psychopathology Lab, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Marco Armando

Authors
  1. Paul Klauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexis Revet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dimitri Anagnostopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johannes Hebebrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carmen Moreno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jean-Philippe Raynaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marco Armando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Armando.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

CM reports personal fees from Janssen, Angelini, Servier, Nuvelution, Otsuka, Lundbeck and Esteve.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klauser, P., Revet, A., Anagnostopoulos, D. et al. Clinical high risk for psychosis paradigm for CAP: do not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 31, 685–687 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-020-01624-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-020-01624-2

Search

Navigation