Skip to main content
Log in

Philosophy of the MiniZinc challenge

  • Viewpoints
  • Published:
Constraints Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MiniZinc arose as a response to the extended discussion at CP2006 of the need for a standard modelling language for CP. This is a challenging problem, and we believe MiniZinc makes a good attempt to handle the most obvious obstacle: there are hundreds of potential global constraints, most handled by few or no systems. A standard input language for solvers gives us the capability to compare different solvers. Hence, every year since 2008 we have run the MiniZinc Challenge comparing different solvers that support MiniZinc. In this report we discuss the philosophy behind the challenge, why we do it, how we do it, and why we do it that way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apt, K., & Wallace, M. (2007). Constraint logic programming using ECLiPSe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Fourth international CSP solver competition (2009). http://www.cril.univ-artois.fr/CPAI09/.

  3. Huang, J. (2008). Universal booleanization of constraint models. In P. Stuckey (Ed.), 14th int. conf. on principles and practice of constraint programming (CP’08), LNCS (Vol. 5202, pp. 144–158). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. JaCoP Java Constraint Programming Solver (2010). http://jacop.osolpro.com/.

  5. Minizinc challenge (2009). http://www.g12.csse.unimelb.edu.au/minizinc/challenge2009/challenge.html.

  6. Minizinc + Flatzinc (2010). http://www.g12.csse.unimelb.edu.au/minizinc/.

  7. Nethercote, N., Stuckey, P., Becket, R., Brand, S., Duck, G., & Tack, G. (2007). Minizinc: Towards a standard CP modelling language. In C. Bessiere (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference on principles and practice of constraint programming, LNCS (Vol. 4741, pp. 529–543). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. SCIP (2010). Solving constraint integer programs. http://scip.zib.de/scip.shtml.

  9. Schulte, C., Lagerkvist, M., & Tack, G. (2010). Gecode. http://www.gecode.org/.

  10. SICStus Prolog (2010). http://www.sics.se/sisctus/.

  11. Simonis, H. (2009). A hybrid constraint model fo the routing and wavelength assignment problem. In I. Gent (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th international conference on principles and practice of constraint programming, LNCS (Vol. 5732, pp. 104–118). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, B., & Gent, I. (2005). Constraint modelling challenge 2005. www.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~ipg/challenge/.

  13. Third international CSP solver competition (2008). http://www.cril.univ-artois.fr/CPAI08/.

  14. Van Gelder, A., Le Berre, D., Biere, A., Kullmann, O., & Simon, L. (2005). Purse-based scoring for comparison of exponential-time programs. http://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~avg/purse-poster.pdf.

  15. XCSP 2.1 (2008). http://www.cril.univ-artois.fr/CPAI08/XCSP2_1.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Stuckey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stuckey, P.J., Becket, R. & Fischer, J. Philosophy of the MiniZinc challenge. Constraints 15, 307–316 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10601-010-9093-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10601-010-9093-0

Keywords

Navigation