Skip to main content
Log in

Undivided Corporate Responsibility: Towards a Theory of Corporate Integrity

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the years since Enron corporate social responsibility, or “CSR,” has become a ubiquitous phenomenon in both research and business practice. CSR is used as an umbrella term to describe much of what is done in terms of ethics-related activities in firms around the globe to such an extent that some consider it a “tortured concept” (Godfrey and Hatch 2007, Journal of Business Ethics 70, 87–98). Addressing this skepticism, I argue in this article that the focus on CSR is indeed problematic for three main reasons: (1) the term carries a lot of historical baggage – baggage that is not necessarily conducive to the clarity of the concept; (2) it is the object of increasing ethical instrumentalism; and (3) given the multiple ethical challenges that corporations face, and given the fact that the “social” responsibilities of business are but one set of corporate responsibilities, a suitable term would have to be more inclusive and integrative. I therefore suggests moving instead toward a sound definition of corporate integrity and aim in this article to develop a working definition by fleshing out “7 Cs” of integrity: commitment, conduct, content, context, consistency, coherence, and continuity. I then discuss how these 7 Cs impact our understanding of CSR or, more broadly, corporate responsibility in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, F.W.: 1951, ‘Management’s Responsibilities in a Complex World’, Harvard Business Review 29(3), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. and P.E. Murphy: 2006, ‘The Many Faces of Integrity’, Business Ethics Quarterly 16(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and G. Palazzo: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility. A Process Model of Sensemaking’, Academy of Management Review 33, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, C.D., E. Collins and A.A. Powell: 2006, ‘Doing Business after the Fall: The Virtue of Moral Hypocrisy’, Journal of Business Ethics 66, 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BAWB: 2006, ‘Business as an Agent of World Benefit’, Conference at Case Western Reserve University with Academy of Management and UN Global Compact, October 24–26

  • Beauchamp, T. and N. E. Bowie (eds.): 2001, Ethical Theory and Business, 6th Edition (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ), pp. 51–55

  • Becker, T.E.: 1998, ‘Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness’, Academy of Management Review 23(1), 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R.: 1953, The Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Brothers, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N.E.: 1998, Business Ethics. A Kantian Perspective. Blackwell, Malden, MA/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickson, S.: 2005, ‘Organizational Identity Orientation: Making the Link Between Organizational Identity and Organizations’ Relations with Stakeholders’, Administrative Science Quarterly 50, 576–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickson, S.: 2007, ‘Organizational Identity Orientation: The Genesis of the Role of the Firm and Distinct Forms of Social Value’, Academy of Management Review 32(3), 864–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.T.: 2005, Corporate Integrity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. and J.M. Logsdon: 1996, ‘How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off’, Long Range Planning 29(4), 495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C.: 1995, ‘Standing for Something’, Journal of Philosophy 92(5), 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.L.: 2007, ‘Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 32(3), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B.: 1979, ‘A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance’, Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B.: 1999, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct’, Business & Society 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee for Economic Development: 1971, Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations (Author, New York)

  • Crook, C.: 2005, ‘The Good Company: a survey of corporate social responsibility’, The Economist, 22, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.: 1960, ‘Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities?’, California Management Review 2, 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.: 1967, ‘Understanding the Social Responsibility Puzzle’, Business Horizons 10(4), 45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.: 1973, ‘The Case for and against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities’, Academy of Management Journal 16(2), 312–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De George, R.T.: 1993, Competing with Integrity in International Business. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diermeier, D.: 2006, ‘Leading in a World of Competing Values’. In Maak, Th. and N.M. Pless (Eds.), Responsible Leadership. Routledge, London, New York, 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.: 1982, Corporations & Morality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.: 1989, The Ethics of International Business. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.: 1996, ‘Values in Tension: Ethics Away from Home’, Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee: 1994, ‘Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory’, Academy of Management Review 19(2), 252–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee: 1999, Ties That Bind. A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L.E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eels, R. and C. Walton: 1974, Conceptual Foundations of Business, 3rd ed. Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J.: 1998. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC/Stony Creek, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J.: 1996, Reputation. Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W.C.: 1998, ‘Moving to CSR 4. What to Pack for the Trip’, Business & Society 37(1), 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P.A.: 1984, Collective and Corporate Responsibility. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, P.A.: 1995, Corporate Ethics. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth/Dallas, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits’, New York Times Magazine, September 13, 32–33, 122–126. [Reprinted in: Beauchamp, T. and N. E. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business, 6th Edition (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ), pp. 51–55]

  • Godfrey, P.C. and N.W. Hatch: 2007, ‘Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century’, Journal of Business Ethics 70, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K.T.: 2004, Building Reputational Capital. Strategies for Integrity and Fair Play that Improve the Bottom Line. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics’, Academy of Management Review 20(2), 404–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M., W. Felps and G. Bigley: 2007, ‘Ethical Theory and Stakeholder-Related Decisions: The Role of Stakeholder Culture’, Academy of Management Review 32(1), 137–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M.: 1999, ‘Integrity Management’, European Management Journal 17(6), 625–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M.: 2003, ‘The Diamond of Managerial Integrity’, European Management Journal 21(1), 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. and J. Wempe: 2002, The Balanced Company. A Theory of Corporate Integrity. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy-Glans, D. and B. Schulz: 2005, Corporate Integrity. A Toolkit for Managing Beyond Compliance. John Wiley & Sons Canada, Mississauga, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D.: 2005, ‘Integrity as a Business Asset, Journal of Business Ethics 58, 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A.: 1988, ‘Integrity, Advanced Professional Development, and Learning. In Srivastva, S. and Associates (Eds.): 1988, Executive Integrity. The Search for High Human Values in Organizational Life. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA/London, 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and N. Lee: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, G. and C. Wilson: 2006, A Corporate Solution to Global Poverty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maak, Th. and Y. Lunau: 1998, Weltwirtschaftsethik [Global Business Ethics] (Haupt: Bern/Stuttgart/Vienna)

  • Maak, Th. and N.M. Pless (eds.): 2006a, Responsible Leadership. Routledge, London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maak, Th. and N.M. Pless: 2006b, ‘Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society’, Journal of Business Ethics 66, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, Th. and P. Ulrich: 2007, Integre Unternehmensführung. Ethisches Orientierungswissen für die Wirtschaftspraxis [Managing with Integrity] (Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart).

  • Margolis, J.D. and J.P. Walsh: 2003, ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’, Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFall, L.: 1987, ‘Integrity’, Ethics 98, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.K, B.R. Agle and D.J. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.’ Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.: 1999, ‘Corporate Moral Agency: Review and Implications’, Journal of Business Ethics 21, 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy, R.S., R.T. De George, T. Donaldson, W.J. Ellos, R.C. Solomon and R.B. Textor: 1998, Uncompromising Integrity: Motorola’s Global Challenge. Motorola University Press, Schaumburg, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. and A. Sen (Eds.): 1993, The Quality of Life. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S.: 1994, ‘Managing for Organizational Integrity’, Harvard Business Review March–April, pp. 106–117

  • Petrick, J.A. and J.F. Quinn: 2001, ‘The Challenge of Leadership Accountability for Integrity Capacity as a Strategic Asset’, Journal of Business Ethics 34, 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategy & Society. The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review, December, pp. 78–92

  • Post, J.E., L.E. Preston and S. Sachs: 2002, Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K.: 2005, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, V.K., J.A. Quelch, G. Herrero and B. Barton (Eds.): 2007, Business Solutions for the Global Poor. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A.G. and G. Palazzo (2007), ‘Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S.P.: 1975, ‘Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework’, California Management Review 17(3), 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C.: 1993, Ethics and Excellence. Cooperation and Integrity in Business. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C.: 1999, A Better Way to Think About Business. How Personal Integrity Leads to Corporate Success. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastva, S. and Associates (Eds.): 1988, Executive Integrity. The Search for High Human Values in Organizational Life. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G.A.: 1971, Business and Society. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne LeClair, D., O.C. Ferrell and J.P. Fraedrich: 1998, Integrity Management. University of Tampa Press, Tampa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P.: 1997, Integrative Wirtschaftsethik (Haupt: Bern/Stuttgart/Vienna)

  • Ulrich, P.: 2008, Integrative Economic Ethics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) (forthcoming)

  • Velasquez, M.: 1983, ‘Why Corporations are not Responsible for Anything They Do’, Business & Professional Ethics Journal 2(3), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M.: 2002, Business Ethics. Concepts and Cases. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D.: 2006, The Market for Virtue. The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Brookings, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C.E.: 1991, Managing with Integrity. Insights from America’s CEOs. Praeger, New York/Westport, CT/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster’s: 2001, Webster’s New World College Dictionary, 4th Edition. (IDG Books Worldwide, Foster City, CA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. and M. Sillanpää: 1997, The Stakeholder Corporation. Pitman Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.J., J.M. Logsdon, P.G. Lewellyn and K. Davenport: 2006, Global Business Citizenship. A Transformative Framework for Ethics and Sustainable Capitalism. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY/London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Maak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maak, T. Undivided Corporate Responsibility: Towards a Theory of Corporate Integrity. J Bus Ethics 82, 353–368 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9891-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9891-0

Keywords

Navigation