Skip to main content
Log in

Gender and Perceived Fundamental Moral Orientations: An Empirical Study of the Turkish Hotel Industry

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent history is replete with scandalous acts and charitable acts within the business community. Unfortunately, scandalous acts seem to occur with greater frequency than charitable acts – at least as reported in the broadcast and print media. An interesting corollary to the incidence of scandalous and charitable acts is the apparent differential involvement of men and women, particularly in scandals. This article explores a possible explanation for the apparent gender differential in involvement in scandals and acts of charity. Drawing on a conceptual framework of three Fundamental Moral Orientations (FMOs) – selfishness, self-fullness, and selflessness – and relevant literature on gender effects, this article explores whether men and women are perceived as differing fundamentally in how they approach moral dilemmas. This phenomenon is examined with a sample of personnel (n = 682) from the hotel industry in Turkey. Results of the study indicate that gender has some effect on the perceived adoption of FMOs, and that these gender effects are generally consistent across age, educational level, and organizational rank categories. Implications of the findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Archer, J., & Coyne, S. (2005). An Integrated Review of Indirect, Relational, and Social Aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212–230 . doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsu, S.: 2005, ‹World Briefing, Europe: Turkey: Ex-Premier on Trial’, The New York Times Archives, http://www.nytimes.com. Accessed 5 Nov 2007

  • Ball, D. A., McCulloch, W. H., Jr., Frantz, P. L., Geringer, J. M., & Minor, M. S. (2002). International Business: The Challenge of Global Competition, 8th ed. (McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. N., & Pfeffer, J. (1994). The Social Psychology of Organizations and Inequality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(3), 190–209. doi:10.2307/2786876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC News: 2001, ‹Turkey Hopes for $25bn Loan’, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1194496.stm. Accessed 5 Nov 2007

  • Beu, D. S., Buckley, R. M., & Harvey, M. G. (2003). ‹Ethical Decision-Making: A Multidimensional Construct’, Business Ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 20(1), 88–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D., & Neuman, J. H. (1992). ‹The Implications of Attraction Research for Organizational Issues’. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issues, Theory, and Research in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (Elsevier, New York, NY), 29–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73. doi:10.2307/3150876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A., Jr., & Iacobucci, D. (2005). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, 9th ed. (Thomson/South-Western, Cincinnati, OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Plant, L., & Sharp, D. (1998). Are Women Held to a Higher Moral Standard than Men? Gender Bias among University Students. Teaching Business Ethics, 2(2), 197–209. doi:10.1023/A:1009797124068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. (2000). The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1,500 Articles Published in Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(1), 1–73. doi:10.1023/A:1006358104098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N., & Grotpeter, J. (1995). Relational Aggression, Gender, and Social-Psychological Adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722 . doi:10.2307/1131945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. (1995). Women and Men, Morality and Ethics. Business Horizons, 38(4), 61–68. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(95)90010-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. M. (1997). Ethical Differences Between Men and Women in the Sales Profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(11), 1143–1152. doi:10.1023/A:1005721916646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., & Steffen, V. (1986). Gender and Aggressive Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 309–330 . doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elm, D. R., Kennedy, E. J., & Lawton, L. (2001). Determinants of Moral Reasoning: Sex Role Orientation, Gender, and Academic Factors. Business & Society, 40(3), 241–265. doi:10.1177/000765030104000302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1994). Gender Differences in Personality: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429–456 . doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). ‹Two Moral Orientations’. In C. Gilligan, J.V. Ward & J.M. Taylors (Eds.), Mapping the Moral Domain (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1995). ‹The Effect of Sex Similarity on Recruiters’ Evaluations of Actual Applicants: A Test of the Similarity Attraction Paradigm’. Personnel Psychology, 48(1), 85–98. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01747.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. (1998). Are Women Really More Ethical Than Men? Maybe It Depends on the Situation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10, 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M. M., & Bilimoria, D. (2004). Care and Justice Orientations in Workplace Ethical Dilemmas of Women Business Owners. Group & Organization Management, 29(4), 495–516. doi:10.1177/1059601103257424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. (2005). The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592 . doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. K.: 1985, Two Moral Orientations – Two Problem-Solving Strategies: Adolescents’ Solutions to Dilemmas in Fables. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education.

  • Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204. doi:10.1023/A:1006083612239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, E. S., & Mudrack, P. E. (1996). Gender and Ethical Orientation: A Test of Gender and Occupational Socialization Theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 599–604. doi:10.1007/BF00411793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R., & Dato-on, M. C. (2006). The Business of Ethics and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 101–116. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-3327-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCuddy, M. K. (2005). Linking Moral Alternatives and Stewardship Options to Personal and Organizational Outcomes: A Proposed Model. Review of Business Research, 5(1), 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuddy, M. K. (2006). The Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: A Moral Analysis of Human Responses to a Disaster. Proceedings of the American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 1348–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuddy, M. K., & Peery, B. L. (1996). ‹Selected Individual Differences and Collegians’ Ethical Beliefs’. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 261–272. doi:10.1007/BF00382952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G., & Pak, P. C. (1996). ‹It’s All Fair in Love, War, and Business: Cognitive Philosophies in Ethical Decision Making’. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(9), 973–996. doi:10.1007/BF00705577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeilly, K. M., & Russ, F. (2000). Does Relational Demography Matter in a Personal Selling Context? Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 20(2), 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeilly-Choque, M., Hart, C., Robinson, C., Nelson, L., & Olsen, S. (1996). Physical and Relational Aggression on the Playground: Correspondence Among Different Informants. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 11(1), 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45–81 . doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The Effects of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54, 20–35. doi:10.2307/1251757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M.: 1998, ‹Moral Development’ in R. Chadwick (Ed.-in-Chief), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Vol. 3 (Academic Press San Diego, CA), pp. 267–273.

  • Peter, E., & Gallup, R. (1994). The Ethic of Care: A Comparison of Nursing and Medical Students. Image, 26(1), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, M., J. E. Nisolle and M. K. McCuddy: 2007a, ‹Examining the Gender Effect on Recruitment and Earning Potential for Salespeople in a Developing Country: A Study of Tajik Students’ Perceptions’, Perspectives on Business and Management, Vol. 2: Selected Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Business, Management, and Economics, 291–314.

  • Pinar, M., Nisolle, J. E., & McCuddy, M. K. (2007b). Investigating the Impact of Gender on Managing a Sales Force in a Developing Country: An Exploratory Study in Tajikistan. The Business Review, Cambridge, 8(1), 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D., & Babin, L. (1997). Making Sense of the Research on Gender and Ethics in Business: A Critical Analysis and Extension. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(4), 61–90. doi:10.2307/3857209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., Hanley, D., & Albert, M. (1986). Gender Differences in Moral Reasoning. Sex Roles, 15, 645–653. doi:10.1007/BF00288220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxas, M. L., & Stoneback, J. Y. (2004). The Importance of Gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 149–165. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022127.51047.ef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L. (1999). The Development of Six Ethical Business Dilemmas. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 20(4), 189–197. doi:10.1108/01437739910276993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B. (1998). Buyer-Seller Relationships: Similarity, Relationship Management, and Quality. Psychology and Marketing, 15, 3–21. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199801)15:1<3::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L., & Oakley, E. F., III. (1997). Gender-Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 37–45. doi:10.1023/A:1017995530951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (Cambridge University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). ‹The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior’. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Nelson-Hall, Chicago, IL), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. (1986). Estimating Gender Differences in the Comprehension and Preference of Moral Issues. Developmental Review, 6(22), 165–180. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(86)90010-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, 12, 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1985). Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social-Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior. Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, 2, 77–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S. R., & Rittenberg, T. L. (2007). The Ethical Decision Making of Men and Women Executive in International Business Situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(2), 125–134. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9129-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review. Child Development, 55, 677–691. doi:10.2307/1130121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J. (1986). Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Rejoinder to Baumrind. Child Development, 55, 522–526. doi:10.2307/1130607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J., deVries, B., & Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral Stages and Moral Orientations in Real Life and Hypothetical Dilemmas. Child Development, 55(3), 842–858. doi:10.2307/1130221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and Negotiator Competitiveness: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(1), 1–29 . doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1982). ‹Circumplex Models of Interpersonal Behavior in Clinical Psychology’. In P.C. Kendall & J.N. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology. Wiley: New York, NY. 183–221.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael K. McCuddy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCuddy, M.K., Pinar, M., Birkin, I. et al. Gender and Perceived Fundamental Moral Orientations: An Empirical Study of the Turkish Hotel Industry. J Bus Ethics 89, 331–349 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0003-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0003-y

Keywords

Navigation