Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Re-thinking climate change adaptation and capacities at the household scale

  • Essay
  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reality of anthropogenic climate change has rendered adaptive responses at all scales an imperative. Households are an increasing focus of attention, but more in the developing world than the developed world, because of the presumed lesser vulnerabilities and stronger adaptive capacities of the latter. Critiques of such presumptions, and the quantitative, macro-scale focus of much adaptation research are emergent. How relatively affluent households, as complex social assemblages, may adapt to climate change impacts encountered in their day-to-day functioning remains unclear. There is, however, a sizeable body of research on household environmental sustainability in the developed world. That research has significant implications for climate change adaptation. This paper brings household environmental sustainability research into productive conversation with the climate change adaptation literature. The former shows that sustainability issues are refracted through social relations within households, and the demands of everyday life. This has three implications for how adaptation needs to be re-framed. First, climate change will not be experienced only via climatic stimuli and extreme weather events. It will be entwined in the complexity of everyday life. Second, knowledge of climate change is not a prerequisite for household adaptive capacity. Third, household-scale analyses show that assumed capacities and vulnerabilities may end up being quite different to those imagined or measured at a macro-scale. These insights invite consideration of how householders’ adaptive capacities can be better supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Barnett J (2009) Four reasons for concern about adaptation to climate change. Environ Plan A 41:2800–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allon F, Sofoulis Z (2006) Everyday water: cultures in transition. Aust Geogr 37(1):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthurson K, Baum S (2013) Making space for social inclusion in conceptualising climate change vulnerability. Local Environ 20(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett J, Waters E, Pendergast S, Puleston A (2013) Barriers to adaptation to sea-level rise. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin HC, Lemos MC, Nelson DR (2014) Differentiating capacities as a means to sustainable climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 27:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elrick-Barr CE, Preston BL, Thomsen DC, Smith TF (2014) Toward a new conceptualization of household adaptive capacity to climate change: applying a risk governance lens. Ecol Soc 19(4):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen SH, Nightingale AJ, Eakin H (2015) Reframing adaptation: the political nature of climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 35:523–533

  • Fankhauser S, McDermott TKJ (2014) Understanding the adaptation deficit: why are poor countries more vulnerable to climate events than rich countries? Glob Environ Chang 27:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Paterson J (2011) A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations. Clim Chang 106(2):327–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson C, Farbotko C, Gill N, Head L, Waitt G (2013) Household sustainability: challenges and dilemmas in everyday life. Edward Elgar, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson C, Head L, Carr C (2015) From incremental change to radical disjuncture: rethinking everyday household sustainability practices as survival Skills. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 105(2):416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham JK (2008) Diverse economies: performative practices for ‘other worlds’. Prog Hum Geogr 32(5):613–632

  • Harvatt J, Petts J, Chilvers J (2011) Understanding householder responses to natural hazards: flooding and sea level rise comparisons. J Risk Res 14(1):63–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head L (2010) Cultural ecology: adaptation – retrofitting a concept? Prog Hum Geogr 34(2):234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head L, Farbotko C, Gibson C, Gill N, Waitt G (2013) Zones of friction, zones of traction: the connected household in climate change and sustainability policy. Aust J Environ Manag 20(4):351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchings R, Collins R, Day R (2015) Inadvertent environmentalism and the action–value opportunity: reflections from studies at both ends of the generational spectrum. Local Environ 20(3):369–385

  • Klocker N, Head L (2013) Diversifying ethnicity in Australia’s population and environment debates. Aust Geogr 44(1):41–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klocker N, Gibson C, Borger E (2012) Living together, but apart: Material geographies of everyday sustainability in extended family households. Environ Plan A 44(9):2240–2259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klocker N, Toole S, Tindale A, Kerr S-M (2015) Ethnically diverse transport behaviours: an Australian perspective. Geogr Res 53(4):393–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA, Park S, Howden SM, Dowd AB, Jakku ES (2013) Climate change awareness is associated with enhanced adaptive capacity. Agric Syst 117:30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC (2010) Now more than ever: the need for more societally relevant research on vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Appl Geogr 30(4):464–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moy C (2012) Rainwater tank households: water savers or water users? Geogr Res 50(2):204–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Sygna L, Naess LO (2006) Questioning complacency: climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. AMBIO 35(2):50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter JJ, Dessai S, Tompkins EL (2014) What do we know about UK household adaptation to climate change? A systematic review. Clim Chang 127(2):371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid L, Sutton P, Hunter C (2010) Theorizing the meso level: the household as a crucible of pro-environmental behaviour. Prog Hum Geogr 34(3):309–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saman W et al (2013) A framework for adaptation of Australian households to heat waves. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevoyan A et al (2013) Impact of climate change on disadvantaged groups: Issues and interventions. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence A, Poortinga W, Butter C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy relate to flood experience. Nat Clim Chang 1:46–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford Smith M, Horrocks L, Harvey A, Hamilton C (2011) Rethinking adaptation for a 4 °C world. Philos Trans R Soc A 369(1934):196–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanes E, Klocker N, Gibson C (2015) Young adult households and domestic sustainabilities. Geoforum 65:46–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strengers Y, Maller C (2012) Materialising energy and water resources in everyday practices: insights for securing supply systems. Glob Environ Chang 22(3):754–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M (2015) The political ecology of climate change adaptation. Routledge and Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Waitt G et al (2012) Sustainable household capability: which households are doing the work of environmental sustainability? Aust Geogr 43(1):51–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh L (2009) Behavioural responses to climate change: asymmetry of intentions and impacts. J Environ Psychol 29(1):13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J, Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, Abrahamson V, Raine R (2010) Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: an empirical study of two UK cities. Glob Environ Chang 20(1):44–52

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natascha Klocker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toole, S., Klocker, N. & Head, L. Re-thinking climate change adaptation and capacities at the household scale. Climatic Change 135, 203–209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1577-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1577-x

Keywords

Navigation