Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dealing with Ethical Dilemmas: A Look at Financial Reporting by Firms Facing Product Harm Crises

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A product harm crisis (PHC) undermines a firm’s reputation as well as its managers’ career outlook. To shake off the stigmatization resulting from the PHC and regain a firm’s legitimacy among stakeholders, managers usually face an ethical dilemma as they choose to be transparent about the crisis’ financial implications or to obfuscate them to neutralize the negative impact of the PHC. We find evidence that managers engage in income-increasing earnings management when their firms experience PHCs. Moreover, while income-increasing earnings management in PHCs reduces the likelihood of customer loss and CEO forced turnover in the short run, such behavior can be deemed opportunistic and unethical as it carries long-run negative consequences in terms of a higher likelihood of accounting restatement and weaker future operating performance. Finally, managers in firms that are subject to stricter external monitoring and managers in firms with proactive ethical policies are less likely to engage in upward earnings management in PHCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Coca-Cola’s 1999 PHC in Europe provides a vivid illustration of the potential consequences of a PHC (Mitroff and Silvers 2010, pp. 7–9). Following production problems at bottling plants in France and Belgium, more than 200 consumers ended up ill after drinking the firm’s products and McDonald’s even stopped serving Coke in its restaurants. A major product recall ensued as the governments of several countries banned the firm’s products. Beyond its health effects on consumers and the economic costs to the firm, the PHC ultimately cost Coca-Cola’s CEO, Ken Ivester, his job less than 2 years after his appointment. A 20-year Coca-Cola veteran with an impeccable record, Mr. Ivester was perceived to have mishandled the crisis, thus exposing the firm to additional economic and reputational costs. The Coca-Cola PHC also illustrates that the range of stakeholders affected by a PHC can be wide, encompassing consumers, management, shareholders, governments, regulators, suppliers, and employees (if plants are shut down or production is stopped).

  2. The implicit claims normally have no legal standing, and hence they can be breached by either party. However, Bull (1987) argues that there are forces that prevent firms from breaching the implicit claims. Rather, firms have incentives to build their reputation as having the ability to fulfill the implicit claims because such reputation ultimately determines the trade terms between firms and their stakeholders (Cornell and Shapiro 1987; Titman 1984).

  3. Since the advent of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and following the global financial crisis (2007–2009), stakeholders from various arenas have become increasingly critical of the ethics underlying certain financial reporting practices that were previously deemed as “business as usual” (e.g., Cryan and Theriault 2012; Sherman and Young 2016).

  4. Bowen et al. (1995) illustrate that customers care about firms’ accounting numbers including earnings. One example in their paper shows that LeCie advertised that customers can trust the company because its hard drives are backed by $400 million in assets and thus the company is a reliable source of high-quality machines and components. Moreover, media usually pays much attention to and publicizes firms’ earnings performance after PHCs. For example, Samsung hit the news headlines because of the Note 7 recall, but subsequent news reports specifically mentioned its soaring fourth quarter earnings (Yahoo 2017).

  5. Available at: http://faculty.washington.edu/pdemerj/data.html, accessed March 15, 2019.

  6. Managers can anticipate a product recall several months before its public announcement (Chen et al. 2009; Gao et al. 2015; Gokalp et al. 2016). Thus, even if a PHC occurs towards year-end, managers may engage in earnings management during the year before its announcement. For this reason, we focus on annual estimates rather than more granular quarterly estimates of earnings management. Nevertheless, we hand collected data on recall dates for a subsample of crisis firms in our main analysis. Analyzing 64 firms with fourth quarter product recalls, we find that their quarterly discretionary accruals exhibit an increasing trend up to the third quarter and a slight decrease in the fourth quarter, which is consistent with managers manipulating accruals even before they announce the product recalls in the fourth quarter.

  7. As robustness checks, we use discretionary accruals derived from modified Jones (1991) model and performance-adjusted modified Jones (1991) model as described in Kothari et al. (2015) and find consistent results.

  8. We use the two-stage regression with an IV to alleviate the concern that unobservable factors drive both a firm’s likelihood of experiencing a PHC and its earnings management behavior (Tucker 2010; Lennox et al. 2012). In Sect. 5.1, we conduct additional robustness tests using propensity score matching and entropy balancing to further mitigate the endogeneity concern arising from observable differences in firm characteristics between crisis and non-crisis firms.

  9. We also check the VIF of other control variables and none of them have VIF larger than three.

  10. Our results are not sensitive to the cut-off of difference in propensity scores. Our results stay the same if the cut-off is set to be 0.1 or 0.01.

References

  • Aaker, J., Vohs, K. D., & Mogilner, C. (2010). Non-profits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 224–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Advisen. (2018). Advisen data spotlight: It’s not you, there actually are more food recalls than there used to be. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from https://www.advisenltd.com/advisen-data-spotlight-its-not-you-there-actually-are-more-food-recalls-than-there-used-to-be/.

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2016). Manipulation and deception as part of a phishing equilibrium. Business Economics, 51(4), 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alissa, W., Bonsall, S. B., Koharki, K., & Penn, M. W. (2013). Firms’ use of accounting discretion to influence their credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(2–3), 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty. (2017). Product recall managing: The impact of the new risk landscape. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from https://www.agcs.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/agcs/agcs/reports/AGCS-Product-Recall-Report.pdf.

  • Arya, A., Glover, J. C., & Sunder, S. (2003). Are unmanaged earnings always better for shareholders? Accounting Horizons, 17(Supplement), 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, G., Gibbons, R., & Murphy, K. J. (2002). Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 39–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, T., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, D. C. (2010). Evaluating ethical approaches to crisis leadership: Insights from unintentional harm research. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(2), 281–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg. (2013). The most expensive product recalls. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/photo-essays/2013-01-17/the-most-expensive-product-recalls.

  • Bowen, R., Du Charme, L., & Shores, D. (1995). Stakeholders’ implicit claims and accounting method. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 255–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, M., Ertimur, Y., & O’Brien, P. (2017). Financial analysts and their contribution to well-functioning capital markets., Foundations and Trends in Accounting Hanover, MA: now Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, C. (1987). The existence of self-enforcing implicit contracts. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(1), 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 99–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. D., & Reimers, J. L. (2005). Unethical and fraudulent financial reporting: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, S. W., Muralidharan, E., & Bapuj, H. (2015). Corporate social ‘irresponsibility’: Are consumers’ biases in attribution of blame helping companies in product–harm crises involving hybrid products? Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 651–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Ganesan, S., & Liu, Y. (2009). Does a firm’s product-recall strategy affect its financial value? An examination of strategic alternatives during product harm crises. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 214–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, Y. M., Lapsley, I., & Lee, H. W. (2007). Choice of auditors and earnings management during the Asian financial crisis. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), 177–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. M., & Choe, C. (2014). Earnings management surrounding CEO turnover: Evidence from Korea. Abacus, 50(1), 25–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleeren, K., Van Heerde, H. J., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2013). Rising from the ashes: How brands and categories can overcome product harm crises. Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. A., & Zarowin, P. (2010). Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 50(1), 2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coldwell, D. A. L., Joosub, T., & Papageorgiou, E. (2012). Responsible leadership in organizational crises: An analysis of the effects of public perceptions of selected SA business organizations’ reputations. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16(1), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cryan, J. R., & Theriault, J. (2012). Is accounting blocking RandD investments? CFO.com. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from http://www.cfo.com/cash-flow/2012/12/is-accounting-blocking-rd-investments/.

  • Dawar, N., & Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., & Skinner, D. J. (1994). Accounting choice in troubled companies. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 17(1–2), 113–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerjian, P., Lev, B., & McVay, S. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science, 58(7), 1229–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devers, C. E., Dewett, T., Mishina, Y., & Belsito, C. A. (2009). A general theory of organizational stigma. Organization Science, 20(1), 154–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devin, I., & Halpern, P. (2001). Implicit claims: The role of corporate reputation in value creation. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(1), 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou, Y., Hope, O.-K., & Thomas, W. B. (2013). Relationship-specificity, contract enforceability, and income smoothing. The Accounting Review, 88(5), 1629–1656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific sociological review, 18(1), 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, E., Hayes, R. H., & Wang, X. (2003). CEO turnover and properties of accounting information. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1), 197–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, S. L., Stone, M., Hanson, T. A., Tolifson, A., Ngongoni, N., & Kalthoff, J. (2017). Shareholder value and crisis communication patterns: An analysis of the ford and firestone tire recall. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 32–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filip, A., & Raffournier, B. (2014). Financial crisis and earnings management: The European evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 49(4), 455–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N., & Sever, J. (2000). The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B., Hasan, I., & Wu, Q. (2013). The benefits of conservative accounting to shareholders: Evidence from the financial crisis. Accounting Horizons, 27(2), 319–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frecka, T. (2008). Ethical issues in financial reporting: Is intentional structuring of lease contracts to avoid capitalization unethical? Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J., & Becker, H. (1983). Ethical behavior of marketing managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(4), 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1995). A theory of income and dividend smoothing based on incumbency rents. Journal of Political Economy, 103(1), 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, H., Xie, J., Wang, Q., & Wilbur, K. C. (2015). Should ad spending increase or decrease before a recall announcement? The marketing-finance interface in product harm crisis management. Journal of Marketing, 79(5), 80–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatzert, N. (2015). The impact of corporate reputation and reputation damaging events on financial performance: Empirical evidence from the literature. European Management Journal, 33(6), 485–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokalp, O., Keskek, S., Kumas, A., & Subasi, M. (2016). Insider trading activity around auto recalls. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2016(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R., Harvey, C., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1), 3–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grougiou, V., Dedoulis, E., & Leventis, S. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting and organizational stigma: The case of sin industries. Journal of Business Research, 69, 905–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainmueller, J., & Xu, Y. (2013). Ebalance: A Stata Package for entropy balancing. Journal of Statistical Software, 54(7).

  • Hammond, R. G. (2013). Quantifying consumer perception of a financially distressed company. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 31(4), 398–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris Interactive. (2007). Consumer concern over product recalls high. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from https://theharrispoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Harris-Interactive-Poll-Research-Crisis-Food-Recalls-2007-06.pdf.

  • Haunschild, P. R., & Rhee, M. (2004). The role of volition on organizational learning: The case of automotive product recalls. Management Science, 50(11), 1454–1560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneghan, C. (2016). More than money: What a recall truly costs—While manufacturers are likely to spend millions, they also need to preserve consumer trust Food Dive. Retrieved September 26, 2019, from https://www.fooddive.com/news/more-than-money-what-a-recall-truly-costs/426855/.

  • Holthausen, R. W. (1990). Accounting method choice: Opportunistic behavior, efficient contracting, and information perspectives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1–3), 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. A. (2008). Against all odds: A consideration of core-stigmatized organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 252–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. (2009). Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organization Science, 20(1), 134–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrell, G., & Peltzman, S. (1985). The impact of product recalls on the wealth of sellers. Journal of Political Economy, 93(3), 512–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashmiri, S., & Brower, J. (2016). Oops! I did it again: Effect of corporate governance and top management team characteristics on the likelihood of product harm crises. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 621–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2014). What’s worse in times of product-harm crisis? Negative corporate ability or negative CSR reputation? Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D., & Goranova, M. (2014). Do investors see value in ethically sound CEO apologies? Investigating stock market reaction to CEO apologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, S. P., Mizik, N., & Roychowdhury, S. (2015). Managing for the moment: The role of earnings management via real activities versus accruals in SEO valuation. The Accounting Review, 91(2), 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. F., Hutton, A. P., & Shu, S. (2015). The role of social media in the capital market: Evidence from consumer product recalls. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 367–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, C. S., Francis, J. R., & Wang, Z. (2012). Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 589–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A. Z., Subramanyam, K. R., Zhang, J., & Shi, C. (2018). Do firms manage earnings to influence credit ratings? Evidence from negative credit watch resolutions. The Accounting Review, 93(3), 267–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maksimovic, V., & Titman, S. (1991). Financial policy and reputation for product quality. Review of Financial Studies, 4(1), 175–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, J. J., & Cowen, A. P. (2014). Cleaning house or jumping ship? Understanding board upheaval following financial fraud. Strategic Management Journal, 35(6), 926–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D. A. (2002). Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 483–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, B., & Elkind, P. (2003). The smartest guys in the room: The amazing rise and scandalous fall of Enron. Portfolio Trade.

  • Melé, D., Rosanas, J. M., & Fontrodona, J. (2017). Ethics in finance and accounting: Editorial introduction. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(4), 609–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirabito, A. M., Otnes, C. C., Crosby, E., Wooten, D. B., Machin, J. E., Pullig, C., et al. (2016). The stigma turbine: A theoretical framework for conceptualizing and contextualizing marketplace stigma. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 35(2), 170–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., & Silvers, A. (2010). Dirty rotten strategies: How we trick ourselves and others into solving the wrong problems precisely. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSCI. (2015). MSCI index calculation methodology. Retrieved March 15, 2019, from https://www.msci.com/eqb/methodology/meth_docs/MSCI_May15_IndexCalcMethodology.pdf.

  • Munyon, T. P., Jenkins, M. T., Crook, T. R., Edwards, J., & Harvey, N. P. (2019). Consequential cognition: Exploring how attribution theory sheds new light on the firm-level consequences of product recalls. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(5), 587–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2015). Monthly recall reports. Retrieved July 2, 2019, from http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/recallmonthlyreports.cfm.

  • Noack, D., Miller, D. R., & Smith, D. (2019). Let me make it up to you: Understanding the mitigative ability of corporate social responsibility following product recalls. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler, T. C., & Titman, S. (1994). Financial distress and corporate performance. The Journal of Finance, 49(3), 1015–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. (2012). Normal organizational wrongdoing: A critical analysis of theories of misconduct in and by organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, K., & Shahrur, H. (2008). Relationship-specific investments and earnings management: Evidence on corporate suppliers and customers. The Accounting Review, 83(4), 1041–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuber, R., & Fischer, E. (2010). Organizations behaving badly: When are discreditable actions likely to damage organizational reputation? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2006). The liability of a good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automotive industry. Organization Science, 17(1), 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, K. (1989). Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons, 3(4), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeger, M. W., & Ulmer, R. R. (2001). Virtuous responses to organizational crisis: Aaron Feuerstein and milt colt. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(4), 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. E. (2002). Effects of materiality, risk, and ethical perceptions on fraudulent reporting by financial executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(3), 241–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R., Ball, G. P., & Netessine, S. (2016). Plant operations and product recalls in the automotive industry: An empirical investigation. Management Science, 63(8), 2439–2459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D., & Young, S. D. (2016). Where financial reporting still falls short. Harvard Business Review, 94(7), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, J. E., Swanquist, Q. T., & Whited, R. L. (2017). Propensity score matching in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 92(1), 213–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, P., Hall, M., Robertson, J., Jasinski, T., & Miller, J. S. (2006). Ethical rationality: A strategic approach to organizational crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(4), 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, T., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Business Ethics. London: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, A. D., & Oddo, A. (2011). It’s time for principles-based accounting ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanyam, K. R. (1996). The pricing of discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1), 249–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. I., & Callahan, A. L. (1987). The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 405–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirumalai, S., & Sinha, K. K. (2011). Product recalls in the medical device industry: An empirical exploration of the sources and financial consequences. Management Science, 57(2), 376–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y., & Zhou, H. (2015). From bottom line to consumers’ mind: The framing effects of accounting information. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 43, 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titman, S. (1984). The effect of capital structure on a firm’s liquidation decision. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(1), 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. (2010). Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29, 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heerde, H., Helsen, K., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2007). The impact of a product harm crisis on marketing effectiveness. Marketing Science, 26(2), 230–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhamme, J., & Grobben, B. (2009). “Too good to be true!” The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladu, A. B., Amat, O., & Cuzdriorean, D. D. (2017). Truthfulness in accounting: How to discriminate accounting manipulators from non-manipulators. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(4), 633–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahoo. (2017). Samsung earnings soar in Q4 despite unprecedented Note 7 recall. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from http://bgr.com/2017/01/24/samsung-earnings-report-2016-q4/.

  • Zang, A. Y. (2012). Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 675–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (2012). Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1079–1101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Sophie Andousset-Coulier, Daniel Bens, Robert Bushman, Qiang Chen, Agnes Cheng, Ilia Dichev, Claude Francoeur, Simon Fung, Stephen Hillegeist, David Larcker, Vic Naiker, Jeffrey Ng, Valeri Nikolaev, Gordon Richardson, Douglas Skinner, Jennifer Wu Tucker, Yachang Zeng for their helpful suggestions. We also thank seminar participants at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Monash University, Concordia University, Université de Rennes I, and Deakin University as well as participants at the 2017 European Accounting Association and the 2017 Canadian Academic Accounting Association conferences for their comments. Like Jiang acknowledges financial support from the Faculty of Business and Economics of the University of Melbourne. Michel Magnan acknowledges financial support from Concordia University, the S.A. Jarislowsky Chair in Corporate Governance (Concordia University), and the Institute for Governance of Private and Public Organizations. Shafu Zhang acknowledges financial support from Nanjing University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

    Shafu Zhang

  2. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Like Jiang

  3. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada

    Michel Magnan

  4. Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong

    Lixin Nancy Su

Authors
  1. Shafu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Like Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michel Magnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lixin Nancy Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Like Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Jiang, L., Magnan, M. et al. Dealing with Ethical Dilemmas: A Look at Financial Reporting by Firms Facing Product Harm Crises. J Bus Ethics 170, 497–518 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04375-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04375-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation