Abstract
In most countries the funding for early childhood education has increased and governments in some countries have taken serious steps to bring about positive change in the profession. However, the increase in funding by governments and other funding organisations around the world has, understandably, attracted increased accountability as these organisations need to know that their financial investments are achieving desired outcomes. To seek evidence that positive learning outcomes have indeed been achieved through these investments is a reasonable request, and there is a shared responsibility and accountability for professionals to provide appropriate evidence. The downside, however, can be the request for standardised test information, as if performance on such tests provides proof of all desired outcomes. More than ever before, it is important for early childhood educators to be able to provide accurate, objective information about children’s assessment in ways other than by standardised testing, which may not reflect the complex reality of children’s lives. This paper reports on a research study in Singapore that investigated curriculum effectiveness using developmental learning outcomes as a means of assessing children. The research was devised to examine if eight specified broad developmental learning outcomes could measure the effectiveness of the curriculum by assessing children’s learning as shown in qualitative data. Practical examples showed evidence of children’s learning and the role of the educator in facilitating and documenting developmental learning outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur, L., Beecher, B., Death, E., Dockett, S., & Farmer, S. (2012). Programming and planning in early childhood settings (5th ed.). South Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.
Beaty, J. J. (2009). Observing development of the young child (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Bell, J. (2010). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science (5th ed.). New York, NJ: McGraw-Hill Education.
Berk, L. (2012). Infants and children: Prenatal through middle childhood (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Carr, M. (2001). Assessment in early childhood settings: Learning stories. London, UK: Sage.
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Dalberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from http://books.google.ca/books?id=X85J8ipMpZEC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Department of Education and Children’s Services (DECS). (2001). South Australian Curriculum, Standards and Accountability Framework: Early Years Band—Birth to Year 2. Adelaide: Department of Education and Children’s Services.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://foi.deewr.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/belonging_being_and_becoming_the_early_years_learning_framework_for_australia.pdf.
Dodge, D., Heroman, C., & Maiorca, J. (2004). Beyond outcomes: How assessment supports children’s learning and leads to meaningful curriculum. Young Children, 59(1), 22–28.
Ebbeck, M., & Waniganayake, M. (Eds.). (2010). Play in early childhood education: Learning in diverse contexts. Sydney, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Essa, E. (2011). Introduction to early childhood education, annotated student’s edition (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Gestwicki, C. (2011). Developmentally appropriate practice: Curriculum and development in early education (4th ed.). Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Gonzalez-Mena, J. (2005). Foundations of early childhood education: Teaching children in a diverse society (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Goodfellow, J. (2009). The early years learning framework: Getting started. Research in Practice Series, 16(4), 1–27. Retrieved from http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/pdf/rips/RIP0904_sample.pdf.
Heckman, J. J. (2000). The real question is how to use the available funds wisely. The best evidence supports the policy prescription: Invest in the very young. Chicago, IL: Ounce of Prevention Fund and the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy Studies. Retrieved from http://www.ounceofprevention.org/news/pdfs/HeckmanInvestInVeryYoung.pdf.
Hutchin, V. (2010). Meeting individual needs. In T. Bruce (Ed.), Early childhood: A guide for students (2nd ed., pp. 37–52). London, UK: Sage.
Jones, J. (2004). Framing the assessment discussion. Young Children, 59(1), 14–18.
Kelly, A. V. (1986). Knowledge and curriculum planning. London, UK: Paul Chapman.
Klein, L., & Knitzer, J. (2006). Effective preschool curricula and teaching strategies. Pathways to early school success. Issue Brief 2. New York, NY: Columbia University, National Center for children in Poverty.
Kostelnik, M. J., Soderman, A. K., & Whiren, A. P. (2011). Developmentally appropriate curriculum: Best practices in early childhood education (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Laevers, F. (1994). Defining and assessing quality in early childhood education. Studia Paedagogica. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Laevers, F. (1997). A process-oriented child follow-up system for young children. Leuven, Belgium: Centre for Experiential Education.
Laevers, F. (2005). The curriculum as means to raise the quality of early childhood education: Implications for policy. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(1), 17–29. doi:10.1080/13502930585209531.
McMurray, A. J., Pace, R. W., & Scott, D. (2007). Research: A commonsense approach. Victoria, Australia: Thomson/Social Science Press.
Ministry of Social and Family Development, Singapore (2011). Early Years Development Framework (EYDF) [Press Room]. Retrieved from http://app.msf.gov.sg/PressRoom/EarlyYearsDevelopmentFrameworkEYDF.aspx.
Mustard, J. F. (2008). Investing in the early years: Closing the gap between what we know and what we do. Adelaide, SA: Department of the Premier and Cabinet.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1988). NAEYC position statement on standardized testing of young children 3 through 8 years of age. Young Children, 43(3), 42–47.
National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education [NAEYC & NAECS/SDE] (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation: Building an effective, accountable system in programs for children birth through age 8. Joint position statement. http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/CAPEexpand.pdf.
NTUC First Campus, Singapore (2011, July 5). Learning for Life: Birth-to-Three Curriculum Framework [Media Release]. Retrieved from http://www.ntucfirstcampus.com/newsdetail.aspx?ID=60.
Oberklaid, F. (2007). Brain development and the life course: The importance of the early caretaking environment. Putting Children First: The newsletter of the National Childcare Accreditation Council [NCAC], (24), 8–11. Retrieved from http://ncac.acecqa.gov.au/educator-resources/pcf-articles/Brain_Development_Life_Course_Dec07.pdf.
Papalia, D. E., Wendkosolds, S., & Feldman, R. D. (2009). Human development (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Pascal, C., & Bertram, T. (1999). Accounting early for life long learning. In L. Abbott & H. Moylett (Eds.), Early education transformed (pp. 93–104). London, UK: Falmer Press.
Pyle, A., & DeLuca, C. (2013). Assessment in the kindergarten classroom: An empirical study of teachers’ assessment approaches. Early Childhood Education Journal, 1–8. doi 10.1007/s10643-012-0573-2.
Roberts-Holmes, G. (2010). Doing practitioner research. In T. Bruce (Ed.), Early childhood: A guide for students (2nd ed., pp. 24–36). London, UK: Sage.
Saracho, O. N., & Spodek, B. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of research on the education of young children (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from http://books.google.com.sg/books?id=OxMQeZApbYAC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_book_other_versions#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighbourhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Winter, P. (2003). Curriculum for babies and toddlers: A critical evaluation of the first phase (birth to age three) of the South Australian Curriculum, Standards and Accountability Framework in selected childcare centres in South Australia. Ph.D. dissertation. University of South Australia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebbeck, M., Teo, G.L.C., Tan, C. et al. Relooking Assessment: A Study on Assessing Developmental Learning Outcomes in Toddlers. Early Childhood Educ J 42, 115–123 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0602-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0602-9