Abstract
This study investigated differences between the demographic characteristics, participation rates (i.e., agreeing to respond to questions about sexual behavior), and sexual behaviors of landline and mobile phone samples in Australia. A nationally representative sample of Australians aged 18 years and over was recruited via random digit dialing in December 2011 to collect data via computer-assisted telephone interviews. A total of 1012 people (370 men, 642 women) completed a landline interview and 1002 (524 men, 478 women) completed a mobile phone interview. Results revealed that telephone user status was significantly related to all demographic variables: gender, age, educational attainment, area of residence, country of birth, household composition, and current ongoing relationship status. In unadjusted analyses, telephone status was also associated with women’s participation rates, participants’ number of other-sex sexual partners in the previous year, and women’s lifetime sexual experience. However, after controlling for significant demographic factors, telephone status was only independently related to women’s participation rates. Post hoc analyses showed that significant, between-group differences for all other sexual behavior outcomes could be explained by demographic covariates. Results also suggested that telephone status may be associated with participation bias in research on sexual behavior. Taken together, these findings highlight the importance of sampling both landline and mobile phone users to improve the representativeness of sexual behavior data collected via telephone interviews.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ansolabehere, S., & Schaffner, B. F. (2010). Residential mobility, family structure, and the cell-only population. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 244–259.
Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2010). Report 2: Take-up and use of voice services by Australian consumers. In 2009–2010 Communications Report Series. Melbourne: Australian Communications and Media Authority.
Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2011). Report 2: Converging communication channels—Preferences and behaviours of Australian communications users, 2011. In 2010–2011 Communications Report Series. Melbourne: Australian Communications and Media Authority.
Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2012). Communications report 2011–2012. Melbourne: Australian Communications and Media Authority.
Bajos, N., Bozon, M., Beltzer, N., Laborde, C., Andro, A., Ferrand, M., & Leridon, H. (2010). Changes in sexual behaviours: From secular trends to public health policies. AIDS, 24, 1185–1191.
Barr, M. L., Van Ritten, J. J., Steel, D. G., & Thackway, S. V. (2012). Inclusion of mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey in New South Wales, Australia: Design, methods, call outcomes, costs and sample representativeness. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 177. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-177.
Blumberg, S. J., & Luke, J. V. (2009). Reevaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1806–1810.
Blumberg, S. J., & Luke, J. V. (2010). Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates from the National Interview Survey, July–December 2009. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Blumberg, S. J., & Luke, J. V. (2012). Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, July–December 2011. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Blumberg, S. J., Luke, J. V., & Cynamon, M. L. (2006). Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: Evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 926–931.
Brick, J. M., Dipko, S., Presser, S., Tucker, C., & Yuan, Y. (2006). Nonresponse bias in a dual frame sample of cell and landline numbers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 780–793.
Dal Grande, E., & Taylor, A. W. (2010). Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: Results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 77. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-77.
Dillman, D. A. (2002). Navigating the rapids of change: Some observations on survey methodology in the early twenty-first century. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 473–494.
Dubois-Arber, F., Jeannin, A., Konings, E., & Paccaud, F. (1997). Increased condom use without other major changes in sexual behavior among the general population in Switzerland. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 558–566.
Dunne, M. P., Martin, N. G., Bailey, J. M., Heath, A. C., Bucholz, K. K., Madden, P., & Statham, D. J. (1997). Participation bias in a sexuality survey: Psychological and behavioural characteristics of responders and non-responders. International Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 844–854.
Dutwin, D., Keeter, S., & Kennedy, C. (2010). Bias from wireless substitution in surveys of Hispanics. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 32, 309–328.
Holborn, A. T., Reavley, N. J., & Jorm, A. F. (2012). Differences between landline and mobile-only respondents in a dual-frame mental health literacy survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 36, 192–193.
Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Clark, A., Tompson, T., & Mokrzycki, M. (2007). What’s missing from national landline RDD surveys? The impact of the growing cell-only population. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 722–792.
Kempf, A. M., & Remington, P. L. (2007). New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 113–126.
Lavrakas, P. J., Shuttles, C. D., Steeh, C., & Fienberg, H. (2007). The state of surveying cell phone numbers in the United States: 2007 and beyond. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 840–854.
Layte, R. D., McGee, H. P., Quail, A., Rundle, K., Cousins, G., Donnelly, C. D., et al. (2006). The Irish study of sexual health and relationships: Main report. Dublin: Crisis Pregnancy Agency, and Department of Health and Children.
Lee, S., Brick, J. M., Brown, E. R., & Grant, D. (2010). Growing cell phone population and noncoverage bias in traditional random digit dial telephone health surveys. Health Services Research, 45, 1121–1139.
Link, M. W., Battaglia, M. P., Frankel, M. R., Osborn, L., & Mokdad, A. H. (2007). Reaching the US cell phone generation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 814–839.
Liu, B., Brotherton, J. M. L., Shellard, D., Donovan, B., Saville, M., & Kaldor, J. M. (2011). Mobile phones are a viable option for surveying young Australian women: A comparison of two telephone survey methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 159. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-159.
McBride, O., Morgan, K., & Hannah, M. (2012). Recruitment using mobile telephones in an Irish general population sexual health survey: Challenges and practical solutions. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 45. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-45.
Newman, L. (2011). Telephone survey methods: Implications of the increasing mobile-only population for public health research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 35, 491–492.
Paul, C., Dickson, N., Davis, P. B., Yee, R. L., Chetwynd, J., & McMillan, N. (1995). Heterosexual behaviour and HIV risk in New Zealand: Data from a national survey. Australian Journal of Public Health, 19, 13–18.
Pennay, D. W. (2010). Profiling the ‘mobile phone only’ population: Results from a dual-frame telephone survey using a landline and mobile phone sample frame. Melbourne: Social Research Centre.
Pennay, D. W. (2012). Social research centre dual-frame omnibus survey: Technical and methodological report. Melbourne: Social Research Centre.
Rissel, C., Bauman, A., Lesjak, M., & McLellan, L. (2000). A 1994 population survey of the number of sexual partners over a 12 month period in New South Wales, Australia. Venereology, 13, 111–117.
Salmon, C. T., & Nichols, J. S. (1983). The next-birthday method of respondent selection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 270–276.
Smith, A. M. A., Pitts, M. K., Shelley, J. M., Richters, J., & Ferris, J. (2007). The Australian Longitudinal Study of Health and Relationships. BMC Public Health, 7, 139. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-139.
Smith, A. M. A., Rissel, C. E., Richters, J., Grulich, A. E., & de Visser, R. O. (2003). Sex in Australia: The rationale and methods of the Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27, 106–117.
Spira, A., Bajos, N., Béjin, A., & Beltzer, N. (1992). AIDS and sexual behaviour in France. Nature, 360, 407–413.
Uitenbroek, D. G., & McQueen, D. V. (1992). Changing patterns in reported sexual practices in the population: Multiple partners and condom use. AIDS, 6, 587–592.
Vicente, P., & Reis, E. (2009). The mobile-only population in Portugal and its impact in a dual frame telephone survey. Survey Research Methods, 3, 105–111.
Voigt, L. F., Schwartz, S. M., Doody, D. R., Lee, S. C., & Li, C. I. (2011). Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 173, 118–126.
Wellings, K., Collumbien, M., Slaymaker, E., Singh, S., Hodges, Z., Patel, D., & Bajos, N. (2006). Sexual behaviour in context: A global perspective. Lancet, 368, 1706–1728.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (Project Grant 1002174).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All study procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Anthony M. A. Smith: Deceased 7 November 2012.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Badcock, P.B., Patrick, K., Smith, A.M.A. et al. Differences Between Landline and Mobile Phone Users in Sexual Behavior Research. Arch Sex Behav 46, 1711–1721 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0859-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0859-3