References
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781.
Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 23(7), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434537.
Betancourt, N., Kovács, B., & Otner, S. M. G. (2018). The perception of status: How we infer the status of others from their social relationships. Network Science, 6(3), 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2018.13.
Blake, K. R., & Brooks, R. C. (2019). Status anxiety mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and sexualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(50), 25029–25033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909806116.
Buss, D. (2016). Evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York, NY: The Perseus Books Group.
Davis, A. C., & Arnocky, S. (2020). An evolutionary perspective on appearance enhancement behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01745-4.
de Paoli, T., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Halliwell, E., Puccio, F., & Krug, I. (2017). Social rank and rejection sensitivity as mediators of the relationship between insecure attachment and disordered eating. European Eating Disorders Review, 25(6), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2537.
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109.
Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 304–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304.
Fournier, M. A. (2009). Adolescent hierarchy formation and the social competition theory of depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28(9), 1144–1172. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2009.28.9.1144.
Hamermesh, D. S. (2011). Beauty pays: Why attractive people are more successful. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hrdy, S. B. (2000). Mother nature: Maternal instincts and how they shape the human species. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
Kranz, F., & Ishai, A. (2006). Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Current Biology, 16(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.070.
Leary, M. R., Cottrell, C. A., & Phillips, M. (2001). Deconfounding the effects of dominance and social acceptance on self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.898.
Maestripieri, D., Henry, A., & Nickels, N. (2017). Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000340.
Reynolds, T. A. (2021). Our grandmothers’ legacy: Challenges faced by female ancestors leave traces in modern women’s same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01768-x.
Stockley, P., & Bro-Jørgensen, J. (2011). Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 86(2), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00149.x.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Commentary refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01745-4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blake, K.R. Attractiveness Helps Women Secure Mates, But Also Status and Reproductively Relevant Resources. Arch Sex Behav 51, 39–41 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01949-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01949-2