Abstract
We present a novel computational approach, based on a parametrized reduced-order model, for accelerating the calculation of pressure drop along blood vessels. Vessel lumina are defined by a geometric parametrization using the discrete empirical interpolation method on control points located on the surface of the vessel. Hemodynamics are then computed using a reduced-order representation of the parametrized three-dimensional unsteady Navier–Stokes and continuity equations. The reduced-order model is based on an offline–online splitting of the solution process, and on the projection of a finite volume full-order model on a low-dimensionality subspace generated by proper orthogonal decomposition of pressure and velocity fields. The algebraic operators of the hemodynamic equations are assembled efficiently during the online phase using the discrete empirical interpolation method. Our results show that with this approach calculations can be sped up by a factor of about 25 compared to the conventional full-order model, while maintaining prediction errors within the uncertainty limits of invasive clinical measurement of pressure drop. This is of importance for a clinically viable implementation of noninvasive, medical imaging-based computation of fractional flow reserve.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amsallem D, Zahr M, Farhat C (2012) Nonlinear model order reduction based on local reduced-order bases. Int J Numer Methods Eng 92(10):891–916
Ashtekar KD, Back LH, Khoury SF, Banerjee RK (2007) In vitro quantification of guidewire flow-obstruction effect in model coronary stenoses for interventional diagnostic procedure. ASME J Med Dev 1(3):185–196
Ballarin F, Manzoni A, Quarteroni A, Rozza G (2015) Supremizer stabilization of POD-Galerkin approximation of parametrized steady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102(5):1136–1161
Ballarin F, Faggiano E, Ippolito S, Manzoni A, Quarteroni A, Rozza G, Scrofani R (2016) Fast simulations of patient-specific haemodynamics of coronary artery bypass grafts based on a POD-Galerkin method and a vascular shape parametrization. J Comput Phys 315:609–628
Ballarin F, Faggiano E, Manzoni A, Quarteroni A, Rozza G, Ippolito S, Antona C, Scrofani R (2017) Numerical modeling of hemodynamics scenarios of patient-specific coronary artery bypass grafts. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16(4):1373–1399
Bergmann M, Bruneau CH, Iollo A (2009) Enablers for robust POD models. J Computat Phys 228(2):516–538
Buljak V (2011) Inverse analyses with model reduction. Computational fluid and solid mechanics. Springer, Berlin
Buoso S, Palacios R (2017) On-demand aerodynamics of integrally actuated membranes with feedback control. AIAA J 55(2):377–388
Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A, Kono A, Dedic A, Chelu RG, Dijkshoorn ML, Gijsen FJ, Ouhlous M, van Geuns RM, Nieman K (2015) Fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: diagnostic performance of an on-site clinician-operated computational fluid dynamics algorithm. Radiology 274(3):674–683
Colciago C, Deparis S, Quarteroni A (2014) Comparisons between reduced order models and full 3D models for fluid-structure interaction problems in haemodynamics. J Comput Appl Math 265:20–138
de Vecchi A, Clough RE, Gaddum NR, Rutten MCM, Lamata P, Schaeffter T, Nordsletten DA, Smith NP (2014) Catheter-induced errors in pressure measurements in vessels: an in-vitro and numerical study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61(6):1844–1850
de Zélicourt DA, Kurtcuoglu V (2016) Patient-specific surgical planning, where do we stand? The example of the Fontan procedure. Ann Biomed Eng 44(1):174–186
Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, Curzen N, Purcell I, Gutberlet M, Rioufol G, Hink U, Schuchlenz HW, Feuchtner G, Gilard M, Andreini D, Jensen JM, Hadamitzky M, Chiswell K, Cyr D, Wilk A, Wang F, Rogers C, Hlatky MA (2016) 1-Year outcomes of FFRCT-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(5):435–445
Gijsen FJ, Schuurbiers JC, van de Giessen AG, Schaap M, van der Steen AF, Wentzel JJ (2014) 3D reconstruction techniques of human coronary bifurcations for shear stress computations. J Biomech 47(1):39–43
Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton WG (1974) Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Am J Cardiol 33(1):87–94
Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, Butler J, Dracup K, Ezekowitz MD, Finkelstein EA, Hong Y, Johnston SC, Khera A, Lloyd-Jones DM, Nelson SA, Nichol G, Orenstein D, Wilson PW, Woo YJ (2011) Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States. Circulation 123(8):933–944
Hlatky MA, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, Curzen N, Purcell I, Gutberlet M, Rioufol G, Hink U, Schuchlenz HW, Feuchtner G, Gilard M, Andreini D, Jensen JM, Hadamitzky M, Wilk A, Wang F, Rogers C, Douglas PS (2015) Quality-of-life and economic outcomes of assessing fractional flow reserve with computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(21):2315–2323
Itu L, Rapaka S, Passerini T, Georgescu B, Schwemmer C, Schoebinger M, Flohr T, Sharma P, Comaniciu D (2016) A machine-learning approach for computation of fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomography. J Appl Physiol 121:42–52
Jasak H (1996) Error analysis and estimation for the finite volume method with applications to fluid flows. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London
Keegan J, Gatehouse PD, Yang G-Z, Firmin DN (2004) Spiral phase velocity mapping of left and right coronary artery blood flow: correction for through-plane motion using selective fat-only excitation. J Magn Reson Imaging 20(6):953–960
Knight J, Olgac U, Saur SC, Poulikakos D, Marshall W, Cattin PC, Alkadhi H, Kurtcuoglu V (2010) Choosing the optimal wall shear parameter for the prediction of plaque location: a patient-specific computational study in human right coronary arteries. Atherosclerosis 211(2):445–450
Lassila T, Manzoni A, Quarteroni A, Rozza G (2013) A reduced computational and geometrical framework for inverse problems in haemodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 29(7):741–776
Maday Y, Nguyen NC, Patera TA, Pau SH (2009) A general multipurpose interpolation procedure: the magic points. Commun Pure Appl Anal 8:383
Mancini GBJ, Ryomoto A, Kamimura C, Yeoh E, Ramanathan K, Schulzer M, Hamburger J, Ricci D (2007) Redefining the normal angiogram using population-derived ranges for coronary size and shape: validation using intravascular ultrasound and applications in diverse patient cohorts. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23(4):441–453
Manzoni A (2014) An efficient computational framework for reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation of parametrized Navier–Stokes flows. ESAIM Math Model Numer Anal 48:1199–1226
Manzoni A, Quarteroni A, Rozza G (2012a) Model reduction techniques for fast blood flow simulation in parametrized geometries. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 28(6–7):604–625
Manzoni A, Quarteroni A, Rozza G (2012b) Shape optimization of cardiovascular geometries by reduced basis methods and free-form deformation techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 70(5):646–670
Moukalled F, Mangani L, Darwish M (2015) The finite volume method in computational fluid dynamics: an advanced introduction with OpenFOAM and Matlab, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin
Negri F, Manzoni A, Amsallem D (2015) Efficient model reduction of parametrized systems by matrix discrete empirical interpolation. J Computat Phys 303:431–454
Olgac U, Poulikakos D, Saur SC, Alkadhi H, Kurtcuoglu V (2009) Patient-specific three-dimensional simulation of LDL accumulation in a human left coronary artery in its healthy and atherosclerotic states. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 296(6):H1969–H1982
Pagani S, Manzoni A, Quarteroni A (2018) Numerical approximation of parametrized problems in cardiac electrophysiology by a local reduced basis method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 340:530–558
Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Jan-Willem B, vant Veer M, Bär F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(21):2105–2111
Quarteroni A, Manzoni A, Negri F (2016) Reduced basis methods for partial differential equations: an introduction. Vol. 92 of UNITEXT - La Matematica per il 3+2. Springer, Berlin
Quarteroni A, Rozza G (2007) Numerical solution of parametrized Navier–Stokes equations by reduced basis methods. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ 23(4):923–948
Rikhtegar F, Knight JA, Olgac U, Saur SC, Poulikakos D, Marshall W, Cattin PC, Alkadhi H, Kurtcuoglu V (2012) Choosing the optimal wall shear parameter for the prediction of plaque locationa patient-specific computational study in human left coronary arteries. Atherosclerosis 221(2):432–437
Rowley CW (2011) Model reduction for fluids, using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition. Int J Bifurc Chaos 15(03):997–1013
Sankaran S, Esmaily Moghadam M, Kahn AM, Tseng EE, Guccione JM, Marsden AL (2012) Patient-specific multiscale modeling of blood flow for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Biomed Eng 40(10):2228–2242
Stabile G, Hijazi S, Mola A, Lorenzi S, Rozza G (2015) Advances in reduced order modelling for CFD: vortex shedding around a circular cylinder using a POD-Galerkin method. Commun Appl Ind Math 9(1):1–s21
Stabile G, Rozza G (2018) Finite volume POD-Galerkin stabilised reduced order methods for the parametrised incompressible Navier Stokes equations. Comput Fluids 173:273–284
Stergiopulos N, Meister JJ, Westerhof N (1995) Evaluation of methods for estimation of total arterial compliance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 268(4):H1540–H1548
Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK (2013) Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(22):2233–2241
Tonino PA, Fearon WF, Bruyne BD, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Lee PNV, MacCarthy PA, van’t Veer M, Pijls NH (2010) Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(25):2816–2821
Vergallo R, Papafaklis MI, Yonetsu T, Bourantas CV, Andreou I, Wang Z, Fujimoto JG, McNulty I, Lee H, Biasucci LM, Crea F, Feldman CL, Michalis LK, Stone PH, Jang I-K (2014) Endothelial shear stress and coronary plaque characteristics in humans. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 7(6):905–911
Weller HG, Tabor G, Jasak H, Fureby C (1998) A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques. Comput Phys 12(6):620–631
Zafar H, Sharif F, Leahy MJ (2014) Measurement of the blood flow rate and velocity in coronary artery stenosis using intracoronary frequency domain optical coherence tomography: validation against fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Supplement C(5):68–71
Zhang JM, Zhong L, Luo T, Lomarda AM, Huo Y, Yap J, Lim ST, Tan RS, Wong ASL, Tan JWC, Yeo KK, Fam JM, Keng FYJ, Wan M, Su B, Zhao X, Allen JC, Kassab GS, Chua TSJ, Tan SY (2016) Simplified models of non-invasive fractional flow reserve based on CT images. PLoS ONE 11(5):1–20
Zimmermann FM, Ferrara A, Johnson NP, van Nunen LX, Escaned J, Albertsson P, Erbel R, Legrand V, Gwon H-C, Remkes WS, Stella PR, van Schaardenburgh P, Jan Willem G, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH (2015) Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. Eur Heart J 36(45):3182–3188
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support of Mr. Joe Clark, the Swiss National Science Foundation through NCCR Kidney.CH, and the University of Zurich through the Forschungskredit Postdoc Fellowship (FK-18-043).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
A patent application covering parts of the technology described in the manuscript has been filed.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buoso, S., Manzoni, A., Alkadhi, H. et al. Reduced-order modeling of blood flow for noninvasive functional evaluation of coronary artery disease. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 18, 1867–1881 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01182-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01182-w