Abstract
Most successful invasive species eradication programs were applied to invasions confined to a small area. Invasions occupying large areas at a low density can potentially be eradicated if individual infestations can be found at affordable cost. The development of low cost aerial surveillance methods allows for larger areas to be monitored but such methods often have lower sensitivity than conventional surveillance methods, making their cost-effectiveness uncertain. Here, we consider the cost-effectiveness of including a new aerial monitoring method in Australia’s largest eradication program, the campaign to eradicate red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta). The program previously relied on higher sensitivity ground surveillance and broadcast treatment. The high cost of those methods restricted the total area that could be managed with available resources below the level required to prevent ongoing expansion of the invasion. By increasing the area that can be monitored and thereby improving the targeting of treatment and ground surveillance, we estimate that remote sensing could substantially reduce eradication costs despite the method’s low sensitivity. The development of low cost monitoring methods could potentially lead to substantially improved management of invasive species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bax N, Hayes K, Marshall A, Parry D, Thresher R (2002) Man-made marinas as sheltered islands for alien marine organisms: establishment and eradication of an alien invasive marine species. Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp 26–39
Baxter PWJ, Possingham HP (2011) Optimizing search strategies for invasive pests: learn before you leap. J Appl Ecol 48:86–95
Bogich TL, Liebhold AM, Shea K (2008) To sample or eradicate? A cost minimization model for monitoring and managing an invasive species. J Appl Ecol 45:1134–1142
Bryson M, Reid A, Hung C, Ramos FT, Sukkarieh S (2014) Cost-effective mapping using unmanned aerial vehicles in ecology monitoring applications. In: Khatib O, Kumar V, Sukhatme G (eds) Experimental robotics: the 12th international symposium on experimental robotics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 509–523
Chadès I, Martin TG, Nicol S, Burgman MA, Possingham HP (2011) General rules for managing and surveying networks of pests, diseases, and endangered species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(8323):8328
Cook SR, Gelman A, Rubin DB (2006) Validation of software for Bayesian models using posterior quantiles. J Comput Graph Stat 15:675–692
Epanchin-Niell RS, Haight RG, Berec L, Kean JM, Liebhold AM (2012) Optimal surveillance and eradication of invasive species in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecol Lett 15:803–812
Giljohann KM, Hauser C, Williams NS, Moore JL (2011) Optimizing invasive species control across space: willow invasion management in the Australian Alps. J Appl Ecol 48(5):1286–1294
Göktoǧan AH, Sukkarieh S (2014) Autonomous Remote Sensing of Invasive Species from Robotic Aircraft. In: Valavanis KP, Vachtsevanos GJ (eds) Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 2813–2834
Haight RG, Polasky S (2010) Optimal control of an invasive species with imperfect information about the level of infestation. Resour Energy Econ 32:519–533
Hauser CE, McCarthy MA (2009) Streamlining ‘search and destroy’: cost-effective surveillance for invasive species management. Ecol Lett 12:683–692
Hauser CE, Giljohann KM, Rigby M, Herbert K, Curran I, Pascoe C, Williams NS, Cousens RD, Moore JL (2016) Practicable methods for delimiting a plant invasion. Divers Distrib 22:136–147
Homans F, Horie T (2011) Optimal detection strategies for an established invasive pest. Ecol Econ 70:1129–1138
Horie T, Haight RG, Homans FR, Venette RC (2013) Optimal strategies for the surveillance and control of forest pathogens: a case study with oak wilt. Ecol Econ 86:78–85
Hu W, Bulusu N, Chou CT, Jha S, Taylor A, Tran VN (2009) Design and evaluation of a hybrid sensor network for cane toad monitoring. ACM Trans Sens Netw 5:4
Hung C, Bryson M, Sukkarieh S (2012) Multi-class predictive template for tree crown detection. ISPRS J Photogram Rem Sens 68:170–183
Keith JM, Spring D (2013) Agent-based Bayesian approach to monitoring the progress of invasive species eradication programs. PNAS 110:13229–13230. doi:10.1073/iti3313110
Keith JM, Spring D (2015) Has the Brisbane fire ant infestation been delimited? Unpublished report to Biosecurity Queensland Control Centre
Leung B, Cacho O, Spring D (2010) Searching for non-indigenous species: rapidly delimiting the invasion boundary. Divers Distrib 16:451–460
Lofgren CS, Banks WA, Glancey BM (1975) Biology and control of imported fire ants. Annu Rev Entomol 20:1–30
Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710
Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (QDAF) (undated). “Aerial operations for fire ants”. Document accessed on 05/03/2015 at https://www.daff.qld.gov.au/plants/weeds-pest-animals-ants/invasive-ants/fire-ants/aerial-operations-for-fire-ants
Simberloff D (2009) We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects. Biol Invasions 11:149–157
Thompson S, Seber G (1996) Adaptive sampling. Series in probability and statistics. Wiley, New York
Turner W, Spector S, Gardiner N, Flodeland M, Sterling E, Steininger M (2003) Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 18:306–314
Vogt JT, Wallet BC (2008) Feasibility of using template-based and object-based automated detection methods for quantifying black and hybrid imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta and S. invicta × richteri) mounds in aerial digital imagery. Rangel J 30:291–295
Acknowledgments
Funding from the Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, the Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, in conjunction with ABARES, and the Centre of Excellence in Biosecurity Risk Analysis is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks to Jonathon Keith for assistance with spread modelling.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spring, D., Croft, L. & Kompas, T. Look before you treat: increasing the cost effectiveness of eradication programs with aerial surveillance. Biol Invasions 19, 521–535 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1292-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1292-1