Skip to main content
Log in

Yellow traps reloaded: what is the benefit for decision making in practice?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sticky traps are a standard tool for monitoring alate arthropod pests in greenhouses. However, in practice, evaluation of traps over the whole growing season is rarely done. For decision making by growers, sticky traps are often only used for detection of pest presence. The reason behind is that although many studies show that pest population densities can be estimated using sticky traps under experimental conditions, validation under growing conditions and monitoring of beneficials are often lacking. In the current study, we evaluated whether trap densities recommended for practice are sufficient to estimate pest population densities of Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and its natural enemy Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in protected tomato cultures throughout the growing season. Our results show that trap catches provide reliable information about pest densities, in which correlations differed for specific developmental stages, i.e. adults < nymphs < nymphs (previous week). A single yellow sticky trap provided reliable information on nymphal density in the tomato crop on an area of at least 170 m2. A rapid increase of parasitoid trap catches indicated high parasitism. In our experiments, a total trap catch of ≥6 parasitoids/trap was a suitable threshold for sufficient natural enemy activity in the tomato crop. The implementation of these results in practice and the transferability to other cropping systems are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beers EH (2012) Effect of trap color and orientation on the capture of Aphelinus mali (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a parasitoid of woolly apple aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Econ Entomol 105:1342–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne N, Bellows TS (1991) Whitefly biology. Ann Rev Entomol 36:431–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne DN, Von Bretzel PK, Hoffman CJ (1986) Impact of trap design and placement when monitoring for the bandedwinged whitefly and the sweet-potato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environ Entomol 15:300–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho J, Choi J, Qiao M et al. (2008) Automatic identification of tobacco whiteflies, aphids and thrips in greenhouse using image processing techniques. In: Proceedings of the 4th Wseas International Conference on Mathematical Biology and Ecology. World Scientific and Engineering Acad and Soc, Athens, pp 74–79

  • Cloyd RA (2009) Western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis): management on ornamental crops grown in greenhouses: have we reached an impasse? Pest Technol 3:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen E, Zalom F, Flint M, Zilbert E (2000) Quantifying trade-offs between pest sampling time and precision in commercial IPM sampling programs. Agr Syst 66:99–113. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00038-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vis RMJ, van Lenteren JC (2008) Biological control of Trialeurodes vaporariorum by Encarsia formosa on tomato in unheated greenhouses in the high altitude tropics. Bull Insectol 61:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield SJ, Jordan SL (2000) Evaluation of insecticides for the control of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Helicoverpa punctigera (Wallengren) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on soybean, and the implications for field adoption. Aust J Entomol 39:322–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerling D, Horowitz AR (1984) Yellow traps for evaluating the population-levels and dispersal patterns of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:753–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie DR, Quiring D (1987) Yellow sticky traps for detecting and monitoring greenhouse whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) adults on greenhouse tomato crops. J Econ Entomol 80:675–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarnieri A, Maini S, Molari G, Rondelli V (2012) Automatic trap for moth detection in integrated pest management. Bull Insectol 64:247–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall DG (2009) An assessment of yellow sticky card traps as indicators of the abundance of adult Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in citrus. J Econ Entomol 102:446–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton AJ, Endersby NM, Schellhorn NA et al (2006) Evaluation of fixed sample-size plans for Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on broccoli crops in Australia. J Econ Entomol 99:2171–2176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoelmer KA, Simmons AM (2008) Yellow sticky trap catches of parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in vegetable crops and their relationship to in-field populations yellow sticky trap catches of parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in vegetable. Environ Entomol 37:391–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek S (2010) Whitefly management in greenhouse vegetable crops. Primefact 1007:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis MA (2005) Insects as natural enemies: a practical perspective. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karatolos N, Denholm I, Williamson M et al (2010) Incidence and characterisation of resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides and pymetrozine in the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pest Manag Sci 66:1304–1307. doi:10.1002/ps.2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karut K, Kazak C (2007) Monitoring adult Eretmocerus mundus, Encarsia lutea and Bemisia tabaci with yellow sticky traps in cotton Gossypium hirsutum. J Appl Entomol 131:553–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Lim UT (2011) Evaluation of a modified sticky card to attract Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and a behavioural study on their visual response. Crop Prot 30:508–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JG, Park JJ, Pak H, Cho K (1999) Implementation of yellow sticky trap for management of greenhouse whitefly in cherry tomato greenhouses. J Korean Soc Hortic Sci 40:549–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppert (2013) Horiver. http://www.koppert.com/products/monitoring/product. Accessed 10 June 2013

  • Martin NA, Dale JR (1989) Monitoring greenhouse-whitefly puparia and parasitism: a decision approach. N Z J Crop Hortic 17:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JR (2003) Economic injury level. Department of entomology, NC State University. http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/course/ent425/tutorial/ec. Accessed 20 June 2013

  • Noldus L, Rumei X, Mansveld-Rotteveel MHE, Van Lenteren JC (1986) The parasite-host relationship between Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) 20. Analyses of the spatial distribution of greenhouse whiteflies in a large glasshouse. J Appl Entomol 102:484–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohnesorge B, Rapp G (1986) Monitoring Bemisia tabaci: a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 17:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrella MP, Paine TD, Bethke JA et al (1991) Evaluation of Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) for biological-control of sweet-potato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on poinsettia. Environ Entomol 20:713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto-Zevallos DM, Vänninen I (2013) Yellow sticky traps for decision-making in whitefly management: what has been achieved? Crop Prot 47:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzol J, Nammour D, Hervouet P et al (2010) Comparison of two methods of monitoring thrips populations in a greenhouse rose crop. J Pest Sci 83:191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz-Döblin H (2013) Wichtige und bewährte Nützlinge für den Einsatz im Gemüsebau unter Glas, außer Ganzjahreskultur Tomaten. Landwirtschaftskammer Nordrhein-Westfalen. http://www.landwirtschaftskammer.de/landwirtschaft/pflanzenschutz/gemuesebau/gemuese-nuetzlinge.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2014

  • Steiner MY, Spohr LJ, Barchia I, Goodwin S (1999) Rapid estimation of numbers of whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleurodidae) and thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on sticky traps. Aust J Entomol 38:367–372. doi:10.1046/j.1440-6055.1999.00114.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Veire M, Vacante V (1984) Greenhouse-whitefly control through the combined use of the color attraction system with the parasite wasp Encarsia formosa (Hym.: Aphelinidae). Entomophaga 29:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Roermund HJW (1995) Understanding biological control of greenhouse whitefly with the parasitoid Encarsia formosa. Dissertation, University of Wageningen

  • Van Roermund HJW, van Lenteren JC (1995) Residence times of the whitefly parasitoid Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hym., Aphelinidae) on tomato leaflets. J Appl Entomol 119:465–471. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1995.tb01319.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon RS, Gillespie DR (1995) Influence of trap shape, size, and background color on captures of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in a cucumber greenhouse. J Econ Entomol 88:288–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajnberg E, Bernstein C, van Alphen J (2007) Behavioural ecology of insect parasitoids: from theoretical approaches to field applications. Blackwell Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb RE, Smith FF (1980) Greenhouse whitefly control of an integrated regime based on adult trapping and nymphal parasitism. Bull SROP/WPRS 3:235–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia C (2012) In situ detection of small-size insect pests sampled on traps using multifractal analysis. Opt Eng 51:027001. doi:10.1117/1.OE.51.2.027001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the team of gardeners for maintenance of the tomato greenhouse cultures. Thanks also go to Kerstin Koenneke and Anton Sartisohn for assistance in the experiments and Sebastian Laurenz for language editing. Additionally we thank all Gezonde Kas partners for the fruitful discussions and especially Lia Hemerik and Maaike Wubs for critical comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. The project “Gezonde Kas – Gesundes Gewächshaus” (www.gezondekas.eu) is co-financed within the framework of the INTERREG IV A-programme Deutschland-Nederland by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Ministerie van Economische Zaken (NL), the Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Arbeit und Verkehr (D), the Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Energie, Bauen, Wohnen und Verkehr des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (D), the Provinicie Drenthe (NL), the Provincie Limburg (NL), the Provincie Gelderland (NL), and the Provincie Groningen (NL). It is accompanied by the program management of the Euregio Rhein-Waal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Meyhöfer.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Traugott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Böckmann, E., Hommes, M. & Meyhöfer, R. Yellow traps reloaded: what is the benefit for decision making in practice?. J Pest Sci 88, 439–449 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-014-0601-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-014-0601-7

Keywords

Navigation