Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Modified Menstrual Attitudes Scale: Heteronormative Attitudes, Sexism, and Attitudes Toward Menstruation in Male and Female Adults

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social shame and stigma surround menstruation, which may compromise women’s health and rights in various contexts. Men’s attitudes are particularly important because men often hold positions of power that influence women’s experience. This study examined factors associated with menstrual attitudes, including heteronormative attitudes, sexism, and family influences. A cross-sectional Qualtrics panel survey (n = 802; aged 18–44; 50.8% female) was performed. We tested a revised menstrual attitudes scale based on items drawn from previously validated measures. Data were analyzed using a structural equation modeling framework. Factor analysis identified and confirmed a 5-factor model for menstrual attitudes. Men endorsed more negative attitudes toward menstruation than women; however, this difference was largely explained by factors other than gender in the structural equation model. After controlling for family and demographic characteristics, attitudes toward openness and secrecy surrounding menstruation were most strongly associated with gender role expectations and hostile sexism. Benevolent sexism was associated with finding menstruation debilitating, denying menstrual symptoms, and endorsing avoidance of activities during menstruation. Heteronormative and sexist attitudes were associated with more negative menstrual attitudes, while increased menstrual knowledge was associated with more positive menstrual attitudes. The difference in menstrual attitudes between males and females was explained largely by heteronormative attitudes and sexism. This suggests that attitudes toward menstruation are closely linked to social ideals about men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data available upon request.

Code Availability

Mplus version 7.

Notes

  1. The terms female, woman, male, and man are used deliberately. Specifically, male/female refer to biological sex while man/woman refer to gender. This distinguishes statements referring to one’s capacity to menstruate (i.e., biological sex: female/male) from those referring to one’s sociocultural experience (i.e., gender: woman/man). The participants in our analytical sample were wholly cisgender, giving the results equal applicability to sex and gender.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Sarah R. Christensen and Emily B. Pilling for their helpful contributions to concept ideation and survey development.

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Public Health at Brigham Young University. Study methodology was included as part of the grant application process, but the funder did not consult on research design, collection, interpretation of data, writing, or publication. The funding organization will not gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JBE and BMM contributed to study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by JBE and BMM. All authors contributed to the analysis, led by AAC. The manuscript was drafted or edited by all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. B. Eyring.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Human or Animal Rights

This research involved human subjects who consented to participating in a survey and having the aggregate results published.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Human Research Protection Program and Institutional Review Board at Brigham Young University.

Informed Consent

This research involved human subjects who gave informed consent to participating in a survey and having the aggregate results published.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eyring, J.B., Crandall, A. & Magnusson, B.M. A Modified Menstrual Attitudes Scale: Heteronormative Attitudes, Sexism, and Attitudes Toward Menstruation in Male and Female Adults. Arch Sex Behav 52, 1535–1547 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02565-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02565-y

Keywords

Navigation