Skip to main content
Log in

Convergence Versus Divergence of CSR in Developing Countries: An Embedded Multi-Layered Institutional Lens

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper capitalizes on an institutional perspective to analyze corporate social responsibility (CSR) orientations in the Lebanese context. Specifically, the paper compiles a new theoretical framework drawing on a multi-level model of institutional flows by Scott (Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests, 2008) and the explicit/implicit CSR model by Matten and Moon (Acad Manag Rev 33(2):404–424, 2008). This new theoretical framework is then used to explore the CSR convergence versus divergence question in a developing country context. The findings highlight the usefulness of the compiled multi-layered institutional framework and the varied nuances and profound insights it offers in analyzing CSR in context. They also suggest that a cosmetic level of global convergence in explicit CSR may materialize in light of mimetic isomorphic pressures, but that the path dependence hypothesis is indeed salient in light of national history trajectories and socio-politico configurations. The findings correspond most closely to patterns of CSR crossvergence, combining elements of both convergence and divergence, and reflecting in complex hybridized CSR expressions. The findings and their implications are presented and assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaeshi, K., Adi, B., Ogbechie, C. and Amao, O. (2006). CSR In Nigeria: Western Mimicry or Indigenous Influences? The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Vol. 24, pp. 83-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Lebanese Chamber of Commerce (AmCham Lebanon) on Line Newsletter, www.amcham.org.lb.

  • Blowfield, M. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Reinventing the Meaning of Development? International Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 515-524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Pavelin, S. and Porter, L. (2006). Corporate Social Performance and Geographical Diversification. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59, pp. 1025-1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2007). Why Would Corporations Behave In Socially Responsible Ways: An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 946-967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. and Marquis, C. (2005). Prospects for Organization Theory in the early Twenty-First Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms. Organization Science, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 332-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mooij, M. (2004). Consumer Bahavior and Culture: Consequences for Global Marketing and Advertising. Sage, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, pp. 147-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit: 2007, Country Profile 2007 – Lebanon (The Economist Intelligence Unit, London).

  • European Commission: 2002, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg) [Online], http://ew.eea.europa.eu/Industry/Reporting/cec__corporate_responsibility/com2001_0366en01.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2009.

  • Frynas, J. G. (2005). The False Development Promise of CSR: Evidence from Multinational Oil Companies. International Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 581-598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gat, A.: 2007, ‘The End of the End of History’, Foreign Affairs, July/August 2007.

  • Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R. and Hinings, C. (1996). Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 1022-1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. (2006). Insights into Triple Bottom Line Integration From A Learning Organization Perspective. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 809-821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. (2007). The Case for Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries. Business and Society Review, Vol. 112, No. 1, pp. 1-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. (2010). MNCs and International Accountability Standards Through An Institutional Lends: Evidence of Symbolic Conformity or Decoupling, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 617-640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. and Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 72, pp. 243-262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. and Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Synergies and Inter-Relationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 443-459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D., Sidani Y., and Safieddine A. (2005). Constraints Facing Working Women in Lebanon: An Insider View. Women in Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 581-594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D., Zanhour, M. and Keshishian, T. (2009). Peculiar Strengths and Relational Attributes of SMEs in the Context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 355-367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. and Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 215-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., and Lee, N. (2005). Corporate Social ResponsibilityDoing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M. and Block, E. (2008). Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism. In The Sage Handbook for Organizational Institutionalism (Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R. and Sahlin, K. Eds). Sage Publications, Ltd, pp. 243-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1983). The Globalization of Markets. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 92-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional Transformation and Status Mobility: The Professionalization of the Field of Finance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 255-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, P. (2004). Towards a Critical Framework on Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in the South: The Case of Pakistan. Development, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 106-113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. and Walsh, J. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, pp. 268-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., Glynn, M. and Davis, G. (2007). Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Action. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 925-945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. and Crane, A. (2005). Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualisation. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 166-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and Explicit CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 404-424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. and Scott, R. (2005). Organizations and Movements. In Social Movements and Organization Theory (G. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, and M. N. Zald, Eds), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 4-40.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. (2004). Perspectives on Multinational Enterprises in Emerging Economies. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 259-276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 145-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M., Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edition, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1979). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (2nd Edition). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. A. (2008). The Crossvergence Perspective: Reflections and Projections. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 27-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D., Pounder, J., Lo. C., Wong, Y., Egri, C. and Stauffer, J. (2006). Stability and Change in Managerial Work Values: A Longitudinal Study of China, Hong Kong and the US. Management and Organization Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 67-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2004). The McDonaldization of Society: Revised New Century Edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiberg, M. and Clemens, E. (2006). The Typical Tools for the Job: Research Strategies in Institutional Analysis. Sociological Theory, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 195-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1994). Conceptualizing Organizational Fields: Linking Organizations and Societal Systems. In: Derlien, H., Gerhardt, U., Scharpf, F. (Eds) Systems Rationality and Partial Interests. Nomos-Verlag, Germany, pp 203-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Sage. Thousand Oaks, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidani, Y. (2002), Management In Lebanon. In Malcolm Warner (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, Second Edition, Thomson Learning, pp. 3797-3802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J., Hill, R.P. and Martin, D. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World’s Most Successful Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 48, pp. 175-187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Institute of Directors: 2002, ‘A Guide to Corporate Social Responsibility’, www.6.miami.edu/ethics/pdf_files/csr_guide.pdf, pp. 1–12.

  • Visser, W. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries, in The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. and Siegel, D. Eds), Oxford University Press, pp. 473-503.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2008). Building a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 87-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. D. (1994). Dominant Form of Economic Organization in Market Economies. Organization Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 153–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, M., and Hoffman, A. (2008). Organizational Fields: Past, Present and Future. In The Sage Handbook for Organizational Institutionalism (Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R. and Sahlin, K. Eds). Sage Publications, Ltd, pp. 130-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005). The Status and Progress of Women in the Middle East and North Africa. World Bank Middle East and North Africa Socio-Economic Development Group, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge and express sincere thanks and appreciation to Professor Bryan Husted Professor Dirk Matten and Dr. Bijan Azad for their constructive comments on earlier drafts of this paper. They also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their round(s) of most constructive comments. The first author also wishes to acknowledge generous funding support from the University Research Board (URB) at the American University of Beirut for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dima Jamali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jamali, D., Neville, B. Convergence Versus Divergence of CSR in Developing Countries: An Embedded Multi-Layered Institutional Lens. J Bus Ethics 102, 599–621 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0

Keywords

Navigation