Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Duration, Frequency, and Severity of the Non-flow Period on Stream Biofilm Metabolism

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temporary streams make up the majority of river networks in many regions around the world. Although they are known to have non-flow periods, it is uncertain in what ways the temporal components of the non-flow period affect stream ecosystems. We analyzed how duration and frequency of the non-flow period influence the biofilm metabolism of 33 Mediterranean streams in NE Iberian Peninsula. Selected streams ranged from perennial to ephemeral, and their hydrology was characterized during a period of 150 days before the sampling. Cobbles were collected from the streams, for which the total biofilm biomass (ash-free dry mass and chlorophyll-a) and metabolism (community respiration and gross primary production) were measured. Metabolic differences were observed between both permanent and temporary streams, as well as within temporary streams. Among these, the frequency of the non-flow period did not affect biofilm biomass or metabolism, but the duration did significantly decrease autotrophic biomass and gross primary production. Severity of the non-flow period (solar radiation and maximum streambed temperature) also affected gross primary production negatively. Thus, 80% of the observed gross primary production variability among all temporary streams was explained by the total duration and the severity of the non-flow period. In contrast, community respiration in the streams was not affected by the temporal components of the non-flow period. Our results highlight the effects of different temporal components of the non-flow period on autotrophic and heterotrophic processes, indicating that longer durations of the non-flow period or high severity conditions might decrease gross primary production promoting heterotrophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acuña V, Casellas M, Corcoll N, Timoner X, Sabater S. 2015. Increasing extent of periods of no flow in intermittent waterways promotes heterotrophy. Freshw Biol 60:1810–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acuña V, Datry T, Marshall J, Barceló D, Dahm CN, Ginebreda A, McGregor G, Sabater S, Tockner K, Palmer MA. 2014. Why should we care about temporary waterways? Science 343(6175):1080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Acuña V, Hunter M, Ruhí A. 2017. Managing temporary streams and rivers as unique rather than second-class ecosystems. Biol Conserv 211:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acuña V, Wolf A, Uehlinger U, Tockner K. 2008. Temperature dependence of stream benthic respiration in an Alpine river network under global warming. Freshw Biol 53(10):2076–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard RL, Osborne CA, Firestone MK. 2013. Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting. ISME J 7:2229–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burns A, Ryder D. 2001. Potential for biofilms as biological indicators in Australian riverine systems. Ecol Manag Restor 2:53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch F (1981) Metabolism of a desert stream. Freshw Biol 11:301–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cid N, Bonada N, Carlson SM, Grantham TE, Gasith A, Resh VH. 2017. High variability is a defining component of mediterranean-climate rivers and their biota. Water 9:1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Closs GP, Lake PS (1996) Drought, differential mortality and the coexistence of a native and an introduced fish species in a south east Australian intermittent stream. Environ Biol Fishes 47:17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Closs GP, Lake PS (1994) Spatial and temporal variation in the structure of an intermittent-stream food web. http://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/pdfsummaries/GA2017-Kenya-eng.pdf.

  • Constantz J, Stonestrom D, Stewart AE, Niswonger R, Smith TR. 2001. Analysis of streambed temperatures in ephemeral channels to determine streamflow frequency and duration. Water Resour Res 37:317–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datry T. 2012. Benthic and hyporheic invertebrate assemblages along a flow intermittence gradient: effects of duration of dry events. Freshw Biol 57:563–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datry T, Foulquier A, Corti R, Von Schiller D, Tockner K, Mendoza-Lera C, Clément JC, Gessner MO, Moleón M, Stubbington R, Gücker B, Albarinõ R, Allen DC, Altermatt F, Arce MI, Arnon S, Banas D, Banegas-Medina A, Beller E, Blanchette ML, Blanco-Libreros JF, Blessing JJ, Boëchat IG, Boersma KS, Bogan MT, Bonada N, Bond NR, Brintrup Barriá KC, Bruder A, Burrows RM, Cancellario T, Canhoto C, Carlson SM, Cauvy-Fraunié S, Cid N, Danger M, De Freitas Terra B, De Girolamo AM, De La Barra E, Del Campo R, Diaz-Villanueva VD, Dyer F, Elosegi A, Faye E, Febria C, Four B, Gafny S, Ghate SD, Gómez R, Gómez-Gener L, Gracą MAS, Guareschi S, Hoppeler F, Hwan JL, Jones JI, Kubheka S, Laini A, Langhans SD, Leigh C, Little CJ, Lorenz S, Marshall JC, Martín E, McIntosh AR, Meyer EI, Miliša M, Mlambo MC, Morais M, Moya N, Negus PM, Niyogi DK, Papatheodoulou A, Pardo I, Pařil P, Pauls SU, Pešić V, Polášek M, Robinson CT, Rodríguez-Lozano P, Rolls RJ, Sánchez-Montoya MM, Savić A, Shumilova O, Sridhar KR, Steward AL, Storey R, Taleb A, Uzan A, Vander Vorste R, Waltham NJ, Woelfle-Erskine C, Zak D, Zarfl C, Zoppini A. 2018. A global analysis of terrestrial plant litter dynamics in non-perennial waterways. Nat Geosci 11:497–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Döll P, Trautmann T, Gerten D, Schmied HM, Ostberg S, Saaed F, Schleussner CF. 2018. Risks for the global freshwater system at 1.5°c and 2°c global warming. Environ Res Lett 13:44038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döll P, Schmied HM. 2012. How is the impact of climate change on river flow regimes related to the impact on mean annual runoff? A global-scale analysis. Environ Res Lett 7:014037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geider RJ (1987) Light and temperature dependence of the carbon to chlorophyll a ratio in microalgae and cyanobacteria: implications for physiology and growth of phytoplankton published by Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the New Phytologist Trust Stable. http://.NewPhytol 106:1–34.

  • Gomi T, Sidle RC, Richardson JS. 2002. Understanding processes and downstream linkages of headwater systems. Bioscience 52:905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray DW, Lewis LA, Cardon ZG. 2007. Photosynthetic recovery following desiccation of desert green algae (Chlorophyta) and their aquatic relatives. Plant Cell Environ 30:1240–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch H, Martí E, Sabater S. 1995. Nutrient enrichment effects on biofilm metabolism in a Mediterranean stream. Freshw Biol 33:373–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries P, Baldwin DS. 2003. Drought and aquatic ecosystems. Freshw Biol 48:1141–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger KL, Olden JD, Pelland NA. 2014. Climate change poised to threaten hydrologic connectivity and endemic fishes in dryland streams. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:13894–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey SW, Humphrey GF. 1975. New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem und Physiol der Pflanz 167:191–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karsten U, Holzinger A. 2014. Green algae in alpine biological soil crust communities: acclimation strategies against ultraviolet radiation and dehydration. Biodivers Conserv 23:1845–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krause GH, Weis E. 1991. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42:313–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lake PS. 2003. Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. Freshw Biol 48:1161–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malard F, Mangin A, Uehlinger U, Ward JV. 2001. Thermal heterogeneity in the hyporheic zone of a glacial floodplain. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1319–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann HB, Whitney DR. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 18:50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx A, Kumar R, Thober S, Zink M, Wanders N, Wood EF, Ming P, Sheffield J, Samaniego L. 2017. Climate change alters low flows in Europe under a 1.5, 2, and 3 degree global warming. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22:1017–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz I, Abril M, Casas-Ruiz JP, Casellas M, Gómez-Gener L, Marcé R, Menéndez M, Obrador B, Sabater S, von Schiller D, Acuña V. 2018. Does the severity of non-flow periods influence ecosystem structure and function of temporary streams? A mesocosm study. Freshw Biol 63:613–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland PJ, Fellows CS, Tank J, Grimm N, Webster J, Hamilton S, Marti E, Ashkenas L, Bowden W, Dodds W, McDowell W, Paul M, Peterson B. 2001. Inter-biome comparison of factors controlling stream metabolism. Freshw Biol 46:1503–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poff L, Ward J. 1990. Physical habitat template of lotic systems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Environ Manag 14:629–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond PA, Hartmann J, Lauerwald R, Sobek S, McDonald C, Hoover M, Butman D, Striegl R, Mayorga E, Humborg C, Kortelainen P, Dürr H, Meybeck M, Ciais P, Guth P. 2013. Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503:355–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. 2016. A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria.

  • Romaní AM, Amalfitano S, Artigas J, Fazi S, Sabater S, Timoner X, Ylla I, Zoppini A. 2013. Microbial biofilm structure and organic matter use in mediterranean streams. Hydrobiologia 719:43–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabater S, Timoner X, Borrego C, Acuña V. 2016. Stream biofilm responses to flow intermittency: from cells to ecosystems. Front Environ Sci 4:14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schriever TA, Bogan MT, Boersma KS, Cañedo-Argüelles M, Jaeger KL, Olden JD, Lytle DA. 2015. Hydrology shapes taxonomic and functional structure of desert stream invertebrate communities. Freshw Sci 34:399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber U, Müller JF, Haugg A, Gademann R. 2002. New type of dual-channel PAM chlorophyll fluorometer for highly sensitive water toxicity biotests. Photosynth Res 74:317–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley EH, Fisher S, Jeremy B, Jones J. 2004. Effects of water loss on primary production: a landscape-scale model. Aquat Sci 66:2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabater S, Guasch H, Romaní A, Muñoz I. 2002. The effect of biological factors on the efficiency of river biofilms in improving water quality. Hydrobiologia 469:149–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinman AD (1996) Biomass and pigments of benthic algae. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA, Eds. Methods in stream ecology. pp 295–313.

  • Steward AL, Negus P, Marshall JC, Clifford SE, Dent C. 2018. Assessing the ecological health of rivers when they are dry. Ecol Indic 85:537–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg JC, Bagstad KJ, Leenhouts JM, Lite SJ, Makings E. 2005. Effects of stream flow intermittency on riparian vegetation of a semiarid region river (San Pedro River, Arizona). River Res Appl 21:925–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tank Jennifer L, Webster JR. 1998. Interaction of substrate and nutrient availability on wood biofilm processes in streams. Ecology 79:2168–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tank JL, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Griffiths NA, Entrekin SA, Stephen ML. 2010. A review of allochthonous organic matter dynamics and metabolism in streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 29:118–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tait CK, Li JL, Lamberti GA, Pearsons TN, Li HW. 1994. Relationships between riparian cover and the community structure of high desert streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 13:45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timoner X, Acuña V, Von Schiller D, Sabater S. 2012. Functional responses of stream biofilms to flow cessation, desiccation and rewetting. Freshw Biol 57:1565–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timoner X, Buchaca T, Acuña V, Sabater S. 2014. Photosynthetic pigment changes and adaptations in biofilms in response to flow intermittency. Aquat Sci 76:565–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin JD, Bogan MT, Bonada N, Rios-Touma B, Lytle DA. 2017. Seasonality and predictability shape temporal species diversity. Ecology 98:1201–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White JC, House A, Punchard N, Hannah DM, Wilding NA, Wood PJ. 2018. Macroinvertebrate community responses to hydrological controls and groundwater abstraction effects across intermittent and perennial headwater streams. Sci Total Environ 610–611:1514–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.081.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams D. 1998. The role of dormancy in the evolution and structure of temporary water invertebrate communities:109–24.

  • Wood PJ, Gunn J, Smith H, Abas-Kutty A. 2005. Flow permanence and macroinvertebrate community diversity within groundwater dominated headwater streams and springs. Hydrobiologia 545:54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylla I, Sanpera-Calbet I, Vázquez E, Romaní AM, Muñoz I, Butturini A, Sabater S. 2010. Organic matter availability during pre- and post-drought periods in a Mediterranean stream. Hydrobiologia 657:217–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the SPACESTREAM project (CGL2017-88640-C2-1-R) of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. We are very grateful to Carmen Gutiérrez and Maria Casellas for their contribution in the laboratory analyses, to Jordi René and Rebeca Areas, Veronica Granados, to Giulia Gionchetta for their role in the field work. Authors acknowledge the support from the Economy and Knowledge Department of the Catalan Government through Consolidated Research Group (ICRA-ENV 2017 SGR 1124).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Catalan Institute of Water Research (ICRA), Parc Científic i Tecnològic de la Universitat de Girona, Carrer Emili Grahit 101, Edifici H2O, E- 17003, Girona, Spain

    Miriam Colls, Xisca Timoner, Carme Font, Sergi Sabater & Vicenç Acuña

  2. GRECO, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Campus de Montilivi, 17071, Girona, Spain

    Sergi Sabater

Authors
  1. Miriam Colls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xisca Timoner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carme Font
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergi Sabater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vicenç Acuña
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam Colls.

Additional information

Author contribution

SS and VA conceived the idea of this study and, together with MC, developed the conceptual basis for this manuscript in consultation with XT. MC and XT carried out field and laboratory analyses. CF conducted statistical modeling. The manuscript was written by MC with contributions from all co-authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 155 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Colls, M., Timoner, X., Font, C. et al. Effects of Duration, Frequency, and Severity of the Non-flow Period on Stream Biofilm Metabolism. Ecosystems 22, 1393–1405 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00345-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00345-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation