Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Professional development learning environments (PDLEs) embedded in a collaborative online learning environment (COLE): Moving towards a new conception of online professional learning

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teaching, and education in general, remain firmly rooted in the practices of the past and continue to resist the implementation of strategies and theories arising from educational research. Consequently, significant reforms have been slow to take hold in educational systems around the world. Much of the reluctance can be attributed to a widely-held misconception of the nature of learning. This project attempts to address this misconception through the development of Professional Development Learning Environments (PDLEs are a series of learning tasks and a video-based case study) embedded in an online learning environment that requires the collaboration of users to solve problems. To use a Problem-Based-Learning (PBL) approach in an online context requires a major paradigm shift as well as using tools that were not designed specifically for such a student-driven, process-centred pedagogical paradigm. This becomes a problem when online resources and systems are used for supporting in-service teacher in their pursuit of furthering their education. Although the current theories of learning and teaching may present the philosophical content of such courses, the online strategies used often conflict with the theory. To study the formal implementation of PBL as a social-constructivist pedagogical approach, into an online learning environment to provide the tools for e-learning that would be closer in design to the current thinking on the very nature of learning, the PDLEs were modified to become small reusable video clips with a structure designed to facilitate PBL and focus learners’ attention on higher order thinking skills rather than specifically on content. These modified PDLEs are referred to as Problem-Based Learning Objects (PBLOs). The PBLOs were embedded into a prototype of a Collaborative Online Learning Environment (COLE) which was developed simultaneously. The entire system was pilot tested with small groups. Preliminary results show that although many technical difficulties remain to be solved, using the environment does show evidence of some effect on beliefs about personal theories of learning, causing shifts from technical issues to those surrounding processes of learning. Our preliminary research has called attention to the potential ability of PBLO/COLE to disrupt conventional, transmission-based conceptions of online learning as content delivery. At the same time, however, our preliminary work has also indicated that learners who are not used to the collaborative opportunities provided within PBLO/COLE may still hold traditional orientations to teaching and learning as a “gold standard” to which all other options are compared. A purposeful direction for our future research will entail working with learners in PBLO/COLE over a sustained period so that they may engage in an online experience grounded in principles of socio-constructivism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and practice of online learning (2nded.). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone, C. (2005). The New Academy. In Oblinger, D.G. & Oblinger, J.L. (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation. Retrieved January 1, 2010 from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101n.pdf.

  • Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1994). Teacher development as professional, personal, and social development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 483–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J.L. (1995). Towards a more authentic and feasible science curriculum for secondary schools. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Toronto.

  • Bencze, J.L., Bowen, G.M., Alsop, S. (2006). Teachers’ tendencies to promote student-led science projects: associations with their views about science. Science Education, 90(3), 400–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., & Pedretti, E. (2001). Multi-media case methods in pre-service science education: Enabling an apprenticeship for praxis. Research in Science Education, 31(2), 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 17–50). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind experience and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council. Retrieved January 2, 2010 from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9853&page=23.

  • Burnaford, G. (1999). Teacher action research as professional development in schools: four paths to change. School wide inquiry: a self-study of an “outside” teacher researcher. Opinion Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, PQ., April.

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannings, T. R., & Talley, S. (2002). Multimedia and online video case studies for preservice teacher preparation. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference Board of Canada. (2006). Employability Skills 2000+. Retrieved Sep. 15, 2008 from http://www.conferenceboard.ca/education/.

  • Copeland, W. D., & Decker, D. L. (1996). Video cases and the development of meaning making in preservice teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 12(5), 467–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couros, G. (2015). Professional development and professional learning #miamidevice. The Principal of Change: Stories of learning and leading. Retrieved from https://georgecouros.ca/blog/archives/5791.

  • Daley, B.J. (2004). Using concept maps in qualitative research. In Canas, A.J., Novak, J.D. & Gonzalez, F.M. (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain.

  • Dede, C., Brown-L'Bahy, T., Ketelhut, D., & Whitehouse, P. (2004). Distance Learning (Virtual Learning). In The Internet Encyclopedia (p. 558). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, F. J., (2005) La représentation par les enseignants, quant à leurs profils de compétences relatives à l'ordinateur : vers une théorie des TIC en éducation , La revue canadienne de l'apprentissage et de la technologie, Vol. 31 (1) 27–49.

  • Desjardins, F. J., Lacasse, R., Bélair, L. M., (2001). Toward a definition of four orders of competency for the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in Education, Computers and Advanced Technology in Education: Proceedings of the Fourth IASTED International Conference, Calgary: ACTA Press, pp. 213–217.

  • Desjardins, F.J., van Oostveen, R. (2008a). Collaborative Online Learning Environment: Towards a process driven approach and collective knowledge building. Proceedings of the Ed-Media Conference on Education Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Vienna, Austria, June 30–July 4, 2008, CDROM.

  • Desjardins, F.J., van Oostveen, R. (2008b). Implementing PBL online as a collaborative learning strategy for teachers: The COLE. A presentation at The Eleventh IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, September 29 – October 1, 2008, Crete, Greece.

  • Desjardins, F.J., van Oostveen, R. (2009). Research focus for EILab. Retrieved January 29, 2010 from http://eilab.ca/spip/spip.php?rubrique3.

  • Feixas, G., Alvarez, J.M.C. (2000). A manual for the repertory grid. Retrieved June 1, 2003 from http://www.terapiacognitiva.net/record/pag/contents.htm.

  • Fogarty, R. (1997). Problem Based Learning and Other Curriculum Models for the Multiple Intelligences Classroom. Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (Ed.). (1992). Successful school improvement: The implementation perspective and beyond. Buckingham: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depth of educational reform. Lewes: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership & sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Getting reform right: what works and what doesn’t. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 744–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, B.R., Shaw, M.L.G. (2003). Repertory Grids: WebGrid III. Retrieved April 5, 2003 from http://gigi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/WebGrid/.

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

  • Goldman-Segall, R. (1998). Points of viewing children’s thinking. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D.F., Hakel, M.D. (2003). “Applying the Science of Learning to the University and Beyond: Teaching for Long-Term Retention and Transfer,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, (July–August, 2003): 37–38.

  • Harvard Business Publishing for Educators (2017). Short Cases. Retrieved on December 15, 2017 from https://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cbmp/pages/content/briefcases.

  • Hay, D. B. (2007). Using concept maps to measure deep, surface and non-learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. B., & Kinchin, I. M. (2006). Using concept maps to reveal conceptual typologies. Education + Training, 48(2/3), 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D., & Kinchin, I. (2008). Using concept mapping to measure learning quality. Education + Training, 50(2), 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. B., Wells, H., & Kinchin, I. M. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative measures of student learning at university level. Higher Education, 56, 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, J. (2008). Framing learning activities for the effective use of ICT. In N. J. Yelland, G. Neal, & E. Dakich (Eds.), Rethinking education with ICT: New directions for effective practices (pp. 31–44). Sense: Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Bencze, L., Vaillancourt, B. D., & Yoon, S. (2003). New applications for multimedia cases: Promoting reflective practice in preservice teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 483–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, W. (2003). Learning How to Learn: Problem Based Learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2003v28n2.1.

  • Jackson, K. M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2002). Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 307–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T., Wisniewski, M. A., Kuhlemeyer, G., Isaacs, G., & Krzykowski, J. (2012). Technology adoption in higher education: Overcoming anxiety through faculty bootcamp. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: mintools for critical thinking. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. & Carr, CS. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knolwedge representations for learning.

  • Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, R., Bullen, M., Loftus, J. (2006). A pilot study of problem formulation and resolution in an online problem-based learning course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3). Retrieved on December 15, 2017 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/248/749.

  • Kinchin, I. M., & Hay, D. B. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, T. L., Batarelo, I., & Middleton, J. A. (2009). Examining elementary preservice teachers’ perspectives concerning curriculum themes for video case integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 461–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (1994). L'intelligence collective: Pour une anthropologie du cyberespace, Paris: La Découverte, 246 pages.

  • Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  • Lloyd, S. A., Byrne, M. M., & McCoy, T. S. (2012). Faculty-perceived barriers of online education. Journal of online learning and teaching, 8(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. (1994). The fate of knowledge in the social theories of science. In F. T. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, W., Wallace, J., & Groves, R. (2001). Spinning a web (case) around professional standards: Capturing the complexity of science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. (2006). Literacies for the digital age: Preview of Part 1. In A. Martin & D. Madigan (Eds.), Digital literacies for learning (pp. 3–25). London: Facet Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, A. D. (2002). Problem-based learning in initial teacher education: Taking the agenda forward. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 3(1), 60–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., & Nunes, M. B. (2004). Developing Innovation in Online Learning: an Action Research Framework. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouza, C. (2003). Learning to teach with new technology. Implications for professional development., 35(2), 272–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J.D., Canas, A.J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006–01 Rev 01–2008. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Retreived on October 2, 2009 from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.

  • Olson, J.K. (1990). Teachers’ conceptions of their subject and laboratory work in science. In Hagarty-Hazel, E. (Ed.) The student laboratory and the science curriculum. London: Routledge.

  • Ontario College of Teachers. (1999). Standards of practice for the teaching profession. Toronto: Council of the Ontario College of Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto (2003). Retrieved August 20, 2004 from http://ro.oise.utoronto.ca/BulPage90.htm.

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E. G., Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Romkey, L., & Jivraj, A. (2008). Promoting issues-based STSE perspectives in science teacher education: problems of identity and ideology. Science & Education, 17, 941–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettenati, M.C., Cigognini, M.E., Mangione, G.R., Guerin, E. (2009). Personal knowledge management skills for lifelong-learners 2.0. In Social Software and Developing Community Ontology. IGI Global Publishing. Information Science Reference. Retrieved from http://www.igi- global.com/reference/details.asp?ID=33011.

  • Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1977). La construction du réel chez l’enfant (sixième édition). Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. (1996). The social construction of technology: A review. In R. Fox (Ed.), In Technological change: Methods and themes in the history of technology (pp. 17–35). Australia: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, A., Bate, A. (2008). Using Word Clouds in Teaching and Learning. Retrieved January 26, 2010 from http://opus.bath.ac.uk/474/1/using%2520word%2520clouds%2520in%2520teaching%2520and%2 520learning.pdf.

  • Rey-Lopez, M., Brusilovsky, P., Meccawy, M., Diaz-Redondo, R., Fernadez-Vilas, A. & Ashman, H. (2008). Resolving the Problem of Intelligent Learning Content in Learning Management Systems. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), 363–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagor, R. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (2002). Educational reform: A self-scrutinizing memoir. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M. (2007). Challenging models and perspectives of problem-based learning. In Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering, edited by de Graaff, E. & Kolmos, A., Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.

  • Scardemalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 256–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Michael (2003), "(Contextual and Mutated) Learning Objects in the Context of Design, Learning and (Re)Use", Teaching and Learning with Technology. Retrieved from http://www.shawmultimedia.com/edtech_oct_03.html.

  • Siemens, G. (2009). Socialization as information objects. Retrieved August 20, 2004from http://www.connectivism.ca/?p=127.

  • Tagg, J. (2012). Why does the faculty resist change? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(1), 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Faculty of Education at York University (2003). Retrieved August 20, 2004 from http://www.edu.yorku.ca.

  • VandenBerg, E. (2001). An exploration of the use of multimedia cases as a reflective tool in teacher education. Research in Science Education, 31, 245–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oostveen, R. (2005). Using action research for teacher professional development: Research in science and technology education. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The University of Toronto.

  • van Oostveen, R., Desjardins, F., Bullock, S., DiGiuseppe, M., Robertson, L. (2010). Towards a reconceptualization of online teacher professional learning: Problem-based learning objects (PBLOs). In J. Herrington & C. Montgomerie (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2010--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1579–1588). Toronto, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 20, 2017 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/34849/.

  • Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language (p. 352). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. (1991). The science of problem-solving. London: Cassell.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Learning as Social Participation. Knowledge Management Review, 6, 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organizations, 7(2), 225–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Governors University (2014). Professional Development vs. Professional Learning: How To Become A Better Teacher. The Night Owl Blog. Retrieved from https://www.wgu.edu/blogpost/professional-development-vs-professional-learning-teachers#.

  • Williams, R., Edge, D. (1996). The Social Shaping of Technology. Research Policy, 25, 856–899. Yoon, S.

  • Yoon, S., Pedretti, E., Bencze, L, Hewitt, J., Perris, K. & vanOostveen, R. (2006). Improving elementary preservice science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs through the use of cases and case-methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), 1–21.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St. N, Oshawa, ON, L1H 7K4, Canada

    Roland vanOostveen

  2. Alexandria, ON, K0C 1A0, Canada

    François Desjardins

  3. Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, UK

    Shawn Bullock

Authors
  1. Roland vanOostveen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. François Desjardins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shawn Bullock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland vanOostveen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

vanOostveen, R., Desjardins, F. & Bullock, S. Professional development learning environments (PDLEs) embedded in a collaborative online learning environment (COLE): Moving towards a new conception of online professional learning. Educ Inf Technol 24, 1863–1900 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9686-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9686-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation