Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Food safety risks, disruptive events and alternative beef production: a case study of agricultural transition in Alberta

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A key focus for agri-food scholars today pertains to emerging “alternative food movements,” particularly their long-term viability, and their potential to induce transitions in our prevailing conventional global agri-food systems. One under-studied element in recent research on sustainability transitions more broadly is the role of disruptive events in the emergence or expansion of these movements. We present the findings of a case study of the effect of a sudden acute food safety crisis—bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease—on alternative beef production in the Province of Alberta, Canada. Employing the conceptual lens of Sustainability Transition Theory, we explore the perspectives of conventional and alternative beef producers, treating alternative beef production as a niche operating within the dominant regime of global industrial agri-business. Three key findings are presented here. First, food safety risks and disruptive events can emerge as a direct consequence of the socio-ecological contradictions embedded in industrial agriculture, representing an opportunity for expansion of agricultural niches. Second, certain features of socio-economic regimes can also contribute to niche emergence, such as an economic system that disenfranchises beef-producing families. Finally, our study highlights the high level of diversity among niche agents and the complex and nuanced nature of their support for the niche.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angel, D., and M.T. Rock. 2009. Environmental rationalities and the developmental state in East Asia: Prospects for a sustainability transition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76(2): 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1998. World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta, G.D., and W. Doppler. 2010. Farming differentiation in the rural-urban interface of the middle mountains, Nepal: Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) modeling. Journal of Agricultural Science 2(4): 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blue, G. 2008. If it ain’t Alberta, it ain’t Beef: Local food, regional identity, (inter)national politics. Food, Culture and Society: An International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 11(1): 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, R., and J. Cavanaugh. 2012. The development and agriculture paradigms transformed: Reflections from the small-scale organic rice fields of the Philippines. Journal of Peasant Studies 39(5): 1181–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brado, E. 2004. Cattle kingdom: Early ranching in Alberta. Edmonton: Heritage House Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzen, B., F.W. Geels, and K. Green (eds.). 2004a. System innovation and the transition to sustainability—Theory, evidence and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzen, B., F.W. Geels, P.S. Hofman, and K. Green. 2004b. Sociotechnical scenarios as a tool for transition policy: An example from the traffic and transport domain. In System innovation and the transition to sustainability—Theory, evidence and policy, ed. B. Elzen, F.W. Geels, and K. Green, 251–281. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foxon, T.J., G.P. Hammond, and P.J.G. Pearson. 2010. Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77(8): 1203–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31(8): 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F.W. 2005a. Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F.W. 2005b. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72(6): 681–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F.W., and J. Schot. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36(3): 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. 2012. Agroecology and shifting paradigms. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36(5): 499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haxeltine, A., L. Whitmarsh, N. Bergman, J. Rotmans, M. Schilperoord, and J. Köhler. 2008. A conceptual framework for transition modeling. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 3(1/2): 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert, M.P., R.A.A. Suurs, S.O. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R.E.H.M. Smits. 2007. Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analyzing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(4): 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, P.S., B. Elzen, and F.W. Geels. 2004. Socio-technical scenarios as a new tool to explore system innovations: Co-evolution of technology and society in the Netherlands’ energy system. Innovation: Management Policy and Practice 6(2): 344–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K.E., and D.J. Davidson. 2014. Adapting to food safety crises: Interpreting success and failure in the Canadian response to BSE. Food Policy 49(1): 250–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K.E. 2004. BSE and the Phillips Report: A cautionary tale about the uptake of ‘risk’. In The governance of knowledge, ed. N. Stehr, 161–186. New Jersey: Transaction Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L.V. 2010. The range men: Pioneer ranchers of Alberta. Edmonton: Heritage House Publishing Company Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen, C., A. Iles, and C. Bacon. 2012. Diversified farming systems: An agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and Society 17(4): 44–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, F. 2012. Using the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions to assess innovation policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79(2): 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamine, C. 2011. Transition pathways towards a robust ecologization of agriculture and the need for system redesign: Cases from organic farming and IPM. Journal of Rural Studies 27(2): 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, M. 2012. Environmental entrepreneurship in organic agriculture in Järna, Sweden. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36(2): 153–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawhon, M., and J.T. Murphy. 2011. Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology. Progress in Human Geography 36(3): 354–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Roy, D.G., and K.K. Klein. 2011. Mad cow chaos in Canada: Was it just bad luck or did government policies play a role? Canadian Public Policy/Analyses de Politiques 31(4): 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiss, W., M.G. Tyshenko, D. Krewski, N. Cashman, L. Lemyre, M. Al-Zoughool, and C. Amaratunga. 2010. Managing the risks of bovine spongiform encephalopathy: A Canadian perspective. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 14(5): 381–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R.E., and M.G. Tyshenko. 2009. The impact of social amplification and attenuation of risk and the public reaction to mad cow disease in Canada. Risk Analysis 29(5): 714–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, G. 2001. BSE and the regulation of risk. The Modern Law Review 64(5): 730–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S., and D. Carpenter (eds.). 2010. Agriculture, biodiversity and markets: Livelihoods and agroecology in comparative perspective. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, R. 2014. Transnational discursive opportunities and social movement risk frames opposing GMOs. Social Movement Studies, 1–20.

  • Mount, P., and J. Smithers. 2014. The conventionalization of local food: Farm reflections on local, alternative beef marketing groups. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 4(3): 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Farmers Union (NFU). 2008. The farm crisis and the cattle sector: Toward a new analysis and new solutions. Saskatoon: National Farmers Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, D., and A.K. Boame. 2009. Mad cow disease and beef trade, http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-621-m/11-621-m2003005-eng.htm. Accessed 6 Mar 2015.

  • Quinion, A., P.W. Chirwa, F.K. Akinnifesi, and O.C. Ajayi. 2010. Do agroforestry technologies improve the livelihoods of resource poor farmers? Evidence from Kasungu and Machinga districts of Malawi. Agroforestry Systems 80(3): 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rios, A., H.J. Sanchez-Perez, and J. Hellin. 2007. Child nutrition in Mexico under conventional and organic agriculture. LEISA Magazine 23(3): 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, P.M., and M.E. Martinez-Torres. 2012. Rural social movements and agroecology: Context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society 17(3): 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., and G.P. Walker. 2007. Caution! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice and transition management. Environmental Planning A 39(4): 763–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34(10): 1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. 2009. The financial picture of farms in Canada; 2006 Census of agriculture. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/ca-ra2006/articles/finpicture-portrait-eng.htm#A5. Accessed 1 Mar 2013.

  • Statistics Canada. 2014. Canadian agriculture at a glance: census year 2011 (96-325-X). http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/96-325-x/2007000/t/6000061-eng.htm. Accessed 5 Mar 2015.

  • Stull, D.D., and M.J. Broadway. 2013. Slaughterhouse blues: The meat and poultry industry in North America, 2nd ed. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschner, N., A. McDonald, T.J. Foxon, and J. Paavola. 2012. Integrated transitions toward sustainability: The case of water and energy policies in Israel. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79(3): 457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, G.C. 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12): 817–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbong, G., and F.W. Geels. 2007. The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy 35(2): 1025–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, B. 2012. Feeding the planet without destroying it. Time Magazine (May 22). http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2115423,00.html. Accessed 6 Mar 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the time and the insights of individual beef producers and processors in Alberta who participated in this study. Major funding was provided by the Alberta Prion Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra J. Davidson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davidson, D.J., Jones, K.E. & Parkins, J.R. Food safety risks, disruptive events and alternative beef production: a case study of agricultural transition in Alberta. Agric Hum Values 33, 359–371 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9609-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9609-8

Keywords

Navigation