Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Web 2.0 Social Networks: The Role of Trust

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Online social networks (OSNs) have gained enormous popularity in recent years. Hundreds of millions of social network users reveal great amounts of personal information in the Web 2.0 environment that is largely devoid of security standards and practices. The central question in this article is why so many social network users are being so trusting. The focus is on theory-building on trust as a critical issue in OSNs. A theoretical framework is developed, which facilitates a multi-level and multi-dimensional analysis of research problems related to trust in OSNs. First, the structural and relational underpinnings of trust in OSNs are investigated from a governance perspective that integrates concepts of social network theory, social capital and the role of value in relational exchanges. Subsequently, the focus moves to the individual’s decision to trust and to processes through which trust actually emerges. Different types and sources of trust from the trust literature and their importance for trust-related decisions and behaviours in OSNs are discussed. Several research propositions are presented, which contribute to a better understanding of the role of trust and the relevance of facets of trust and social capital in OSNs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, F. and B. Roncevic: 2003, ‘Social Capital: Recent Debates and Research Trends’, Social Science Information 42(2), 155-183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S. and S.-W. Kwon: 2002, ‘Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept’, Academy of Management Review 27, 17-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D., J. Preece, and M. Turoff: 2002, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Demographic Groups Resistant to On-line Community Interaction’, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6, 9-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M. J. and K.E. Reynolds: 2003, ‘Hedonic Shopping Motivations’, Journal of Retailing 79(2), 77-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babin, B.J., W.R. Darden and M. Griffin: 1994, ‘Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value’, Journal of Consumer Research 20(4), 644-656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian, S. and V. Mahajan: 2001, ‘The Economic Leverage of the Virtual Community’, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 5, 103-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R. and O.T. Ahtola: 1990, ‘Measuring the Hedonic and Utiliarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes’, Marketing Letters 2(2), 159-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bews, N. F. and G.J. Rossouw: 2002, ‘A Role for Business Ethics in Facilitating Trustworthiness’, Journal of Business Ethics 39(4), 377-390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonhard, P. and M.A. Sasse: 2006, ‘‘Knowing Me, Knowing You’ - Using Profiles and Social Networking to Improve Recommender Systems’, BT Technology Journal 24(3), 84-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and L.J. Wacquant: 1992, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. L. and G. Easton: 2007, ‘Entrepreneurial Social Capital Unplugged: An Activity-based Analysis’, International Small Business Journal 25(3), 273-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. M. and N. B. Ellison: 2007, ‘Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.

  • Brass, D., K. Butterfield. and B. Skaggs: 1998, ‘Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 23, 14-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., A.J. Broderick and N. Lee: 2007, ‘Word of Mouth Communication within Online Communities: Conceptualizing the Online Social Network’, Journal of Interactive Marketing 21(3), 2-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S.: 2000, ‘The Network Structure of Social Capital’, Research in Organizational Behavior 22, 345-423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachia, R., R. Compañó and O. Da Costa: 2007, ‘Grasping the Potential of Online Social Networks for Foresight’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(8), 1179-1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M.: 1996, The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M.: 2001, The Internet Galaxy. Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A. and M.B. Holbrook: 2001, ‘The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty’, Journal of Marketing 65(April), 81-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chewar, C.M., D.S. McCrickard and J.M. Carroll: 2005, ‘Analyzing the Social Capital Value Chain in Community Network Interfaces’, Internet Research 15(3), 262-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S.: 1988, ‘Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital’, American Journal of Sociology 94, 95-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corritore, C. L., B. Kracher and S. Wiedenbeck: 2003, ‘On-line Trust: Concepts, Evolving Themes, a Model’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58, 737-758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. C., K. Bijlsma-Frankema and B. de Jong: 2009, ‘The Role of Social Capital on Trust Development and Dynamics: Implications for Cooperation, Monitoring and Team Performance’, Social Science Information 48(2), 199-228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Valck, K., G.H. van Bruggen and B. Wierenga: 2009, ‘Virtual Communities: A Marketing Perspective’, Decision Support Systems 47(3), 185-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, U.M., R.P. Bagozzi and L.K. Pearo: 2004, ‘A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities’, International Journal of Research in Marketing 21(3), 241-263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diep, V.C.S. and J.C. Sweeney: 2008, ‘Shopping Trip Value: Do Stores and Products Matter?’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 15(5), 399-409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P.M. and J.P. Cannon: 1997, ‘An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships’, Journal of Marketing 61, 35-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. and A. Wigfield: 2002, ‘Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals’, Annual Review of Psychology 53, 109-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., C. Steinfield and C. Lampe: 2007, ‘The Benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(4), 1143–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, A. M. 2008. ‘Glitch Opens Bebo Users’ Private Details to Others’, The New Zealand Herald.

  • Ferlander, S.: 2003, The Internet, Social Capital and Local Community (Department of Psychology, University of Sterling).

  • Ferlander, S.: 2007, ‘The Importance of Different Forms of Social Capital for Health’, Acta Sociologica 50(2), 115-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, J. and E. Nehmad: 2009, ‘Internet Social Network Communities: Risk Taking, Trust, and Privacy Concerns’, Computers in Human Behavior 25, 153-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F.: 1999, Social Capital and Civil Society. IMF Conference on Second Generation Reforms, International Monetary Fund.

  • Gallarza, M. G. and I. Gil Saura: 2006, ‘Value Dimensions, Perceived Value, Satisfaction and Loyalty: An Investigation of University Students’ Travel Behaviour’, Tourism Management 27(3), 437-452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganley, D. and C. Lampe: 2009, ‘The Ties that Bind: Social Network Principles in Online Communities’, Decision Support Systems 47(3), 266-274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzaroli, A.: 2002, Creating Trust Between Local and Global Systems (Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam).

  • Glanville, J. L. and E. J. Bienenstock: 2009, ‘A Typology for Understanding the Connections among Different Forms of Social Capital’, American Behavioral Scientist 52(11), 1507-1530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenane-Antoniadis, A., G. Whitwell, S. J. Bell, and B. Menguc: 2003, ‘Extending the Vision of Social Marketing through Social Capital Theory: Marketing in the Context of Intricate Exchange and Market Failure’, Marketing Theory 3(3), 323-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R. D.: 2003, ‘Relational Networks, Social Trust, and Norms: A Social Capital Perspective on Students’ Chances of Academic Success’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25(1), 59-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall Powers, J.: 2001, ‘The Formation of Interorganizational Relationships and the Development of Trust’, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University at Albany, Albany, NY.

  • Grabner-Kräuter, S.: 2002, ‘The Role of Consumers Trust in Online Shopping’, Journal of Business Ethics 39, 43-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabner-Kräuter, S. and R. Faullant: 2008, ‘Consumer Acceptance of Internet Banking: the Influence of Internet Trust’, International Journal of Bank Marketing 26(7), 483-504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabner-Kräuter, S. and E.A. Kaluscha: 2003, ‘Empirical Research in On-line Trust: A Review and Critical Assessment’, International Journal of Human-Computer-Studies 58, 783-812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graddy, E. and L. Wang: 2009, ‘Community Foundation Development and Social Capital’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 38(3), 392-412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S.: 1973, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360-1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S.: 1985, ‘Economic Action and Social Structure’, American Journal of Sociology 91, 481-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S.: 1992, ‘Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology,’ in N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, 25-56 (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubbins, C. and S. MacCurtain: 2008, ‘Understanding the Dynamics of Collective Learning: The Role of Trust and Social Capital’, Advances in Developing Human Resources 10(4), 578-599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H.: 1989, Motivation und Handeln (Springer, Berlin et al.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: 1995, ‘Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics ‘, Academy of Management Review 20(2), 379-403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., W. S. Hesterly, and S. P. Borgatti: 1997, ‘A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 911-945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaluscha, E. A.: 2004, The Importance of Initial Consumer Trust in B2C Electronic Commerce (University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt).

  • Koehn, D.: 2003, ‘The Nature of and Conditions for Online Trust’, Journal of Business Ethics 43, 3-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M.: 1999, ‘Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions’, Annual Review of Psychology 50, 569-598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M., M. B. Brewer, and B. A. Hanna: 1996, ‘Collective Trust and Collective Action: The Decision to Trust as a Social Decision’, In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations. Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp. 357-389 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, L. S. L. and E. Turban: 2008, ‘Groups Formation and Operations in the Web 2.0 Environment and Social Networks’, Group Decision and Negotiation 17(5), 387-402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, P. G.: 2007, ‘Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/lange.html.

  • Lee, M. K. O. and E. Turban: 2001, ‘A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping’, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6(1), 75-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. Z., R. Cross and L. C. Abrams: 2002, The Strength of Weak Ties you can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Academy of Management Proceedings 2002, pp. 1–7.

  • Levin, D. Z. and R. Cross: 2004, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer’, Management Science 50(11), 1477-1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J. and B. B. Bunker: 1995, ‘Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships’ in R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (Eds.) Trust in Oraganisations, pp. 114-139 (Sage Publishing, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., E. C. Tomlinson, and N. Gillespie: 2006, ‘Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions’, Journal of Management 32(6), 991-1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1989, Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität (Stuttgart).

  • Macaulay, L. A., K. Keeling, P. McGoldrick, G. Dafoulas, E. Kalaitzakis, and D. Keeling: 2007, ‘Co-Evolving E-Tail and On-Line Communities: Conceptual Framework’, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 11, 53–77.

  • Mansfield-Devine, S.: 2008, ‘Anti-Social Networking: Exploiting the Trusting Environment of Web 2.0’, Network Security (November), 4–7.

  • Mayer, A.: 2009, ‘Online Social Networks in Economics’, Decision Support Systems 47(3), 169-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and D. F. Schoorman: 1995, ‘An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust’, Academy of Management Review 20(3), 709 – 734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D. H. and N. L. Chervany: 1996, ‘The Meanings of Trust’, MISRC Working Paper, http://www.misrc.umc.edu/wpaper/WorkingPapers/9604.pdf. Accessed Oct 2002.

  • McKnight, H. D. and N. L. Chervany: 2002, ‘What Trust Means in e-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology’, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6(2), 35-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D. H., V. Choudhury, and C. Kacmar: 2002, ‘Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology’, Information System Research 13(3), 334-359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, H. D., L. L. Cummings, and N. L. Chervany: 1998, ‘Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships’, Academy of Management Review 23(3), 473-490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C., R. Deshpande, and G. Zaltman: 1993, ‘Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships’, Journal of Marketing 57, 81-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. T.: 2006, ‘Building Trust in Economic Space’, Progress in Human Geography 30(4), 427-450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal: 1998, ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage’, Academy of Management Review 23, 242-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K.: 2001, ‘Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy’, International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science pol 22(2), 201-214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P.: 2002, ‘The Bridging and Bonding Role of Online Communities’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 7(3), 3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pempek, T. A., Y.A. Yermolayeva, and S. L. Calvert: 2009, ‘College Students’ Social Networking Experiences on Facebook’, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30(3), 227-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, R., D. H. Wilcox, and V. Grover: 2003/2004, ‘The Role of System Trust in Business-to-Consumer Transactions’, Journal of Management Information Systems 20(3), 197–226.

  • Porter Liebeskind, J., A. Lumerman Oliver, L. G. Zucker, and M. B. Brewer: 1995, Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms (SSRN).

  • Puranam, P. and B. S. Vanneste: 2009, ‘Trust and Governance: Untangling a Tangled Web’, Academy of Management Review 34, 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D.: 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon & Schuster, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnasingam, P.: 1999, ‘Risks in Low Trust among Trading Partners in Electronic Commerce’, Computers & Security 18, 587-592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnasingam, P.: 2005, ‘Trust in Inter-organizational Exchanges: A Case Study in Business to Business Electronic Commerce’, Decision Support Systems 39(3), 525-544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D. and B. Arinze: 2002, `Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities', The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11(3–4), 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegelsberger, J., A. M. Sasse, and J. D. McCarthy: 2005, ‘The Mechanics of Trust: A Framework for Research and Design’, International Journal of Human-Computer-Studies 62, 381-422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotchanakitumnuai, S. and M. Speece: 2003, ‘Barriers to Internet Banking Adoption: A Qualitative Study among Coperate Customers in Thailand’, International Journal of Bank Marketing 21(6), 312-323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B.: 1967, ‘A New Scale for the Measurement of Interpersonal Trust’, Journal of Personality 35, 651-665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B.: 1971, ‘Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust’, American Psychologist 26(5), 443-452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Butt, and C. Camerer: 1998, ‘Not so Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust’, Academy of Management Review 23(3), 393-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Fernandez, R. and M. A. Iniesta-Bonillo: 2007, ‘The Concept of Perceived Value: A Systematic Review of the Research’, Marketing Theory 7(4), 427-451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T.: 2008, ‘Market Ideology and the Myths of Web 2.0’, First Monday 13(3), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2138/1945.

  • Shankar, V., G. L. Urban, and F. Sultan: 2002, ‘Online Trust: A Stakeholder Perspective, Concepts, Implications, and Future Directions’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11, 325-344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L., B. H. Sheppard, and L. Cheraskin: 1992, ‘Business on Handshake’, Negotiation Journal 8, 365-377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sledgianowski, D. and S. Kulviwat: 2009, ‘Using Social Network Sites: The Effects of Playfulness, Critical Mass and Trust in a Hedonic Context’, The Journal of Computer Information Systems 49(4), 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L. J. and R. Schmidpeter: 2003, ‘SMEs, Social Capital and the Common Good’, Journal of Business Ethics 45(1), 93-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfield, C., N. B. Ellison, and C. Lampe: 2008, ‘Social Capital, Self-Esteem, and Use of Online Social Network Sites: A Longitudinal Analysis’, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29(6), 434-445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. C. and G. N. Soutar: 2001, ‘Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale’, Journal of Retailing 77(2), 203-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, J. B., M. L. Loughry, J. Lim, and D. H. McKnight: 2007, ‘Internet Anxiety: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Personality, Beliefs, and Social Support’, Information & Management 44, 353-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Zee, K., M. Vos, and K. Luijters: 2009, ‘Social Identity Patterns and Trust in Demographically Diverse Work Teams’, Social Science Information 48(2), 175-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., J. Salaff, D. Dimitrova, L. Garton, M. Gulia, and C. Haythornthwaite: 1996, ‘Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community’, Annual Review of Sociology 22, 213-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. and S. Wortley: 1990, ‘Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support’, American Journal of Sociology 96, 558-588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E.: 1993, ‘Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization’, Journal of Law & Economics 36, 453-486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, M.: 2008, ‘The Externalities of Search 2.0: The Emerging Privacy Threats when the Drive for the Perfect Search Engine Meets Web 2.0’, First Monday 13(3), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/rt/printerFriendly/2136/1944.

  • Zucker, L. G.: 1986, ‘Production of Trust: Institutional Source of Eeconomic Structure, 1840-1920’, Research in Organizational Behavior 8, 53-111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klagenfurt University, Universitaetsstrasse 65-67, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Sonja Grabner-Kräuter

Authors
  1. Sonja Grabner-Kräuter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Grabner-Kräuter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grabner-Kräuter, S. Web 2.0 Social Networks: The Role of Trust. J Bus Ethics 90 (Suppl 4), 505–522 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0603-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0603-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation