Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The three-dimensionality of obstructed shear flows

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Obstructed shear flows (i.e. those over permeable media) are common in the environment. An archetypal example, flow over a submerged vegetation canopy, is investigated here. Like any flow through complex geometry, canopy flows are characterised by strong spatial gradients. The focus of this experimental study is the three-dimensionality of aquatic canopy flow, in particular that of the coherent interfacial vortices that govern mixing into and out of the canopy. It is shown here that the vortices have a finite lateral scale that is comparable to their vertical scale; both are of the order of the drag length scale of the canopy, (C D a)−1, where a is the frontal area density and C D is a bulk drag coefficient. The finite lateral extent of the vortices generates strong lateral hydrodynamic gradients, both instantaneously and in the long-term. The instantaneous gradients, which can contribute greatly to the dispersion of dissolved and particulate species, are far more pronounced. Finally, the potential for canopies to generate differential roughness secondary circulation is examined. In the consideration of vertical scalar transport, this circulation can be of the same order as turbulent diffusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balestri E, Cinelli F, Lardicci C (2003) Spatial variation in Posidonia oceanica structural, morphological and dynamic features in a northwestern mediterranean coastal area: a multi-scale analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 250: 51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernal LP, Roshko A (1986) Streamwise vortex structure in plane mixing layers. J Fluid Mech 170: 499–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coceal O, Belcher SE (2004) A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130: 1349–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duarte CM, Sand-Jensen K (1990) Seagrass colonization: patch formation and patch growth in Cymodocea nodosa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 65: 193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fonseca MS, Koehl MAR (2006) Flow in seagrass canopies: the influence of patch width. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 67: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghisalberti M (2009) Obstructed shear flows: similarities across systems and scales. J Fluid Mech 641: 51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghisalberti M, Nepf HM (2002) Mixing layers and coherent structures in vegetated aquatic flows. J Geophys Res 107(C2): 3–1 to 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghisalberti M, Nepf HM (2004) The limited growth of vegetated shear layers. Water Resour Res 40: W07502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghisalberti M, Nepf H (2005) Mass transport in vegetated shear flows. Environ Fluid Mech 5(6): 527–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghisalberti M, Nepf H (2006) The structure of the shear layer in flows over rigid and flexible canopies. Environ Fluid Mech 6: 277–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghisalberti M, Nepf H (2009) Shallow flows over a permeable medium: the hydrodynamics of submerged aquatic canopies. Transp Porous Med 78(3): 385–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ikeda S, Kanazawa M (1996) Three-dimensional organized vortices above flexible water plants. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 122(11): 634–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jimenez J (1983) A spanwise structure in the plane shear layer. J Fluid Mech 132: 319–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Katul G, Wiberg P, Albertson J, Hornberger G (2002) A mixing layer theory for flow resistance in shallow streams. Water Resour Res 38(11): 1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lacey RWJ, Roy AG (2007) A comparative study of the turbulent flow field with and without a pebble cluster in a gravel bed river. Water Resour Res 43: W05502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lopez F, Garcia M (1997) Open-channel flow through simulated vegetation: turbulence modeling and sediment transport. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-CP-10, US Army Corps of Engineers

  17. Luhar M, Rominger J, Nepf H (2008) Interaction between flow, transport and vegetation spatial structure. Environ Fluid Mech 8: 423–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Naden P, Rameshwaran P, Mountford O, Robertson C (2006) The influence of macrophyte growth, typical of eutrophic conditions, on river flow velocities and turbulence production. Hydrol Process 20: 3915–3938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nepf H, Ghisalberti M (2008) Flow and transport in channels with submerged vegetation. Acta Geophys 56(3): 753–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nepf HM, Vivoni ER (2000) Flow structure in depth-limited, vegetated flow. J Geophys Res 105(C12): 28547–28557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nepf H, Ghisalberti M, White B, Murphy E (2007) Retention time and dispersion associated with submerged aquatic canopies. Water Resour Res 43: W04422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nezu I, Nakagawa H (1993) Turbulence in open-channel flows. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nikora V, McLean S, Coleman S, Pokrajac D, McEwan I, Campbell L, Aberle J, Clunie D, Koll K (2007) Double-averaging concept for rough-bed open-channel and overland flows: applications. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 133(8): 884–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pantin HM, Hamilton D, Evans CDR (1981) Secondary flow caused by differential roughness, langmuir circulations, and their effect on the development of sand ribbons. Geo Mar Lett 1: 255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pierrehumbert RT, Widnall SE (1982) The two- and three-dimensional instabilities of a spatially periodic shear layer. J Fluid Mech 114: 59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Poggi D, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Albertson JD, Katul GG (2004) The effect of vegetation density on canopy sub-layer turbulence. Bound-Layer Meteorol 111: 565–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Raupach MR, Shaw RH (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Bound-Layer Meteorol 22: 79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Bound-Layer Meteorol 78: 351–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rogers MM, Moser RD (1992) The three-dimensional evolution of a plane mixing layer: the Kelvin-Helmholtz rollup. J Fluid Mech 243: 183–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Roy AG, Buffin-Bélanger T, Lamarre H, Kirkbride AD (2004) Size, shape and dynamics of large-scale turbulent flow structures in a gravel-bed river. J Fluid Mech 500: 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shvidchenko AB, Pender G (2001) Macroturbulent structure of open-channel flow over gravel beds. Water Resour Res 37(3): 709–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. White BL, Nepf HM (2003) Scalar transport in random cylinder arrays at moderate Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 487: 43–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. White BL, Nepf HM (2007) Shear instability and coherent structures in shallow flow adjacent to a porous layer. J Fluid Mech 593: 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. White BL (2006) Momentum and mass transport by coherent structures in a shallow vegetated shear flow. PhD thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  35. Zhou J, Adrian RJ, Balachandar S, Kendall TM (1999) Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J Fluid Mech 387: 353–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Ghisalberti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghisalberti, M. The three-dimensionality of obstructed shear flows. Environ Fluid Mech 10, 329–343 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-009-9161-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-009-9161-4

Keywords

Navigation