Skip to main content
Log in

“It’s yours to take”: generating learner feedback literacy in the workplace

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feedback can improve students’ learning and performance on clinical placements, yet students are often dissatisfied with the process. Attempts to improve feedback frequently focus on faculty development programs without addressing learners’ capabilities to engage with feedback. For feedback to be effective, students need to understand its processes and to translate this into practice. Developing student feedback literacy may enhance feedback engagement and, therefore, learning outcomes. This qualitative interview study aimed to problematise student feedback literacy in the healthcare setting, from the learner’s perspective. Before commencing placements, 105 healthcare students at an Australian teaching hospital participated in a feedback literacy program. After their placements, 27 students engaged in semi-structured interviews to explore their feedback experiences. Informed by workplace learning theory, interview transcripts were analysed using the framework method of qualitative analysis. Students reported reframing feedback as a process they could initiate and engage in, rather one they were subjected to. When they took an intentional stance, students noted that feedback conversations generated plans for improvement which they were enacting. However, students had to work hard against orthodox feedback expectations and habits in healthcare. They privileged intraprofessional supervisor feedback over interprofessional practitioners, patients, or peers. Findings suggest that student engagement with feedback can be augmented with focussed retraining. However, further research examining the structural and cultural influences on students’ capacity to be active in workplace feedback is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajjawi, R., Molloy, E., Bearman, M., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Contextual influences on feedback practices: An Ecological perspective. In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 129–143). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. A. M. (2012). Giving feedback on clinical skills: Are we starving our young? Journal of Graduate Medical Education,4(2), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-11-000295.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. C. (2010). State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Medical Education,44(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J., & Ellaway, R. H. (2016). Mapping the dark matter of context: A conceptual scoping review. Medical Education,50(8), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J., Ellaway, R. H., & Watling, C. (2018). The influence of workplace context on learning and teaching. In C. Delany & E. Molloy (Eds.), Learning and teaching in clinical contexts: A practical guide. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (1996). Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorising. Learning and Instruction,6(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(96)00006-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2006). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture, and Activity,13(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1301_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2008). Learning throughout working life: A relational interdependence between personal and social agency. British Journal of Educational Studies,56(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00394.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2009). Developing agentic professionals through practice-based pedagogies. Retrieved from Sydney, Australia: https://altf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Billett_S_Associate-Fellowship-Final-Report.pdf.

  • Billett, S. (2015). Readiness and learning in health care education. The Clinical Teacher,12, 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2016). Learning through health care work: Premises, contributions and practices. Medical Education,50(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., Cain, M., & Le, A. H. (2016). Augmenting higher education students’ work experiences: Preferred purposes and processes. Studies in Higher Education, 43, 1279–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1250073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bing-You, R. G., & Trowbridge, R. L. (2009). Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA,302(12), 1330–1331. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bing-You, R. M. D. M. M. B. A., Hayes, V. M. D., Varaklis, K. M. D. M., Trowbridge, R. M. D., Kemp, H. M., & McKelvy, D. M. A. M. L. S. (2017). Feedback for learners in medical education: What is known? A scoping review. Academic Medicine,92(9), 1346–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, H. G. J., Teunissen, P. W., Spruijt, A., Fokkema, J. P. I., van Beukelen, P., Jaarsma, D. A. D. C., et al. (2013). Clarifying students’ feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships. Medical Education,47(3), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013a). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013b). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2017). Students’ Experiences of Assessment for Learning. In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 113–126). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A., Bordage, G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Description, justification and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Medical Education,42(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02974.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delva, D., Sargeant, J., Miller, S., Holland, J., Alexiadis Brown, P., Leblanc, C., et al. (2013). Encouraging residents to seek feedback. Medical Teacher,35(12), e1625–e1631. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.806791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Armson, H., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., Mann, K., et al. (2012). Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Advances in Health Sciences Education,17(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnan, J. M., Petty, L. A., Georgitis, E., Martin, S., Chiu, E., Prochaska, M., et al. (2012). A systematic review: The effect of clinical supervision on patient and residency education outcomes. Academic Medicine,87(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824822cc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, C. J., Warner, J. R., Williams, K. M., Schallert, D. L., Chen, L.-H., Williamson, Z. H., et al. (2016). Deconstructing constructive criticism: The nature of academic emotions associated with constructive, positive, and negative feedback. Learning and Individual Differences,49, 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education,37(4), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.604951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research,77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (Eds.). (in press). The impact of feedback in higher education. Palgrave.

  • Iedema, R., Carroll, K., Collier, A., Hor, S.-Y., Mesman, J., & Wyer, M. (2019). Video-reflexive ethnography and healthcare improvement: Theory and application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilminster, S., Cottrell, D., Grant, J., & Jolly, B. (2007). AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision. Medical Teacher,29(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701210907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin,119(2), 254–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situation learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, E. (2009). Time to pause: Giving and receiving feedback in clinical education. In C. Delaney & E. Molloy (Eds.), Clinical education in the health professions: An educator’s guide. Chatswood: Elsevier Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, E., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Noble, C., Rudland, J., & Ryan, A. (in press). Challenging feedback myths: Involving learners and promoting longer-term effects. Medical Education.

  • Molloy, E. K., Borello, F., & Epstein, R. (2013). The impact of emotion in feedback. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, E., Lew, S., Woodward-Kron, R., Delaney, C., Dodds, A., Lavercombe, M., & Hughson, J. (2018). Medical student clinical placements as sites of learning and contribution. Retrieved from Melbourne.

  • Murdoch-Eaton, D., & Sargeant, J. (2012). Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students’ perceptions about feedback. Medical Education,46(7), 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04291.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J. M., Billett, S., Jolly, B., & Ockerby, C. M. (2009). Lost in translation: Barriers to learning in health professional clinical education. Learning in Health and Social Care,8(4), 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education,31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, C., & Hassell, K. (2008). Informal learning in the workplace: What are the environmental barriers for junior hospital pharmacists? International Journal of Pharmacy Practice,16(4), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1211/ijpp.16.4.0008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, C., Sly, C., Collier, L., Armit, L., Hilder, J., & Molloy, E. (2019). Enhancing feedback literacy in the workplace: A learner-centred approach. In S. Bilett, J. M. Newton, G. Rogers, & C. Noble (Eds.), Augmenting health and social care students’ clinical learning experiences: Outcomes and processes. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, B., Rust, C., & Price, M. (2016). A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,41(6), 938–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramani, S., Könings, K. D., Ginsburg, S., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2019). Feedback redefined: Principles and practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(5), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04874-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramani, S., Könings, K., Mann, K. V., & van der Vleuten, C. (2017a). Uncovering the unknown: A grounded theory study exploring the impact of self-awareness on the culture of feedback in residency education. Medical Teacher,39(10), 1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1353071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramani, S., Post, S. E., Könings, K., Mann, K., Katz, J. T., & van der Vleuten, C. (2017b). “It’s Just Not the Culture”: A qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback. Teaching and Learning in Medicine,29(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2016.1244014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking—Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, J. P., Lockyer, J. P., Mann, K. P., Holmboe, E. M. D., Silver, I. M. D. M. F., Armson, H. M. D., et al. (2015). Facilitated reflective performance feedback: Developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Academic Medicine,90(12), 1698–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, S., Ajjawi, R., Allbutt, H., Butler, J., Jindal-Snape, D., Morrison, J., et al. (2017). Balancing health care education and patient care in the UK workplace: A realist synthesis. Medical Education,51(8), 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education,76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telio, S., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2015). The “Educational Alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Academic Medicine,90(5), 609–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telio, S., Regehr, G., & Ajjawi, R. (2016). Feedback and the educational alliance: Examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Medical Education,50(9), 933–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen, P. W. M. D., Stapel, D. A. M. P., van der Vleuten, C. M. P., Scherpbier, A. M. D. P., Boor, K. M. D., & Scheele, F. M. D. P. (2009). Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Academic Medicine,84(7), 910–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, L. M., Ker, J. S., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Exploring the influence of context on feedback at medical school: A video-ethnography study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23(1), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9781-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, L., Rees, C., & Ker, J. (2014). Making sense of feedback experiences: A multi-school study of medical students’ narratives. Medical Education,48(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Leeuw, R. M., Teunissen, P. W., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2018). Broadening the scope of feedback to promote its relevance to workplace learning. Academic Medicine,93(4), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L. V., O’Brien, B. C., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect: Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education,51(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Lingard, L. (2012). Learning from clinical work: The roles of learning cues and credibility judgements. Medical Education,46(2), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04126.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Vanstone, M., & Lingard, L. (2013). Beyond individualism: Professional culture and its influence on feedback. Medical Education,47(6), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist,52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Parker, M. (2016). ‘It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it’: Barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2026–2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the students who participated in the study and acknowledge the funding provided by the Office of Learning and Teaching (Grant No. ID15-4902) to support this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christy Noble.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noble, C., Billett, S., Armit, L. et al. “It’s yours to take”: generating learner feedback literacy in the workplace. Adv in Health Sci Educ 25, 55–74 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09905-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09905-5

Keywords

Navigation