Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Dose Titration Responses to the Introduction of Bisoprolol or Carvedilol in Stable Chronic Systolic Heart Failure

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Several beta blocking drugs (BB) reduce mortality in systolic heart failure (LVSD). We have compared the initial response to introduction of carvedilol and bisoprolol during the standard dose titration protocols for each drug.

Methods

Approximately 31 unselected patients with stable LVSD were randomised to either carvedilol or bisoprolol measuring blood pressure, heart rate responses and both time and frequency domain heart rate variability (HRV).

Results

One subject died; five withdrew due to intolerable BB related side effects. Carvedilol (n = 13) and bisoprolol (n = 12) attained similar maximal heart rate reduction and induced comparable falls in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Higher carvedilol doses were associated with lower blood pressure compared to baseline. Individual time domain HRV indices remained unchanged over the initial titration period. Significant increases in triangular Index (TI) were seen with both BB. Carvedilol demonstrated greater (but non-significant) rises in TI compared to Bisoprolol.

Conclusions

In this study we found similar degrees and rate of onset of HR, HRV and BP response to both carvedilol and bisoprolol in treated LVSD patients. Carvedilol appears to show superior HRV rises compared to bisoprolol during initial titration. Any significant increases in HRV attributable to carvedilol compared to bisoprolol may emerge over a longer treatment interval in LVSD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MERIT-CHF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-CHF). Lancet 1999;353:2001–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. CIBIS-II Investigators and Committees. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;353:9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Packer M, Coats AJS, Fowler MB, et al. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. New Eng J Med 2001;344:1651–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bristow MR. β-adrenergic receptor blockade in chronic heart failure. Circulation 2000;101:558–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. COMET Trial Investigators. Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;362:7–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dargie HJ. β-blockers in heart failure. The Lancet 2003;362:2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Metra M, Torp-Pederson C, Swedberg K, on behalf of the COMET Trial Investigators, et al. Influence of heart rate, blood pressure, and beta-blocker dose on outcome and the differences in outcome between carvedilol and metoprolol tartate in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the COMET trial. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2259–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 1996;93:1043–65.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Binder T, Frey B, Porenta G, et al. Prognostic value of heart rate variability in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation. PACE 1992;15:2215–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brouwer J, van Veldhuisen DJ, Man in t’Veld, et al. Dutch Ibopamine Multicenter Trial Study Group. Prognostic value of heart rate variability during long-term follow-up in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;29:1183–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponikowski P, Anker SD, Chua TP, et al. Depressed heart rate variability as an independent predictor of death in chronic congestive heart failure in secondary to ischaemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1645–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nolan J, Batin PD, Andrews R, et al. Prospective study of heart rate variability and mortality in chronic heart failure: results of the United Kingdom heart failure evaluation and assessment of risk trial (UK-heart). Circulation 1998;98:1510–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pousset F, Copie X, Lechat P, et al. Effects of Bisoprolol on heart rate variability in heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:612–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aronson D, Burger AJ. Effect of beta-blockade on heart rate variability in decompensated heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2001;79:31–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mortara A, La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, et al. Nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent carvedilol improves arterial baroflex gain and heart rate variability in patients with stable chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1612–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Akdeniz B, Guneri S, Savas IZ, et al. Effects of carvedilol therapy on arrhythmia markers in patients with congestive heart failure. Int Heart J 2006;47:565–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jansson K, Hagerman I, Ostlund R, et al. The effects of metoprolol and captopril on heart rate variability in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Clin Cardiol 1999;22:397–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldsmith RL, Bigger JT, Bloomfield DM, et al. Long-term carvedilol therapy increases parasympathetic nervous system activity in chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:1101–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Copie X, Pousset F, Lechat P, et al. Effects of betablockade with bisoprolol on heart rate variability in advanced heart failure: analysis of scatterplots of R–R intervals at selected heart rates. Am Heart J 1996;132:369–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Niemela MJ, Airaksinen KE, Huikuri HV. Effect of beta-blockade on heart rate variability in patients with coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1370–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lurje L, Wennerblom B, Tygesen H, Karlsson T, Hjalmarson A. Heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction in patients treated with atenolol and metoprolol. Int J Cardiol 1997;60:157–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kardos A, Long V, Bryant J, Singh J, Sleight P, Casadei B. Lipophilic versus hydrophilic β1 blockers and the cardiac sympatho-vagal balance during stress and daily activity in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Heart 1998;79:153–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation 1996;93:1043–65.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goyal D, MacFadyen RJ, Watson RD, Lip GYH. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in heart failure: a systematic review. Eur J heart Failure 2005;7:149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kindermann M, Maack C, Schaller S, et al. Carvedilol but not metoprolol reduces beta-adrenergic responsiveness after complete elimination from plasma in vivo. Circulation 2004;109:3182–90, Jun 29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanderson JE, Chan SKW, Yip GY, et al. Beta-blockade in heart failure: a comparison of carvedilol with metoprolol. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1522–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Malik M, Xia R, Odemuyiwa O, et al. Influence of the recognition of artefact in the autonomic analysis of long-term electrocardiograms on time-domain measurement of heart rate variability. Med Biol Eng Comput 1993;31:539–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Casadei B, Moon J, Johnston J, Caiazza A, Sleight P. Is respiratory sinus arrhythmia a good index of cardiac vagal tone in exercise? Am J Physiol 1996;81:556–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mortara A, La Rovere MT, Signorini MG, et al. Can power spectral analysis of heart rate variability identify a high risk subgroup of congestive heart failure patients with excessive sympathetic activation? A pilot study before and after heart transplantation. Br Heart J 1994;71:422–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Van de Born P, Montano N, Pagani M, Oren R, Somers VK. Absence of low-frequency variability of sympathetic nerve activity in severe heart failure. Circulation 1997;95:1449–54.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Malik M, Hnatkova K, Camm AJ. Practicality of post infarction risk assessment based on time domain measurement of heart rate variability. Chapter 30 pp. 393–405 Heart Rate Variability 1995; Futura, Armonk NY

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. MacFadyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamaad, A., Lip, G.Y.H., Nicholls, D. et al. Comparative Dose Titration Responses to the Introduction of Bisoprolol or Carvedilol in Stable Chronic Systolic Heart Failure. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 21, 437–444 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-007-6055-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-007-6055-x

Key words

Navigation