Abstract
Over the years, researchers have used various theoretical frameworks and analytical tools to evaluate the relationship between board gender diversity and firm financial performance. The results, however, have remained largely inconclusive, perhaps because the role of board gender diversity has been studied separately from other board and firm characteristics. To address this issue, we examine the relationship between board gender diversity and firm financial performance through the theoretical framework of complexity theory, using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Our sample comprises 204 non-financial firms listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). We find that board gender diversity does not affect firm financial performance in isolation, but rather in combination with other board and firm characteristics. In some combinations it is associated with both stronger firm financial performance and in other configurations with weaker firm financial performance. We also find that greater gender diversity on boards mitigates the negative effects of CEO duality on firm financial performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We also note that, unlike standard ordinary least squares regression, QCA is not econometrically required to remove outliers. Indeed, outliers (those that are valid data points) are retained in QCA as integral to comprehensive analysis (see, Berg-Schlosser, Meur, Rihoux, & Ragin, 2009; Nair & Gibbert, 2016; Pappas & Woodside, 2021).
In Woodside words (2014, p. 2499), “Consistency is an asymmetric metric analogous to the symmetric correlation metric; coverage is an asymmetric metric analogous to the symmetric “coefficient of determination” (i.e., r2).”.
References
Abdullah, S. N., Ismail, K. N. I. K., & Nachum, L. (2016). Does having women on boards create value? the impact of societal perceptions and corporate governance in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2352
Abou-El-Sood, H. (2021). Board gender diversity, power, and bank risk taking. International Review of Financial Analysis, 75(January 2020): 101733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101733
Adams, R. B. (2016). Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow? The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.001
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science, 58(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452
Aggarwal, R., Jindal, V., & Seth, R. (2019). Board diversity and firm performance: The role of business group affiliation. International Business Review, 28(6), 101600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101600
Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr049
Arnaboldi, F., Casu, B., Kalotychou, E., & Sarkisyan, A. (2020a). Board diversity reforms: Do they matter for EU bank performance? European Financial Management, 26(2), 416–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12238
Arnaboldi, F., Casu, B., Kalotychou, E., & Sarkisyan, A. (2020b). The performance effects of board heterogeneity: What works for EU banks? European Journal of Finance, 26(10), 897–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2018.1479719
Atif, M., Hossain, M., Alam, M. S., & Goergen, M. (2021). Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption? Journal of Corporate Finance, 66(February), 101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101665
Balasubramanian, N., Black, B. S., & Khanna, V. (2010). The relation between firm-level corporate governance and market value: A case study of India. Emerging Markets Review, 11(4), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2010.05.001
Bennouri, M., Chtioui, T., Nagati, H., & Nekhili, M. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters? Journal of Banking & Finance, 88, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.010
Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C.C. (2009). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an approach. Configurational Comparative Methods, 1–18
Bhaumik, S., Driffield, N., Gaur, A., Mickiewicz, T., & Vaaler, P. (2019). Corporate governance and MNE strategies in emerging economies. Journal of World Business, 54(4), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.03.004
Black, B. S., & Khanna, V. S. (2007). Can corporate governance reforms increase firm market values? Event study evidence from India. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(4), 749–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00106.x
Bøhren, Ø., & Staubo, S. (2014). Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational form to avoid board upheaval. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.005
Bøhren, Ø., & Staubo, S. (2016). Mandatory gender balance and board independence. European Financial Management, 22(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12060
Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y
Cardillo, G., Onali, E., & Torluccio, G. (2021). Does gender diversity on banks’ boards matter? Evidence from public bailouts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 71(December), 101560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101560
Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x
Cheng, L. Y., Su, Y. C., Yan, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2019). Corporate governance and target price accuracy. International Review of Financial Analysis, 64(March), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.05.005
Conyon, M. J., & He, L. (2017). Firm performance and boardroom gender diversity: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Business Research, 79(1), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.006
Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Board structure to enhance social responsibility development: A qualitative comparative analysis of US Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 524–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1425
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006). Business groups and their types. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9012-5
Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Integration of micro and macro studies in Governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance. Journal of Management, 37(2), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310373399
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686. https://doi.org/10.5465/256988
de Cabo, R. M., Gimeno, R., & Nieto, M. J. (2012). Gender diversity on European banks’ boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1112-6
Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802–835. https://doi.org/10.2307/256713
Duppati, G., Rao, N. V., Matlani, N., Scrimgeour, F., & Patnaik, D. (2020). Gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from India and Singapore. Applied Economics, 52(14), 1553–1565. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1676872
Dwivedi, P., Joshi, A., & Misangyi, V. F. (2018). Gender-inclusive gatekeeping: How (mostly male) predecessors influence the success of female CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1238
Eagly, A. H. (2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance. Journal of Social Issues, 72(1), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12163
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Agency-and institutional-theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 488–511. https://doi.org/10.5465/256457
Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00011
Eulerich, M., Velte, P., & Uum, C. Van. (2014). The impact of management board diversity on corporate performance - An empirical analysis for the German two-tier system. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 12(1): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v71.3854
Evgeniou, T., & Vermaelen, T. (2017). Share buybacks and gender diversity. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45, 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.06.005
Fainshmidt, S., Witt, M. A., Aguilera, R. V., & Verbeke, A. (2020). The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00313-1
Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.12.001
Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. A Academy of Management Journal, 32, 1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
Fiss, P. C., Doty, H., Sawy, O. E., Jaspers, F., Kennedy, M., Meyer, A., More, P., Ocasio, W., Ragin, C., Rajagopalan, N., & Snow, C. (2011). Building better causal theories : A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9482-5
Frijns, B., Dodd, O., & Cimerova, H. (2016). The impact of cultural diversity in corporate boards on firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.07.014
Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0298
Galbreath, J. (2018). Is board gender diversity linked to financial performance? The mediating mechanism of CSR. Business and Society, 57(5), 863–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316647967
García Lara, J. M., GarcíaOsma, B., Mora, A., & Scapin, M. (2017). The monitoring role of female directors over accounting quality. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45, 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.016
García-Castro, R., Aguilera, R. V., & Ariño, M. A. (2013). Bundles of firm corporate governance practices: A fuzzy set analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(4), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12024
García-Ramos, R., & Díaz, B. D. (2021). Board structure and firm financial performance: A qualitative comparative analysis. Long Range Planning, 54(6), 102017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102017
Goodell, J., Li, M., & Liu, D. (2021). Price informativeness and state-owned enterprises: Considering their heterogeneity. International Review of Financial Analysis, 76(April), 101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101783
Gresov, C., & Drazin, R. (1997). Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. ACademy of Management Review, 22(2), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707154064
Grosvold, J., & Brammer, S. (2011). National institutional systems as antecedents of female board representation: An empirical study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00830.x
Hambrick, D. C., Misangyi, V. F., & Park, C. A. (2015). The quad model for identifying a corporate director’s potential for effective monitoring: Toward a new theory of board sufficiency. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0066
Harjoto, M. A., & Rossi, F. (2019). Religiosity, female directors, and corporate social responsibility for Italian listed companies. Journal of Business Research, 95(1), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.013
Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. (2008). Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0355
Hoobler, J. M., Masterson, C. R., Nkomo, S. M., & Michel, E. J. (2018). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2473–2499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316628643
Hsiao, J.P.-H., Jaw, C., Huan, T.-C.(T).C.). and Woodside, A.G. (2015). Applying complexity theory to solve hospitality contrarian case conundrums. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(4): 608–647.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2013-0533
Husted, B. W., & de Sousa-Filho, J. M. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102(September), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017
Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00760.x
Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, Exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond ndependence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312463938
Kabongo, J. D., & Okpara, J. O. (2019). Timing and speed of internationalization: Evidence from African banks. Journal of Business Research, 102(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.003
Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. (2014). Interlocking directorships and firm performance in highly regulated sectors: The moderating impact of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(2), 347–372.
Kader, H. A., Adams, M., Hardwick, P., & Kwon, W. J. (2014). Cost efficiency and board composition under different takaful insurance business models. International Review of Financial Analysis, 32, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2013.12.008
Kang, E., Ding, D. K., & Charoenwong, C. (2010). Investor reaction to women directors. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 888–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.06.008
Kasper-brauer, K., & Leischnig, A. (2016). Yes, we can ! A fuzzy-set analysis of challenges, skills, and enjoyment of work. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.126
Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016
Low, D. C. M., Roberts, H., & Whiting, R. H. (2015). Board gender diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 35, 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.02.008
Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 13(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002
Malik, M. F., Nowland, J., & Buckby, S. (2021). Voluntary adoption of board risk committees and financial constraints risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 73(January), 101611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101611
Marquardt, C., & Wiedman, C. (2016). Can shareholder activism improve gender diversity on corporate boards? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12170
McGuinness, P. B., Lam, K. C. K., & Vieito, J. P. (2015). Gender and other major board characteristics in China: Explaining corporate dividend policy and governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 989–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9443-y
McNulty, T., Zattoni, A., & Douglas, T. (2013). Developing corporate governance research through qualitative methods: A review of previous studies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12006
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational Strategy. West Publishing Company, New York.
Miller, T., & Triana, M. del C. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board idversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5): 755–786https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x
Mínguez-Vera, A., & Martin, A. (2011). Gender and management on spanish SMEs: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(14), 2852–2873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.599948
Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0728
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2017). Embracing causal complexity. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252
Muravyev, A., Berezinets, I., & Ilina, Y. (2014). The structure of corporate boards and private benefits of control: Evidence from the Russian stock exchange. International Review of Financial Analysis, 34, 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.03.008
Nair, L. B., & Gibbert, M. (2016). Analyzing inconsistent cases in management fsQCA studies: A methodological manifesto. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1464–1470.
Neville, F., Byron, K., Post, C., & Ward, A. (2019). Board independence and corporate misconduct: A cross-national meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 45(6): 2538–2569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318801999
Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58: 102310.
Pathan, S., Skully, M., & Wickramanayake, J. (2008). Reforms in Thai bank governance: The aftermath of the Asian financial crisis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 17(2), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2006.05.002
Pezeshkan, A., Smith, A., Fainshmidt, S., & Nair, A. (2020). A neo-configurational institutional analysis of international venture capital attractiveness and performance: Insights for Asia-Pacific. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09727-9
Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0319
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C., Kriss A. D., Sean, D., 2006. Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Tucson, Arizona: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.
Ragin, C. C., 2006. User's guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Tucson, Arizona: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.
Rediker, K. J., & Seth, A. (1995). Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160202
Reed, A. M. (2002). Corporate governance reforms in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015260208546
Richard, O. C., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S., & Chadwick, K. (2004). Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159576
Rihoux, B., & Marx, A. (2013). QCA, 25 Years after “The comparative method.” Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 167–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912468269
Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1997.9709231661
Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance ? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00570.x
Samara, G., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2018). Independent directors and family firm performance: Does one size fit all? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0455-6
Scalera, V. G., Mukherjee, D., & Piscitello, L. (2020). Ownership strategies in knowledge-intensive cross-border acquisitions: Comparing Chinese and Indian MNEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1), 155–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9616-6
Shehata, N., Salhin, A., & El-Helaly, M. (2017). Board diversity and firm performance: evidence from the U.K. SMEs. Applied Economics, 49(48): 4817–4832. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1293796
Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003
Singh, D., & Delios, A. (2017). Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.02.002
Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. (2013). Governance structure, innovation and internationalization: Evidence from India. Journal of International Management, 19(3), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.03.006
Terjesen, S., & Sealy, R. (2016). Board gender quotas: Exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(1), 23–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.7
Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(3), 447–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8
Tian, J. J., & Lau, C.-M. (2001). Board composition, leadership structure and performance in Chinese shareholding companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 18(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010628209918
Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z
Tosun, O. K. (2021). Changes in corporate governance: Externally dictated vs voluntarily determined. International Review of Financial Analysis, 73(June 2020): 101608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101608
Triana, M., Miller, T., & Trzebiatowski, T. (2015). The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organization Science Publication, 25(2), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2627729
Trinh, V. Q., Aljughaiman, A. A., & Cao, N. D. (2020). Fetching better deals from creditors: Board busyness, agency relationships and the bank cost of debt. International Review of Financial Analysis, 69(February), 101472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101472
Tuggle, C. S., Schnatterly, K., & Johnson, R. A. (2010). Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468687
van Essen, M., van Oosterhout, J. H., & Carney, M. (2012). Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9269-1
Veltrop, D. B., Hermes, N., Postma, T. J. B. M., & de Haan, J. (2015). A tale of two factions: Why and when factional demographic faultlines hurt board performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12098
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283976
Vis, B. (2012). The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 168–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112442142
Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
Woodside, A. G. (2014). Embrace•perform•model : Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495–2503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.006
Woodside, A. G. (Ed.). (2017). The complexity turn: Cultural, management, and marketing applications. Springer.
Wowak, K. D., Ball, G. P., Post, C., & Ketchen, D. J. (2020). The Influence of female directors on product recall decisions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 23(4), 745–1004. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0841
Wu, P., Yeh, S., Huan, T. T. C., & Woodside, A. G. (2014). Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations☆. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1647–1670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.012
Ye, D., Deng, J., Liu, Y., Szewczyk, S. H., & Chen, X. (2019). Does board gender diversity increase dividend payouts? Analysis of global evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58(October), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.04.002
Yoshikawa, T., Shim, J. W., Kim, C. H., & Tuschke, A. (2020). How do board ties affect the adoption of new practices? The effects of managerial interest and hierarchical power. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12300
Zattoni, A., Pedersen, T., & Kumar, V. (2009). The performance of group-affiliated firms during institutional transition: A longitudinal study of Indian firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00761.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pandey, N., Kumar, S., Post, C. et al. Board gender diversity and firm performance: A complexity theory perspective. Asia Pac J Manag 40, 1289–1320 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09817-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09817-w
Keywords
- Board gender diversity
- Women on boards
- Qualitative comparative analysis
- Firm performance
- Tobin’s Q
- Board characteristics