Skip to main content
Log in

The internationalization of new ventures in an emerging economy: The shifting role of industry concentration

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the influence of firm rivalry within an industry on the internationalization of new ventures in an emerging economy. Drawing on industrial organization and institutional theories, it was hypothesized that the influence of industry concentration (an index of firm rivalry) on new venture internationalization changes with the deepening of economic liberalization processes. An analysis of new ventures from 67 Indian industries from 1996 to 2014 suggests that the relation between industry concentration and new venture internationalization shifts gradually from a U-shaped relation to an inverted U-shaped relation during this time period. Implications for the generalizability of research in an emerging economy across time are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The 2015/2016 GEM Report notes that the countries with the highest levels of necessity-based motives were Macedonia followed by Guatemala, Panama, Brazil, and Egypt. On the other hand, Sweden, Luxembourg, and Switzerland led the countries at the lowest levels of necessity-based motives and started businesses based on opportunities that were foreseen and opted into.

  2. http://www.exim-policy.com retrieved on 15th March 2016

References

  • Acedo, F. J., & Jones, M. V. 2007. Speed of internationalization and entrepreneurial cognition: Insights and a comparison between international new ventures, exporters and domestic firms. Journal of World Business, 42(3): 236–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnihotri, A. 2013. Determinants of acquisitions: An Indian perspective. Management Research Review, 36(9): 882–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. 2012. When can you safely ignore multicollinearity? Statistical horizons. http://statisticalhorizons.com/multicollinearity [26 April 2016].

  • Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W. P. 1993. Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1): 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S., Evers, N., & Kuivalainen, O. 2014. International new ventures: Rapid internationalization across different industry contexts. European Business Review, 26(5): 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. S. 1951. Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing, 1936–1940. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65(3): 293–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basant, R., & Mishra, P. 2013. Concentration and other determinants of innovative efforts in Indian manufacturing sector: A dynamic panel data analysis. In Working paper 2013-02-01. Ahmedabad, India: Indian Institute of Management Available at: http://vslir.iimahd.ernet.in:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11718/11411/2013-02-01rakeshbasant.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basant, R., & Saha, S. N. 2010. Determinants of entry in the Indian manufacturing sector. Technology Operations Management, 1(1): 11–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belleflamme, P., & Peitz, M. 2015. Industrial organization: Markets and strategies. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Besanko, D., Dranove, D., & Shanley, M. 1996. The economics of strategy. New York, NY:Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaumik, S. K., Driffield, N., & Pal, S. 2009. Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3): 437–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggadike, E. R. 1979. Corporate diversification: Entry, strategy, and performance. Boston, MA:Division of Research, Graduate School of Business, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloodgood, J. M., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. 1996. The internationalization of new high-potential U.S. ventures: Antecedents and outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(4): 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. P., & Wiersema, M. F. 2004. Modeling limited dependent variables: Methods and guidelines for researchers in strategic management. In research methodology in strategy and management. Oxford, UK:Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. P., & Wiersema, M. F. 2005. Foreign based competition and corporate diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1153–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneel, J., Yli-Renko, H., & Clarysse, B. 2010. Learning from experience and learning from others: How congenital and interorganizational learning substitute for experiential learning in young firm internationalization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4: 164–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. 2008. Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Filtotchev, I., Si, S., & Wright, M. 2013. Entrepreneurship and strategy in emerging economies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7: 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. C., Haggard, K. S., Hmieleski, K. M., & Zahra, S. A. 2010. A study of the moderating effects of firm age at internationalization on firm survival and short-term growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4: 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. 1987. American industry: Structure, conduct, performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T., & Knight, G. 2015. The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chari, M. D., & David, P. 2012. Sustaining superior performance in an emerging economy: An empirical test in the Indian context. Strategic Management Journal, 33(2): 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Tse, D. K. 2001. China’s transition and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittoor, R., Kale, P., & Puranam, P. 2015. Business groups in developing capital markets: Towards a complementarity perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9): 1277–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittoor, R., Sarkar, M., Ray, S., & Aulakh, P. S. 2009. Third-world copycats to emerging multinationals: Institutional changes and organizational transformation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Organization Science, 20(1): 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F. J., Hus, C.-C., & Kundu, S. K. 2005. Explaining export performance: A comparative study of international new ventures in Indian and Taiwanese software industry. Management International Review, 45(3): 83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. 2007. Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4): 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E., & Jones, M. V. 2004. Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. Ε. 2006. The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2): 713–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Gaur, A., & Singh, G. 2019. Pro-market institutions and global strategies: The pendulum of pro-market reforms and reversals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(4): 598–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo, A., Majocchi, A., Zucchella, A., & Buck, T. 2013. Geographical pathways for SME internationalization: Insights from an Italian sample. International Marketing Review, 30(2): 80–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danis, W. M., De Clerq, D., & Petricevic, O. 2011. Are social networks more important for new business activity in emerging than developed economies? An empirical extension. International Business Review, 20(4): 394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3): 543–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elango, B., & Pattnaik, C. 2007. Building capabilities for international operations through networks: A study of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 541–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etiennot, H., Vassolo, R., Diaz Hermelo, F., & McGaham, A. 2019. How do industry and country impact firm performance? A national and supranational analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 13(4): 791–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, N. 2010. Factors influencing the internationalization of new ventures in the Irish aquaculture industry: An exploratory study. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8(4): 392–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, N., Kuivalainen, O., & Andersson, S. 2015. Industry factors influencing international new ventures internationalisation processes. In P. Konara, F. McDonald, Y. J. Ha, & Y. Wei (Eds.). The rise of multinationals from emerging economies: 226–242. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, Z., & Nieto, M. J. 2006. Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 340–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernhaber, S. A., Gilbert, B. A., & McDougall, P. P. 2008. International entrepreneurship and geographic location: An empirical examination of new venture internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(2): 267–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernhaber, S. A., & Li, D. 2010. The impact of interorganizational imitation on new venture international entry and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1): 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernhaber, S. A., McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. 2007. Exploring the role of industry structure in new venture internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4): 517–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernhaber, S. A., McDougall-Covin, P. P., & Shepherd, D. A. 2009. International entrepreneurship: Leveraging internal and external knowledge sources. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3: 297–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. S., & Kumar, V. 2009. International diversification, business group affiliation and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. British Journal of Management, 20(2): 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Singh, D. 2014. Institutions, resources, and internationalization of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(1): 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginevičius, R., & Krivka, A. 2009. Multicriteria evaluation of the competitive environment in the oligopolic market. Business: Theory and Practice, 10(4): 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glejser, H., Jacquemin, A., & Petit, J. 1980. Exports in an imperfect competition framework: An analysis of 1446 exporters. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(3): 507–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., Pavcnik, N., & Topalova, P. 2010. Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4): 1727–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. 2003. Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grogaard, B., Gioia, C., & Benito, G. R. G. 2013. An empirical investigation of the role of industry factors in the internationalization patterns of firms. International Studies of Management and Organization, 43(1): 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashai, N., & Almor, T. 2004. Gradually internationalizing ‘born global’ firms: An oxymoron? International Business Review, 13(4): 465–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F., & Park, Y.-R. 1994. Location, governance and strategic determinants of Japanese manufacturing investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6): 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houngbonon, G. V., & Jeanjean, F. 2016. What level of competition intensity maximises investment in the wireless industry? Telecommunications Policy, 40(8): 774–790.

  • Ito, K., & Pucik, V. 1993. Global competitiveness, domestic competition, and R&D spending of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1): 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin, A., de Ghellinck, E., & Huveneers, C. 1980. Concentration and profitability in a small open economy. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 29(2): 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. V., Coviello, N., & Tang, Y. K. 2011. International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6): 632–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jong, A. D., Ruyter, K. D., & Wetzels, M. 2005. Antecedents and consequences of group potency: A study of self-managing service teams. Management Science, 51(11): 1593–1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kam, C. D., & Franzese, R. J. 2007. Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor, MI:The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karadeniz, E. E., & Gocer, K. 2007. Internationalization of small firms: A case study of Turkish small- and medium-sized enterprises. European Business Review, 19(5): 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karthik, D., Upadhyayula, R., & Basant, R. 2015. Strategic paths and performance of born globals: A study of Indian IT firms. Working paper no. 2015-03-36. Available at: http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/assets/snippets/workingpaperpdf/3261065992015-03-36.pdf.

  • Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. 2009. The past and the future of international entrepreneurship: A review and suggestions for developing the field. Journal of Management, 35(3): 600–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, A. N., Danis, W. M., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2012. International entrepreneurship research in emerging economies: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2): 266–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, A. Y. C., & Martin, S. 1984. Market structure and U.S. trade flows. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2(3): 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, S. K., & Renko, M. 2005. Explaining export performance: A comparative study of international new ventures in Finnish and Indian software industry. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 8: 43–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamin, A. 2013. The business group as an information resource: An investigation of business group affiliation in the Indian software services industry. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5): 1487–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lance, C. E. 1988. Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Applied Psychology Measurement, 12(2): 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 615–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. 2013. The internationalization of entrepreneurial firms from emerging economies: The roles of institutional transitions and market opportunities. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 11: 158–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. 2010. With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Exford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1): 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Xu, B., & Liu, X. 2009. The effects of corporate governance and institutional environments on export behaviour in emerging economies: Evidence from China. Management International Review, 49: 455–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. 2007. International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Zhao, H., Wang, Y., & Xi, Y. 2011. Venturing abroad by emerging market enterprises. Management International Review, 51: 433–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, S. K., Vora, D., & Nag, A. 2010. Industry structure characteristics and international entrepreneurship in India’s software industry. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 19(2): 109–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolova, T. S., Manev, I. M., & Gyoshev, B. S. 2010. In good company: The role of personal and inter-firm networks for new-venture internationalization in a transition economy. Journal of World Business, 45(3): 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P., Robinson, R., & Denisi, A. S. 1992. Modeling new venture performance: An analysis of new venture strategy, industry structure, and venture origin. Journal of Business Venturing, 7: 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGahan, A. M., & Victer, R. 2010. How much does home country matter to corporate profitability? Journal of International Business Studies, 41(1): 142–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. 2016. Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47: 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, J. D., Ward, W. A., & Nowlin, E. 2006. Location, industrial concentration and the propensity of small U.S. firms to export. International Marketing Review, 23(5): 486–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Zahra, S. A. 2007. The survival of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2): 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, K., & Bhat, S. 2011. Technology sourcing and outward FDI: A study of IT industry in India. Technovation, 31(4): 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W., & Rossouw, S. 2010. Early international entrepreneurship in China: Extent and determinants. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8(1): 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar, D. 2008. The internationalization of firms from India: Investment, mergers and acquisitions. Oxford Development Studies, 36(1): 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. 1996. Applied linear statistical methods. Chicago, IL:Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, S. M. 1999. Modern competitive analysis. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1): 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 1995. Global starts-ups: Entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage. The Academy of Management Executive, 9: 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashigian, P. 1968. Market concentration in the United States and Great Britain. Journal of Law and Economics, 11: 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattnaik, C., & Elango, B. 2009. The impact of firm resources on the internationalization and performance relationship: A study of Indian manufacturing firms. Multinational Business Review, 17(2): 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavic, I., Galetic, F., & Piplica, D. 2016. Similarities and differences between the CR and HHI as an indicator of market concentration and market power. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 13(1): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiris, I. K., Akoorie, M. E. M., & Sinha, P. 2012. International entrepreneurship: A critical analysis of studies in the past two decades and future directions for research. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10(4): 279–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popli, M., Akbar, M., Kumar, V., & Gaur, A. 2017. Performance impact of temporal strategic fit: Entrainment of internationalization with pro-market reforms. Global Strategy Journal, 7(4): 354–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY:The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6): 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. 2004. The determinants of outward foreign direct investment: A firm-level analysis of Indian manufacturing. Oxford Development Studies, 32(4): 619–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. 2007. How do Indian multinationals affect exports from home country? Working paper 2007/07. Institute for Studies in Industrial Development. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/19022.

  • Pradhan, J. P., & Abhraham, V. 2005. Overseas mergers and acquisitions by Indian enterprises: Patterns and motivations. Indian journal of economics, LXXXV(33): 365–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prashantham, S., & Dhanaraj, C. 2015. MNE ties and new venture internationalization: Exploratory insights from India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4): 901–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prashantham, S., Eranova, M., & Couper, C. 2018. Globalization, entrepreneurship and paradox thinking. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purkayastha, S., Kumar, V., & Lu, J. 2017. Business group heterogeneity and the internationalization-performance relationship: Evidence from Indian business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(2): 247–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, K. S., & Pangarkar, N. 2000. Mode of entry choice: An empirical study of Singaporean multinationals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17(1): 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, K., Li, M., & Petitt, B. S. 2012. Why do business groups continue to matter? A study of market failure and performance among Indian manufacturers. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(3): 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. C., & McDougall, P. P. 1998. The impact of alternative operationalizations of industry structural elements on measures of performance for entrepreneurial manufacturing ventures. Strategic International Management, 19: 1079–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H. J., Autio, E., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. 2006. A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 914–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraswathy, B. 2010. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions in India: Extent, nature and structure. Working paper no. id: 3096. Available at: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=Document129102010410.8110468.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=3096&fref=repec.

  • Semadeni, M., Withers, M. C., & Certo, S. T. 2014. The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7): 1070–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. A. 2009. Export performance of emerging market firms. International Business Review, 18: 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. 2011. Emerging economy multinationals: The role of business groups. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 6(1): 142–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M., Orser, B., & Riding, A. 2011. A comparative study of international and domestic new ventures. Management International Review, 51(1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J., Wright, J., & Yogo, M. 2002. A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20: 518–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, R., & Morris, S. 2010. FDI outflows from India: An examination of the underlying economics, policies and their impacts. Ahmedabad, Gujarat:Indian Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., Hessels, J., & Li, D. 2013. Comparative international entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 20(10): 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, T. W., Alessandri, T. M., Reuer, J. J., & Chintakananda, A. 2008. How much does country matter? An analysis of firms’ growth options. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3): 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulan, O. N. 1996. Nonlinearities in the impact of industry structure: The case of concentration and intra-industry variability in rates of return. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 175–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. M., MacMillan, I. C., & Low, M. B. 1991. Effects of strategy and environment on corporate venture success in industrial markets. Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2019. World Investment Report 2019.

  • Varma, S. 2011. Born global acquirers from Indian IT: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 6(4): 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. 2000. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 108. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. L. 2008. What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies? Entrepreneurship. Theory Into Practice, 32(1): 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D. W., Lau, C., & Bruton, G. D. 2007. International venturing by emerging economy firms: The effects of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. 2005. A theory of international new ventures: A decade of research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1): 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 925–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., & Zou, S. 2002. The impact of industry concentration and firm location on export propensity and intensity: An empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of International Marketing, 10(1): 52–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abrar Ali Saiyed.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saiyed, A.A., Fernhaber, S.A., Basant, R. et al. The internationalization of new ventures in an emerging economy: The shifting role of industry concentration. Asia Pac J Manag 38, 1467–1497 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09712-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09712-2

Keywords

Navigation