Abstract
Impacts from climate change will significantly affect local governance, and efforts to develop adaptation and mitigation policies will require widespread public support. However, public engagement, and discussions of climate change, remains limited. A new approach to public engagement titled, deliberative framing, can help bridge political divides and provide opportunities to discover innovative policy options. This paper reviews deliberative democracy and framing where they have been applied to examine public engagement on climate change. Integrating insights from these fields can help develop a practice of deliberative framing for managing climate change mitigation and adaptation actions at local scales, to complement national and international efforts. This could assist with community-based agenda setting toward greater justice and the public good. Challenges include building capacity for reflexivity, communication, and public engagement among government actors, recognizing there are different ways to frame climate change and designing deliberative forums that are more inclusive of disparate groups and often underrepresented minorities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
10 November 2020
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02913-0
References
Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J et al (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 743; 17). Cambridge University press, Cambridge, UK
Aklin M, Urpelainen J (2013) Debating clean energy: frames, counter frames, and audiences. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):1225–1232
Anderson B, Bernauer T (2016) How much carbon offsetting and where? Implications of efficiency, effectiveness, and ethicality considerations for public opinion formation. Energy Policy 94:387–395
Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(4):216–224
Ayers J (2011) Resolving the adaptation paradox: exploring the potential for deliberative adaptation policy-making in Bangladesh. Global Environmental Politics 11(1):62–88
Aytur SA, Hecht JS, Kirshen P (2015) Aligning climate change adaptation planning with adaptive governance: lessons from Exeter, NH. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 155(1):83–98
Barrett G, Vera Schattan PC, Wyman M (2012) Assessing the policy impacts of deliberative civic engagement: comparing engagement in health policy practices in Canada and Brazil. Democracy in motion. Oxford University Press, New York
Beierle TC, Cayford J (2002) Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Bellamy R, Lezaun J (2015) A review of deliberative public engagements with climate geoengineering University of Oxford
Bellamy R, Lezaun J (2017) Crafting a public for geoengineering. Public Underst Sci 26(4):402–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515600965
Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE, Lenton TM (2013) ‘Opening up’ geoengineering appraisal: multi-criteria mapping of options for tackling climate change. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):926–937
Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE (2016) Deliberative mapping of options for tackling climate change: citizens and specialists ‘open up’ appraisal of geoengineering. Public Underst Sci 25(3):269–286
Bellamy R, Lezaun J, Palmer J (2017) Public perceptions of geoengineering research governance: an experimental deliberative approach. Glob Environ Chang 45:194–202
Bendick R, Dahlin KM, Smoliak BV, Kumler L, Jones SJ, Aktipis A et al (2010) Choosing carbon mitigation strategies using ethical deliberation. Weather Clim Soc 2(2):140–147
Benford RD, Snow DA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annu Rev Sociol 26(1):611–639
Benjamin D, Por H, Budescu D (2017) Climate change versus global warming: who is susceptible to the framing of climate change? Environ Behav 49(7):745–770
Bernauer T, McGrath LF (2016) Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nature Climate Change
Bertolotti M, Catellani P (2014) Effects of message framing in policy communication on climate change. Eur J Soc Psychol 44(5):474–486
Bertolotti M, Catellani P (2015) Agreement with climate change policies: framing the future and national versus supranational identity. Eur J Soc Psychol 45(7):847–857
Bherer L, Gauthier M, Simard L (2017) The professionalization of public participation. Taylor & Francis, New York
Biesbroek GR, Termeer CJ, Klostermann JE, Kabat P (2014) Rethinking barriers to adaptation: mechanism-based explanation of impasses in the governance of an innovative adaptation measure. Glob Environ Chang 26:108–118
Blue G (2015) Public deliberation with climate change: opening up or closing down policy options? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 24(2):152–159
Blue G (2016) Framing climate change for public deliberation: what role for interpretive social sciences and humanities? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18(1):67–84
Blue G (2018) From facts to frames: dominant and alternative meanings of climate change. In: Hanson L (ed) Public deliberation on climate change: lessons from Alberta climate dialogue. Athabasca University Press, Edmonton, AB, pp 133–146
Blue G, Dale J (2016) Framing and power in public deliberation with climate change: critical reflections on the role of deliberative practitioners. Journal of Public Deliberation 12(1)
Bosomworth K (2015) Climate change adaptation in public policy: frames, fire management, and frame reflection. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33(6):1450–1466
Büchs M, Saunders C, Wallbridge R, Smith G, Bardsley N (2015) Identifying and explaining framing strategies of low carbon lifestyle movement organizations. Glob Environ Chang 35:307–315
Bulkeley H (2010) Cities and the governing of climate change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 35:229–253
Calvert A, Warren ME (2014) Deliberative democracy and framing effects: why frames are a problem and how deliberative mini-publics might overcome them. In: Grönlund K, Bächtiger A, Setälä M (eds) Deliberative mini-publics: involving citizens in the democratic process. ECPR Press, Colchester, UK, pp 203–224
Cann HW, Raymond L (2018) Does climate denialism still matter? The prevalence of alternative frames in opposition to climate policy. Environmental Politics 27(3):433–454
Carnesale A, Chameides W (eds) (2011) America’s climate choices. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
Carpini MXD, Cook FL, Jacobs LR (2004) Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature. Annu.Rev.Polit.Sci. 7:315–344
Chilvers J, Kearnes M (2016) In: Chilvers, Kearnes M (eds) Remaking participation. Routledge, Abingdon
Chilvers J, Kearnes M (2019) Remaking participation in science and democracy. Sci Technol Hum Values. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919850885
Chong D, Druckman JN (2007) Framing theory. Annu.Rev.Polit.Sci. 10:103–126
Chu EK (2016) The governance of climate change adaptation through urban policy experiments. Environ Policy Gov 26(6):439–451
Collins K, Ison R (2009) Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environ Policy Gov 19(6):358–373
Corner A, Pidgeon N (2015) Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Clim Chang 130(3):425–438
Corner A, Parkhill KA, Pidgeon N (2011) ‘Experiment earth?’ Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering: reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Cardiff University. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/82861/
Corner A, Parkhill K, Pidgeon N, Vaughan NE (2013) Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Glob Environ Chang 23(5):938–947
Corner A, Markowitz E, Pidgeon N (2014) Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5(3):411–422
Curato N, Niemeyer S (2013) Reaching out to overcome political apathy: building participatory capacity through deliberative engagement. Politics & Policy 41(3):355–383
Curato N, Dryzek JS, Ercan SA, Hendriks CM, Niemeyer S (2017) Twelve key findings in deliberative democracy research. Daedalus 146(3):28–38
Damsø T, Kjær T, Christensen TB (2016) Local climate action plans in climate change mitigation–examining the case of Denmark. Energy Policy 89:74–83
Dawson A (2010) Climate justice: the emerging movement against green capitalism. South Atlantic Quarterly 109(2):313–338
de Boer J, Wardekker JA, van der Sluijs JP (2010) Frame-based guide to situated decision-making on climate change. Glob Environ Chang 20(3):502–510
Dewulf A (2013) Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 4(4):321–330
Dietz T, Stern PC, Dan A (2009) How deliberation affects stated willingness to pay for mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions: an experiment. Land Econ 85(2):329–347
Dodge J (2014) Civil society organizations and deliberative policy making: interpreting environmental controversies in the deliberative system. Policy Sci 47(2):161–185
Döring M, Ratter B (2018) The regional framing of climate change: towards a place-based perspective on regional climate change perception in north Frisia. J Coast Conserv 22(1):131–143
Druckman JN, Nelson KR (2003) Framing and deliberation: how citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. Am J Polit Sci 47(4):729–745
Dryzek JS (2000) Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press, New York
Dryzek JS, Lo AY (2015) Reason and rhetoric in climate communication. Environmental Politics 24(1):1–16
Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (2013) Climate-challenged society. Oxford University Press
Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, pp 144–160
Dupuis J, Knoepfel P (2013) The adaptation policy paradox: the implementation deficit of policies framed as climate change adaptation. Ecol Soc 18(4)
Edwards PB, Hindmarsh R, Mercer H, Bond M, Rowland A (2008) A three-stage evaluation of a deliberative event on climate change and transforming energy. Journal of Public Deliberation 4(1)
Einsiedel EF, Boyd AD, Medlock J, Ashworth P (2013) Assessing socio-technical mindsets: public deliberations on carbon capture and storage in the context of energy sources and climate change. Energy Policy 53:149–158
Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43(4):51–58
Entman RM (2004) Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy. University of Chicago Press
Fischer F (2003) Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press
Fischer F (2017) Climate crisis and the democratic prospect: Participatory governance in sustainable communities Oxford University Press
Fishkin JS (2011) When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford University Press
Fleming A, Vanclay F, Hiller C, Wilson S (2014) Challenging dominant discourses of climate change. Clim Chang 127(3–4):407–418
Flood S, Schechtman J (2014) The rise of resilience: evolution of a new concept in coastal planning in Ireland and the US. Ocean & Coastal Management 102:19–31
Foss A (2018) Divergent responses to sustainability and climate change planning: the role of politics, cultural frames and public participation. Urban Stud 55(2):332–348
Friedman W (2006) Reframing framing. Public Agenda’s Center for Advances in Public Engagement, New York
Fünfgeld H, McEvoy D (2014) Frame divergence in climate change adaptation policy: insights from Australian local government planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32(4):603–622
Fung A (2015) Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Adm Rev 75(4):513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
Galbraith K, Price A (2013) The great Texas wind rush: How George Bush, Ann Richards, and a bunch of tinkerers helped the oil and gas state win the race to wind power. University of Texas Press
Gastil J, Levine P (2005) The deliberative democracy handbook: strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Gastil J, Knobloch KR, Kahan D, Braman D (2016) Participatory policymaking across cultural cognitive divides: two tests of cultural biasing in public forum design and deliberation. Public Adm 94(4):970–987
Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press
Guber DL, Bosso CI (2012) Issue framing, agenda setting, and environmental discourse. S.Kamieniecki & M.Kraft, the Oxford Handbook of US Environmental Policy, , 437–460
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Dr. Gwendolyn Blue and Dr. Thomas Dietz for their feedback on this project. Thanks also to the reviewers for their time and helpful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References H-Z are located in Appendix 1
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Romsdahl, R.J. Deliberative framing: opening up discussions for local-level public engagement on climate change. Climatic Change 162, 145–163 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02754-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02754-x