Skip to main content
Log in

Assortment optimization under a multinomial logit model with position bias and social influence

  • Research paper
  • Published:
4OR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motivated by applications in retail, online advertising, and cultural markets, this paper studies the problem of finding an optimal assortment and positioning of products subject to a capacity constraint in a setting where consumers preferences can be modeled as a discrete choice under a multinomial logit model that captures the intrinsic product appeal, position biases, and social influence. For the static problem, we prove that the optimal assortment and positioning can be found in polynomial time. This is despite the fact that adding a product to the assortment may increase the probability of selecting the no-choice option, a phenomenon not observed in almost all models studied in the literature. We then consider the dynamics of such a market, where consumers are influenced by the aggregate past purchases. In this dynamic setting, we provide a small example to show that the natural and often used policy known as popularity ranking, that ranks products in decreasing order of the number of purchases, can reduce the expected profit as times goes by. We then prove that a greedy policy that applies the static optimal assortment and positioning at each period, always benefits from the popularity signal and outperforms any policy where consumers cannot observe the number of past purchases (in expectation).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Profit-ordered assortment are sometimes referred as revenue-ordered assortments.

  2. Parameter d, which is the social signal, only appears as an argument of the social influence function, which is an arbitrary positive and non-decreasing function. Hence, all results hold for any social signal that is a positive and non-decreasing function of the number of purchases.

References

  • Abeliuk A, Berbeglia G, Cebrian M, Van Hentenryck P (2015) The benefits of social influence in optimized cultural markets. PloS One 10(4):e0121934. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berbeglia G, Joret G (2015) Assortment optimisation under a general discrete choice model: a tight analysis of revenue ordered assortments. Available at SSRN 2620165

  • Block HD, Marschak J (1960) Random orderings and stochastic theories of responses. Contrib probab Stat 2:97–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Bront JJM, Méndez-Díaz I, Vulcano G (2009) A column generation algorithm for choice-based network revenue management. Oper Res 57(3):769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buscher G, Cutrell E, Morris MR (2009) What do you see when you’re surfing?: using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 21–30. ACM

  • Craswell N, Zoeter O, Taylor M, Ramsey B (2008) An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In: Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining, pp 87–94. ACM

  • Daly Andrew, Zachary Stanley (1978) Improved multiple choice models. Determ Travel Choice 335:357

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J, Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2013) Assortment planning under the multinomial logit model with totally unimodular constraint structures. Technical report, Department of IEOR, Columbia University

  • Davis JM, Gallego G, Topaloglu H (2014) Assortment optimization under variants of the nested logit model. Oper Res 62(2):250–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreze Xavier, Hoch Stephen J, Purk Mary E (1995) Shelf management and space elasticity. J Retail 70(4):301–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engstrom P, Forsell E (2014) Demand effects of consumers’ stated and revealed preferences. Available at SSRN 2253859

  • Gallego G, Iyengar G, Phillips R, Dubey A (2004) Managing flexible products on a network. Technical report, Columbia University, New York

  • Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Polya G (1952) Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel P, McAfee RP (2014) Position auctions with externalities. In: Tie-Yan Liu, Qi Qi, Yinyu Ye (eds) Web and Internet Economics: Proceeding of the 10th International Conference, WINE 2014, Beijing, China, 14–17 December 2014

  • Joachims T, Granka L, Pan B, Hembrooke H, Gay G (2005) Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp 154–161. ACM

  • Kempe D, Mahdian M (2008) A cascade model for externalities in sponsored search. In: Papadimitriou, Christos, Zhang, Shuzhong (eds) Internet and Network Economics. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop, WINE 2008, Shanghai, China, 17–20 December 2008

  • Krumme C, Cebrian M, Pickard G, Pentland S (2012) Quantifying social influence in an online cultural market. PloS One 7(5):e33785. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Ecuyer P, Maillé P, Stier-Moses N, Tuffin B (2015) Revenue-maximizing rankings for online platforms with quality-sensitive consumers. Technical Report: Les Cahiers du Gerad, G-2015-73. University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada

  • Lerman K, Hogg T (2014) Leveraging position bias to improve peer recommendation. PloS One 9(6):06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, van Ryzin G (2008) On the choice-based linear programming model for network revenue management. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 10(2):288–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan Luce R (1965) Individual choice behavior. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maillé Patrick, Markakis Evangelos, Naldi Maurizio, Stamoulis George D, Tuffin Bruno (2012) Sponsored search auctions: an overview of research with emphasis on game theoretic aspects. Electron Commer Res 12(3):265–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusmevichientong P, Shen Z-JM, Shmoys DB (2010a) Dynamic assortment optimization with a multinomial logit choice model and capacity constraint. Oper Res 58(6):1666–1680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusmevichientong P, Shmoys D, Topaloglu H (2010b) Assortment optimization with mixtures of logits. Technical report, School of IEOR, Cornell University

  • Salganik Matthew J, Dodds Peter Sheridan, Watts Duncan J (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talluri Kalyan, Van Ryzin Garrett (2004) Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Manag Sci 50(1):15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker Catherine, Zhang Juanjuan (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Manag Sci 57(5):828–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams HCWL (1977) On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit Environ Plan 9(3):285–344

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the reviewers for their constructive remarks and suggestions. NICTA is funded by the Australian Government through the Department of Communications and the Australian Research Council through the ICT Centre of Excellence Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Van Hentenryck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abeliuk, A., Berbeglia, G., Cebrian, M. et al. Assortment optimization under a multinomial logit model with position bias and social influence. 4OR-Q J Oper Res 14, 57–75 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-015-0302-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-015-0302-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation