Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contrasting perspectives on barriers to adaptation in Australian climate change policy

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Barriers to adaptation have emerged as key concerns in climate change theory and practice, however there remains little consensus about which barriers are the most significant to different groups and how competing concerns may be addressed. We investigate the significance of different barriers to adaptation for governments, the private sector, and civil society in Australia through a systematic analysis of submissions to the Australian Productivity Commission’s inquiry into barriers to adaptation. Our results show that respondents prioritise barriers differently according to their respective sectors, and that there are competing concerns about which barriers should be addressed first. Nevertheless, some barriers are more persistent in the submissions than others, with governance and policy seen by most groups as being the major impediments to adaptation. We explain the implications of our analysis for adaptation politics and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a full list of respondents see Productivity Commission Final Report (Productivity Commission 2012) and for full text of the submissions see http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/climate-change-adaptation/submissions#initial

References

  • Adger WN (2001) Scales of governance and environmental justice for adaptation and mitigation of climate change. J of Int Dev 13:921–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN et al (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (2009) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values and governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Brown K, Barnett J, Marshall N, O’Brien K (2013) Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 3:112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A (2008) The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. The World Bank, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen H, Berglund F, Westskog H (2010) Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation—a question of multilevel governance? Environ and Plan C 28:276–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedsworth LW, Hanak E (2010) Adaptation to climate change. J Am Plann Assoc 76(4):477–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek G, Klostermann J, Termeer C, Kabat P (2013) On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Reg Environ Change 2013:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch S (2010) Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: Insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Glob Environ Chang 20(2):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission P (2012) Barriers to effective climate change adaptation. The Australian Government Productivity Commission, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabbé P, Robin M (2006) Institutional adaptation of water resource infrastructures to climate change in eastern ontario. Clim Chang 78(1):103–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessai S, Hulme M (2004) Does climate policy need probabilities? Clim Policy 4:07–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers SR, Hezri A (2010) Institutions and policy processes: the means to the ends of adaptation. WIREs Clim Chang 1:212–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber D (2007) Adapting to climate change: who should pay. J of Land Use and Envi Law 23(1):1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Few R, Brown K, Tompkins EL (2007) Climate change and coastal management decisions: insights from Christchurch Bay, UK. Coas Manag 35:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field CB, Mortsch LD, Brklacichet M, Forbes DL, Kovacs P, Patz JA, Running SW, Scott MJ (2007) North America. In: Parry ML et al (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of working group ii to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Flugman E, Mozumder P, Randhir T (2011) Facilitating adaptation to global climate change: perspectives from experts and decision makers serving the Florida Keys. Clim Change 112(3–4):1015–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford JD, Smit B, Wandel J, and MacDonald J (2006) Vulnerability to climate change in Igloolik, Nunavut: what we can learn from the past and present. Polar Rec 42(221):127–138

  • Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 15(3):199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovelsrud GK, Smit B (2010) Community adaptation and vulnerability in Arctic regions. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones L, Boyd E (2011) Exploring social barriers to adaptation: insights from Western Nepal. Glob Environ Chang 21(4):262–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuruppu N (2009) Adapting water resources to climate change in Kiribati: the importance of cultural values and meanings. Envi Sci & Policy 12(7):799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Chang 17(3–4):445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measham TG et al (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 16(8):889–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn R (2006) The role of markets and governments in helping society adapt to a changing climate. Clim Change 78(1):203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles M, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortreux C, Barnett J (2009) Climate change, migration and adaptation in Funafuti, Tuvalu. Glob Environ Chang 19(1):105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC (2005) Impact assessments and policy responses to sea-level rise in three US states: an exploration of human-dimension uncertainties. Glob Environ Chang 15(4):353–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(51):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Næss LO, Bang G, Eriksen S, Vevatneet J (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Glob Environ Chang 15(2):125–138

  • Nielsen JØ, Reenberg A (2010) Cultural barriers to climate change adaptation: a case study from Northern Burkina Faso. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttal M (2009) Living in a world of movement: human resilience to environmental instability in greenland. In: Crate S, Nuttall M (eds) Anthropology and climate change: from encounters to actions. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill S, Hulme M (2009) An iconic approach for representing climate change. Glob Environ Chang 19(4):402–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt A, Schroter D (2008) Perceptions of climate risk in Mozambique: implications for the success of adaptation strategies. Glob Environ Chang 18(3):458–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petheram L, Zander KK, Campbell BM, High C, Stacey N (2010) “Strange changes”: indigenous perspectives of climate change and adaptation in NE Arnhem Land (Australia). Glob Environ Chang 20(4):681–692

  • Rosenzweig C, Solecki W (2010) Chapter 1: New York City adaptation in context. Ann of the New York Acad of Sci 1196:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudiak-Gould P (2012) Promiscuous corroboration and climate change translation: a case study from the Marshall Islands. Glob Environ Chang 22(1):46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci & Policy 7(5):385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scally J, Wescott G (2011) Perceptions of climate change and adaptation responses in a local community: the Barwon estuary complex, Victoria. Aust Geogr 42(4):387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storbjörk S (2010) “It takes more to get a ship to change course”: barriers for organizational learning and local climate adaptation in Sweden. J of Environ Policy & Plan 12(3):235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart R, Biesbroek R, Binnerup S, Carter TR, Cowan C, Henrichs T (2009). Europe Adapts to Climate Change—Comparing National Adaptation Strategies S. Loquen et al., eds. Partnership for European Environmental Research, Pp. 1–283

  • Swim JK, Stern PC, Doherty TJ, Clayton S, Reser JP, Weber EU, Gifford R, Howard GS, (2011) Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. Am Psychol 66(4):241–250

  • Tol RSJ, Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ (2008) Towards successful adaptation to sea-level rise along Europe’s Coasts. J of Coast Res 24(2):432–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins EL, Eakin H (2012) Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 22(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urwin K, Jordan A (2008) Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Glob Environ Chang 18(1):180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby R, Dessai S (2010) Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65(7):180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J, Moser SC (2011) Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in-depth studies across the world. WIREs Clim Chang 2(4):547–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J, Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, Abrahamson V, Raine R, (2010) Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: an empirical study of two UK cities. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):44–52

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with financial support from the Australian Government (Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency) and the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility. The views expressed herein are not necessarily the views of the Commonwealth or NCCARF, and neither the Commonwealth nor NCCARF accept responsibility for information or advice contained herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elissa Waters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waters, E., Barnett, J. & Puleston, A. Contrasting perspectives on barriers to adaptation in Australian climate change policy. Climatic Change 124, 691–702 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1138-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1138-8

Keywords

Navigation