Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Green Consumption Practices Among Young Environmentalists: A Practice Theory Perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the subjective experiences of young environmentalists who engage in green consumption practices from the theoretical lens of Warde’s (J Consum Cult 5(2):131–153, 2005) practice theory. Data were gathered through 21 photo-elicited, in-depth interviews with young environmentalists. Based on our findings, we postulated a theoretical framework to understand green consumption practices among our informants as a process with three interrelated phases: green credibility seeking, green procurement and prosumption, and green whispers. This inductive investigation revealed various symbolic meanings of green consumption (e.g. happiness and empowerment) that are instrumental in effectively engaging in green consumption practice and are widely shared among our informants. Our investigation extends the existing literature on green consumption with an alternative theoretical perspective and provides managers with insights into the motivations and practices of green consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M., & Nilan, P. (2015). Urban growth, youth and environmentalism driving local initiatives in Bandung, Indonesia. In Australian sociological association conference, Cairns, Australia. The Australian Sociological Association.

  • Arnould, E. J., Price, L. L., & Moisio, R. (2006). Making contexts matter: Selecting research contexts for theoretical insights. Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing (pp. 106–125). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, L. (2013). Smart Shoppers? Using QR codes and ‘green’ smartphone apps to mobilize sustainable consumption in the retail environment. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37, 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(4), 361–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, M., Heiskanen, E., & Heinonen, V. (2009). Narratives of ‘green’ consumers-the antihero, the environmental hero and the anarchist. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8(1), 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry, J. F. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birtwistle, G., & Moore, C. M. (2007). Fashion clothing-where does it all end up? International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(3), 210–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, I. (2010). Sustainability through anti-consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann, A. (2000). The moral complexion of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 418–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • California_Compost_Coalition. (2015). Food waste not. Retrieved May 7, 2015, from http://caorganicsrecycling.org/mobius/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/15-04-CCC-Newsletter-with-Inserts.pdf.

  • Carrier, J. G. (2010). Protecting the environment the natural way: Ethical consumption and commodity fetishism. Antipode, 42(3), 672–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, P. J., & Scott, K. (2006). Environmental concern and behaviour in an Australian sample within an ecocentricanthropocentric framework. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58(2), 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. K. (2015). Prosumption: From parasitic to prefigurative. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(3), 446–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2006). Consumer identity and moral obligations in non plastic bag consumption: A dialectical perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(5), 515–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2007). Ethical consumption practices: Co production of self expression and social recognition. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2009). Anti-consumption discourses and consumer-resistant identities. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H., Black, I. R., & Lee, M. (2011). Intentional non-consumption for sustainability: Consumer resistance and/or anti-consumption? European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1757–1767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2003). Sustainable consumption: Consumption, consumers and the commodity discourse. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 6(4), 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2008). Green consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), 117–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, S. (2010). Projective techniques in consumer research. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences/Tydskrif vir Gesinsekologie en Verbruikerswetenskappe, 28(1), 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durning, A. T. (1992). How much is enough? The consumer society and the future of the earth. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, F., & Mercer, D. (2007). Gleaning from gluttony: An Australian youth subculture confronts the ethics of waste. Australian Geographer, 38(3), 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eighner, L. (1991). On dumpster diving. The Threepenny Review, 47(Autumn), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eräranta, K., Moisander, J., & Pesonen, S. (2009). Narratives of self and relatedness in eco-communes. European Societies, 11(3), 347–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, K. V., Brittain, A. J., & Bennett, S. D. (2011). “Doing the duck”: Negotiating the resistant-consumer identity. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1779–1788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fien, J., Neil, C., & Bentley, M. (2008). Youth can lead the way to sustainable consumption. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 2(1), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. (1995). Liberatory postmodernism and the reenchantment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 239–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brain to culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, C. (2014). Managing green complexities: Consumers’ strategies and techniques for greener shopping. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38, 485–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler, C. B., Butler, T. D., & Adams, F. G. (2013). The environmental belief-behaviour gap: Exploring barriers to green consumption. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 12(2–3), 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2014). Finding the right shade of green: The effect of advertising appeal type on environmentally friendly consumption. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 128–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guagnano, G. A. (2001). Altruism and market-like behavior: An analysis of willingness to pay for recycled paper products. Population and Environment, 22(4), 425–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunders, D. (2012). Wasted: How America is losing up to 40 percent of its food from farm to fork to landfill. Retrieved May 7, 2016, from https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/wasted-food-IP.pdf.

  • Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, B. J. (2016). Peeking behind the mask of the prosumer: Theorizing the organization of consumptive and productive practice moments. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgdon, S. (2015). Young Americans do care about the environment. Retrieved July 22, 2016, from http://www.treehugger.com/culture/young-americans-do-care-about-environment.html.

  • Holt, D. B. (1995). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, M. (2010). Compassion without action: Examining the young consumers consumption and attitude to sustainable consumption. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, M.-L., & Tan, L. P. (2015). Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., Hubner, G., & Bogner, F. X. (2005). Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(10), 2150–2170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalafatis, S. P., Pollard, M., East, R., & Tsogas, M. H. (1999). Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: A cross-market examination. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(5), 441–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, S., McDonagh, P., & Prothero, A. (1997). Sustainable consumption and the quality of life: A macromarketing challenge to the dominant social paradigm. Journal of Macromarketing, 17(1), 4–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E. (1998). Green marketing: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6), 641–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E., & Beckmann, S. C. (1998). Review and critical assessment of research on marketing and the environment. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6), 513–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E., Beckmann, S. C., Lewis, A., & Van Dam, Y. (2001). A multinational examination of the role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes of university students. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 209–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E., Beckmann, S. C., & Thelen, E. (2002). The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: A multinational examination. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E., Dorsch, M. J., McDonagh, P., Urien, B., Prothero, A., Grunhagen, M., et al. (2009). The institutional foundations of materialism in western societies: A conceptualization and empirical test. Journal of Macromarketing, 29(3), 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E., & Pickett, G. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 885–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1986). The prosumer movement: A new challenge for marketers. Advances in Consumer Research, 13(1), 510–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 691–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., & Kvasova, O. (2010). Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(13), 1319–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(1), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisander, J., & Pesonen, S. (2002). Narratives of sustainable ways of living: Constructing the self and the other as a green consumer. Management Decision, 40(4), 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. R., & Birtwistle, G. (2009). An investigation of young fashion consumers disposal habits. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 190–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: A review of research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. P., Chen, S., & Mukherjee, S. (2014). Reverse stigma in the freegan community. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1877–1884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen. (2012). The global, socially-conscious consumer. Retrieved March 27, 2012, from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2012/the-global–socially-conscious-consumer.html.

  • Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). Why don’t consumers care about CSR?: A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 449–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaoikonomou, E., Ryan, G., & Valverde, M. (2011a). Mapping ethical consumer behavior: Integrating the empirical research and identifying future directions. Ethics and Behavior, 21(3), 197–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaoikonomou, E., Valverde, M., & Ryan, G. (2011b). Articulating the meanings of collective experiences of ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentina, I., & Amos, C. (2011). The freegan phenomenon: Anti-consumption or consumer resistance? European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1768–1778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, A., & Fitchett, J. A. (2000). Greening capitalism: Opportunities for a green commodity. Journal of Macromarketing, 20(1), 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, A., McDonagh, P., & Dobscha, S. (2010). Is green the new black? Reflections on a green commodity discourse. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRweb. (2016). U.S. green cleaning products market retail sales growth at 20% CAGR for 2007–2011. Retrieved May 7, 2016, from http://www.prweb.com/releases/usa-green-cleaning/products-market-retail/prweb9874539.htm.

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2015). Prosumer capitalism. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(3), 413–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rombach, M., & Bitsch, V. (2015). Food movements in Germany: Slow food, food sharing, and dumpster diving. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 18(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røpke, I. (2009). Theories of practice—new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2490–2497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royne, M. B., Levy, M., & Martinez, J. (2011). The public health implications of consumers environmental concern and their willingness to pay for an eco friendly product. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 45(2), 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Judith, H. A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J. P. Rushton & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and Helping Behaviour (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Carsted, G., & Poter, P. L. (2001). Innovating our way to the next industrial revolution. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G. (2004). Shopping to save the planet: A critical analysis of sustainable consumption policy and practice. In ECPR joint sessions of workshops (citizenship and the environment). Uppsala: ECPR.

  • Shaw, D., McMaster, R., & Newholm, T. (2016). Care and commitment in ethical consumption: An exploration of the ‘attitude-bahaviour gap’. Journal of Business Ethics, 136, 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J. (2012). Understanding the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay for eco-labeled products: An empirical analysis of the China environmental label. Journal of Service Science and Management, 5(1), 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, N. (2002). Anarcho-environmentalists: Ascetics of late modernity. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 31(2), 135–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2004). Changing human behaviour and lifestyle: A challenge for sustainable consumption? London: Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, K. (2004). Rethinking the “good life”: The consumer as citizen. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 15(3), 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000a). Psychology and the science of human–environment interactions. American Psychologist, 55(5), 523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000b). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T. D., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behaviour, 25(5), 322–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2013). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J. (1997). Interpreting consumers: A hermeneutical framework for deriving marketing insights from the texts of consumers consumption stories. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(4), 438–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranter, B. (2010). Environmental activists and non-active environmentalists in Australia. Environmental Politics, 19(3), 413–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trend-Watching. (2011). 11 crucial trends for 2011. Retrieved March 23, 2012, from http://trendwatching.com/trends/11trends2011/.

  • Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion and the Environment, 44(2), 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallendorf, M., & Belk R. W. (1989). Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In Interpretive consumer research (pp. 69–84). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

  • Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1991). Religious rejections of the world and their directions. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 323–359). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2006). To be or not to be? The influence of dissociative reference groups on consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 404–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K., Simpson, B., & Argo, J. J. (2014). The motivating role of dissociative out-groups in encourgaing positive consumer behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 433–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilk, R. (2001). Consuming morality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1(2), 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18, 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Samuelson Appau for his helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia

    Chamila Perera

  2. Melbourne Business School, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia

    Pat Auger & Jill Klein

Authors
  1. Chamila Perera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pat Auger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jill Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pat Auger.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 1.

Table 1 Informant profiles
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perera, C., Auger, P. & Klein, J. Green Consumption Practices Among Young Environmentalists: A Practice Theory Perspective. J Bus Ethics 152, 843–864 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3376-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3376-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation