Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Development and testing of a coupled ocean–atmosphere mesoscale ensemble prediction system

  • Published:
Ocean Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A coupled ocean–atmosphere mesoscale ensemble prediction system has been developed by the Naval Research Laboratory. This paper describes the components and implementation of the system and presents baseline results from coupled ensemble simulations for two tropical cyclones. The system is designed to take into account major sources of uncertainty in: (1) non-deterministic dynamics, (2) model error, and (3) initial states. The purpose of the system is to provide mesoscale ensemble forecasts for use in probabilistic products, such as reliability and frequency of occurrence, and in risk management applications. The system components include COAMPS® (Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System) and NCOM (Navy Coastal Ocean Model) for atmosphere and ocean forecasting and NAVDAS (NRL Atmospheric Variational Data Assimilation System) and NCODA (Navy Coupled Ocean Data Assimilation) for atmosphere and ocean data assimilation. NAVDAS and NCODA are 3D-variational (3DVAR) analysis schemes. The ensembles are generated using separate applications of the Ensemble Transform (ET) technique in both the atmosphere (for moving or non-moving nests) and the ocean. The atmospheric ET is computed using wind, temperature, and moisture variables, while the oceanographic ET is derived from ocean current, temperature, and salinity variables. Estimates of analysis error covariance, which is used as a constraint in the ET, are provided by the ocean and atmosphere 3DVAR assimilation systems. The newly developed system has been successfully tested for a variety of configurations, including differing model resolution, number of members, forecast length, and moving and fixed nest options. Results from relatively coarse resolution (∼27-km) ensemble simulations of Hurricanes Hanna and Ike demonstrate that the ensemble can provide valuable uncertainty information about the storm track and intensity, though the ensemble mean provides only a small amount of improved predictive skill compared to the deterministic control member.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berner J, Shutts GJ, Leutbecher M, Palmer TN (2009) A spectral stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme and its impact on flow-dependent predictability in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. J Atmos Sci 66:603–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CH, Toth Z (1999) Ensemble transformation and adaptive observations. J Atmos Sci 56:1748–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CH, Holt T, Nachamkin J, Chen S, McLay J, Doyle J, Thompson WT (2009) Regional ensemble forecasts using the Ensemble Transform technique. Mon Wea Rev 137:288–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black PG et al (2007) Air–sea exchange in hurricanes: synthesis of observations from the coupled boundary layer air–sea transfer experiment. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 88:357–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelton DB, DeSzoeke RA, Schlax MG, Naggar KE, Siwertz N (1998) Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of deformation. J Physical Oceanogr 28:433–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SS, Zhao W, Donelan MA, Price JF, Walsh EJ (2007) The CBLAST-hurricane program and the next-generation fully coupled atmosphere–wave–ocean models for hurricane research and prediction. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 88:311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Campbell TJ, Jin H, Gabersek S, Hodur RM, Martin P (2010) Effect of two-way air–sea coupling in high and low wind speed regimes. Mon Wea Rev 138:3579–3602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JA (2005) Operational multivariate ocean data assimilation. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 131:3583–3604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JA (2011) Ocean data quality control. In: Operational oceanography in the 21st century. Springer (in press)

  • Daley R, Barker E (2001a) NAVDAS source book 2001: the NRL atmospheric variational data assimilation system. NRL Publication NRL/PU/7530-00-418, 160 pp. [available from Marine Meteorology Division, NRL, Monterey, CA 93943-5502]

  • Daley R, Barker E (2001b) NAVDAS: formulation and diagnostics. Mon Wea Rev 129:869–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donelan MA, Haus BK, Reul N, Plant WJ, Stiassnie M, Graber HC (2004) On the limiting aerodynamic roughness of the ocean in very strong winds. Geophys Res Lett 31:L18306. doi:10.1029/2004GL019460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairall C, Bradley E, Hare J, Grachev A, Edson J (2003) Bulk parameterization of air–sea fluxes: updates and verification for the COARE algorithm. J Climate 16:571–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harshvardhan, Davies R, Randall DA, Corsetti TG (1987) A fast radiation parameterization for atmospheric circulation models. J Geophys Res 92:1009–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodur RM (1997) The Naval Research Laboratory’s Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS). Mon Wea Rev 125:1414–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt T, Pullen J, Bishop CH (2009) Urban and ocean ensembles for improved meteorological and dispersion modeling of the coastal zone. Tellus 61A:232–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong X, Chang SW, Raman S, Shay LK, Hodur R (2000) The interaction between hurricane Opal (1995) and a warm core ring in the Gulf of Mexico. Mon Wea Rev 128:1347–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houtekamer PL, Mitchell HL (2001) A sequential ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Mon Wea Rev 129:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y, Thompson WT, Wang S, Liou C-S (2007) A numerical study of the effect of dissipative heating on tropical cyclone intensity. Wea Forecasting 22:950–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain JS (2004) The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteor 43:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1993) Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: the Kain–Fritsch scheme. The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. Meteorol. Monogr., 24, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Boston, pp 165–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler E (1969) On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations. Meteorol. Monogr., 10, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Boston, p 88

  • Louis J-F (1979) A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Bound-Layer Meteor 17:187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin PJ (2000) Description of the NAVY coastal ocean model version 1.0. NRL Rep. NRL/FR/7322-00-9962, 42 pp

  • McLay J, Bishop CH, Reynolds CA (2008) Evaluation of the Ensemble Transform analysis perturbation scheme at NRL. Mon Wea Rev 136:1093–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLay J, Bishop CH, Reynolds CA (2010) A local formulation of the Ensemble Transform (ET) analysis perturbation scheme. Wea Forecasting 25:985–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor G, Yamada T (1974) A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 31:1791–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor G, Yamada T (1982) Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys Space Phys 20:851–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell MD, Vickery RJ, Reinhold TA (2003) Reduced drag coefficient for high wind speeds in tropical cyclones. Nature 422:279–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport EN, Franklin JL, Avila LA, Baig SR, Beven JL, Blake ES, Burr CA, Jiing JG, Juckins CA, Knabb RD, Landsea CW, Mainelli M, Mayfield M, McAdie CJ, Pasch RJ, Sisko C, Stewart SR, Tribble AN (2009) Advances and challenges at the National Hurricane Center. Wea Forecasting 24:395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge SA, Hobbs PV (1983) The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. VIII: a model for the “seeder–feeder” process in warm-frontal rainbands. J Atmos Sci 40:1185–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sashegyi K, Pauley PM, Frost MD, Geiszler DA (2009) Hourly analyses with NAVDAS 3DAR system for COAMPS-OS, 16th Conference on Satellite Meteorology and Oceanography, 10–15 January 2009. Available at: http://ams.confex.com/ams/89annual/techprogram/paper_146820.htm

  • Shutts G (2005) A kinetic energy backscatter algorithm for use in ensemble prediction systems. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 131:3079–3102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shutts G, Palmer TN (2004) The use of high-resolution numerical simulations of tropical circulation to calibrate stochastic physics schemes. Proc. ECMWF/CLIVAR simulation and prediction of intra-seasonal variability with emphasis on the MJO, Reading, UK, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, pp 83–102

  • Therry G, Lacarrère P (1983) Improving the kinetic energy model for planetary boundary layer description. Bound-Layer Meteor 25:63–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth Z, Kalnay E (1993) Ensemble forecasting at NMC: the generation of perturbations. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 74:2317–2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen PJ (2009) Particle filtering in geophysical systems. Mon Wea Rev 137:4089–4114

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by project support from the Oceanographer of the Navy through the program office at PEO C4I PMW-120 (PE 0603207 N). Special thanks to Carolyn Reynolds and Justin McLay of NRL for providing the global ensemble data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USA

    Teddy R. Holt, James A. Cummings, Craig H. Bishop, James D. Doyle, Xiaodong Hong, Sue Chen & Yi Jin

  2. Oceanography Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USA

    Teddy R. Holt, James A. Cummings, Craig H. Bishop, James D. Doyle, Xiaodong Hong, Sue Chen & Yi Jin

Authors
  1. Teddy R. Holt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James A. Cummings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Craig H. Bishop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James D. Doyle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaodong Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sue Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yi Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teddy R. Holt.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Pierre Lermusiaux

COAMPS is a registered trademark of the Naval Research Laboratory.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Maritime Rapid Environmental Assessment

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holt, T.R., Cummings, J.A., Bishop, C.H. et al. Development and testing of a coupled ocean–atmosphere mesoscale ensemble prediction system. Ocean Dynamics 61, 1937–1954 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-011-0449-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-011-0449-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation