Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy of custom temporomandibular joint replacement surgery using a virtual surgical planning protocol

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Accurate placement of TMJ implant components may be facilitated by virtual surgical planning (VSP) technologies. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a typical VSP protocol and describe the pattern of surgical error associated with total alloplastic TMJ replacement.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was undertaken on 40 adult patients who were implanted with a fully customised, 3D printed TMJ prosthesis due to end-stage TMJ disease. Planned TMJ implant position based on preoperative CBCT images was compared with final position on postoperative OPGs using a previously validated linear rescaling method. Translational discrepancy was described in the anterior-posterior direction and superior-inferior direction. Rotational discrepancy was described as anterior or posterior.

Results

Lin’s concordance between preoperative and postoperative position was 0.97, with no significant differences (p > 0.05). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a 95% limit of agreement between planned and final position of − 5.9 to 5.4 mm. Overall, final implant position was more anterior (0.4 mm), superior (0.4 mm) and posteriorly rotated (2.4°) compared with planned position.

Conclusion

The use of VSP in TMJ replacement surgery results in accurate implant placement with good agreement between planned and final implant position. Discrepancies in planned and final implant position tended to result in the mandibular component of the implant being translated anterior superiorly and rotated posteriorly, with potential implications for the biomechanical performance of the implant and overall device longevity. These results should be used to assist TMJ surgeons pre- and intraoperatively to facilitating accurate implant positioning and optimal surgical rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dimitroulis G (2013) A new surgical classification for temporomandibular joint disorders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(2):218–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mercuri LG (2000) The use of alloplastic prostheses for temporomandibular joint reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58(1):70–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ackland DC, Moskaljuk A, Hart C, Lee PVS, Dimitroulis G (2015) Prosthesis loading after temporomandibular joint replacement surgery: a musculoskeletal modeling study. J Biomech Eng 137(4):041001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsu JT, Huang HL, Tsai MT, Fuh LJ, Tu MG (2011) Effect of screw fixation on temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(5):1320–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mesnard M, Ramos A, Ballu A, Morlier J, Cid M, Simoes JA (2011) Biomechanical analysis comparing natural and alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement using a finite element model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(4):1008–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Speculand B (2008) Current status of replacement of the temporomandibular join in the United Kingdom. Brit J Oral Max Surg 47:37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zielinski E, Jacobs R, Barker E, Rodby K, Antony A (2015) Virtual surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction

  8. Ackland DC, Robinson D, Redhead M, Lee PVS, Moskaljuk A, Dimitroulis G (2017) A personalized 3D-printed prosthetic joint replacement for the human temporomandibular joint: from implant design to implantation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 69:404–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dimitroulis G, Austin S, Sin Lee PV, Ackland D (2018) A new three-dimensional, print-on-demand temporomandibular prosthetic total joint replacement system: Preliminary outcomes. J Cranio Maxill Surg 46(8):1192–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chim H, Wetjen N, Mardini S (2014) Virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery. Semin Plast Surg 28(3):150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ciocca L, Marchetti C, Mazzoni S, Baldissara P, Gatto MR, Cipriani R et al (2015) Accuracy of fibular sectioning and insertion into a rapid-prototyped bone plate, for mandibular reconstruction using CAD-CAM technology. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43(1):28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ (2013) Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction. Laryngoscope 123(3):597–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khechoyan DY, Saber NR, Burge J, Fattah A, Drake J, Forrest CR, Phillips JH (2014) Surgical outcomes in craniosynostosis reconstruction: the use of prefabricated templates in cranial vault remodelling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(1):9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazzoni S, Bianchi A, Schiariti G, Badiali G, Marchetti C (2015) Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing cutting guides and customized titanium plates are useful in upper maxilla waferless repositioning. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(4):701–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mazzoni S, Marchetti C, Sgarzani R, Cipriani R, Scotti R, Ciocca L (2013) Prosthetically guided maxillofacial surgery: evaluation of the accuracy of a surgical guide and custom-made bone plate in oncology patients after mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(6)

  16. Schneider D, Kammerer PW, Hennig M, Schon G, Thiem DGE, Bschorer R (2019) Customized virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Clin Oral Investig 23(7):3115–3122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Suojanen J, Leikola J, Stoor P (2016) The use of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: a series of 32 maxillary osteotomy patients. J Cranio Maxill Surg 44(12):1913–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kraeima J, Merema BJ, Witjes MJH, Spijkervet FKL (2018) Development of a patient-specific temporomandibular joint prosthesis according to the Groningen principle through a cadaver test series. J Cranio Maxill Surg 46(5):779–784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sembronio S, Tel A, Costa F, Isola M, Robiony M (2019) Accuracy of custom-fitted temporomandibular joint alloplastic reconstruction and virtual surgical planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(8):1077–1083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mian M, Fink S, Ackland D, Wang N, Dimitroulis G (2020) Accuracy of orthopantomograms in the assessment of implant position following alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement. Oral Maxillofac Surg 24(2):203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson NR, Roberts MJ, Doi SA, Batstone MD (2017) Total temporomandibular joint replacement prostheses: a systematic review and bias-adjusted meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(1):86–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zou L, He D, Ellis E (2018) A comparison of clinical follow-up of different total temporomandibular joint replacement prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76(2):294–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffman D, Puig L (2015) Complications of TMJ surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 27(1):109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bai G, He D, Yang C, Chen M, Yuan J, Wilson JJ (2014) Application of digital templates to guide total alloplastic joint replacement surgery with biomet standard replacement system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(12):2440–2452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruf S, Pancherz H (1995) Is orthopantomography reliable for TMJ diagnosis? An experimental study on a dry skull. J Orofac Pain 9(4):365–374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ongkosuwito E, Dieleman M, Kuijpers-Jagtman A, Mulder P, Neck J (2009) Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 46:147–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schlicher W, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher DC, Miller AJ (2012) Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans. Eur J Orthod 34(3):263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Mian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The senior author (G.D.) holds shares in OMX Solutions Pty Ltd. Co-authors (S.F. and N.W.) are employed by OMX Solutions Pty Ltd.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mian, M., Ackland, D., Fink, S. et al. Accuracy of custom temporomandibular joint replacement surgery using a virtual surgical planning protocol. Oral Maxillofac Surg 25, 367–371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00928-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00928-6

Keywords

Navigation