Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Childhood body mass index and adult mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to determine if body mass index (BMI) during childhood is associated with the breast cancer risk factor ‘adult mammographic density adjusted for age and BMI’. In 1968, the Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study studied every Tasmanian school child born in 1961. We obtained measured heights and weights from annual school medical records across ages 7–15 years and imputed missing values. Between 2009 and 2012, we administered to 490 women a questionnaire that asked current height and weight and digitised at least one mammogram per woman. Absolute and percent mammographic densities were measured using the computer-assisted method CUMULUS. We used linear regression and adjusted for age at interview and log current BMI. The mammographic density measures were negatively associated: with log BMI at each age from 7 to 15 years (all p < 0.05); with the average of standardised log BMIs across ages 7–15 years (p < 0.0005); and more strongly with standardised log BMI measures closer to age 15 years (p < 0.03). Childhood BMI measures explained 7 and 10 % of the variance in absolute and percent mammographic densities, respectively, and 25 and 20 % of the association between current BMI and absolute and percent mammographic densities, respectively. Associations were not altered by adjustment for age at menarche. There is a negative association between BMI in late childhood and the adult mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk. This could explain, at least in part, why BMI in adolescence is negatively associated with breast cancer risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1159–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen TL, Schmidt DF, Makalic E et al (2013) Explaining variance in the cumulus mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk: a twins and sisters study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22:2395–2403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huo CW, Chew GL, Britt KL et al (2014) Mammographic density-a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:479–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin LJ, Melnichouk O, Guo H et al (2010) Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:456–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J et al (2002) Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:886–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stone J, Dite GS, Gunasekara A et al (2006) The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:612–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Odefrey F, Stone J, Gurrin LC et al (2010) Common genetic variants associated with breast cancer and mammographic density measures that predict disease. Cancer Res 70:1449–1458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stone J, Thompson DJ, dos-Santos-Silva I et al (2015) Large International Study reveals novel associations between common breast cancer susceptibility variants and risk-predicting mammographic density measures. Cancer Res 75:2457–2467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Matheson M, Abramson MJ, Burgess JA, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Jenkins M, Johns DP, Perret JL, Walters EH, Lowe A, Thompson BR, Pretto JJ, Markos J, Morrison S, Thomas PS, McDonald CF, Wood-Baker R, Svanes C, Dharmage SC for the TAHS investigator group. Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study (TAHS)—cohort profile. Int J Epidemiol

  10. Wharton C, Dharmage S, Jenkins M et al (2006) Tracing 8,600 participants 36 years after recruitment at age seven for the Tasmanian Asthma Study. Aust N Z J Public Health 30:105–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakajima K, Dharmage SC, Carlin JB et al (2007) Is childhood immunisation associated with atopic disease from age 7 to 32 years? Thorax 62:270–275

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Milne RL, John EM, Knight JA et al (2011) The potential value of sibling controls compared with population controls for association studies of lifestyle-related risk factors: an example from the Breast Cancer Family Registry. Int J Epidemiol 40:1342–1354

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E et al (1994) The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 39:1629–1638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Preece MA, Baines MJ (1978) A new family of mathematical models describing the human growth curve. Ann Hum Biol 5:1–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Diggle PJ, Zeger SL, Lian K-Y (1994) Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hopper JL, Mathews JD (1994) A multivariate normal model for pedigree and longitudinal data, and the statistical package “FISHER”. Aust J Stat 36:153–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stone J, Dite GS, Giles GG et al (2012) Inference about causation from examination of familial confounding: application to longitudinal twin data on mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1149–1155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lange K, Weeks D, Boehnke M (1988) Programs for pedigree analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, and dGENE. Genet Epidemiol 5:471–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Core Team R (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  20. StatCorp (2009) Stata statistical software: release 11. StataCorp LP, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCormack V, dos Santos Silva I, De Stavola BL et al (2003) Life-course body size and perimenopausal mammographic parenchymal patterns in the MRC 1946 British birth cohort. Br J Cancer 89:852–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersen ZJ, Baker JL, Bihrmann K et al (2014) Birth weight, childhood body mass index, and height in relation to mammographic density and breast cancer: a register-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 20:R4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris HR, Tamimi RM, Willett WC et al (2011) Body size across the life course, MD, and risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 174:909–918

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Colditz GA, Bohlke K, Berkey CS (2014) Breast cancer risk accumulation starts early: prevention must also. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145:567–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Baer HJ, Colditz GA, Rosner B et al (2005) Body fatness during childhood and adolescence and incidence of breast cancer in premenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 7:R314–R325

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Baer HJ, Tworoger SS, Hankinson SE et al (2010) Body fatness at young ages and risk of breast cancer throughout life. Am J Epidemiol 171:1183–1194

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bardia A, Vachon CM, Olson JE et al (2008) Relative weight at age 12 and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:374–378

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Berkey CS, Frazier AL, Gardner JD et al (1999) Adolescence and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer 85:2400–2409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Le Marchand L, Kolonel LN, Earle ME et al (1988) Body size at different periods of life and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 128:137–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. London SJ, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ et al (1989) Prospective study of relative weight, height, and risk of breast cancer. JAMA 262:2853–2858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Magnusson CM, Roddam AW, Pike MC et al (2005) Body fatness and physical activity at young ages and the risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women. Br J Cancer 93:817–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Palmer JR, Adams-Campbell LL, Boggs DA et al (2007) A prospective study of body size and breast cancer in black women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:1795–1802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Michels KB, Terry KL, Willett WC (2006) Longitudinal study on the role of body size in premenopausal breast cancer. Arch Intern Med 166:2395–2402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sangaramoorthy M, Phipps AI, Horn-Ross PL et al (2013) Early-life factors and breast cancer risk in Hispanic women: the role of adolescent body size. Cancer Causes Control 24:1771–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bandera EV, Chandran U, Zirpoli G et al (2013) Body size in early life and breast cancer risk in African American and European American women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 138:601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jordan HL, Hopper JL, Thomson RJ et al (2010) Influence of high-dose estrogen exposure during adolescence on mammographic density for age in adulthood. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:121–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nguyen TL, Aung YK, Evans CF et al (2015) Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms. Breast Cancer Res 17:142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Stone J, Dite GS, Giles GG et al (2012) Inference about causation from examination of familial confounding: application to longitudinal twin data on mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:1149–1155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants in the TAHS, the study interviewers and the Tasmanian State Archives for providing access to school medical records.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 3, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, 3053, VIC, Australia

    John L. Hopper, Tuong L. Nguyen, Kelly Aujard, Melanie C. Matheson, John A. Burgess, Gillian S. Dite, Minh Bui, Christopher Evans, Enes Makalic, Daniel F. Schmidt, Mark A. Jenkins, Graham G. Giles, Shyamali C. Dharmage & Carmel Apicella

  2. Seoul Department of Epidemiology and Institute of Health and Environment, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

    John L. Hopper

  3. The Curtin UWA Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, Curtin University and The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

    Jennifer Stone

  4. Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Michael J. Abramson

  5. NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence for Chronic Respiratory Disease, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia

    E. Haydn Walters

  6. Department of Health & Human Services, BreastScreen Tasmania, Level 4 25 Argyle St., Hobart, TAS, Australia

    Gail Ward

  7. Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, St Kilda, VIC, Australia

    Graham G. Giles

Authors
  1. John L. Hopper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tuong L. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer Stone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kelly Aujard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Melanie C. Matheson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael J. Abramson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. John A. Burgess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. Haydn Walters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gillian S. Dite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Minh Bui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Christopher Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Enes Makalic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Daniel F. Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Gail Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Mark A. Jenkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Graham G. Giles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Shyamali C. Dharmage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Carmel Apicella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John L. Hopper.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hopper, J.L., Nguyen, T.L., Stone, J. et al. Childhood body mass index and adult mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 156, 163–170 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3719-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3719-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation