Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anti-angiogenic effect of tamoxifen combined with epirubicin in breast cancer patients

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) are the key factors mediating neo-vascularization. They are often coexpressed in breast cancer. Sex steroids may stimulate angiogenesis via the estrogen receptor (ER) pathway. We investigated to compare the effects of the addition of tamoxifen to epirubicin versus epirubicin alone on VEGF and VEGFR2 expression in breast cancer patients. The expression of VEGF and VEGFR2 was assessed on tissue microarray by immunohistochemistry at baseline conditions and after treatments in the case of 191 patients with T2-4 N0-1 breast cancer enrolled in a randomized trial comparing four cycles of single agent epirubicin versus epirubicin plus tamoxifen as primary systemic treatment. Epirubicin alone failed to induce changes in VEGF expression (P = 0.54), while the addition of tamoxifen to epirubicin resulted in a significant reduction in VEGF expression (P < 0.001). As a consequence, baseline VEGF had a negative prognostic role in patients who received epirubicin alone but not in patients receiving epirubicin plus tamoxifen (interaction test P < 0.05). VEGFR2 expression increased at residual tumor histology in both treatment arms, with a lesser extent in patients receiving tamoxifen plus epirubicin. Decrease in VEGFR2 expression was significantly associated with response rate (P = 0.02). The addition of tamoxifen to epirubicin resulted in a suppression of a key angiogenic pathway. These data suggest a potential synergism of these two drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlson RW, Hudis Ca, Pritchard KI (2006) Adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer: evolution of NCCN, ASCO, and St Gallen recommendations. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 4(10):971–979

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ (2009) Panel members, thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer. Ann Oncol 20:1319–1329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Albain KS, Green SJ, Ravdin PM et al (2002) Adjuvant chemohormonal therapy for primary breast cancer should be sequential instead of concurrent: initial results from Intergroup Trial 0100 (SWOG-8814). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:37a (abstract 143)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garvin S, Nilsson UW, Dabrosin C (2005) Effects of oestradiol and tamoxifen on VEGF, soluble VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 in breast cancer and endothelial cells. Br J Cancer 93(9):1005–1010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haran EF, Maretzek AF, Goldberg I, Horowitz A, Degani H (1994) Tamoxifen enhances cell death in implanted MCF7 breast cancer by inhibiting endothelium growth. Cancer Res 54:5511–5514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindner DJ, Borden EC (1997) Effects of tamoxifen and interferon-beta or the combination on tumor-induced angiogenesis. Int J Cancer 71:456–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo Y, Mazar AP, Lebrun JJ, Rabbani SA (2002) An antiangiogenic urokinase-derived peptide combined with tamoxifen decreases tumor growth and metastasis in a syngeneic model of breast cancer. Cancer Res 62:4678–4684

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garvin S, Dabrosin C (2003) Tamoxifen inhibits secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer in vivo. Cancer Res 63:8742–8748

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elkin M, Orgel A, Kleinman HK (2004) An angiogenic switch in breast cancer involves estrogen and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:875–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Applanat MP, Buteau-Lozano H, Herve MA, Corpet A (2008) Vascular endothelial growth factor is a target gene for estrogen receptor and contributes to breast cancer progression. Adv Exp Med Biol 617:437–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kerbel RS (2008) Tumor angiogenesis. N Engl J Med 358:2039–2049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J (2003) The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med 9(6):669–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrara N, Kerbel RS (2005) Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. Nature 438:967–974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shibuya M (2006) Differential roles of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and receptor-2 in angiogenesis. J Biochem Mol Biol 39(5):469–478

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rydén L, Linderholm B, Nielsen NH, Emdin S, Jonsson PE, Landberg G (2003) Tumor specific VEGF-A and VEGFR2/KDR protein are co-expressed in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 82:147–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Neufeld G, Cohen T, Gengrinovitch S, Poltorak Z (1999) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. FASEB J 13(1):9–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Banerjee S, Dowsett M, Ashworth A, Martin LA (2007) Mechanisms of disease: angiogenesis and the management of breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4(9):536–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bottini A, Berruti A, Brizzi MP et al (2005) Cytotoxic and antiproliferative activity of the single agent epirubicin versus epirubicin plus tamoxifen as primary chemotherapy in human breast cancer: a single-institution phase III trial. Endocr Relat Cancer 12(2):383–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee AHS, Ellis IO (2009) The Nottingham Prognostic Index for invasive carcinoma of the breast. Pathol Oncol Res 14:113–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bottini A, Berruti A, Bersiga A et al (2000) p53 but not bcl-2 immunostaining is predictive of poor complete response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 6:2751–2758

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Generali D, Buffa F, Berruti A et al (2009) Phosphorylated ER, HIF-1, and MAPK signaling as predictors of primary endocrine treatment response and resistance in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(2):227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fox SB, Braganca J, Turley H et al (2004) CITED4 inhibits hypoxia-activated transcription in cancer cells, and its cytoplasmic location in breast cancer is associated with elevated expression of tumor cell hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha. Cancer Res 64:6075–6081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bottini A, Berruti A, Bersiga A et al (2002) Changes in microvessel density as assessed by CD34 antibodies after primary chemotherapy in human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 8:1816–1821

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bottini A, Generali D, Brizzi MP et al (2006) Randomized phase II trial of letrozole and letrozole plus low-dose metronomic oral cyclophosphamide as primary systemic treatment in elderly breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 24(22):3623–3628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baar J, Silverman P, Lyons J et al (2009) A vasculature-targeting regimen of preoperative docetaxel with or without bevacizumab for locally advanced breast cancer: impact on angiogenic biomarkers. Clin Cancer Res 15(10):3583–3590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Foekens JA, Peters HA, Grebenchtchikov N et al (2001) High tumor levels of vascular endothelial growth factor predict poor response to systemic therapy in advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res 61:5407–5414

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Linderholm BK, Lindahl T, Holmberg L et al (2001) The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor correlates with mutant p53 and poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 61:2256–2260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gasparini G, Toi M, Gion M et al (1997) Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor protein in node-negative breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 89(2):139–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gasparini GP, Toi M, Verderio P et al (1998) Prognostic significance of p53, angiogenesis, and other conventional features in operable breast cancer: subanalysis in node-positive and node-negative patients. Int J Oncol 12:1117–1125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Konecny GE, Meng YG, Untch M et al (2004) Association between HER-2/neu and vascular endothelial growth factor expression predicts clinical outcome in primary breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 10:1706–1716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Linderholm BK, Hellborg H, Johansson U et al (2009) Significantly higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and shorter survival times for patients with primary operable triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 20:1639–1646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gasparini G (2000) Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer. Oncologist 5(Suppl 1):37–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the ‘Associazione Patologia Oncologica Mammaria – APOM’, Cremona, Italy, by the Association of ‘Amici dell’Ospedale di Cremona’, by Cancer Research UK (CRUK), UK and the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Programme.

Conflict of intrest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Mele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mele, T., Generali, D., Fox, S. et al. Anti-angiogenic effect of tamoxifen combined with epirubicin in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123, 795–804 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1063-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1063-0

Keywords

Navigation