Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers are a major complication of diabetes and are often colonised by complex bacterial communities, where Staphylococcus aureus is frequently co-present with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These bacteria interact through quorum sensing, encoded in S. aureus by the accessory gene regulator (agr). Typing and copy number of S. aureus agr were assessed here to give insights on strain variability and possible interspecies influence. As agr is classified in four genetic groups, agr-I, agr-II, agr-III and agr-IV, the agr type of 23 S. aureus diabetic foot ulcers isolates was evaluated by PCR and gene copy number determined by qPCR, including in S. aureus present in polymicrobial infections. agr-I and agr-II were found to be present in 52 and 39% of the isolates, respectively. In two isolates, no agr type was identified, and types III and IV were not detected. Interestingly, agr-II copy number was higher in dual suspensions than in S. aureus single suspension. We conclude that agr type I was the most frequent in clinical centers in Lisbon, and variations in agr-I and agr-II copy numbers were strain specific. Variations in agr copy number in dual suspensions suggests that P. aeruginosa may influence S. aureus agr-II gene regulation, confirming an interaction between these two bacteria. This is a first approach to characterise agr variation in S. aureus from diabetic foot ulcers in vitro.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Abdelnour A, Arvidson S, Bremell T, Ryden C, Tarkowski A (1993) The accessory gene regulator (agr) controls Staphylococcus aureus virulence in a murine arthritis model. Infect Immun 61:3879–3885
Bio-Rad Laboratories (2006) Real-time PCR applications guide. http://www.gene-quantification.com/real-time-pcr-guide-bio-rad.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2018
Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Santagati M, Demelio V, Spina D, Nicoletti G, Stefani S (2007) agr-Genotyping and transcriptional analysis of biofilm-producing Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 51:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00298.x
Cheung AL, Eberhardt KJ, Chung E, Yeaman MR, Sullam PM, Ramos M, Bayer AS (1994) Diminished virulence of a sar-/agr- mutant of Staphylococcus aureus in the rabbit model of endocarditis. J Clin Invest 94:1815–1822. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117530
Cirz RT, Chin JK, Andes DR, de Crecy-Lagard V, Craig WA, Romesberg FE (2005) Inhibition of mutation and combating the evolution of antibiotic resistance. PLoS Biol 3:e176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030176
Citron DM, Goldstein EJ, Merriam CV, Lipsky BA, Abramson MA (2007) Bacteriology of moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infections and in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents. J Clin Microbiol 45:2819–2828. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00551-07
DeLeon S, Clinton A, Fowler H, Everett J, Horswill AR, Rumbaugh KP (2014) Synergistic interactions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro wound model. Infect Immun 82:4718–4728. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.02198-14
Djahmi N et al (2013) Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from inpatients with infected diabetic foot ulcers in an Algerian University Hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E398–E404. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12199
Filkins LM, Graber JA, Olson DG, Dolben EL, Lynd LR, Bhuju S, O’Toole GA (2015) Coculture of Staphylococcus aureus with Pseudomonas aeruginosa drives S. aureus towards fermentative metabolism and reduced viability in a cystic fibrosis model. J Bacteriol 197:2252–2264. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00059-15
Francois P et al (2006) Rapid Staphylococcus aureus agr type determination by a novel multiplex real-time quantitative PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 44:1892–1895. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.5.1892-1895.2006
Frydenlund MC, Hossein KSM, Krogh JH, Ingmer H, Dorrestein PC, Jelsbak L (2016) Evolution of metabolic divergence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during long-term infection facilitates a proto-cooperative interspecies interaction. ISME J 10:1323–1336. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.220
Ghasemian A et al (2014) Acessory gene regulator specificity groups among Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospitalized children. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis 3:e16096. https://doi.org/10.5812/pedinfect.16096
Gillaspy AF, Hickmon SG, Skinner RA, Thomas JR, Nelson CL, Smeltzer MS (1995) Role of the accessory gene regulator (agr) in pathogenesis of staphylococcal osteomyelitis. Infect Immun 63:3373–3380
Gomes AR, Vinga S, Zavolan M, de Lencastre H (2005) Analysis of the genetic variability of virulence-related loci in epidemic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:366–379. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.1.366-379.2005
Gordon CP, Williams P, Chan WC (2013) Attenuating Staphylococcus aureus virulence gene regulation: a medicinal chemistry perspective. J Med Chem 56:1389–1404. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm3014635
Grundmeier M et al (2010) Staphylococcal strains vary greatly in their ability to induce an inflammatory response in endothelial cells. J Infect Dis 201:871–880. https://doi.org/10.1086/651023
Hastings PJ, Lupski JR, Rosenberg SM, Ira G (2009) Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat Rev Genet 10:551–564. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2593
Hotterbeekx A, Kumar-Singh S, Goossens H, Malhotra-Kumar S (2017) In vivo and In vitro Interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus spp. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00106
Ikonomidis A, Vasdeki A, Kristo I, Maniatis AN, Tsakris A, Malizos KN, Pournaras S (2009) Association of biofilm formation and methicillin-resistance with accessory gene regulator (agr) loci in Greek Staphylococcus aureus clones. Microb Pathog 47:341–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2009.09.011
Jarraud S et al (2002) Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun 70:631–641
Kavanaugh JS, Horswill AR (2016) Impact of environmental cues on staphylococcal quorum sensing and biofilm development. J Biol Chem 291:12556–12564. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R116.722710
Khan BA, Yeh AJ, Cheung GY, Otto M (2015) Investigational therapies targeting quorum-sensing for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 24:689–704. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.2015.1019062
Korgaonkar A, Trivedi U, Rumbaugh KP, Whiteley M (2013) Community surveillance enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence during polymicrobial infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:1059–1064. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214550110
Le KY, Otto M (2015) Quorum-sensing regulation in staphylococci—an overview. Front Microbiol 6:1174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01174
Liu GY (2009) Molecular pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infection. Pediatr Res 65:71R–77R. https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819dc44d
Melake N et al (2014) Prevalence of agr specificity groups among in vitro biofilm forming methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from nasal carriers. Int J Microbiol Res 5:76–84. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ijmr.2014.5.2.83184
Mendes JJ, Marques-Costa A, Vilela C, Neves J, Candeias N, Cavaco-Silva P, Melo-Cristino J (2012) Clinical and bacteriological survey of diabetic foot infections in Lisbon. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 95:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.001
Millar BC, Jiru X, Moore JE, Earle JA (2000) A simple and sensitive method to extract bacterial, yeast and fungal DNA from blood culture material. J Microbiol Methods 42:139–147
Mitchell G et al (2010) Staphylococcus aureus sigma B-dependent emergence of small-colony variants and biofilm production following exposure to Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline-N-oxide. BMC Microbiol 10:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-33
Montgomery CP, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS (2010) Importance of the global regulators Agr and SaeRS in the pathogenesis of CA-MRSA USA300 infection. PLoS ONE 5:e15177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015177
Mottola C, Semedo-Lemsaddek T, Mendes JJ, Melo-Cristino J, Tavares L, Cavaco-Silva P, Oliveira M (2016) Molecular typing, virulence traits and antimicrobial resistance of diabetic foot staphylococci. J Biomed Sci 23:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-016-0250-7
Nair N, Biswas R, Gotz F, Biswas L (2014) Impact of Staphylococcus aureus on pathogenesis in polymicrobial infections. Infect Immun 82:2162–2169. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00059-14
Novick RP, Geisinger E (2008) Quorum sensing in staphylococci. Annu Rev Genet 42:541–564. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091640
Pader V, James EH, Painter KL, Wigneshweraraj S, Edwards AM (2014) The Agr quorum-sensing system regulates fibronectin binding but not hemolysis in the absence of a functional electron transport chain. Infect Immun 82:4337–4347. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.02254-14
Peng HL, Novick RP, Kreiswirth B, Kornblum J, Schlievert P (1988) Cloning, characterization, and sequencing of an accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 170:4365–4372
Rathur HM, Boulton AJ (2007) The diabetic foot. Clin Dermatol 25:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.09.015
Riesenfeld C, Everett M, Piddock LJ, Hall BG (1997) Adaptive mutations produce resistance to ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:2059–2060
Sakoulas G et al (2003) Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) group II: is there a relationship to the development of intermediate-level glycopeptide resistance? J Infect Dis 187:929–938. https://doi.org/10.1086/368128
Schirrmeister BE, Dalquen DA, Anisimova M, Bagheri HC (2012) Gene copy number variation and its significance in cyanobacterial phylogeny. BMC Microbiol 12:177. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-177
Shopsin B et al (2003) Prevalence of agr specificity groups among Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing children and their guardians. J Clin Microbiol 41:456–459
Singh R, Ray P (2014) Quorum sensing-mediated regulation of staphylococcal virulence and antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol 9:669–681. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.14.31
Tan L, Li SR, Jiang B, Hu XM, Li S (2018) Therapeutic targeting of the Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) system. Front Microbiol 9:55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00055
Tang YC, Amon A (2013) Gene copy-number alterations: a cost–benefit analysis. Cell 152:394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.043
Vindel A et al (2009) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Spain: molecular epidemiology and utility of different typing methods. J Clin Microbiol 47:1620–1627. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01579-08
Vuong C, Kocianova S, Yao Y, Carmody AB, Otto M (2004) Increased colonization of indwelling medical devices by quorum-sensing mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vivo. J Infect Dis 190:1498–1505. https://doi.org/10.1086/424487
Waters CM, Bassler BL (2005) Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:319–346. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001
Xiong YQ, Van Wamel W, Nast CC, Yeaman MR, Cheung AL, Bayer AS (2002) Activation and transcriptional interaction between agr RNAII and RNAIII in Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in an experimental endocarditis model. J Infect Dis 186:668–677. https://doi.org/10.1086/342046
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [Project UID/CVT/00276/2013, and Project PTDC/SAU-MIC/122816/2010—Biofilms in diabetic foot: microbial virulence characterization and cross-talk of major isolates], The Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal (CIISA), and Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matias, C., Serrano, I., Van-Harten, S. et al. Polymicrobial interactions influence the agr copy number in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from diabetic foot ulcers. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 111, 2225–2232 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1103-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-018-1103-z