Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Early Childhood Educators Resolve Workplace Challenges Using Character Strengths and Model Character for Children in the Process

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Character strengths improve performance and well-being but are rarely studied among early childhood educators. This qualitative study describes how in-service early childhood educators (n = 17, United States) resolved workplace challenges following a character strength application intervention. During professional development, teachers learned to write action plans to use character strengths (e.g., perseverance, kindness) to address their challenges. Teachers reported a 71% success rate in fully or mostly resolving challenges using this method. Another 22% experienced partial success. This study documents how teachers matched character strengths to personal challenges with children, coworkers and parents. Teachers reported using certain strengths mostly with children (e.g., love, forgiveness), others mostly with adults (e.g., teamwork, bravery), and others universally (e.g., kindness, leadership). Teachers reported modeling or teaching character strengths to children in 31% of cases in which they were seeking to resolve some form of workplace challenge. Teachers perceived that the intervention made it more likely for them to model or teach character strengths to children, particularly kindness, forgiveness, social intelligence and teamwork. Educators and children are likely to benefit from professional development that explores the application of character strengths in the workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The frequencies of character strengths used by educators will be reported elsewhere, due to space limitations in the current paper.

  2. The difficulty level of challenges (high, moderate, low), with examples and frequencies, is also being reported elsewhere due to space limitations.

References

  • Altheide, D., & Johnson, J. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485–499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. (2010). Presenting and evaluating qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(8), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, J. J. (1999). Prosocial guidance for the preschool child. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W. (2011). What works in values education? International Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2005). What works in character education: A research-driven guide for educators?. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2007). What works in character education? Journal of Research in Character Education, 5(1), 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Parrott, L., O’Conner, L. E., & Wade, N. G. (2001). Dispositional forgiveness: Development and construct validity of the Transgression Narrative Test of Forgiveness (TNTF). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1277–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. A., & Dasson, M. (2017). What school leaders are doing to support a culture of character: An exploratory study with preschools in Singapore. Childhood Education, 93(1), 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J. (2003). Transforming the lives of children. In M. J. Elias, H. Arnold, & C. Steiger-Hussey (Eds.), EQ + IQ: Best practices in leadership for caring and successful schools (pp. 11–22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindji, R., & Linley, P. A. (2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(2), 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradišek, P. (2012). Character strengths and life satisfaction of Slovenian in-service and pre-service teachers. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2(3), 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D. (2018). Doing research in the real world (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslip, M. J., Allen-Handy, A., & Donaldson, L. (2018). How urban early childhood educators used positive guidance principles and improved teacher-child relationships: A social-emotional learning intervention study. Early Child Development and Care, 190(7), 971–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1507027.

  • Honig, A. S. (2004). How teachers and caregivers can help young children become more prosocial. In A blueprint for the promotion of prosocial behavior in early childhood (pp. 51–91). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyson, M., & Taylor, J. L. (2011). Caring about caring: What adults can do to promote young children’s prosocial skills. Young Children, 66(4), 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivtzan, I., Niemiec, R. M., & Briscoe, C. (2016). A study investigating the effects of Mindfulness-Based Strengths Practice (MBSP) on wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i2.557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B. H. (1992). Social health and the forgiving heart: The type B story. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokoszka, C., & Smith, J. (2016). Fostering character education in an urban early childhood setting. Journal of Character Education, 12(1), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, S., & Littman-Ovadia, H. (2016). My better self: Using strengths at work and work productivity, organizational citizenship behavior and satisfaction. Journal of Career Development, 44(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linley, P. A., Nielsen, K. M., Gillett, R., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). Using signature strengths in pursuit of goals: Effects on goal progress, need satisfaction, and well-being, and implications for coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5(1), 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littman-Ovadia, H., & Steger, M. (2010). Character strengths and well-being among volunteers and employees: Toward an integrative model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(6), 419–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lottman, T. J., Zawaly, S., & Niemiec, R. (2017). Well-being and well-doing: Bringing mindfulness and character strengths to the early childhood classroom and home. In Positive psychology interventions in practice (pp. 83–105). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Bellah, C. G., Kilpatrick, S. D., & Johnson, J. L. (2001). Vengefulness: Relationships with forgiveness, rumination, well-being and Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1141–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern, T. V., & Miller, S. L. (2008). Integrating teacher behaviors with character strengths and virtues for faculty development. Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 278–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E. (2015). Character strengths in 75 nations: An update. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mei-Ju, C., Chen-Hsin, Y., & Pin-Chen, H. (2014). The beauty of character education on preschool children’s parent–child relationship. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 527–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemiec, R. M. (2014). Mindfulness and character strengths: A practical guide to flourishing. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrish, J. M., Williams, P., O’Connor, M., & Robinson, J. (2013). An applied framework for positive education. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2), 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1999). Relation of hope to self-perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88(2), 535–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006). Character strengths and happiness among young children: Content analysis of parental descriptions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 323–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Character strengths: Research and practice. Journal of College and Character, 10(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(3), 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2006). Character strengths in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1149–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2009). Classifying and measuring strengths of character. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 25–33). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press and Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Pianta, R. C., Burchinal, M., Jamil, F. M., Sabol, T., Grimm, K., Hamre, B. K., et al. (2014). A cross-lag analysis of longitudinal associations between preschool teachers’ instructional support identification skills and observed behavior. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(2), 144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, C. (2007). Incorporating character education into the early childhood degree program: The need, and one department’s response. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 28(2), 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C., Maltby, J., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths use as a predictor of well-being and health-related quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(1), 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2013). What good are character strengths beyond subjective well-being? The contribution of the good character on self-reported health-oriented behavior, physical fitness, and the subjective health status. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(3), 222–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2015). Strengths-based positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strengths- vs. a lesser strengths-intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V., & Bergin, C. (2009). Do reinforcement and induction increase prosocial behavior? Results of a teacher-based intervention in preschool. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23(4), 527–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., Gander, F., Platt, T., & Hofmann, J. (2018). Team roles: Their relationships to character strengths and job satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1257051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuberth, D. A., Schuberth, D. A., Zheng, Y., Zheng, Y., Pasalich, D. S., Pasalich, D. S., et al. (2019). The role of emotion understanding in the development of aggression and callous-unemotional features across early childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47(4), 619–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoshani, A., & Slone, M. (2017). Positive education for young children: Effects of a positive psychology intervention for preschool children on subjective well being and learning behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubert, J., Wray-Lake, L., Syvertsen, A. K., & Metzger, A. (2019). Examining character structure and function across childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 90(4), e505–e524.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Woerkom, M., Bakker, A. B., & Nishii, L. H. (2016). Accumulative job demands and support for strength use: Fine-tuning the job demands-resources model using conservation of resources theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • VIA Institute on Character. (2018). What the research says about character strengths. https://www.viacharacter.org/www/Research/Research-Findings.

  • Weber, M., Wagner, L., & Ruch, W. (2016). Positive feelings at school: On the relationships between students’ character strengths, school-related affect, and school functioning. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(1), 341–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitebook, M., McLean, C., Austin, L. J., & Edwards, B. (2018). Early childhood workforce index 2018. Center for the Study of Child Care Employment, University of California at Berkeley. Retrieved from https://cscce.berkeley.edu/early-childhood-workforce-2018-index/.

  • Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Ayana Allen-Handy for her helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Teaching, Learning and Curriculum, School of Education, Drexel University, 3401 Market Street, Room 3225, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Michael J. Haslip

  2. School of Education, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA

    Leona Donaldson

Authors
  1. Michael J. Haslip
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leona Donaldson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Haslip.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haslip, M.J., Donaldson, L. How Early Childhood Educators Resolve Workplace Challenges Using Character Strengths and Model Character for Children in the Process. Early Childhood Educ J 49, 337–348 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01072-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01072-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation