Abstract
Many early childhood practitioners in the U.S. are experiencing tension between their desire to offer students developmentally appropriate learning experiences and their obligation to teach the academic knowledge and skills mandated by their states. However, careful examination of the DAP guidelines’ definition of culturally appropriate practice reveals a significant sociopolitical dimension that has been obscured by the field’s tight focus on the sociocultural dimension. Because standards-based education is an explicit feature of the sociopolitical landscape of U. S. public education, teaching the standards is developmentally appropriate practice. Implementation of this broadened understanding of DAP adds new complexity to early childhood teachers’ work. This article offers ideas drawn from Bronfenbrenner, Vygotsky, and Dewey as sources of theoretical support and provides examples of strategic decision making—illustrated with examples drawn from Texas kindergartens—that can assist teachers in managing the curricular and instructional complexities that accompany the broadened understanding of DAP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All names used in the article are pseudonyms.
References
Ardovino, J., Hollingsworth, J., & Ybarra, S. (2000). Multiple measures: Accurate ways to assess student achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Borko, H., Cone, R., Russo, N. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1979). Teachers’ decision making. In P. Peterson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 136–160). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corp.
Bredekamp, S. (Ed.). (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Bredekamp, S. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice: The early childhood teacher as decision maker. In S. Bredekamp & C. Copple (Eds.), Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. Revised edition (pp. 33–52). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, S. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practices in early childhood programs. Revised edition. . Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). The unforgiving complexity of teaching: Avoiding simplicity in an age of accountability. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/0022487102238653.
Cole, M., & Wersch, J. (2003). The role of culture in Vygotskyean-informed psychology. Retrieved February 16, 2007 from, http://www.massey.ac.nz/~alock/virtual/colevyg.htm
Da Ros-Voseles, D. A., Danyi, D., & Aurillo, J. (2003). Aligning professional preparation and practice: Bringing constructivist learning to kindergarten. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 31(2), 33–38.
DeVault, L. (2003). The tide is high but we can hold on: One kindergarten teacher’s thoughts on the rising tide of academic expectations. Young Children, 58(6), 90–93.
Dever, M. T., Falconer, R. C., & Kessenich, C. (2003). Implementing developmentally appropriate practices in a developmentally inappropriate climate: Assessment in kindergarten. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 31(3), 27–33.
Dewey J (1963). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books (Original work published 1938).
Dewey J (1990). The school and society and The child and the curriculum. Combined edition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press (Original work published 1902).
Epstein, A. S. (2007). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for young children’s learning. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Floden, R. E. (1986). The cultures of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 505–526). New York: Macmillan.
French, M. (2004). Can you really say no? Standards and good practices can work together. Little Rock, AK: Southern Early Childhood Association.
Geist, E., & Baum, A. C. (2005). Yeah, buts that keep teachers from embracing an active curriculum: Overcoming the resistance. Young Children, 60(4), 28–36.
Goldstein, L. S. (2007a). Embracing multiplicity: Learning from two practitioners’ pedagogical responses to the changing demands of kindergarten teaching in the United States. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21(4), 378–399.
Goldstein, L. S. (2007b). Examining the unforgiving complexity of kindergarten teaching. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 39–54. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.08.001.
Gronlund, G. (2001). Rigorous academics in preschool and kindergarten? Yes! Let me tell you how. Young Children, 56(2), 42–43.
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Accountability shovedown: Resisting the standards movement in early childhood education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(6), 457–463.
Hawthorne, R. K. (1992). Curriculum in the making: Teacher choice and the classroom experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
Helm, J. H. (2003). Beyond the basics: Using the project approach in standards-based classrooms. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 31(3), 6–12.
Lave, J., & Wegner, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mallory, B. L., & New, R. S. (Eds.). (1994). Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education. New York: Teachers College Press.
McDaniel, G. L., Isaac, M. Y., Brooks, H. M., & Hatch, A. (2005). Confronting K-3 challenges in an era of accountability. Young Children, 60(2), 20–26.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
Neuharth-Pritchett, S., Reguero de Atiles, J., & Park, B. (2003). Using integrated curriculum to connect standards and developmentally appropriate practice. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 31(3), 13–17.
No Child Left Behind Act of (2001). 20 U.S. C. 6301 et seq. Retrieved March 5, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/.
Powell, D. (1994). Parents, pluralism, and the NAEYC statement on developmentally appropriate practice. In B. L. Mallory & R. S. New (Eds.), Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education (pp. 166–182). New York: Teachers College Press.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Seefeldt, C. (2005). How to work with standards in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Stipek, D. (2006). No Child Left Behind comes to preschool. Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 455–465. doi:10.1086/505440.
Swadener, E. B., & Kessler, S. (Eds.). (1991). Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue. New York: Teachers College Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wien, C. A. (2002). The press of standardized curriculum: Does a kindergarten teacher instruct with worksheets or let children play? Canadian Children, 27(1), 10–17.
Wien, C. A. (2004). Negotiating standards in the primary classroom: The teacher’s dilemma. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldstein, L.S. Teaching the Standards is Developmentally Appropriate Practice: Strategies for Incorporating the Sociopolitical Dimension of DAP in Early Childhood Teaching. Early Childhood Educ J 36, 253–260 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0268-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0268-x