Abstract
Climate change plays a key role in the development and survival of oviparous ectotherms such as sea turtles. Higher environmental temperatures are expected to lead to increased production of female hatchlings and potential feminization of many populations, as well as reduced hatching success and hatchling fitness. We investigated how different sand temperatures affect sea turtle embryo mortality, hatchling phenotype, and hatchling predation during their crawl to the sea. The study was conducted in Cabo Verde, the only rookery of the endangered loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) in the Eastern Atlantic. During three consecutive seasons (2015–2017), 240 loggerhead clutches were exposed to three different incubation temperature regimes created by different sand colours. The warm treatment (mean = 32.3 °C ± 0.5) killed 33% more embryos than the cold treatment (mean = 29.7 °C ± 0.6). Hatchlings from the warm treatment were mostly females, smaller in size, and had lower performance. Hatchling predation by ghost crabs during seaward transit was higher for hatchlings incubated in the warm treatment. Combining embryo mortality and hatchling predation, the rate of female hatchling arrival at the sea was more than twice as high in the cold treatment (34.4 females per 100 eggs) than in the warm treatment (16.0 females per 100 eggs). This increase in mortality caused by warmer incubation temperatures may cancel any potential benefit of a female-biased sex ratio. Conservation planners should consider behavioural adaptations and the potential dispersal of the nesting areas to colder areas to increase resilience of loggerhead turtles to climate change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abella E, Marco A, López-Jurado LF (2007) Success of delayed translocation of loggerhead turtle nests. J Wildl Manag 71:2290–2296. https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-512
Abella EP, Marco A, Martins S, Hawkes LA (2016) Is this what a climate change-resilient population of marine turtles looks like? Biol Conserv 193:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.11.023
Ackerman RA (1997) The nest environment and the embryonic development of sea turtles. In: Lutz P, Musick J (eds) The biology of sea turtles, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 83–106
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bell CD, Blumenthal JM, Broderick AC, Godley BJ (2010) Investigating potential for depensation in marine turtles: how low can you go? Conserv Biol 24:226–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01313.x
Berec L, Boukal DS, Berec M (2001) Linking the Allee effect, sexual reproduction, and temperature-dependent sex determination via spatial dynamics. Am Nat 157:217–230. https://doi.org/10.1086/318626
Booth DT, Astill K (2001) Incubation temperature, energy expenditure and hatchling size in the green turtle (Chelonia mydas), a species with temperature-sensitive sex determination. Aust J Zool 49:389–396. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO01006
Bowen BW, Karl SA (2007) Population genetics and phylogeography of sea turtles. Mol Ecol 16:4886–4907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03542.x
Boyle M, Hone J, Schwanz LE, Georges A (2014) Under what conditions do climate-driven sex ratios enhance versus diminish population persistence? Ecol Evol 4:4522–4533. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1316
Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-9000
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer, New York
Caillouet CW Jr, Shaver DJ, Landry AM Jr (2015) Kemp's ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys kempii) head-start and reintroduction to Padre Island National Seashore, Texas. Herpetol Conserv Biol 10:309–377
Carreras C, Pascual M, Tomás J et al (2018) Sporadic nesting reveals long distance colonisation in the philopatric loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). Sci Rep 8:1435. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19887-w
Colbert PL, Spencer RJ, Janzen FJ (2010) Mechanism and cost of synchronous hatching. Funct Ecol 24:112–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01602.x
Fisher LR, Godfrey MH, Owens DW (2014) Incubation temperature effects on hatchling performance in the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta). PLoS One 9:e114880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114880
Girondot M, Monsinjon J, Guillon JM, (2018) Delimitation of the embryonic thermosensitive period for sex determination using an embryo growth model reveals a potential bias for sex ratio prediction in turtles. J Therm Biol 73:32-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.02.006
Hamann M, Godfrey MH, Seminoff JA et al (2010) Global research priorities for sea turtles: informing management and conservation in the 21st century. Endanger Species Res 11:245–269. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00279
Harley CD, Hughes AR, Hultgren KM et al (2006) The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecol Lett 9:228–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00871.x
Hays GC, Ashworth JS, Barnsley MJ et al (2001) The importance of sand albedo for the thermal conditions on sea turtle nesting beaches. Oikos 93:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930109.x
Hays GC, Mazaris AD, Schofield G (2014) Different male vs. female breeding periodicity helps mitigate offspring sex ratio skews in sea turtles. Front Mar Sci 1:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2014.00043
Hays GC, Mazaris AD, Schofield G, Laloë JO (2017) Population viability at extreme sex-ratio skews produced by temperature-dependent sex determination. Proc R Soc B 284:20162576. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2576
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bruno JF (2010) The impact of climate change on the world’s marine ecosystems. Science 328:1523–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189930
Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70 https://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733. Accessed 10 September 2020
Howard R, Bell I, Pike DA (2014) Thermal tolerances of sea turtle embryos: current understanding and future directions. Endanger Species Res 26:75–86. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00636
Hulin V, Delmas V, Girondot M, Godfrey MH, Guillon JM (2009) Temperature-dependent sex determination and global change: are some species at greater risk? Oecologia 160:493–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1313-1
IPCC (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO et al (eds) Global warming of 1.5°C. an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva
Ischer T, Ireland K, Booth DT (2009) Locomotion performance of green turtle hatchlings from the Heron Island Rookery, Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 156:1399–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1180-7
Jensen MP, Allen CD, Eguchi T et al (2018) Environmental warming and feminization of one of the largest sea turtle populations in the world. Curr Biol 28:154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.057
Kamel SJ, Mrosovsky N (2004) Nest site selection in leatherbacks, Dermochelys coriacea: individual patterns and their consequences. Anim Behav 68:357–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.07.021
Kamel SJ, Mrosovsky N (2006) Inter-seasonal maintenance of individual nest site preferences in hawksbill sea turtles. Ecology 87:2947–2952. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2947:IMOINS]2.0.CO;2
Kobayashi S, Wada M, Fujimoto R et al (2017) The effects of nest incubation temperature on embryos and hatchlings of the loggerhead sea turtle: implications of sex difference for survival rates during early life stages. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 486:274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.10.020
Laloë J-O, Cozens J, Renom B, Taxonera A, Hays GC (2014) Effects of rising temperature on the viability of an important sea turtle rookery. Nat Clim Chang 4:513. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2236
Laloë J-O, Esteban N, Berkel J, Hays GC (2016) Sand temperatures for nesting sea turtles in the Caribbean: implications for hatchling sex ratios in the face of climate change. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 474:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2015.09.015
Laloë J-O, Cozens J, Renom B, Taxonera A, Hays GC (2017) Climate change and temperature-linked hatchling mortality at a globally important sea turtle nesting site. Glob Chang Biol 23:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13765
Lambert D (1992) Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 34:1–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1269547
Lovich JE (1996) Possible demographic and ecologic consequences of sex ratio manipulation in turtles. Chelonian Conserv Bi 2:114–117
Marco A, Abella E, Liria-Loza A et al (2012a) Abundance and exploitation of loggerhead turtles nesting in Boa Vista islands, Cape Verde: the only substantial rookery in the Eastern Atlantic. Anim Conserv 15:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00547.x
Marco A, Abella E, Liria-Loza A, Martins S, Loureiro NS, López-Jurado LF (2012b) Manual for the monitoring of turtles in the Cape Verde islands. Zool CV 3:1–23
Marco A, Abella E, Martins S, López O, Patino-Martinez J (2018) Female nesting behaviour affects hatchling survival and sex ratio in the loggerhead sea turtle: implications for conservation programmes. Ethol Ecol Evol 30:141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2017.1330291
Mazaris AD, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos J, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD (2009) Sea surface temperature variations in core foraging grounds drive nesting trends and phenology of loggerhead turtles in the Mediterranean Sea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 379:23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2009.07.026
Miller JD (1999) Determining clutch size and hatching success. In: Eckert KL, Bjorndal KA, Abreu-Grobois FA, Donnelly M (eds) Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles. IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication, Washington, pp 124–129
Mrosovsky N, Kamel S, Rees AF, Margaritoulis D (2002) Pivotal temperature for loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) from Kyparissia Bay, Greece. Can J Zool 80:2118–2124. https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-204
Mueller MS, Ruiz-García NA, García-Gasca A, Abreu-Grobois FA (2019) Best swimmers hatch from intermediate temperatures: effect of incubation temperature on swimming performance of olive ridley sea turtle hatchlings. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 519:151186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2019.151186
Neeman N, Robinson NJ, Paladino FV, Spotila JR, O'Connor MP (2015) Phenology shifts in leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) due to changes in sea surface temperature. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 462:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2014.10.019
Patrício AR, Varela MR, Barbosa C et al (2018) Nest site selection repeatability of green turtles, Chelonia mydas, and consequences for offspring. Anim Behav 139:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.03.006
Patrício AR, Varela MR, Barbosa C et al (2019) Climate change resilience of a globally important sea turtle nesting population. Glob Chang Biol 25:522–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14520
Pearse DE, Avise JC (2001) Turtle mating systems: behavior, sperm storage, and genetic paternity. J Hered 92:206–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/92.2.206
Pfaller JB, Limpus CJ, Bjorndal KA (2009) Nest-site selection in individual loggerhead turtles and consequences for doomed-egg relocation. Conserv Biol 23:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01055.x
Pike DA, Antworth RL, Stiner JC (2006) Earlier nesting contributes to shorter nesting seasons for the loggerhead seaturtle, Caretta caretta. J Herpetol 40:91–95. https://doi.org/10.1670/100-05N.1
Pritchard PCH, Mortimer JA (1999) Taxonomy, external morphology, and species identification. In: Eckert KL, Bjorndal KA, Abreu-Grobois FA, Donnelly M (eds) Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles. IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication, Washington, pp 31–48
R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL https://www.R-project.org/. (Accessed: 9th September 2020)
Rebelo R, Barbosa C, Granadeiro JP et al (2012) Can leftovers from predators be reliably used to monitor marine turtle hatchling sex-ratios? The implications of prey selection by ghost crabs. Mar Biol 159:613–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1839-8
Rivas ML, Esteban N, Marco A (2019) Potential male leatherback hatchlings exhibit higher fitness which might balance sea turtle sex ratios in the face of climate change. Clim Chang:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02462-1
Saito T, Wada M, Fujimoto R, Kobayashi S, Kumazawa Y (2019) Effects of sand type on hatch, emergence, and locomotor performance in loggerhead turtle hatchlings. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 511:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2018.10.008
Santidrián-Tomillo P, Oro D, Paladino FV, Piedra R, Sieg AE, Spotila JR (2014) High beach temperatures increased female-biased primary sex ratios but reduced output of female hatchlings in the leatherback turtle. Biol Conserv 176:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.011
Sarmiento-Ramírez JM, Abella-Pérez E, Phillott AD et al (2014) Global distribution of two fungal pathogens threatening endangered sea turtles. PLoS One 9:e85853. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085853
Sim EL, Booth DT, Limpus CJ (2015) Incubation temperature, morphology and performance in loggerhead (Caretta caretta) turtle hatchlings from Mon Repos, Queensland, Australia. Biol Open 4:685–692. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20148995
Standora EA, Spotila JR (1985, 1985) Temperature dependent sex determination in sea turtles. Copeia:711–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/1444765
Tanner CE, Marco A, Martins S, Abella EP, Hawkes LA (2019) Highly feminised sex ratio estimations for the world’s third largest nesting aggregation of the loggerhead sea turtle. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 21:209–219. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12963
Teske PR, Sandoval-Castillo J, Golla TR et al (2019) Thermal selection as a driver of marine ecological speciation. Proc R Soc B 286(1896):20182023. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2023
Tucker JK, Paukstis GL, Janzen FJ (2007) Does predator swamping promote synchronous emergence of turtle hatchlings among nest? Behav Ecol 19:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm097
Vieira S, Martins S, Hawkes LA, Marco A, Teodósio MA (2014) Biochemical indices and life traits of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) from Cape Verde Islands. PLoS One 9:e112181. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112181
Wallace BP, DiMatteo AD, Hurley BJ et al (2010) Regional management units for marine turtles: a novel framework for prioritizing conservation and research across multiple scales. PLoS One 5:e15465. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015465
Weishampel JF, Bagley DA, Ehrhart LM (2004) Earlier nesting by loggerhead sea turtles following sea surface warming. Glob Chang Biol 10:1424–1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00817.x
Wood DW, Bjorndal KA (2000, 2000) Relation of temperature, moisture, salinity, and slope to nest site selection in loggerhead sea turtles. Copeia:119–119. https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2000)2000[0119:ROTMSA]2.0.CO;2
Yntema CL, Mrosovsky N (1982) Critical periods and pivotal temperatures for sexual differentiation in loggerhead sea turtles. Can J Zool 60:1012–1016. https://doi.org/10.1139/z82-141
Zeileis A, Kleiber C, Jackman S (2008) Regression models for count data in R. J Stat Softw 27:1–25 URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v27/i08/. Accessed 10 September 2020
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the field camp Fernando Soares in João Barrosa beach and all the staff. We would also like to thank Kátia Lopes, Rita Patricio, Leo Clarke, and Elves Duarte for their comments, the National Directory of the Environment, the local Protect Areas Office in Boa Vista Island, and the University of Cabo Verde. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for the constructive criticism that led to an improvement of this manuscript. This study was funded by the Marine Turtle Conservation Found and MAVA foundation.
Funding
MAVA Foundation—Grant Number: AO1 (17105)
Marine Turtle Conservation Found (MTCF, USA)—Grant Number: F161AP00318
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 28 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martins, S., Silva, E., Abella, E. et al. Warmer incubation temperature influences sea turtle survival and nullifies the benefit of a female-biased sex ratio. Climatic Change 163, 689–704 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02933-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02933-w