Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Associations between pre-operative radiographic osteoarthritis severity and pain and function after total hip replacement

Radiographic OA severity predicts function after THR

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Total hip replacement (THR) is an effective procedure for alleviating pain and improving function in majority of patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA). Clinically, meaningful improvement in pain and function after surgery is not universal, and the reasons for this are unclear. We investigated whether radiographic OA severity was a determinant of pain and disability experienced by patients after THR. The Harris hip score (HHS) was collected pre-operatively and at 1 and 2 years after primary THR (N = 382). The main independent variable was the modified Kellgren-Lawrence grade, which was assessed from the pre-operative radiographs. The outcome variable was response to surgery at 1 and 2 years. The minimum important difference (MID) in the HHS pain and function scores were used to determine response to surgery. This was based on achieving half the standard deviation in change in scores at 1 year. Regression models were created to assess the relationships between pre-operative x-ray findings and pain and function. Based on the MID, 96.2 and 95.5 % of patients demonstrated an improvement in pain, and 81.2 and 78.3 % of patients demonstrated an improvement in function at 1 and 2 years. Odds ratios for demonstrating an MID in both pain and functions scores for patients with less severe baseline radiographic changes were significantly lower at 1 and 2 years when compared to those with severe radiographic changes. Patients with less severe pre-operative radiographic hip damage are least likely to have substantial gains in terms of pain relief and improved function as a result of a THR.

Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dixon T, Shaw M, Ebrahim S, Dieppe P (2004) Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need. Ann Rheum Dis 63(7):825–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dowsey MM, Choong PFM. Predictors of Pain and Function Following Total Joint Replacement. 2013. In: Arthoplasty - Update [Internet]. InTech. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/arthroplasty-update/predictors-of-pain-and-function-following-total-joint-replacement

  4. Singh JA, Lewallen D (2010) Predictors of pain and use of pain medications following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA): 5,707 THAs at 2-years and 3,289 THAs at 5-years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:90

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh JA, Lewallen DG (2010) Predictors of activity limitation and dependence on walking aids after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(12):2387–2393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cushnaghan J, Coggon D, Reading I, Croft P, Byng P, Cox K et al (2007) Long-term outcome following total hip arthroplasty: a controlled longitudinal study. Arthritis Rheum 57(8):1375–1380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keurentjes JC, Fiocco M, So-Osman C, Onstenk R, Koopman-Van Gemert AW, Poll RG et al (2013) Patients with severe radiographic osteoarthritis have a better prognosis in physical functioning after hip and knee replacement: a cohort-study. PLoS ONE 8(4):e59500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Valdes AM, Doherty SA, Zhang W, Muir KR, Maciewicz RA, Doherty M (2012) Inverse relationship between preoperative radiographic severity and postoperative pain in patients with osteoarthritis who have undergone total joint arthroplasty. Semin Arthritis Rheum 41(4):568–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dowsey MM, Nikpour M, Dieppe P, Choong PF (2012) Associations between pre-operative radiographic changes and outcomes after total knee joint replacement for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 20(10):1095–1102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49(4):239–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34(3):220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Altman RD, Gold GE (2007) Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthr Cartil 15(Suppl A):A1–A56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dieppe PA, Reichenbach S, Williams S, Gregg P, Watt I, Juni P (2005) Assessing bone loss on radiographs of the knee in osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum 52(11):3536–3541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dieppe P, Judge A, Williams S, Ikwueke I, Guenther KP, Floeren M et al (2009) Variations in the pre-operative status of patients coming to primary hip replacement for osteoarthritis in European orthopaedic centres. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37(5):360–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582–592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoeksma HL, Van Den Ende CH, Ronday HK, Heering A, Breedveld FC (2003) Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris hip score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. Ann Rheum Dis 62(10):935–938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(5):963–974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lo GH, McAlindon TE, Niu J, Zhang Y, Beals C, Dabrowski C et al (2009) Bone marrow lesions and joint effusion are strongly and independently associated with weight-bearing pain in knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil 17(12):1562–1569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ledingham J, Dawson S, Preston B, Milligan G, Doherty M (1993) Radiographic progression of hospital referred osteoarthritis of the hip. Ann Rheum Dis 52(4):263–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh J, Sloan JA, Johanson NA (2010) Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(2):72–82

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89(8):1010–1014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Achten J, Parsons NR, Edlin RP, Griffin DR, Costa ML (2010) A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr Dowsey and Dr Nikpour hold an NHMRC Early Career Australian Clinical Fellowship (APP1035810) and (APP1071735).

Funding source

Nil

Disclosures

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and The University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia

    Michelle M. Dowsey & Peter F. M. Choong

  2. The University of Melbourne Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Academic Centre, Melbourne, Australia

    Mandana Nikpour

  3. Department of Rheumatology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Mandana Nikpour

  4. University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK

    Paul Dieppe

Authors
  1. Michelle M. Dowsey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mandana Nikpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Dieppe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter F. M. Choong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter F. M. Choong.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dowsey, M.M., Nikpour, M., Dieppe, P. et al. Associations between pre-operative radiographic osteoarthritis severity and pain and function after total hip replacement. Clin Rheumatol 35, 183–189 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2808-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2808-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation