Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A novel sustainable multi-objective optimization model for forward and reverse logistics system under demand uncertainty

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper aims to present a multi-product, multi-stage, multi-period, and multi-objective, probabilistic mixed-integer linear programming model for a sustainable forward and reverse logistics network problem. It looks at original and return products to determine both flows in the supply chain—forward and reverse—simultaneously. Besides, to establish centres of forward and reverse logistics activities and make a decision for transportation strategy in a more close-to-real manner, the demand is considered uncertain. We attempt to represent all major dimensions in the objective functions: First objective function is minimizing the processing, transportation, fixed establishing cost and costs of CO2 emission as environmental impacts. Furthermore, the processing time of reverse logistics activities is developed as the second objective function. Finally, in the third objective function, it is tried to maximize social responsibility. Indeed, a complete sustainable approach is developed in this paper. In addition, this model provides novel environmental constraint and social matters in the objective functions as its innovation and contribution. Another contribution of this paper is using probabilistic programming to manage uncertain parameters. Moreover, a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is configured to achieve Pareto front solutions. The performance of the NSGA-II is compared with a multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) by proposing 10 appropriate test problems according to five comparison metrics using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to validate the modeling approach. Overall, according to the results of ANOVA and the comparison metrics, the performance of NSGA-II algorithm is more satisfying compared with that of MOPSO algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, S., & Singh, R. K. (2019). Analyzing disposition decisions for sustainable reverse logistics: Triple bottom line approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150, 104448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azizi, V., Hu, G., & Mokari, M. (2020). A two-stage stochastic programming model for multi-period reverse logistics network design with lot-sizing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 143, 106397.

  • Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2018). Integrating and extending data and decision tools for Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider selection. Computers & Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, S., & Bhattacharya, R. (2014). Solving a tri-objective supply chain problem with modified NSGA-II algorithm. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(1), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banguera, L. A., Sepúlveda, J. M., Ternero, R., Vargas, M., & Vásquez, Ó. C. (2018). Reverse logistics network design under extended producer responsibility: The case of out-of-use tires in the Gran Santiago city of Chile. International Journal of Production Economics, 205, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B. M. (1999). Designing the green supply chain. Logistics information management., 12(4), 332–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, R. (2000). Genetic algorithms and engineering optimization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coello, C. A. C., Lamont, G. B., & Van Veldhuizen, D. A. (2007). Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems (Vol. 5). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbari, J. D., Kannan, D., Agarwal, V., & Jha, P. C. (2019). Fuzzy criteria programming approach for optimising the TBL performance of closed loop supply chain network design problem. Annals of Operations Research, 273(1–2), 693–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K. (2002). A fast and elitist multi objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dev, N. K., Shankar, R., & Qaiser, F. H. (2020). Industry 4.0 and circular economy: Operational excellence for sustainable reverse supply chain performance. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diabat, A., Abdallah, T., Al-Refaie, A., Svetinovic, D., & Govindan, K. (2012). Strategic closed-loop facility location problem with carbon market trading. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(2), 398–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, P., Mishra, A., Khandelwal, S., & Katthawala, I. (2020). A multiobjective optimization model for sustainable reverse logistics in Indian E-commerce market. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, R. C., & Kennedy, J. (1995). A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on micro machine and human science, Nagoya, Japan (pp. 39–43).

  • Fallah-Mehdipour, E., Haddad, O. B., Tabari, M. M. R., & Mariño, M. A. (2012). Extraction of decision alternatives in construction management projects: Application and adaptation of NSGA-II and MOPSO. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2794–2803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi, M., & Govindan, K. (2017). Integrated forward/reverse logistics network design under uncertainty with pricing for collection of used products. Annals of Operations Research, 253(1), 193–225.

  • Fattahi, M., & Govindan, K. (2020). Data-driven rolling horizon approach for dynamic design of supply chain distribution networks under disruption and demand uncertainty. Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, M., Krikke, H. R., Dekker, R., & Flapper, S. D. P. (2000). A characterization of logistics networks for product recovery. Omega, 28(6), 653–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garetti, M., & Taisch, M. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing: Trends and research challenges. Production Planning & Control, 23(2–3), 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, R., & Jackson, T. (2004). Supply loops and their constraints: The industrial ecologie of recycling and reuse. California Management Review, 46(2), 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Jha, P. C., & Garg, K. (2016a). Product recovery optimization in closed-loop supply chain to improve sustainability in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1463–1486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Mina, H., Esmaeili, A., & Gholami-Zanjani, S. M. (2020a). An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Paam, P., & Abtahi, A. R. (2016b). A fuzzy multi-objective optimization model for sustainable reverse logistics network design. Ecological Indicators, 67, 753–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Rajeev, A., Padhi, S. S., & Pati, R. K. (2020b). Supply chain sustainability and performance of firms: A meta-analysis of the literature. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 137, 101923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Shankar, K. M., & Kannan, D. (2020c). Achieving sustainable development goals through identifying and analyzing barriers to industrial sharing economy: A framework development. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., & Soleimani, H. (2017). A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: A Journal of Cleaner Production focus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., & Kannan, D. (2015). Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 603–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Shaw, M., & Majumdar, A. (2021). Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123075.

  • Guo, J., Liu, X., & Jo, J. (2017a). Dynamic joint construction and optimal operation strategy of multi-period reverse logistics network: A case study of Shanghai apparel E-commerce enterprises. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(3), 819–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J., Wang, X., Fan, S., & Gen, M. (2017b). Forward and reverse logistics network and route planning under the environment of low-carbon emissions: A case study of Shanghai fresh food E-commerce enterprises. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 106, 351–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., & Fard, A. M. F. (2019). Sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design with discount supposition. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(9), 5343–5377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini-Motlagh, S. M., Ebrahimi, S., & Zirakpourdehkordi, R. (2020). Coordination of dual-function acquisition price and corporate social responsibility in a sustainable closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johari, M., & Hosseini-Motlagh, S. M. (2019). Coordination of social welfare, collecting, recycling and pricing decisions in a competitive sustainable closed-loop supply chain: A case for lead-acid battery. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03292-1.

  • Jouzdani, J., & Govindan, K. (2021). On the sustainable perishable food supply chain network design: A dairy products case to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123060.

  • Kannan, D., Mina, H., Nosrati-Abarghooee, S., & Khosrojerdi, G. (2020a). Sustainable circular supplier selection: A novel hybrid approach. The Science of the Total Environment, 722, 137936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, D., Moazzeni, S., Darmain, S. M., & Afrasiabi, A. (2020b). A hybrid approach based on MCDM methods and Monte Carlo simulation for sustainable evaluation of potential solar sites in east of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122368.

  • Khalili-Damghani, K., Abtahi, A. R., & Ghasemi, A. (2015). A new bi-objective location-routing problem for distribution of perishable products: Evolutionary computation approach. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms in Operations Research, 14(3), 287–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V. N. S. A., Kumar, V., Brady, M., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Simpson, M. (2017). Resolving forward-reverse logistics multi-period model using evolutionary algorithms. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 458–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Kannan, D., Jha, P. C., Garg, K., Darbari, J., & Agarwal, N. (2018). Design of a multi echelon product recovery embeded reverse logistics network for multi products and multi periods. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2776-4.

  • Liao, T. Y. (2018). Reverse logistics network design for product recovery and remanufacturing. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 60, 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswari, H., Yudoko, G., & Adhiutama, A. (2017). Toward sustainable reverse logistics implementation: A conceptual framework of the quattro bottom line approach. In 2017 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM) (pp. 1377–1381). IEEE.

  • Mardani, A., Kannan, D., Hooker, R. E., Ozkul, S., Alrasheedi, M., & Tirkolaee, E. B. (2020). Evaluation of green and sustainable supply chain management using structural equation modelling: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavi, R. K., Goh, M., & Zarbakhshnia, N. (2017). Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91(5–8), 2401–2418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9880-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S., & Singh, S. P. (2020). A stochastic disaster-resilient and sustainable reverse logistics model in big data environment. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03573-0.

  • Moktadir, M. A., Rahman, T., Ali, S. M., Nahar, N., & Paul, S. K. (2019). Examining barriers to reverse logistics practices in the leather footwear industry. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03449-y.

  • Park, K., Kim, J., Ko, Y. D., & Song, B. D. (2020). Redesign of reverse logistics network with managerial decisions on the minimum quality level and remanufacturing policy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–14.

  • Parsopoulos, K. E., & Vrahatis, M. N. (2002). Particle swarm optimization method in multi objective problems. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2002 symposium on applied computing (ACM SAC 2002), Madrid, Spain (pp. 603–607).

  • Paydar, M. M., & Olfati, M. (2018). Designing and solving a reverse logistics network for polyethylene terephthalate bottles. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishvaee, M. S., Farahani, R. Z., & Dullaert, W. (2010). A memetic algorithm for bi-objective integrated forward/reverse logistics network design. Computers & Operations Research, 37(6), 1100–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbani, M., Heidari, R., & Yazdanparast, R. (2019). A stochastic multi-period industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem: Integrating NSGA-II and Monte Carlo simulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(3), 945–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahdar, M. H., Heidari, M., Ataei, A., & Choi, J. K. (2016). Modeling and optimization of R-717 and R-134a ice thermal energy storage air conditioning systems using NSGA-II and MOPSO algorithms. Applied Thermal Engineering, 96, 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi, K., Noorizadeh, A., Kannan, D., & Cullinane, K. (2020). Applying the triple bottom line in sustainable supplier selection: A meta-review of the state-of-the-art. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122001.

  • Reddy, K. N., Kumar, A., & Ballantyne, E. E. (2019). A three-phase heuristic approach for reverse logistics network design incorporating carbon footprint. International Journal of Production Research, 57(19), 6090–6114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Y., Wang, C., Li, B., Yu, C., & Zhang, S. (2020). A genetic algorithm for fuzzy random and low-carbon integrated forward/reverse logistics network design. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(7), 2005–2025.

  • Rogers, D. S., & Tibben-Lembke, R. (1999). Going backwards: Reverse logistics trends and practices. Reno, NV: Reverse Logistics Executive Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roghanian, E., & Pazhoheshfar, P. (2014). An optimization model for reverse logistics network under stochastic environment by using genetic algorithm. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(3), 348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, J. R. (1995). (Master’s thesis) Fault tolerant design using single and multi-criteria genetic algorithms optimization. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

  • Soleimani, H., Govindan, K., Saghafi, H., & Jafari, H. (2017). Fuzzy multi-objective sustainable and green closed-loop supply chain network design. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 109, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J., Li, C., Tsai, S. B., Lu, H., Liu, A., & Chen, Q. (2018). A sustainable closed-loop supply chain decision mechanism in the electronic sector. Sustainability, 10(4), 1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleizadeh, A. A., Haji-Sami, E., & Noori-daryan, M. (2020). A robust optimization model for coordinating pharmaceutical reverse supply chains under return strategies. Annals of Operations Research, 291, 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03200-7.

  • Tavana, M., Khalili-Damghani, K., & Abtahi, A. R. (2013). A fuzzy multidimensional multiple-choice knapsack model for project portfolio selection using an evolutionary algorithm. Annals of Operations Research, 206(1), 449–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Huang, L., & He, C. X. (2019). A multi-objective and multi-period optimization model for urban healthcare waste’s reverse logistics network design. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-019-00499-7.

  • Yu, H., & Solvang, W. D. (2017). A carbon-constrained stochastic optimization model with augmented multi-criteria scenario-based risk-averse solution for reverse logistics network design under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1248–1267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandkarimkhani, S., Mina, H., Biuki, M., & Govindan, K. (2020). A chance constrained fuzzy goal programming approach for perishable pharmaceutical supply chain network design. Annals of Operations Research, 1–28.

  • Zarbakhshnia, N., & Jaghdani, T. J. (2018). Sustainable supplier evaluation and selection with a novel two-stage DEA model in the presence of uncontrollable inputs and undesirable outputs: A plastic case study. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 97(5–8), 2933–2945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2138-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarbakhshnia, N., Soleimani, H., & Ghaderi, H. (2018). Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria. Applied Soft Computing, 65, 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarbakhshnia, N., Soleimani, H., Goh, M., & Razavi, S. S. (2019). A novel multi-objective model for green forward and reverse logistics network design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1304–1316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarbakhshnia, N., Wu, Y., Govindan, K., & Soleimani, H. (2020). A novel hybrid multiple attribute decision-making approach for outsourcing sustainable reverse logistics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitzle, E., Thiele, L., Eiben, A. E., Back, T., Schoenauer, M., & Schwefel, H. P. (1998). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms a comparative case study. In: 5th international conference on parallel problem solving from nature (PPSN-V), Berlin, Germany (pp. 292–301).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Devika Kannan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarbakhshnia, N., Kannan, D., Kiani Mavi, R. et al. A novel sustainable multi-objective optimization model for forward and reverse logistics system under demand uncertainty. Ann Oper Res 295, 843–880 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03744-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03744-z

Keywords

Navigation