Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients over 80: is there an increased risk?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) represents the first cause of spinal surgery for the elderly and will increase with the aging population. Although the surgery improves quality of life, the procedure involves anaesthetic and operative risks. The aim of this study was to assess whether the postoperative complication rate was higher for elderly patients and to find confounding factors. We conducted a retrospective study including all LSS surgeries between 2012 and 2020 at the University Hospital of Caen. We compared two populations opposing patients aged over 80 with others. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a severe complication (SC). Minor complications were the secondary endpoint. Comorbidities, history of lumbar spine surgery and surgical characteristics were recorded. Nine hundred ninety-six patients undergoing surgery for degenerative LSS were identified. Patients over 80 were significantly affected by additional comorbidities: hypertension, heart diseases, higher age-adjusted comorbidity Charlson score, ASA score and use of anticoagulants. Knee-chest position was preferred for younger patients. Older patients underwent a more extensive decompression and had more incidental durotomies. Of the patients, 5.2% presented SC. Age over 80 did not appear to be a significant risk factor for SC, but minor complications increased. Multivariate analysis showed that heart diseases, history of laminectomy, AA-CCI and accidental durotomies were independent risk factors for SC. Surgical management for lumbar spinal stenosis is not associated to a higher rate of severe complications for patients over 80 years of age. However, preoperative risk factors should be investigated to warn the elderly patients that the complication risk is increased although an optimal preparation is the way to avoid them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data were available if necessary.

References

  1. Adams KB, Roberts AR, Cole MB (2011) Changes in activity and interest in the third and fourth age: associations with health, functioning and depressive symptoms. Occup Ther Int 18(1):4–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balabaud L, Pitel S, Caux I, Dova C, Richard B, Antonietti P, Mazel C (2015) Lumbar spine surgery in patients 80 years of age or older: morbidity and mortality. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(Suppl 1):S205-212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blumenthal C, Curran J, Benzel EC, Potter R, Magge SN, Harrington JF, Coumans J-V, Ghogawala Z (2013) Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 18(4):340–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bono OJ, Poorman GW, Foster N et al (2018) Body mass index predicts risk of complications in lumbar spine surgery based on surgical invasiveness. Spine J 18(7):1204–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chad DA (2007) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurol Clin 25(2):407–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaló D, Pedrosa S, Amorim P, Gouveia S, Sancho C (2020) Propofol TCI reductions do not attenuate significant falls in cardiac output associated with anesthesia induction and knee-chest positioning in spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 32(2):147–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi JM, Choi MK, Kim SB (2017) Perioperative results and complications after posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spinal stenosis in geriatric patients over than 70 years old. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 60(6):684–690

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Debono B, Wainwright TW, Wang MY et al (2021) Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Spine J 21(5):729–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG (2010) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303(13):1259–1265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Elsamadicy AA, Adogwa O, Vuong VD, Mehta AI, Vasquez RA, Cheng J, Karikari IO, Bagley CA (2016) Patient body mass index is an independent predictor of 30-day hospital readmission after elective spine surgery. World Neurosurg 96:148–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fineberg SJ, Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A, Oglesby M, Patel AA, Singh K (2013) Incidence and risk factors for postoperative delirium after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(20):1790–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgström F, Fritzell P, Öhagen P, Michaëlsson K, Sandén B (2016) A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 374(15):1413–1423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerhardt J, Bette S, Janssen I, Gempt J, Meyer B, Ryang Y-M (2018) Is eighty the new sixty? Outcomes and complications after lumbar decompression surgery in elderly patients over 80 years of age. World Neurosurg 112:e555–e560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghasem A, Sharma A, Greif DN, Alam M, Maaieh MA (2018) The arrival of robotics in spine surgery: a review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43(23):1670–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giannadakis C, Nerland US, Solheim O, Jakola AS, Gulati M, Weber C, Nygaard ØP, Solberg TK, Gulati S (2015) Does obesity affect outcomes after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis? A multicenter, observational, registry-based study. World Neurosurg 84(5):1227–1234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Giannadakis C, Solheim O, Jakola AS, Nordseth T, Gulati AM, Nerland US, Nygaard ØP, Solberg TK, Gulati S (2016) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in individuals aged 80 and older: a multicenter observational study. J Am Geriatr Soc 64(10):2011–2018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Glotzbecker MP, Bono CM, Wood KB, Harris MB (2010) Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(10):E413-420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goh GS-H, Tay YWA, Liow MHL et al (2020) Elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion may have similar clinical outcomes, perioperative complications, and fusion rates as their younger counterparts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 478(4):822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jackson KL, Devine JG (2016) The effects of smoking and smoking cessation on spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Global Spine J 6(7):695–701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ (2009) Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J 9(7):545–550

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, Guermazi A, Berkin V, Hunter DJ (2009) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(2):199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kay HF, Chotai S, Wick JB, Stonko DP, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ (2016) Preoperative and surgical factors associated with postoperative intensive care unit admission following operative treatment for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Eur Spine J 25(3):843–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kazarian ER, Lopez WY, Eizember S, Blucher JA, Culley DJ, Javedan H, Kang JD, Schoenfeld AJ (2020) Incidental durotomy is associated with increased risk of delirium in patients aged 65 and older. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45(17):1215–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim J-E, Choi D-J, Park EJ (2020) Risk factors and options of management for an incidental dural tear in biportal endoscopic spine surgery. Asian Spine J 14(6):790–800

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Knutsson B, Sandén B, Sjödén G, Järvholm B, Michaëlsson K (2015) Body mass index and risk for clinical lumbar spinal stenosis: a cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(18):1451–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kong C, Li X, Sun X, Ding J, Guo M, Lu S (2019) Complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis for spinal stenosis. World Neurosurg 132:e949–e955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, Gilbert TJ, Summers JT, Toton JF, Hwang SW, Mendel RC, Reitman CA, North American Spine Society (2013) An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J 13(7):734–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee CK, Choi SK, Shin DA, Yi S, Ha Y, Kim KN, Kim I (2019) Influence of diabetes mellitus on patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One 14(3):e0213858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Li G, Patil CG, Lad SP, Ho C, Tian W, Boakye M (2008) Effects of age and comorbidities on complication rates and adverse outcomes after lumbar laminectomy in elderly patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(11):1250–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Masson E Traitement chirurgical des sténoses du canal lombaire. In: EM-Consulte. https://www.em-consulte.com/article/56019/traitement-chirurgical-des-stenoses-du-canal-lomba. Accessed 14 Jul 2021

  32. Morcos MW, Jiang F, McIntosh G et al (2018) Predictors of blood transfusion in posterior lumbar spinal fusion: a Canadian Spine Outcome and Research Network Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43(1):E35–E39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Murphy ME, Gilder H, Maloney PR et al (2017) Lumbar decompression in the elderly: increased age as a risk factor for complications and nonhome discharge. J Neurosurg Spine 26(3):353–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nanjo Y, Nagashima H, Dokai T et al (2013) Clinical features and surgical outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients aged 80 years or older: a multi-center retrospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(9):1243–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Otani K, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, Igarashi T, Nikaido T, Watanabe K, Konno S (2013) Lumbar spinal stenosis has a negative impact on quality of life compared with other comorbidities: an epidemiological cross-sectional study of 1862 community-dwelling individuals. ScientificWorldJournal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/590652

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Otani K, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, Igarashi T, Nikaido T, Watanabe K, Konno S (2013) Lumbar spinal stenosis has a negative impact on quality of life compared with other comorbidities: an epidemiological cross-sectional study of 1862 community-dwelling individuals. ScientificWorldJournal 2013:590652

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ould-Slimane M, Cantogrel P, Lefèvre E, Parent HF, Gauthé R (2020) Minimally invasive unilateral lumbar interbody fusion (UNILIF) in over-80-year-olds. Continuous series of 42 patients at 1.4 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106(2):275–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Park JH, Park S, Choi SA (2020) Incidence and risk factors of spinal epidural hemorrhage after spine surgery: a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of a national database. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:324

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Pernik MN, Deme PR, Nguyen ML et al (2021) Perioperative optimization of senior health in spine surgery: impact on postoperative delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc 69(5):1240–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Phan K, Mobbs RJ (2016) Minimally invasive versus open laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 41(2):E91–E100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rigamonti A, Gemma M, Rocca A, Messina M, Bignami E, Beretta L (2005) Prone versus knee-chest position for microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized study of intra-abdominal pressure and intraoperative bleeding. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(17):1918–1923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rodríguez-Mañas L, Féart C, Mann G et al (2013) Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement. The Frailty Operative Definition-Consensus Conference Project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68(1):62–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rudolph C, Schaffranietz L, Hellmundt L, Vitzthum HE, Olthoff D (2002) Comparative studies of patient positioning for lumbar intervertebral disk operation. Anaesthesiol Reanim 27(2):38–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Saleh A, Thirukumaran C, Mesfin A, Molinari RW (2017) Complications and readmission after lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients: an analysis of 2,320 patients. Spine J 17(8):1106–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sharif S, Shaikh Y, Bajamal AH, Costa F, Zileli M (2020) Fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations. World Neurosurg X 7:100077

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Shriver MF, Zeer V, Alentado VJ, Mroz TE, Benzel EC, Steinmetz MP (2015) Lumbar spine surgery positioning complications: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 39(4):E16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Simcox T, Antoku D, Jain N, Acosta F, Hah R (2019) Frailty syndrome and the use of frailty indices as a preoperative risk stratification tool in spine surgery: a review. Asian Spine J 13(5):861–873

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Soleman J, Baumgarten P, Perrig WN, Fandino J, Fathi A-R (2016) Non-instrumented extradural lumbar spine surgery under low-dose acetylsalicylic acid: a comparative risk analysis study. Eur Spine J 25(3):732–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Strömqvist F, Sigmundsson FG, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B, Karlsson MK (2019) Incidental durotomy in degenerative lumbar spine surgery - a register study of 64,431 operations. Spine J 19(4):624–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Takahashi Y, Sato T, Hyodo H, Kawamata T, Takahashi E, Miyatake N, Tokunaga M (2013) Incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery: risk factors and anatomic locations: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 18(2):165–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tsantes AG, Papadopoulos DV, Lytras T et al (2020) Association of malnutrition with surgical site infection following spinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 104(1):111–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang MY, Widi G, Levi AD (2015) The safety profile of lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients 85 years and older. Neurosurg Focus 39(4):E3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al (2008) Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358(8):794–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Yao R, Zhou H, Choma TJ, Kwon BK, Street J (2018) Surgical site infection in spine surgery: who is at risk? Global Spine J 8(4 Suppl):5S-30S

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Yoshioka K, Murakami H, Demura S, Kato S, Tsuchiya H (2015) Prevalence and risk factors for development of venous thromboembolism after degenerative spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(5):E301-306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zaina F, Tomkins-Lane C, Carragee E (2016) Negrini S (2016) Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD010264

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang L, Li E-N (2018) Risk factors for surgical site infection following lumbar spinal surgery: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 14:2161

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Cheisson G (2017) Gestion du patient diabétique en périopératoire. Fiches pratiques. Anesthésie & Réanimation 3(3):263–300. https://www.linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352580017300825. Accessed 14 Jul 2021

  59. Bilan démographique 2020 - Insee Première - 1834. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/5012724#figure6_radio2. Accessed 14 Jul 2021

  60. Le vieillissement démographique en Normandie à l’horizon 2050 : une forte poussée des populations dépendantes à partir de 2030 - Insee Flash Normandie - 65. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/3574506. Accessed 14 Jul 2021

  61. La dépendance des personnes âgées : une projection en 2040 − Données sociales : La société française | Insee. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/1371933?sommaire=1372045. Accessed 14 Jul 2021

  62. MCO par diagnostic ou acte | Stats ATIH. https://www.scansante.fr/applications/statistiques-activite-MCO-par-diagnostique-et-actes/submit?snatnav=&snatdoc=&mbout=&annee=2019&base=deux&typt=cim&code=M4806&ok=Lancer+le+traitement&niveau=0&codh=0000000000. Accessed 14 Jul 2021

  63. Kim BD, Smith TR, Lim S, Cybulski GR, Kim JYS (2014) Predictors of unplanned readmission in patients undergoing lumbar decompression: multi-institutional analysis of 7016 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 20(6):606–616

  64. fiche_memo_note_de_cadrage_hta_cd_20150723_vd.pdf

  65. Preoperative Nutritional Status is an Independent Predictor... : Spine. https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Abstract/2016/09010/Preoperative_Nutritional_Status_is_an_Independent.19.aspx. Accessed 6 Sep 2021

  66. HAS (2013) CT-12342_EXACYL_avis2_RI_reevalSMR_CT12342.pdf. https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/evamed/CT-12342_EXACYL_avis2_RI_reevalSMR_CT12342.pdf. Accessed 14 Jul 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédérick Rault.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional Ethics of French College of Neurosurgery (showed in Appendix) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Not applicable, for this type of study formal consent is not required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Consent of the ethics committee n° IRB00011687 College de neurochirurgie IRB #1: 2020/25.

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rault, F., Briant, A.R., Kamga, H. et al. Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients over 80: is there an increased risk?. Neurosurg Rev 45, 2385–2399 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-022-01756-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-022-01756-w

Keywords

Navigation