Skip to main content
Log in

Drain tube use in incisional hernia repair: a national survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is debate regarding the use of drain tubes in incisional hernia repair. This has become topical in Australia, with a court judge suggesting that drain tubes are mandatory. There continues to be a lack of evidence to support generalised decision-making regarding the use of drain tubes.

Methods

The general surgeon membership of General Surgeons Australia (GSA) were surveyed regarding incisional hernia repair, their use of drains, and the decision-making behind their use.

Results

A total of 196 surgeons’ survey responses were analysed. Most surgeons perform less than 20 incisional hernia repairs per year (78%), prefer an open approach (78%), and preferably perform a pre-peritoneal (sub-lay) repair (53%). There was a variety of approaches to leaving a drain, with the most common answer being “sometimes” (31.28%) and an equal number of surgeons claiming to always or never leaving a drain (11.79% each). There was also no consensus in the duration the drain should stay in, with most surgeons averaging less than 5 days. Interestingly, there was a range of views on the effects of drain tubes, with some surgeons believing drains decreased infections and more believing they increased infections. Most surgeons felt seromas were decreased, but there was increased post-operative pain. The majority of surgeons agreed there was no evidence to support their beliefs.

Conclusion

Placement of drain tubes is not universally practiced by the general surgeons who participated in the survey. The lack of evidence is reflected by a varied approach to incisional hernia repair and the use of drain tubes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GSA:

General Surgeons Australia

References

  1. Truskett P (2018) All ‘complex’ abdominal incisional hernia repairs using mesh must be drained: it’s the law. Aust N Z J Surg 88(1–2):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wysocki A, McGowan B (2018) To drain or not to drain: Supreme Court has the answer. Aust N Z J Surg 88(1–2):115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Mo J, Kao LS, Liang MK (2016) Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Surg 40(1):89–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3252-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deerenberg EB, Timmermans L, Hogerzeil DP, Slieker JC, Eilers PH, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2015) A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia. Hernia 19(1):89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1321-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJ, Nunes QM, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2016) Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Br J Surg 103(12):1598–1607. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alam NN, Narang SK, Pathak S, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2016) Methods of abdominal wall expansion for repair of incisional herniae: a systematic review. Hernia 20(2):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1463-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornette B, De Bacquer D, Berrevoet F (2018) Component separation technique for giant incisional hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg 215(4):719–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Awaiz A, Rahman F, Hossain MB, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon B, Memon MA (2015) Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia. Hernia 19(3):449–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1351-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al Chalabi H, Larkin J, Mehigan B, McCormick P (2015) A systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 20:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ventral Hernia Working G, Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148(3):544–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dietz UA, Fleischhacker A, Menzel S, Klinge U, Jurowich C, Haas K, Heuschmann P, Germer CT, Wiegering A (2017) Risk-adjusted procedure tailoring leads to uniformly low complication rates in ventral and incisional hernia repair: a propensity score analysis and internal validation of classification criteria. Hernia 21(4):569–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1622-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Massey LH, Pathak S, Bhargava A, Smart NJ, Daniels IR (2018) The use of adjuncts to reduce seroma in open incisional hernia repair: a systematic review. Hernia 22(2):273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1690-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kockerling F (2018) Onlay technique in incisional hernia repair-a systematic review. Front Surg 5:71. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2018.00071

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Paasch C, Anders S, Strik MW (2018) Postoperative-treatment following open incisional hernia repair: a survey and a review of literature. Int J Surg 53:320–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Durai R, Mownah A, Ng PC (2009) Use of drains in surgery: a review. J Perioper Pract 19(6):180–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/175045890901900603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurusamy KS, Allen VB, Samraj K (2012) Wound drains after incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005570.pub3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Westphalen AP, Araujo AC, Zacharias P, Rodrigues ES, Fracaro GB, Lopes Filho Gde J (2015) Repair of large incisional hernias. To drain or not to drain. Randomized clinical trial. Acta Cir Bras 30(12):844–851. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020150120000009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perkins SW, Williams JD, Macdonald K, Robinson EB (1997) Prevention of seromas and hematomas after face-lift surgery with the use of postoperative vacuum drains. Arch Otolaryngol 123(7):743–745. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1997.01900070087014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scevola S, Youssef A, Kroll SS, Langstein H (2002) Drains and seromas in TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 48(5):511–514. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200205000-00011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. White TJ, Santos MC, Thompson JS (1998) Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias. Am Surg 64(3):276–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pai D, Sharma A, Kanungo R, Jagdish S, Gupta A (1999) Role of abdominal drains in perforated duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective controlled study. Aust N Z J Surg 69(3):210–213. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01524.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaha AR, Jaffe BM (1993) Selective use of drains in thyroid surgery. J Surg Oncol 52(4):241–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930520409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Carbonell AM, Haskins IN, Phillips S, Poulose BK, Rosen MJ (2017) Drain placement does not increase infectious complications after retromuscular ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh: an AHSQC analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 21(12):2083–2089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3601-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pessaux P, Msika S, Atalla D, Hay JM, Flamant Y, French Association for Surgical R (2003) Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in noncolorectal abdominal surgery: a multivariate analysis based on a prospective multicenter study of 4718 patients. Arch Surg 138(3):314–324. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.3.314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moro ML, Carrieri MP, Tozzi AE, Lana S, Greco D (1996) Risk factors for surgical wound infections in clean surgery: a multicenter study. Italian PRINOS Study Group. Ann Ital Chir 67(1):13–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weiss E, McClelland P, Krupp J, Karadsheh M, Brady MS (2019) Use of prolonged prophylactic antibiotics with closed suction drains in ventral abdominal hernia repair. Am Surg 85(4):403–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Debry C, Renou G, Fingerhut A (1999) Drainage after thyroid surgery: a prospective randomized study. J Laryngol Otol 113(1):49–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100143129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mujagic E, Zeindler J, Coslovsky M, Hoffmann H, Soysal SD, Mechera R, von Strauss M, Delko T, Saxer F, Glaab R, Kraus R, Mueller A, Curti G, Gurke L, Jakob M, Marti WR, Weber WP (2019) The association of surgical drains with surgical site infections - a prospective observational study. Am J Surg 217(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Witzigmann H, Diener MK, Kienkotter S, Rossion I, Bruckner T, Barbel W, Pridohl O, Radulova-Mauersberger O, Lauer H, Knebel P, Ulrich A, Strobel O, Hackert T, Buchler MW (2016) No need for routine drainage after pancreatic head resection: the dual-center, randomized, controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707). Ann Surg 264(3):528–537. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F, Carbonell AM, Chang A, Franklin M, Kercher KW, Lammers BJ, Parra-Davilla E, Roll S, Towfigh S, van Geffen E, Conze J, van Goor H (2014) Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 18(1):7–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1168-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YL and RH conceived and designed the study. YL collected data. YL performed analysis. YL drafted the manuscript. RH provided senior supervision and contributed to the direction of the project. All authors edited the manuscript and approved the final version for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Hodgson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study, where involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical and governance standards of the institutions involved. Ethical and governance approval number: ALR 07.2018.

Human and animal rights

This article only involves human participants and their rights have been observed through compliance with ethical standards as outlined.

Informed consent

Implied consent was used with an introductory paragraph heading the survey, including information on storage and publication of data. This was approved through the above ethical processes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 261 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Y., Mohammed Jinnaah, S., Masood, D. et al. Drain tube use in incisional hernia repair: a national survey. Hernia 25, 427–433 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02115-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02115-3

Keywords

Navigation