Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does biased technological progress facilitate the reduction of transportation carbon emissions? A threshold-based perspective

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rather than relying on traditional factors, low-carbon transportation should be developed by paying more attention to innovation. By constructing an extended stochastic frontier production function, this study explores the threshold effect of technological progress bias on CO2 emission in the transportation sector in eight different regions of China. It is found as the technological progress bias crosses the threshold, the impact of technological progress bias on transportation CO2 emission changes from positive to negative in Northeast China, the midstream of the Yellow River, East China, the Southeast Coast, the midstream of the Yangtze River and the Northwest region. In Northeast China, the coefficient changes from 0.121 to −0.168. In the middle reaches of the Yellow River, the coefficient changes from 0.528 to −0.0468. In East China, the coefficient changes from 0.495 to −0.325. In the Southeast Coast, the coefficient changes from 0.112 to −0.757. In the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, the coefficient changes from 0.518 to −0.177. In Southwest China, the coefficient changes from 0.293 to −0.014. In Northwest China, the coefficient changes from 1.021 to −1.436. In North China, when the technological progress bias exceeds the threshold, the biased technological progress still promotes CO2 emission. The coefficient changes from 0.157 to 0.406. The governments should continue to encourage the transformation of energy technologies from non-renewable energy to renewable energy through differentiated policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P. (2016). Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: Evidence from the auto industry. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 1–51.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. (2002). Directed technical change. Review of Economic Studies, 69(4), 781–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. (2003). Labor- and capital-augmenting technical change. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(1), 1–37.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Aghion, P. (2009). The environment and directed technical change. The National Bureau of Economic Research, 10, 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C. (2016). Technological congruence and the economic complexity of technological change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 38, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D. P., & Aghion, L. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andress, D. (2012). Status of advanced light-duty transportation technologies in the US. Energy Policy, 41, 348–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., Chenery, H. B., Minhas, B. S., & Solow, R. M. (1961). Capital labor substitution and economic efficiency. Review of Economics and Statistics, 43(3), 225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, X., Zhang, X. L., Li, W., & Tang, Y. (2019). The impact of climate change on the sustainable development of regional economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 1387–1395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H. P. (1974). The measurement of technical change biases with many factors of production. American Economic Review, 64(6), 964–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, D. N. (2013). Maximizing the use of energy in cities using an open systems network approach. Ecological Modelling, 250(10), 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P., & Yu, M. M. (2014). Total factor productivity growth and directions of technical change bias: Evidence from 99 OECD and Non-OECD Countries. Annals of Operations Research, 214(1), 143–165.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. F., & Liu, Y. N. (2021). How biased technological progress sustainably improve the energy efficiency: An empirical research of manufacturing industry in China. Energy, 230, 120823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Q., & Li, Y. (2015). An empirical study on the influencing factors of transportation carbon efficiency: Evidences from fifteen countries. Applied Energy, 141(1), 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y. X. (2019). Does FDI have energy-saving spillover effect in China? A perspective of energy biased technical change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17302, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing, X. I. (2019). Which kind of directed technical change does China’s economy have? From the perspective of energy-saving and low-carbon. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233(10), 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrica, 93(2), 345–368.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, Z., & Catarina, R.-P. (2021). Does directed technological change favor energy? Firm-Level Evidence from Portugal. Energy Economics, 98, 105248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, S., & Lyytikainen, T. (2019). New road infrastructure: The effects on firms. Journal of Urban Economics, 110, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kha, B. (2020). How to accelerate green technology diffusion? Directed technological change in the presence of coevolving absorptive capacity. Energy Economics, 85, 104565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Z. Y. (2018). The path of technological progress for China’s low-carbon development: Evidence from three urban agglomerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178(1), 644–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivyiro, P., & Arminen, H. (2014). Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: Causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 74(5), 595–606.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., Pan, S., & Zou, H. (2015). Directed technological change: A knowledge-based model. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 19(1), 1–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., & Yan, Y. X. (2021). Carbon-abatement policies, investment preferences, and directed technological change: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, M. L. (2020). The ‘double-edged effect’ of progress in energy-biased technology on energy efficiency: A comparison between the manufacturing sector of China and Japan. Journal of Environmental Management, 270(2), 110–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, M., Ren, Y., & Zhang, X. (2018). Energy biased technical progress and energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of 27 subdivided manufacturing industries in China. Public Finance Review, 2, 122–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B. Q., & Fei, R. L. (2015). Analyzing inter-factor substitution and technical progress in the Chinese agricultural sector. European Journal of Agronomy, 66, 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B. Q., & Long, H. Y. (2014). How to promote energy conservation in China’s chemical industry. Energy Policy, 73, 728–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B. Q., & Ahmad, I. (2015). Technical change, inter-factor and inter-fuel substitution possibilities in Pakistan: A trans-log production function approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126(3), 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B. Q., & Chen, X. (2020). How technological progress affects input substitution and energy efficiency in China: A case of the non-ferrous metals industry. Energy, 206(1), 118152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., Du, K., & Li, J. (2019). An improved approach to estimate direct rebound effect by incorporating energy efficiency: A revisit of China’s industrial energy demand. Energy Economics, 80(5), 720–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyu, X., & Ke, H. (2022). Dynamic threshold effect of directed technical change suppress on urban carbon footprint in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5151.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Okushima, S., & Tamura, M. (2009). A double calibration approach to the estimation of technological change. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(1), 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, X. L., Zhuang, W. X., & Du, G. (2018). Output elasticities and inter-factor substitution: Empirical evidence from the transportation sector of Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202(10), 969–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietzcker, R. (2014). Long-term transport energy demand and climate policy: Alternative visions on transport decarbonization in energy economy models. Energy, 64(1), 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J. C. (2019). Energy industry investment influences total factor productivity of energy exploitation: A biased technical change analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237(1), 117847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, J. (2020). Research on threshold effect of energy saving oriented technological progress on industrial energy saving and emission reduction. Scientific Research Management, 41(1), 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, R., Narayan, P. K., & Shi, H. L. (2011). Substitution between energy and classical factor inputs in the Chinese steel sector. Applied Energy, 88(1), 361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C., & Ouyang, X. (2016). Price and expenditure elasticities of residential energy demand during urbanization: An empirical analysis based on the household-level survey data in China. Energy, 88, 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, F. F., & Yang, S. S. (2022). The impact of urbanization on carbon emissions: Both from heterogeneity and mechanism test. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 64, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walheer, B. (2018). Labour productivity growth and energy in Europe: A production-frontier approach. Energy, 152(3), 129–143.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Liao, H. (2018). The fluctuations of China’s energy intensity: Biased technical change. Applied Energy, 135(3), 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., & Lin, B. (2017). Factor and fuel substitution in China’s iron & steel industry: Evidence and policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 751–759.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, H., & Ochsen, C. (2005). The determinants of aggregate energy use in west Germany: Factor substitution, technological change and trade. Energy Economics, 27(1), 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. Q., & Du, Y. (2018). Research on the impact of biased technological progress on total factor energy efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. China Soft Science, 17(3), 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Z. N., & Ouyang, X. L. (2019). Economy-wide estimates of energy rebound effect: Evidence from China’s provinces. Energy Economics, 83(9), 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Wang, J. M., & Shi, J. (2017). Can China meet its 2020 economic growth and carbon emissions reduction targets? Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(2), 993–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B., & Liu, B. Z. (2022). The impact of the embedded global value chain position on energy-biased technology progress: Evidence from Chinas manufacturing. Technology in Society, 71, 102065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. B., & Hao, C. Y. (2022). Appropriate technology and energy security: From the perspective of biased technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zha, D. L. (2017). Energy-biased technical change in the Chinese industrial sector with CES production functions. Energy, 33(8), 11875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. X. (2017). Echnological progress bias, property right structure and regional energy efficiency in China. Quantitative and Technical Economics Research, 34(8), 2–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Xiao, J., Huang, F. et al. (2022). How do resource dependence and technological progress affect carbon emissions reduction effect of industrial structure transformation? Empirical research based on the rebound effect in China. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 5, 1–16.

  • Zhou, X. X., & Pan, Z. X. (2020). Directed technological progress driven by diversified industrial structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 54, 112–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Ministry of Education in China Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (22YJC630184);

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, No. 17, North Second Ring East Road, Changan District, Shijiazhuang, 050043, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaohui Yang

  2. Hebei College of Industry and Technology, No. 626, Hongqi Street, Qiaoxi District, Shijiazhuang, 050091, People’s Republic of China

    Zhen Jia

  3. Hebei Normal University, No.20, South Second Ring Road East, Yuhua District, Shijiazhuang, 050024, People’s Republic of China

    Zhongmin Yang

Authors
  1. Xiaohui Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhen Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhongmin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XY was involved in conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation; ZZJ helped in resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Jia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X., Jia, Z. & Yang, Z. Does biased technological progress facilitate the reduction of transportation carbon emissions? A threshold-based perspective. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 4269–4292 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02883-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02883-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation