Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Parents’ and teachers’ perceptions of quality in Portuguese childcare classrooms

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to examine parents’ and teachers’ perceptions of quality in early childhood education for toddlers in Portugal. A total of 110 parents and 110 teachers participated in the study, rating the importance of specific quality criteria and assessing childcare classrooms, based on the Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale Parent Questionnaire (ITERS-RPQ) and on the Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale Teacher Questionnaire (ITERS-RTQ), respectively. The same quality items were used by external observers to evaluate the same classrooms with the Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale (ITERS-R; Harms et al. 2003). Results suggest that parents and teachers give high importance scores to the quality criteria included in the ITERS-R, substantiating the use of this instrument in Portugal. Although correlations were found between observers’ and parents’ ratings of quality, and between observers’ and teachers’ ratings of quality, results suggest that teachers and parents consider education and care in toddler classrooms to be substantially more adequate than the researchers observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu-Lima, I., Leal, T., Cadima, J., & Gamelas, A. M. (2013). Predicting child outcomes from child care quality in Portugal. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 399–420. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0120-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bairrão, J. (1998). O que é a qualidade em educação pré-escolar. Alguns resultados acerca da qualidade da educação pré-escolar em Portugal [What is quality in preschool education. Some results about quality of preschool education in Portugal]. In Ministério Educação da (Ed.), Qualidade e projecto na educação pré-escolar [Quality and project in preschool education]. Lisboan: Editorial do Ministério da Educação.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, S., & Aguiar, C. (2010). Assessing the quality of Portuguese childcare programs for toddlers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 527–535. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, S., & Cruz, O. (2012). Participação das mães na creche e no jardim de infância em Portugal (Mothers’ participation in childcare and preschool). AMAzônica, Ano 5, VIII(1), 8–32. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/revista?codigo=18453. Accessed 3 April 2014.

  • Barros, S., & Leal, T. (2011). Dimensões da qualidade das salas de creche do distrito do Porto (Quality dimensions of day care classrooms in the district of Porto). Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educación, 19(2), 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, S., Peixoto, C., Pessanha, M., Cadima, J., Pinto, A. I., & Bryant, D. (2013, September). Using the infant/toddler environment rating scale – revised to evaluate quality of Portuguese infant classrooms. Paper presented at the 16th European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Lausanne, Switzerland

  • Bisceglia, R., Perlman, M., Schaack, D., & Jenkins, J. (2009). Examining the psychometric properties of the Infant–Toddler Environment Rating Scale-Revised Edition in a high-stakes context. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 121–132. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, J., Berthelsen, D., Irving, K., Boulton-Lewis, G., & McCrindle, A. (2000). Caregivers’ beliefs about practice in infant childcare programmes. International Journal of Early Years Education, 8(2), 155–165. doi:10.1080/09669760050046192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, A. M. S. (2004). Educação e cuidados em creche. Conceptualizações de um grupo de educadoras [Education and care in childcare centers. Conceptualization of a group of teachers]. Doctoral dissertation. Aveiro: University of Aveiro

  • Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: a power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cryer, D., & Burchinal, M. (1997). Parents as childcare consumers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cryer, D., Tietze, W., & Wessels, H. (2002). Parents’ perceptions of their children’s childcare: a cross-national comparison. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(2), 259–277. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00148-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: postmodern perspectives. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, D. M., & Burchinal, M. R. (2001). Early childhood care: relations with family characteristics and preferred care characteristics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16, 475–497. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(01)00120-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Child Care and Education Study Group (1997). European Child Care and Education study: Cross national analyses of the quality and effects of early childhood programmes on children’s development. Final report for work package #1 submitted to European Union DG XII: Science, Research and Development RTD Action: Targeted Socio-Economic Research

  • European Commission (2013). Commission recommendation of 20 February 2013. Investing in children: breaking the cycle of disadvantage. Official Journal of the European Union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013H0112&from=EN. Accessed 4 August 2014.

  • European Commission Childcare Network (1990). Quality in childcare services: Report on an EC Childcare Network Technical Seminar. http://www.childcarecanada.org/pubs/other/quality/index.html. Accessed 27 June 2006.

  • Eurydice European Unit. (2009). Tackling social and cultural inequalities through early childhood education and care in Europe. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency P9 Eurydice. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/about/eurydice/documents/098_en_v2.pdf. Accessed 5 August 2014.

  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2.ª Edição). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folque, M. A. (1995). Parents views of quality early childhood education services in Portugal. Report submitted to obtain master degree. Institute of Education, University of London

  • Folque, M. A., & Siraj-Blatchford, I. (1996). Parents’ view of quality in early childhood services in Portugal. International Journal of Early Childhood, 28(2), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammatikopoulos, V., Gregoriadis, A., Tsigilis, N., & Zachopoulou, E. (2012). Parental conceptions of quality in Greek early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(1), 134–148. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2012.738868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T., & Cryer, D. (2003). Video observations for the infant/toddler environment rating scale (Revisedth ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T., Cryer, D., & Clifford, R. M. (1990). Infant/toddler environment rating scale. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T., Cryer, D., & Clifford, R. M. (2003). Infant/toddler environment rating scale—revised edition (Revisedth ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T., Cryer, D., & Clifford, R. M. (2004). Infant/toddler environment rating scale–Revised Edition (ITERS-R) (S. Barros, Trans.). Unpublished translation (Original work published 2003).

  • Harms, T., Cryer, D., & Clifford, R. M. (2006). Infant/toddler environment rating scale—revised edition, updated. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, N., & Tinning, B. (2012). Hearing parents’ and carers’ voices: experiences of accessing quality long day care in northern regional Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(3), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrist, A. W., Thompson, S. D., & Norris, D. J. (2007). Defining quality childcare: multiple stakeholder perspectives. Early Education & Development, 18(2), 305–336. doi:10.1080/10409280701283106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, L. L., Cassidy, D. J., Hegde, A. V., & Lower, J. K. (2007). Quality in inclusive and noninclusive infant and toddler classrooms. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22(1), 69–84. doi:10.1080/02568540709594613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L. (1998). Cinco perspectivas sobre a qualidade [Five perspectives about quality]. In Ministério Educação da (Ed.), Qualidade e projecto na educação pré-escolar [Quality and project in preschool education]. Editorial do Ministério da Educação: Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. K., & Smith, A. K. (2007). Providing a critical service today for tomorrow’s consumers: a relational model of customer evaluations and responses in the child care industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14, 232–245. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., Präg, P., Tsang, F., Begall, K., Derbyshire, J., Kohle, L., Miani, C., & Hoorens, S. (2014). Use of childcare services in the EU Member States and progress towards the Barcelona targets. Short Statistical Report No. 1. Prepared for European Commission Directorate General- Justice and Fundamental Rights. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/documents/140502_gender_equality_workforce_ssr1_en.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2014.

  • Ministério Educação da. (1997). Orientações curriculares para a educação pré-escolar [Curriculum guidelines for preschool education]. Lisbon: Departamento da Educação Básica, Núcleo de Educação pré-escolar, Ministério da Educação.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, M., & Melo, M. (2006). Qualidade em contextos educativos pré-escolares: percepções parentais [Quality in preschool contexts: parent perceptions]. VI Simpósio Nacional de Investigação em Psicologia, XIX, 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojala, M., & Opper, S. (1994). Study findings: use of organized facilities. In P. P. Olmsted & D. P. Weikart (Eds.), Families speak: early childhood care and education in 11 countries. Ypsilanti: High/Scope Press Editor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Doing better for families. Portugal. http://www.oecd.org/portugal/47704295.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2014.

  • Pessanha, M. (2008). Vulnerabilidade e resiliência no desenvolvimento dos indivíduos: Influência da qualidade dos contextos de socialização no desenvolvimento das crianças. [Vulnerability and resilience on the development of individuals: Influence of the socialization contexts' quality on children's development]. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia

  • Peyton, V., Jacobs, A., O’Brien, M., & Roy, C. (2001). Reasons for choosing child care: associations with family factors, quality, and satisfaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16, 191–208. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(01)00098-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, B., Ramstein, T., Karmaniola, A., Miljkovitch, R., & Halfon, O. (2002). Quality of childcare in the pre-school years: a comparison of the influence of home care and day care characteristics on child outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(5), 385–396. doi:10.1080/01650250143000265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, A., Pessanha, M., & Aguiar, C. (2013). Effects of home environment and center-based child care quality on children’s language, communication, and literacy outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 94–101. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, M. B. P., Couceiro, M. E., & Madeira, M. I. R. (1996). Guiões técnicos. Creche. [Tecnhical guidelines. Child care]. http://195.245.197.202/preview_documentos.asp?r = 6747&m = PDF accessed 28 January 2004

  • Scopelliti, M., & Musatti, T. (2013). Parents’ view of child care quality: values, evaluations, and satisfaction. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 1225–1038. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9664-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. (2000). A comparison of external and self-evaluations of quality in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 164, 63–78. doi:10.1080/0300443001640106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tietze, W., & Cryer, D. (2004). Comparisons of observed process quality in German and American infant/toddler programs. International Journal of Early Years Education, 12(1), 43–62. doi:10.1080/0966976042000182370.

  • Tietze, W., Cryer, D., Bairrão, J., Palacios, J., & Wetzel, G. (1996). Comparisons of observed process quality in early childcare and education programs in five countries. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 447–475. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(96)90017-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, D., Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., Steinberg, L., Vandergrift, N., & NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2010). Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. Child Development, 81(3), 737–756. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01431.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaven, S., & Grace, D. (2010). Examining parental and staff perceptions of childcare service quality across competing business structures. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(2), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, Y., & Li, J. (2012). What makes a high-quality preschool? Similarities and differences between Chinese immigrant and European American parents’ views. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 306–315. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.09.00.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sílvia Barros.

Additional information

Sílvia Barros. Escola Superior de Educação do Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Centro de Investigação e Inovação em Educação; Centro de Psicologia da Universidade do Porto. Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 602, 4200–465 Porto, Portugal. E-mail: silviabarros@ese.ipp.pt; Website: www.ese.ipp.pt

Current themes of research:

Quality in childcare and preschool education. Teacher-child interactions. Child engagement in early childhood education. Infants’ transition to childcare. Family-school relationships.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

Barros, S., & Aguiar, C. (2010). Assessing the quality of Portuguese child care programs for toddlers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 527–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.12.003 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.12.003#_blank

Barros, S., & Cruz, O. (2012). Participação das mães na creche e no jardim de infância em Portugal (Mothers’ participation in childcare and preschool). AMAzônica, 5, VIII(1), 8–32. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/revista?codigo = 18453.

Barros, S., & Leal, T. (2011). Dimensões da qualidade das salas de creche do distrito do Porto (Quality dimensions of day care classrooms in the district of Porto). Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educación, 19 (2), 117–133.

Cruz, O., Aguiar, C., & Barros, S. (2004). Escala de Avaliação dos Estilos de Ensino: qualidades psicométricas dos dados (Teaching Styles Rating Scale: psychometric properties). Psico-USF, 9 (2), 165–171.

Pessanha, M., Pinto, A. I. & Barros, S. (2009). Influência da qualidade dos contextos familiar e de creche no envolvimento e no desenvolvimento da criança [Influence of quality of childcare and home environment in child engagement and development]. Psicologia, XXIII (2),55-71.

Teresa B. Leal. Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200–135 Porto, Portugal. E-mail: tleal@fpce.up.pt; Website: www.fpce. up.pt

Current themes of research:

Quality in preschool and elementary school education. Teacher-student interactions in classrooms. Language, literacy and social skills: relationships and evolution from preschool to elementary school. Adult-child interactions in shared story book reading. Participation in inclusive preschool contexts.

Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:

Abreu-Lima, I., Leal, T., Cadima, J., & Gamelas, A. M. (2013). Predicting child outcomes from preschool quality in Portugal. European Journal of Educational Psychology. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-012-0120-y

Cadima, J., Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., & Leal, T. (2013). Examining teacher-child relationship quality across two countries. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2013.864754

Cadima, J., Leal, T., & Burchinal, M. (2010). The quality of teacher-student interactions: Associations with first graders’ academic and behavioural outcomes, Journal of School Psychology, 48, 457–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.001

Cadima, J., McWilliam, R. A., & Leal, T. (2010). Environmental risk factors and children’s literacy skills during the transition to elementary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(1), 24–33. doi: 10.1177/0165025409345045.

Cadima, J., Peixoto, C., & Leal, T. (2013). Observed Classroom Quality in First Grade: Associations with Teacher, Classroom, and School Characteristics. European Journal of Psychology of Education. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-013-0191-4

This article was based on data included in Sílvia Barros’ doctoral thesis, supervised by Professor Joaquim Bairrão (1935–2007) and Professor Teresa Leal, and funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Reference BD/10721/2002). The authors would like to thank FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, under the project PEst-OE/PSI/UI0050/2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barros, S., Leal, T.B. Parents’ and teachers’ perceptions of quality in Portuguese childcare classrooms. Eur J Psychol Educ 30, 209–226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0235-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0235-4

Keywords

Navigation