Skip to main content
Log in

Autocontrol: A Critical Study of Achievements and Challenges in the Pursuit of Ethical Advertising Through an Advertising Self-Regulation System

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theory and practice of advertising self-regulation have been evolving for decades in pursuit of basic standards for advertising quality. In Spain, this discipline was put into practice in 1995, the year the Association for the Self-Regulation of Commercial Communication (Autocontrol) was created. This article aims to examine in depth the functioning of the Spanish advertising self-regulation system, with special emphasis on the Advertising Jury, and explore to what extent some of the normative requirements of rigour, independence and participation can be considered to have been met. The paper is based on a case study in which interviews with Autocontrol members, Jury members and consumer associations have particular bearing. The results shed light on the achievements of Autocontrol’s self-regulation work and the challenges it still faces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: The authors. (Color figure online)

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.autocontrol.es/.

  2. Interviews were conducted with the following Autocontrol and Jury members:

    Former Jury Members:

    1. 1.

      Former section chairperson. 2012–2015. No. 1

    2. 2.

      Former section chairperson (appointed at the request of the National Consumer Institute). 2009–2015. No. 2

    3. 3.

      Former section chairperson (appointed at the request of the National Consumer Institute). 2009–2015. No. 3

    4. 4.

      Former section President 1999–2001 and President of Jury. No. 4

    Current Members (2016 to present)

    1. 5.

      Section chairperson. No. 5

    2. 6.

      Section chairperson. No. 6

    3. 7.

      Section chairperson. No. 7

    4. 8.

      Section president. No. 8

    Autocontrol Members:

    1. 9.

      Person in charge of Copy Advice and Jury. No. 1

    2. 10.

      Person in charge of Autocontrol. No. 2

    3. 11.

      Autocontrol worker. No. 3.

  3. Interviews were conducted with the following associations and representatives:

    1. 1.

      Coordinator in the Area of Mediation for the Consumers’ Union of the Valencian Community (Unión de Consumidores de la Comunidad Valenciana, UCCV).

    2. 2.

      President of the Association of Communications Users (Asociación de Usuarios de la Comunicación, AUC).

    3. 3.

      Delegate from the Spanish Committee of Representatives of People with Disabilities (Comité Español de Representantes de Personas con Discapacidad, CERMI) for the UN and the Human Rights Convention.

    4. 4.

      Cabinet member (communications) of the Farmers’ Union (Unió de Llauradors i Ramaders).

    5. 5.

      President of the Pedestrians’ Association (Asociación A Pie).

    6. 6.

      Speaker for The Consumers and Users Federation of Andalusia (FACUA).

    7. 7.

      Head of Communications and Image for the Women’s Image Observatory (Observatorio de la Imagen de la Mujer).

  4. A list of the members of the Autocontrol Board of Directors is available at: http://www.autocontrol.es/pdfs/Junta_Directiva_Asamblea.pdf.

  5. The National Consumer Institute merged with the Agency for Food Safety and Nutrition to form AECOSAN in 2014.

  6. http://www.easa-alliance.org/Publications/Statistics/page.aspx/375.

  7. On the levels of Autocontrol participation, see also Ignacio Cruz Roche (2015). Self-regulation of advertising in Spain. Effectiveness and efficiency of the Autocontrol Association (1995–2014). Autocontrol. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4437.8966.

  8. http://www.autocontrol.es/pdfs/folleto_espanol.pdf (p. 8). During the course of this work, the Autocontrol members also noted the predominant role of the Jury.

  9. Organisation: http://www.autocontrol.es/autocontrol_organizacion.shtml.

  10. Article 22 of the Statutes of Autocontrol.

    http://www.autocontrol.es/news/ESTATUTOS%20_%202014.pdf.

  11. http://www.autocontrol.es/pdfs/balance%2013%20AUTOCONTROL.pdf page 19.

  12. http://www.autocontrol.es/pdfs/balance_15_AUTOCONTROL.pdf page 24.

  13. http://www.inmujer.gob.es/observatorios/observImg/informes/docs/Informe2014.pdf (pages 16-17).

  14. The various reports issued by FACUA on Autocontrol can be consulted at http://www.facua.org/es/informe.php?Id=10&capitulo=90&IdAmbito=13 (Consulted 9 May 2016).

  15. See, for instance, 2016 spot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8daxE6LN7mo.

Abbreviations

AECOSAN:

Agencia Española de Consumo, Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición (Spanish Agency for Consumer Affairs, Food Safety and Nutrition)

ASA:

Advertising Standards Authority

ASR:

Advertising Self-Regulation

AUC:

Asociación de Usuarios de la Comunicación (Association of Communications Users)

CERMI:

Comité Español de Representantes de Personas con Discapacidad (Spanish Committee of Representatives of People with Disabilities)

FACUA:

Federación de Asociaciones de Consumidores y Usuarios de Andalucía (The Federation of Consumers and Users of Andalusia)

SRO:

Self-regulatory organisation

UCCV:

Unión de Consumidores de la Comunidad Valenciana (Union of Consumers of the Valencian Community)

References

  • Armstrong, G. M., & Ozanne, J. L. (1983). An evaluation of NAD/NARB purpose and performance. Journal of Advertising, 12(3), 15–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aznar, H. (2005). La comunicación responsable. La autorregulación de los medios. Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aznar, H., & Catalán, M. (2010). Códigos éticos de Publicidad y Marketing. Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. (2001). Decentring regulation: Understanding the role of regulation and self-regulation in a “post-regulatory” world. Current Legal Problems, 54(1), 103–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J. (1985). Advertising self-regulation: Private government and agent of public policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 4, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J. (1988). Advertising self-regulation and outside participation: A multinational comparison. New York: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J. (1989). Advertising self-regulation: True purpose and limits. Journal of Advertising, 18(2), 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J. (1992). Global perspectives on advertising self-regulation. Principles and practices in thirty-eight countries. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation & Governance, 4, 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burleton, E. (1982). The self-regulation of advertising in Europe. Journal of Advertising, 1, 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacko, S. G., & Hart, M. (2005). Critically examining theory and practice: Implications for coregulation and coregulating broadcast advertising in the United Kingdom Office of Communications (Ofcom). The International Journal on Media Management, 7(1&2), 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EASA. (2010). Advertising self-regulation in Europe: An analysis of self-regulatory systems and code of advertising practice (6th ed., ‘The Blue Book’). Brussels: Poot Printers.

  • Feenstra, R. (2013) La monitorización de la publicidad en la era digital: un reto para la ética. Cuadernos.info, 32, 47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Souto, A. B. (2000). Los límites de la publicidad. Análisis de las resoluciones del Jurado de ética publicitaria. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 34, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando Magarzo, M. R. (2011). La consolidación de la autorregulación publicitaria en España:fomento normativo y reconocimiento juridisprudencial. Estudios sobre consumo, 84, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusi, M., & Boddewyn, J. J. (1986). Advertising self-regulation by outsiders: The case of Italy. International Journal of Advertising, 5(2), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García Marzá, D. (2004). Ética de la publicidad. In J. Conill & V. Gozálvez (Eds.), Ética de los medios. Una apuesta por la ciudadanía audiovisual (pp. 111–135). Barcelona: Gedisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginosar, A. (2011). The regulation of advertising. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Handbook of the politics of regulation (pp. 254–266). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginosar, A. (2014). Self-regulation of online advertising: A lesson from a failure. Policy & Internet, 6(3), 296–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, J. D. (2001). La Asociación de Autocontrol de la Publicidad y la aplicación del principio de veracidad por su jurado. Estudios de Consumo, 57, 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Esteban, E. (2007). La teoría de los" stakeholders": un puente para el desarrollo práctico de la ética empresarial y de la responsabilidad social corporativa. VERITAS: revista de filosofía y teología, 17, 205-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, D. (1998). Achieving acceptable advertising. International Marketing Review, 15(2), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker, D. (2000). Complaints about advertising: What’s really happening? Qualitative Market Research, 3, 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker, D., & Harker, M. (2002). Dealing with complaints about advertising in Australia: The importance of regulatory self-discipline. International Journal of Advertising, 21(1), 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, M. (2009). Responsible ads: A workable ideal. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, D. L. (2012). La publicidad ética y responsable: Aproximación al fenómeno español. Entornos, 25, 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, C. T. (2008). Beyond Europe: The internet, regulation, and multistakeholder governance—Representing the consumer interest. Journal of Consumer Policy, 31, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, C. T. (2011). Internet co-regulation European law, regulatory governance and legitimacy in cyberspace. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martín, L. M., & Hernández, R. A. (2011). El control de la comunicación comercial en un mundo globalizado. Regulación, autorregulación e hiperregulación de la publicidad. Portal de la Comunicación InCom-UAB: El portal de los estudios de comunicación (pp. 1–19). Retrieved from http://www.portalcomunicacion.com/uploads/pdf/50_esp.pdf. Consulted November 15, 2015.

  • Medina, M., & An, S. (2012). Advertising self-regulation activity: A comparison between Spain and US. ZER, 17(33), 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muela-Molina, C., & Perelló-Oliver, S. (2014). Advertising self-regulation. A comparative analysis between the United Kingdom and Spain. Communication & Society, 27(3), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patiño Alves, B. (2007). La autorregulación publicitaria: especial referencia al sistema. Barcelona: Bosch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, T. (2008). Self-regulation, co-regulation and the audio-visual media services. Directive Journal of Consumer Policy, 31, 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, F. (2003). La publicidad contaminada. Los consumidores ante la autorregulación publicitaria. Madrid: Universitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotfeld, H. J. (1992). Power and limitations of media clearance practices and advertising self-regulation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotfeld, H. J., & Taylor, C. R. (2009). The advertising regulation and self-regulation issues ripped from the headlines with (sometimes missed) opportunities for disciplined multidisciplinary research. Journal of Advertising, 38(4), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senden, L. (2005). Soft law, self-regulation and co-regulation in European law: Where do they meet? Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 9(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, P. (2014). Enforcing transnational private regulation: A comparative analysis of advertising and food safety. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors, who are members of the Spanish research project FI2013-47136-C2-2-P, would like to express their gratitude to all the association members and individuals who were interviewed during the study, and for their attention, help and patience during the research project. In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge and thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments, which have greatly improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramón A. Feenstra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feenstra, R.A., González Esteban, E. Autocontrol: A Critical Study of Achievements and Challenges in the Pursuit of Ethical Advertising Through an Advertising Self-Regulation System. J Bus Ethics 154, 341–354 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3423-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3423-0

Keywords

Navigation