Skip to main content
Log in

Complementary and alternative medicines in ankylosing spondylitis: a cross-sectional study

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prevalence of dietary complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and consultation with a CAM practitioner was examined in a cross-sectional study of 75 AS patients. Seventy one of 75 (94.7%) study participants reported previous or current CAM use. Among these AS patients, 44 (72.1%) reported dietary CAM use and 27 (36.0%) were seeing a CAM practitioner at the time of study. Of 89 dietary CAM, 50 (56.4%) were perceived to be of slight or no benefit, and only 10 (11.2%) were initiated by a CAM practitioner. Compared with non-users, current dietary CAM users were more likely to be female (OR 6.5; 95% CI, 1.8–23.9). Patients attending a CAM practitioner were more likely to have university education (OR 5.7; 95% CI, 1.5–21.9) and higher BASDAI (OR 1.3; 95%CI, 1.0–1.7). Despite low rates of perceived benefit, dietary CAM use and CAM practitioner attendance is common among AS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Braun J, Sieper J (2007) Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet 369:1379–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Heijde D, Kivitz A, Schiff MH, Sieper J, Dijkmans BA, Braun J et al (2006) Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 54:2136–2146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jois RN, Gaffney K, Keat A (2007) Anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy for ankylosing spondylitis-unresolved issues. Rheumatology 46:899–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bongartz T, Sutton AJ, Sweeting MJ, Buchan I, Matteson EL, Montori V (2006) Anti-TNF antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of rare harmful effects in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 295:2275–2285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao JK, Mihaliak K, Kroenke K, Bradley J, Tierney WM, Weinberger M (1999) Use of complementary therapies for arthritis among patients of rheumatologists. Ann Intern Med 131:409–416

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cronan TA, Kaplan RM, Posner L, Blumberg E, Kozin F (1989) Prevalence of the use of unconventional remedies for arthritis in a metropolitan community. Arthritis Rheum 32:1604–1607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchbinder R, Gingold M, Hall S, Cohen M (2002) Non-prescription complementary treatments used by rheumatoid arthritis patients attending a community-based rheumatology practice. Intern Med J 32:208–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zochling J, March L, Lapsley H, Cross M, Tribe K, Brooks P (2004) Use of complementary medicines for osteoarthritis—a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 63:549–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herman CJ, Allen P, Hunt WC, Prasad A, Brady TJ (2004) Use of complementary therapies among primary care clinic patients with arthritis. Prev Chronic Dis 1:A12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cronan TA, Kaplan RM, Kozin F (1993) Factors affecting unprescribed remedy use among people with self-reported arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 6:149–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moore AD, Petri MA, Manzi S, Isenberg DA, Gordon C, Senecal JL et al (2000) The use of alternative medical therapies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Trination Study Group. Arthritis Rheum 43:1410–1418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fautrel B, Adam V, St-Pierre Y, Joseph L, Clarke AE, Penrod JR (2002) Use of complementary and alternative therapies by patients self-reporting arthritis or rheumatism: results from a nationwide canadian survey. J Rheumatol 29:2435–2441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haugen M, Kjeldsen-Kragh J, Nordvag BY, Forre O (1991) Diet and disease symptoms in rheumatic diseases—results of a questionnaire based survey. Clin Rheumatol 10:401–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramos-Remus C, Watters CA, Dyke L, Suarez-Almazor ME, Russell AS (1999) Assessment of health locus of control in the use of nonconventional remedies by patients with rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol 26:2468–2474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21:2286–2291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O’Hea J, Mallorie P et al (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 21:2281–2285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Doward LC, Spoorenberg A, Cook SA, Whalley D, Helliwell PS, Kay LJ et al (2003) Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 62:20–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones SD, Steiner A, Garrett SL, Calin A (1996) The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Patient Global Score (BAS-G). Br J Rheumatol 35:66–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Australian bureau of statistics, Commonwealth of Australia. Socioeconomic indexes for areas (SEIFA) Volume 1.1. Australian bureau of statistics: Canberra, Australia, 2001

  21. Feldman DE, Duffy C, De Civita M, Malleson P, Philibert L, Gibbon M et al (2004) Factors associated with the use of complementary and alternative medicines in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 51:527–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. MacLennan AH, Wilson DH, Taylor AW (1996) Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia. Lancet 347:569–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sundstrom B, Stalnacke K, Hagfors L, Johansson G (2006) Supplementation of omega-3 fatty acids in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol 35:359–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vecchio PC (1994) Attitudes to alternative medicine by rheumatology outpatient attenders. J Rheumatol 21:145–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lionel Schachna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chatfield, S.M., Dharmage, S.C., Boers, A. et al. Complementary and alternative medicines in ankylosing spondylitis: a cross-sectional study. Clin Rheumatol 28, 213–217 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-1029-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-1029-3

Keywords

Navigation