Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utility of Using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a Screening Tool for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND) In Multi-Ethnic Malaysia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study determines the optimal cut-off scores for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to detect HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) in a multi-ethnic Malaysian HIV-positive cohort by developing demographically corrected normative standards among 283 HIV-negative community-based controls with overlapping demographic characteristics. The norms (corrected for age, sex, education, ethnicity) were applied to 342 HIV-positive virally suppressed individuals on cART. Impairment rates were classified using the Global Deficit Score (GDS ≥ .5) method. The MoCA was also scored according to the recommended cut-off of ≤ 26, and functional decline was applied to both impairment definitions to classify HAND per the Frascati criteria. The ≤ 26 cut-off considerably overestimated cognitive impairment in both samples (59.4% HIV-negative; 69.3% HIV-positive). In contrast, corrected scores yielded impairment rates consistent with what has been reported internationally in virally suppressed cohorts (23.4% with 83.3% mild impairment, 16.7% moderate impairment). A supplemental file allowing the computation of corrected MoCA scores and impairment status is included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heaton R, Clifford D, Franklin D, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy CHARTER Study. Neurology. 2010;75:2087–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis RJ, Deutsch R, Heaton RK, et al. Neurocognitive impairment is an independent risk factor for death in HIV infection. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:416–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanmarti M, Ibáñez L, Huertas S, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. J Mol Psychiatry. 2014;2:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tozzi V, Balestra P, Bellagamba R, et al. Persistence of neuropsychologic deficits despite long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-related neurocognitive impairment: prevalence and risk factors. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45:174–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Woods SP, Moore DJ, Weber E, Grant I. Cognitive neuropsychology of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009;19:152–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker J, et al. Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurology. 2007;69:1789–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kamminga J, Cysique LA, Lu G, Batchelor J, Brew BJ. Validity of cognitive screens for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: a systematic review and an informed screen selection guide. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013;10:342–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan EE, Woods SP, Scott JC, et al. Predictive validity of demographically adjusted normative standards for the HIV Dementia Scale. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008;30:83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasbun R, Eraso J, Ramireddy S, et al. Screening for neurocognitive impairment in HIV individuals: the utility of the montreal cognitive assessment test. J AIDS Clin Res. 2012;3:186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koski L, Brouillette MJ, Lalonde R, et al. Computerized testing augments pencil-and-paper tasks in measuring HIV-associated mild cognitive impairment(*). HIV Med. 2011;12:472–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Freitas S, Simões MR, Alves L, Santana I. Montreal cognitive assessment: influence of sociodemographic and health variables. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;27:165–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaur D, Kumar G, Singh AK. Quick screening of cognitive function in Indian multiple sclerosis patients using Montreal cognitive assessment test-short version. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2013;16:585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Robbins RN, Joska JA, Thomas KG, et al. Exploring the utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to detect HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: the challenge and need for culturally valid screening tests in South Africa. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27:437–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fettig J, Swaminathan M, Murrill CS, Kaplan JE. Global epidemiology of HIV. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014;28:323–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan LG, Kandiah N, Chua A. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) in a South Asian population-contextual application of the 2007 criteria. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng TP, Feng L, Lim WS, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment for screening mild cognitive impairment: variations in test performance and scores by education in Singapore. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015;39:176–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ministry of Health Malaysia: The global AIDS response progress Report 2015: HIV/STI Section 2016.

  19. UNAIDS: Global AIDS Response Progress Report Malaysia 2015, 2015.

  20. Incidence of Poverty by Ethnic Group, Strata and State, Malaysia, 1970–2014.

  21. Hwang JC, Sadiq K. Legislating separation and solidarity in plural societies: the Chinese in Indonesia and Malaysia. Natl Ethn Politics. 2010;16:192–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Blackstone K, Moore D, Franklin D, et al. Defining neurocognitive impairment in HIV: deficit scores versus clinical ratings. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26:894–908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Copersino ML, Fals-Stewart W, Fitzmaurice G, et al. Rapid cognitive screening of patients with substance use disorders. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;17:337–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoops S, Nazem S, Siderowf AD, et al. Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2009;73:1738–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Heaton RK, Marcotte TD, Mindt MR, et al. The impact of HIV-associated neuropsychological impairment on everyday functioning. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10:317–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carey CL, Woods SP, Gonzalez R, et al. Predictive validity of global deficit scores in detecting neuropsychological impairment in HIV infection. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004;26:307–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pumpradit W, Ananworanich J, Lolak S, et al. Neurocognitive impairment and psychiatric comorbidity in well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus-infected Thais from the 2NN Cohort Study. J Neurovirol. 2010;16:76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ku NS, Lee Y, Ahn JY, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder in HIV-infected Koreans: the Korean NeuroAIDS Project. HIV Med. 2014;15:470–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelly CM, van Oosterhout JJ, Ngwalo C, et al. HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) in Malawian adults and effect on adherence to combination anti-retroviral therapy: a cross sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e98962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ene L, Franklin DR, Burlacu R, et al. Neurocognitive functioning in a Romanian cohort of young adults with parenterally-acquired HIV-infection during childhood. J Neurovirol. 2014;20:496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Heaton RK, Taylor M, Manly J: Demographic eVects and use of demographically corrected norms with the WAIS-III and WMS-III. Clin Interpret WAIS-III WMS-III. 2003;181.

  32. Gates TM, Cysique LA. The chronicity of HIV infection should drive the research strategy of neuroHIV treatment studies: a critical review. CNS Drugs. 2016;30:53–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tey NP, Siraj SB, Kamaruzzaman SB, et al. Aging in Multi-ethnic Malaysia. Gerontologist. 2016;56:603–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nell V. Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment: theory and practice. New York: Psychology Press; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Graf C. The Lawton instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale. Gerontologist. 2009;9:179–86.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ng T-P, Niti M, Chiam P-C, Kua E-H. Physical and cognitive domains of the instrumental activities of daily living: validation in a multiethnic population of Asian older adults. J Gerontol Ser A. 2006;61:726–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. McArthur JC. HIV dementia: an evolving disease. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;157:3–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cysique LA, Bain MP, Lane TA, Brew BJ. Management issues in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. 2012.

  39. Valcour V, Paul R, Chiao S, Wendelken LA, Miller B. Screening for cognitive impairment in human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:836–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hasbun R, Eraso J, Ramireddy S, et al. Screening for neurocognitive impairment in HIV individuals: the utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test. J AIDS Clin Res. 2012;3:186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the University of Malaya High Impact Research grants HIR/MOHE H-20001-E000001 (RR, AK, SFO), UM.0000099/HIR.C3 (SK, AVC) and by the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award number T32AI114398 (TM). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reena Rajasuriar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Malaya and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

It was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 146 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukherjee, T., Sakthivel, R., Fong, H.Y. et al. Utility of Using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a Screening Tool for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND) In Multi-Ethnic Malaysia. AIDS Behav 22, 3226–3233 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2073-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2073-x

Keywords

Navigation